Hikino 1
Preliminary Information – Full Audit Pending
This buildings features were determined from publicly available data, including MLS listings. While we cross-referenced additional data sources, it still likely contains incomplete or inaccurate information, as it has not yet been personally verified.
Once a building has been fully audited, this page will be replaced with an in-depth analysis featuring verified details and photos of every key feature.
Until then, we provide a data‑driven overview that blends statistical analysis of the checkbox selections agents make in MLS with an AI‑powered read of their public remarks—yielding a clearer picture of the building than raw listings alone.
If this building is important to your search, you can help prioritize it for a full audit by requesting one below. To see what a complete report looks like, check out the example full report.
Hikino 1
Building Overview
Hikino 1 in Waipahu, built 1985; assigned and guest parking available; pets and short-term rentals not allowed.
About Hikino 1
Based on MLS data, Hikino 1 is a residential building located in the Waipahu neighborhood, originally built in 1985. Specifics on unit sizes and construction type are not specified in the available records.
Key features indicated in the MLS include on-site parking with assigned stalls and guest parking. No information about on-site amenities beyond parking is provided in the data set, and the managing company is listed as unknown in available records.
According to available records, pets are not allowed and short-term rentals are not permitted. Buyers should verify parking assignments, management details, policies, fees, and any other building-specific information with the listing agent or applicable management, as this summary is based solely on MLS data.
Building Features & Data Confidence
All features from MLS data with AI-assisted confidence analysis. Click each category to expand and see details.
No analysis available
The listings identify floor 1 as the highest observed floor, and both the county parcel record and state registration report 2 floors. No evidence indicates a taller residential floor.
The state registration reports 60 units for this single-building registration, and the county's CPR count and dwelling sum also report 60. The county's reconciled figure is 59, so confidence is reduced despite the supporting 60-unit records.
Owner occupancy from AOUO registration(s) 1580. Refreshed by Real_Estate_Scraper/reb_registry/propagate_owner_occupancy.py, which this lock does not block.
The remarks were searched for elevator-related terms, including "elevator," "elevators," "lift," "multiple elevators," and specific elevator counts. No evidence was found to determine the number of elevators.
Calculated from the lowest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from the highest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from association fees observed in penthouse unit listings for this building.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No current listing indicates hot water is included in maintenance fees, and every current listing instead shows an in-unit water heater (WTRHTR). The public remarks are silent on hot water, so there is no evidence of a building-level hot water benefit.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Four of five current listings indicate that sewer is included in the association fee. No public remarks mention sewer, but the repeated checkbox across multiple listings supports this as a likely building-level inclusion rather than a single-agent entry.
Four of five current listings indicate that water is included in the maintenance fee. No public remarks explicitly discuss water billing, but the consistent MLS reporting across multiple listings supports including this feature.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
At least three listings mention patio or lanai amenities, including an "enclosed patio" with a concrete slab, a "small, covered lanai," and a "fully fenced patio." The repeated, specific descriptions across listings provide strong evidence that patio/deck outdoor space is available in the building.
No analysis available
No analysis available
At least four listings describe private yard or equivalent private outdoor space, using phrases such as "private yard," "private fenced courtyard," and "large enclosed private courtyard." The consistent detail across multiple listings and agents strongly supports that private yard space is offered in at least some units.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
1 of 5 public remarks explicitly mentions "extra storage" in connection with a private enclosed courtyard. This confirms storage space is available for at least some units, but there are not enough independent remarks to establish a broadly shared building-level storage facility.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
In-unit laundry is supported by historical high-confidence data and current MLS data, where 4 of 5 listings show washer/dryer in inclusions. One listing explicitly mentions a "full-size side-by-side washer and dryer"; the remaining remarks do not contradict the feature.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Parking is clearly available for this building, with all 4/4 current MLS listings showing parking-related features. Multiple remarks confirm it in plain language, including "one assigned parking stall" and "2 SIDE BY SIDE PARKING STALLS," so this is strong evidence rather than a copy-paste checkbox artifact.
Assigned parking is supported by at least two current listing remarks, including "one assigned parking stall" and "2 SIDE BY SIDE PARKING STALLS." This aligns with the current MLS data showing ASSIGN in 3 of 5 listings and the previously high-confidence determination.
No analysis available
Parking is clearly associated with the units, including assigned and side-by-side stalls. However, there is no public-remarks evidence that the parking is deeded, included in the deed, or separately owned.
No analysis available
The remarks describe assigned, side-by-side, and guest parking but provide no fee information. A monthly parking fee cannot be confirmed from the public remarks.
Guest parking is explicitly mentioned in two current listings: "nearby guest parking" and "ample guest parking." The remarks come from multiple listings and match the current MLS data showing GUEST in 2 of 5 listings, supporting the feature with high confidence.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
The remarks discuss available assigned and guest parking but contain no evidence of a parking waitlist system. The feature is therefore treated as false with limited confidence.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Split AC is mentioned explicitly in 1 of 5 current listing remarks, with the key phrase “new split air conditioning” installed in 2024. ACSPL is also checked in 2 of 5 listings, so the evidence supports including split AC as a building feature, although it is not documented across all listings.
0 of 4 remarks mention window AC; one remark instead says "new split air conditioning," which points away from window units. With no historical confidence and no supporting remarks, the MLS ACWIUN checkbox looks inconsistent with the public descriptions.
No analysis available
All five current listings identify DOUWAL, while 0 of 5 public remarks explicitly mention "double wall," "double-wall construction," or "two walls." The consistent building-level MLS data across all listings provides strong support despite the lack of descriptive remarks.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Two of three current listings indicate 'SLAB' in construction_materials and at least one listing's remarks explicitly note 'the enclosed patio has a large concrete slab added to the small, covered lanai.' This provides moderate evidence that the building includes concrete slab foundation elements or slab additions.
No analysis available
Three of five current listings identify the construction material as WOOFRA, but 0 of 5 public remarks use phrases such as "wood frame" or "wood frame construction." The feature is therefore supported mainly by inconsistent MLS checkbox data rather than independent remarks, so confidence is moderate.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
The remarks do not explicitly permit or prohibit short-term rentals. Under the absence rule, STR is treated as false with limited confidence.
The listings contain no evidence of participation in a hotel rental pool or hotel-managed rental program. Because STR is not established as allowed, this feature must also be false.
The remarks provide no indication that owners must participate in a hotel rental pool or rental program. Since STR is not established as allowed, mandatory pool participation is false.
No analysis available
No analysis available
The remarks were searched for lease-expiry and lease-renewal language, including specific four-digit years. No applicable lease-expiry year was found.
Multiple remarks provide direct evidence that VA financing is available, including an explicit statement that the complex is VA-approved. The VA assumption reference further supports this conclusion.
The phrase "fully insured" directly supports full HOA building insurance coverage under the feature definition. This explicit statement is consistent with the previous high-confidence determination.
No analysis available
The remarks were searched for fire/life safety terms such as "FLSE passed," "fire safety certified," "life safety compliant," and "passed fire inspection." No such statements were found, so there is no evidence that the building has passed an FLSE evaluation.
Flood zone determined from official FEMA Digital Flood Insurance Rate Map (DFIRM) data using building coordinates, not from agent-reported listing data.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No current listing mentions sunset views or related indicators, and all 5 MLS view fields are NONE. The consistent absence across multiple listings provides strong evidence that sunset views should not be attributed to this building.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Two of three recent MLS listings include 'RESMAN' (resident/on-site manager) in the amenities. None of the provided public remarks mention a resident manager, but historical high-confidence data plus multiple current listings checking the RESMAN box indicate the building likely has an on-site/resident manager; evidence appears to come from MLS checkbox entries rather than agent remarks.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Confidence levels are based on MLS checkbox data and AI analysis of listing remarks. High = strong evidence, Medium = some evidence, Low = limited or conflicting evidence. Buyers should always verify critical details independently.