Highlander

No analysis available

I searched for owner-occupancy indicators such as percentages, "majority owner occupied," "highly owner occupied," or similar phrasing. The remarks mention tenant-occupied units and that the property can be used as a primary residence or rental, but they do not give an owner-occupancy rate. Without an explicit percentage or comparable statement, the exact owner-occupancy level is unknown.

I looked for an explicit count such as "4 elevators," "four elevators," or "multiple elevators," as well as any direct elevator references. The listings only confirm that the building has elevators and that they have been modernized, but they do not provide a number. Because no count is stated, the exact number remains unknown.

Calculated from the lowest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.

Calculated from the highest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.

Calculated from association fees observed in penthouse unit listings for this building.

No analysis available

There is no building-level support for cable inclusion in the remarks, and the current MLS data is essentially absent for this item (1/20). This looks more like a stray MLS checkbox than a true building amenity, so cable should be treated as not included.

Strong building-level evidence supports common-area expenses being included. The current MLS pattern is consistent across most listings, and remarks such as “common expenses” reinforce that this is a real association-fee inclusion rather than a copy-paste error.

No analysis available

This is the strongest feature in the set: all current MLS records include electricity, and multiple agent remarks independently confirm it. Remarks repeatedly say “electricity included,” “HOA fee includes electricity,” or similar wording.

No analysis available

Most current MLS records support hot water being included, and remarks directly confirm it in multiple listings. There is one WTRHTR mention, but it is only 1/20 and does not outweigh the broader repeated inclusion language.

No analysis available

No analysis available

Sewer is very clearly a building-level inclusion. Every current MLS record includes SEWER, and several remarks explicitly say “water, sewer” or “water-sewer” in the fee.

Water inclusion is strongly supported across the building. Nearly every current MLS record includes WATER, and multiple remarks independently confirm that maintenance fees cover water-related utilities.

BBQ is well supported by both MLS data and public remarks. Multiple listings describe a shared BBQ area, sometimes with picnic tables and grills, and the amenity appears repeatedly across agents. Confidence is very high.

No analysis available

No analysis available

Weak evidence: MLS boxes for car wash appear in 2/20 listings but none of the public remarks mention 'car wash' or related terms. Given the absence of any agent descriptions and the low MLS prevalence, the car wash feature is uncorroborated and likely incorrect or rare; confidence is low/uncertain.

No analysis available

No analysis available

Limited evidence: MLS indicates 1/20 listings include a dog park and one or a few public remarks explicitly state 'dog park'. This suggests a dog run/pet area exists on site, but mentions are rare across listings so confidence is moderate.

No analysis available

Exercise room evidence is extremely strong across the building. Multiple listings explicitly mention a "fitness room," "fitness center," or "exercise room," and the MLS history shows 20/20 listings with this amenity. This appears consistent and not like a copy-paste error.

No analysis available

Meeting-room evidence is strong and consistent. At least a couple of remarks explicitly reference a "large meeting room" or "meeting room," aligning with the MLS data showing this amenity in many listings. This looks like a genuine building feature.

Strong, consistent evidence that the building offers outdoor spaces: numerous remark blocks reference private lanais, covered lanai/balcony or patio (examples: "private lanai", "72 sq ft lanai", "covered lanai", "private balcony"). At least 15 separate remark entries in the current set explicitly mention a lanai/patio/balcony, and building amenity boxes historically include PATDEC/COVPAT across multiple listings, so the building should be listed as offering patio/deck amenities.

Jogging-path evidence is very weak. The MLS suggests it may appear in one listing, but there are no supporting public remarks using terms like "jogging path" or "walking path." This may be a checkbox anomaly rather than a confirmed building amenity.

No analysis available

Very little evidence that units have private yard space: public remarks do not describe 'private yard', 'fenced yard', or 'enclosed yard' across listings (they instead reference lanais/covered lanais). Only 2/20 MLS listings show the PRIYAR flag, and no remarks corroborate yard access. Given the lack of descriptive remarks, the PRIYAR checks appear unreliable; however, because some MLS boxes remain checked and there is no user/site-verified correction, confidence in declaring this feature false is low.

No analysis available

Recreation-area evidence is present in several remarks, including "recreation room" and "recreation area." While the MLS count is lower than other amenities, the repeated public references suggest this is a real shared building feature. Evidence is moderate-to-strong.

Moderate but clear evidence: 9/20 MLS listings include a recreation/community/meeting room and several public remarks state 'recreation room', 'community room', 'clubhouse', or 'meeting room', indicating a shared rec/meeting space available to residents.

No analysis available

No analysis available

Sauna is one of the most consistently confirmed amenities in the building. Remarks repeatedly mention a sauna or saunas, and the MLS data also shows strong support. This is very high-confidence shared amenity evidence.

Storage is strongly confirmed for The Highlander. Multiple listings mention it directly in both building and unit contexts, including "private storage locker," "assigned storage," "storage locker on site," and "extra deeded storage closet," indicating this is not a one-off or copy-paste error. The evidence appears consistent across many agents and supports that the building offers storage/lockers as an available feature.

I looked for surfboard-specific storage language, including board storage or surf storage. The remarks mention storage lockers, storage boxes, and general storage, but nothing specific to surfboards.

No analysis available

Trash-chute evidence comes mainly from the MLS checkbox data, which is fairly strong but not fully corroborated by the remarks. Because no public listing text explicitly says "trash chute" or "garbage chute," confidence is moderate rather than high. Still, the MLS frequency suggests it likely exists.

No analysis available

No analysis available

Whirlpool/spa evidence is supported by both MLS and remarks. Several listings refer to a "hot tub," "spa," or "whirlpool," which fits the feature definition well. Confidence is high, though not as universal as sauna or fitness.

Pool is strongly supported at the building level. Across the provided remarks, many listings explicitly mention a "swimming pool," "pool," or similar amenity, and the current MLS data shows 20/20 listings with pool included. The evidence is consistent across multiple agents and appears to reflect a real common amenity rather than copy-paste noise.

There is no explicit evidence in the public remarks that the pool is heated. While a few MLS entries show a heated-pool-related amenity code, the remarks do not corroborate it and the dominant signal is just a standard pool plus spa/whirlpool features. This makes heated-pool status unconfirmed and likely not a reliable building feature from the available evidence.

I searched for salt-water pool wording such as "saltwater pool" or "salt pool." The remarks confirm a pool and related amenities, but do not specify that the pool is salt water.

Strong, repeated evidence across many listings supports in-unit laundry at The Highlander. Multiple agents independently mention phrases like 'in-unit washer & dryer,' 'washer/dryer in the unit,' and 'stack washer and dryer in the unit,' which aligns with the high-confidence MLS pattern and does not look like a one-off error.

The building clearly offers shared laundry facilities in addition to in-unit laundry in some units. Multiple listings explicitly reference 'community laundry' or 'on-site laundry facilities,' showing this is a building amenity rather than a copy-paste anomaly.

I searched for evidence that community laundry requires payment, including coin laundry, card-operated machines, or laundry fees. The public remarks mention community laundry and on-site laundry, but none say that it is paid.

I looked for wording such as "laundry on every floor," "each floor," and similar floor-by-floor references. The remarks only mention community laundry or on-site laundry facilities in the building, which does not confirm that every floor has laundry.

Strong, consistent evidence across listings that the building provides parking: 20/20 current listings have parking_features checked and multiple remarks quote "covered parking stall", "TWO (2) PARKING STALLS", and "assigned parking stall." Evidence appears across many agents and listings (not isolated), indicating building-level parking availability.

Evidence is very strong that parking is assigned/reserved in this building. Multiple listings explicitly say 'assigned covered parking stall,' 'assigned parking stall,' and 'deeded' or floor-specific parking, which is consistent across many agent remarks rather than a one-off note.

Covered parking is clearly available in the building. Roughly a dozen listings/remarks reference covered stalls or covered tandem parking, and several descriptions reinforce that the stalls are in a garage or sheltered parking area.

I looked for explicit deeded/owned parking language and did not find it. The listings consistently mention assigned, covered, or tandem stalls, which indicates parking access but not deeded ownership.

No analysis available

I searched for parking fee, monthly parking charge, and parking rental language and found no stated cost. The remarks discuss the presence and type of parking stalls, but not any separate parking fee.

Guest parking is well supported across many listings. Multiple agents independently reference guest stalls or visitor parking, and the remarks include specific counts in at least one listing, indicating this is a real building feature rather than copy-paste noise.

There is strong evidence of secured entry and security-controlled access in the building. While some remarks emphasize building security more than parking-gate details, the repeated references to 'secured entry' and 24-hour security support this feature with high confidence.

Tandem parking is very clearly present in the building. Many listings explicitly use the word 'tandem' and often specify two-car stalls, showing this is a common and consistently marketed parking layout rather than an isolated exception.

No analysis available

I looked for phrases like parking waitlist or join waitlist for parking and found none. The listings suggest parking is available with units, so there is no public-remarks evidence of a waitlist system.

No analysis available

I looked for public remarks indicating card/fob-based access control. The listings describe secured entry, security staff, and security video, but no explicit card or fob access system was mentioned.

Strong evidence that The Highlander has security guard service. Numerous current remarks mention explicit security phrases such as "24-hour security," "security guard on duty," "security desk," and "security" in addition to secured entry. This appears consistent across multiple agents and aligns with the already high-confidence historical MLS checkbox data.

I searched for actual patrol wording rather than general security references. The remarks mention security guards, on-site security, and 24-hour security, but nothing that clearly indicates a patrol service.

No analysis available

No analysis available

Multiple listings for the Highlander explicitly mention split/dual-zone A/C—phrases include 'dual-zone split AC unit', 'split ACs in the living room & bedroom', and 'split a/c'. At least 5–6 separate remarks reference split/dual-zone A/C, and MLS inclusions show ACSPL checked on 3 of 20 listings, so there is strong, building-level evidence that some units offer split AC.

The evidence strongly supports window AC availability in the building. Across the provided remarks, at least 3 listings explicitly mention "window AC" / "window A/C fee," alongside many more mentioning A/C in general, suggesting this is a real building feature rather than a copy-paste checkbox error. Historical MLS data also aligns with this, with ACWIUN checked in roughly 11 of 20 listings.

Concrete construction is supported by the current MLS checkbox data: 20 of 20 listings have CONCRE selected. None of the public remarks contradict this, and the consistency across all listings suggests this is a stable building-level fact rather than copied-in error.

Eight of 20 current MLS listings (8/20) have the DOUWAL construction_materials code checked, but none of the public remarks mention 'double wall' or similar phrasing. This may represent some units or inconsistent agent checkboxing (possible copy/paste). Included with moderate confidence pending on-site verification.

Just 1 of 20 listings has the 'HOLTIL' checkbox checked and none of the public remarks (0/20) mention 'hollow tile' or similar phrasing. This appears to be an isolated checkbox entry (likely copy/paste) without supporting remarks or multiple-agent confirmation, so there is low confidence that hollow-tile construction is a meaningful building-level feature.

No analysis available

No analysis available

Three of 20 listings show the 'SLAB' checkbox, but public remarks across the listings (0/20) contain no references to a 'concrete slab' foundation or similar language. Given the small number of checklist occurrences and lack of textual confirmation across agents, confidence is low that slab foundation is a building-level characteristic.

No analysis available

No analysis available

Only 2 of 20 MLS listings (2/20) have the ABOGRO construction_materials code checked and none of the public remarks reference 'above ground' construction. Evidence is minimal and uncorroborated by remarks, so the feature is included only with low confidence (may be agent checkbox error).

No analysis available

No analysis available

I searched for STR indicators such as short-term rental allowed, vacation rental, NUC, TVU, or hotel-style rental language and found no evidence. Since there is no public-remarks support for STR allowance, this is best treated as not allowed.

I looked for hotel pool references such as hotel rental program, managed by hotel, or branded pools like Hilton/Trump/Ritz and found nothing. Because there is no evidence that short-term rentals are allowed, this must also be false.

I searched for language indicating mandatory participation, required rental program, or cannot opt out and found nothing. With no evidence of STR permission or a hotel pool program, mandatory pool participation is unsupported.

No analysis available

No analysis available

I searched the remarks for leasehold language such as lease expires, ground lease, leasehold, and renewal dates, but found nothing. Without a specific 4-digit expiry year in the public remarks, this remains unknown.

The public remarks provide repeated direct evidence that VA financing is accepted at this building. I found several listings referencing VA assumable mortgages and VA financing options, which is strong confirmation.

The remarks include a direct statement that the building is "100% Hurricane insured through Atlas Insurance Agency," which is strong evidence of full building insurance coverage. This is the clearest available remark on insurance status and supports a fully insured interpretation.

No analysis available

I searched the remarks for fire/life safety evaluation language, FLSE-related wording, and fire inspection/pass statements. Nothing in the listings indicates the building has passed a fire/life safety evaluation. With no supporting mention in the public remarks, this is treated as not evidenced here.

Flood zone determined from official FEMA Digital Flood Insurance Rate Map (DFIRM) data using building coordinates, not from agent-reported listing data.

No analysis available

Several listings describe water-facing views, including phrases like "sweeping Pearl Harbor and ocean views," "breathtaking views of Pearl Harbor," "coastal views," and "some ocean view." The evidence appears consistent across multiple agents rather than a single copied remark, so view_ocean should be included.

No analysis available

No analysis available

At least one listing explicitly says the unit offers "views of the surrounding city," and the MLS view field currently contains CITY in more than half of recent listings. Combined with the prior high-confidence history, this supports keeping view_city as true.

Several listing remarks explicitly mention coastline-facing views: phrases include 'coastal views', 'views of Pearl Harbor', and 'some ocean view'. Though only 2/20 MLS view_descriptions currently flag COASTL, at least 6–10 public-remarks entries reference Pearl Harbor/coastal views across different listings, suggesting multiple units offer coastline views rather than a single erroneous checkbox. Evidence comes from multiple remarks rather than a single copy-paste entry, so the building should be listed as offering coastline views.

Multiple listings explicitly mention garden or landscaped views—quotes include 'lanai overlooking peaceful garden views', 'stunning garden views', and 'beautifully landscaped Koauka Loop'. Although MLS view_descriptions do not reflect GARDEN, the repeated explicit remarks from different listings/agents provide strong evidence that some units offer garden/courtyard/landscaped views.

No analysis available

No analysis available

No analysis available

No analysis available

No analysis available

I looked for explicit fireworks-view language such as being able to watch fireworks from the lanai or from the unit. The remarks discuss golf course, Pearl Harbor, ocean, garden, and mountain views, but nothing about fireworks views.

No analysis available

No analysis available

Historical MLS checkbox data indicated RESMAN in 16 of 20 listings. Current remarks across many listings explicitly reference an on-site/resident manager (quotes include "on-site manager", "resident manager", and "site manager has regular office hours"), showing consistent confirmation across multiple agents rather than isolated mentions.

No analysis available

No analysis available