
Havens Of II Vistas II Ph3
Preliminary Information – Full Audit Pending
This buildings features were determined from publicly available data, including MLS listings. While we cross-referenced additional data sources, it still likely contains incomplete or inaccurate information, as it has not yet been personally verified.
Once a building has been fully audited, this page will be replaced with an in-depth analysis featuring verified details and photos of every key feature.
Until then, we provide a data‑driven overview that blends statistical analysis of the checkbox selections agents make in MLS with an AI‑powered read of their public remarks—yielding a clearer picture of the building than raw listings alone.
If this building is important to your search, you can help prioritize it for a full audit by requesting one below. To see what a complete report looks like, check out the example full report.
Havens Of II Vistas II Ph3
Building Overview
Havens Of II Vistas II Ph3 in neighborhood unknown — built 2005, wood frame construction with pool and window AC.

About Havens Of II Vistas II Ph3
Havens Of II Vistas II Ph3 is a residential building listed in MLS records. According to available records, it was built in 2005 and constructed with a wood frame. Neighborhood and unit size details are not provided in the available MLS data.
Based on MLS data, on-site amenities include a pool. Units use window air conditioning. Pets are allowed and short-term rentals are not permitted according to the listing information.
Parking is listed as available and covered. The management company is noted as unknown in MLS records. Additional details such as HOA fees, exact unit sizes, utilities, and other rules are not provided here; buyers should verify all information with the listing agent or management and review official documents.
Building Features & Data Confidence
All features from MLS data with AI-assisted confidence analysis. Click each category to expand and see details.
No analysis available
There is no information about the percentage of owner-occupied units or phrases like 'majority owner occupied' or 'X% owner occupied'. The remarks focus on the unit’s lifestyle features and nearby amenities, not ownership mix. As a result, the owner-occupancy rate is unknown rather than estimated.
The remarks do not mention any elevators (e.g., 'elevator', 'lift', 'multiple elevators'). Because elevator count is numeric and there is no explicit information, it cannot be reliably inferred. The value is therefore left unknown rather than assumed to be zero.
Calculated from the lowest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from the highest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from association fees observed in penthouse unit listings for this building.
No analysis available
No analysis available
All available current MLS data (1/1 listings) indicate 'OTCOEX' in association_fee_includes, which maps to common expenses including items like common area electricity. Remarks do not discuss utilities, but there is no evidence contradicting the MLS checkbox, so the building is treated as including common area electricity in the maintenance fee.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
In the current data, 1/1 MLS listings include 'SEWER' under association_fee_includes, indicating sewer charges are part of the maintenance fees. The public remarks are silent on utilities, but nothing suggests this is incorrect.
All available MLS records (1/1 listings) show 'WATER' in association_fee_includes, meaning water is included in the maintenance fees. While the remarks do not mention utilities, they also do not conflict with the MLS checkbox data.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
One current listing (1/1) has the WAJOPA amenity checked in the MLS, indicating a walking/jogging path for the community. The public remarks reference multiple recreational amenities but do not specifically mention a jogging or walking path. Given the amenity code is present and there is no conflicting historical data, it is likely the building offers a walking/jogging path, though the confidence is moderate because it is not described in remarks.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
The remarks describe the townhome’s atmosphere, layout, privacy, pet-friendliness, and access to Mililani Town Association pools and recreation centers, but do not mention any storage amenities. Specifically, there are no references to surfboard storage, board storage, surf storage, or combined bike and surfboard storage. Based on this absence of evidence, surfboard storage is assumed not to be present.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
All available MLS data (1/1 listings) indicate some form of pool amenity, and the remarks confirm residents have 'access to Mililani Town Association pools and recreation centers.' While the pools appear to be association-wide rather than on-site, they are available to all units in this building, so pool access should be treated as a building feature.
No analysis available
Public remarks reference access to association pools but do not specify that any pool is salt water. I searched for terms like 'salt water pool', 'saltwater', 'salt pool', and 'saline pool' and found no matches, so there is no evidence the building has a salt water pool.
Current MLS data indicates that the listed unit includes a washer and dryer in the inclusions, which strongly implies in-unit laundry. There is no historical data to the contrary, so it is reasonable to conclude that at least some units in this building offer in-unit laundry.
No analysis available
The remarks do not mention any shared or community laundry that requires payment. I searched for terms like 'coin-op', 'coin laundry', 'card-operated', and 'paid laundry' and found no evidence, so this is treated as not present given the current data.
The public remarks describe the home's layout, atmosphere, and community amenities but do not reference any shared laundry facilities on each floor. I specifically looked for phrases indicating floor-by-floor or every-floor laundry access and found none, so this feature is assumed not present based on available information.
All available MLS data (1/1 listings) indicate the presence of parking via non-NONE parking feature codes. While the public remarks do not mention parking explicitly, the structured MLS parking_features field strongly supports that the building offers parking for residents.
No analysis available
The sole current MLS listing for this building includes a covered-type parking code in parking_features, confirming the availability of covered parking. Although the remarks focus on lifestyle and community, the structured MLS checkbox data is strong evidence that at least some units have covered or garage parking.
The remarks describe the home’s layout, atmosphere, community, and access to Mililani Town Association amenities but do not reference any parking details. There is no language suggesting that a parking stall is deeded or owned with the unit. Based on this absence, deeded parking is assumed not to be present, but with only moderate confidence.
No analysis available
The listing does not mention any parking-related charges, monthly fees, or rental costs for a stall. Phrases such as 'parking fee', 'monthly parking charge', or 'additional parking cost' are absent. In the absence of such language, we assume there is no separate parking fee, but confidence is only moderate.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
The remarks focus on the unit’s features, privacy, and nearby amenities, with no discussion of how parking is assigned or obtained. There are no references to a 'parking waitlist' or similar system. Given the lack of evidence, we assume there is no parking waitlist, with moderate confidence.
No analysis available
Remarks were reviewed for terms like key card, fob, electronic access, card reader, or keycard entry and none were found. The presence of a gate is noted, but without explicit reference to card/fob systems, this feature is assumed not present based on available information.
No analysis available
Remarks were checked for any indication of security patrol services, including roving or on-site patrols, and no such terms appeared. In the absence of explicit evidence, this feature is treated as not present.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
One of one current listing for this building has the MLS inclusion code 'ACWIUN', indicating window air conditioning units are present in at least some units. The public remarks do not reference AC, but there is no conflicting information, so the MLS inclusion is taken as reliable building-level evidence that window AC is available.
No analysis available
The MLS construction field lists double wall construction (DOUWAL) for this property and there is no conflicting commentary in the public remarks. Given 1/1 listings agree on this, it is accepted as a stable building feature.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
MLS data for this listing marks the building as having wood frame construction (WOOFRA) and no remarks contradict this. With 1/1 current listings indicating wood frame and no evidence of a change, this is treated as a confirmed building characteristic.
MLS data shows above ground construction (ABOGRO) for this building, with no contradictory notes in the narrative remarks. With all current listings reflecting this, it is considered a reliable building attribute.
No analysis available
No analysis available
The remarks focus on owner-occupant style living, privacy, and community amenities, with no reference to short-term or vacation rental use. I searched for terms like 'short-term rental', 'vacation rental', 'NUC', 'TVU', or minimum stay language but found none, so STR is assumed not allowed due to lack of evidence.
Because there is no evidence that short-term rentals are allowed in this building, participation in any hotel rental pool program is ruled out by definition. The remarks also do not mention any hotel management or rental pool program.
Mandatory hotel rental pool programs only apply where short-term rentals are allowed, which is not supported here. The remarks do not reference any required rental program, hotel operations, or similar obligations.
No analysis available
No analysis available
The listing does not discuss whether the property is leasehold or fee simple, nor does it mention any lease expiration year. I searched for phrases like 'lease expires', 'land lease to', 'leasehold expiring', or 'ground lease ends' and found no relevant information, so the lease expiry year is unknown.
The remarks focus on lifestyle, layout, and community amenities but do not reference any financing options. I looked for terms like 'VA approved', 'VA financing', and 'VA loans accepted' and found none, so VA approval is assumed not documented here.
The remarks do not mention HOA or building insurance, 'fully insured', 'full insurance coverage', or 'walls-in coverage'. Without explicit language indicating comprehensive building insurance, full coverage cannot be confirmed. It is therefore set to false by default due to lack of evidence in the remarks.
No analysis available
There is no reference to a fire/life safety evaluation, passing an FLSE, or terms like 'fire safety certified' or 'life safety compliant'. In the absence of any explicit statement, this is treated as not confirmed and set to false by default. This does not mean the building has failed, only that no evidence of a passed evaluation is present in the remarks.
Flood zone determined from official FEMA Digital Flood Insurance Rate Map (DFIRM) data using building coordinates, not from agent-reported listing data.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Across the available data for this building, no listings describe sunset views, western exposure, or similar features, and the single set of public remarks does not reference sunsets at all. The emphasis is on natural light, breezes, and privacy rather than view orientation. Given the lack of explicit evidence, this building is not currently being represented as offering sunset-view units.
No analysis available
The description highlights light, breezes, privacy, and proximity to parks and recreation but does not mention any views of fireworks. I searched for phrases like 'fireworks view', 'watch fireworks from lanai', or similar and found no evidence of fireworks views from the property.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Confidence levels are based on MLS checkbox data and AI analysis of listing remarks. High = strong evidence, Medium = some evidence, Low = limited or conflicting evidence. Buyers should always verify critical details independently.