Havens Of II Vistas
Preliminary Information – Full Audit Pending
This buildings features were determined from publicly available data, including MLS listings. While we cross-referenced additional data sources, it still likely contains incomplete or inaccurate information, as it has not yet been personally verified.
Once a building has been fully audited, this page will be replaced with an in-depth analysis featuring verified details and photos of every key feature.
Until then, we provide a data‑driven overview that blends statistical analysis of the checkbox selections agents make in MLS with an AI‑powered read of their public remarks—yielding a clearer picture of the building than raw listings alone.
If this building is important to your search, you can help prioritize it for a full audit by requesting one below. To see what a complete report looks like, check out the example full report.
Havens Of II Vistas
Building Overview
Havens Of II Vistas in Mililani Mauka-Launani Valley, built 2004. Pets allowed; short-term rentals not permitted.
About Havens Of II Vistas
Havens Of II Vistas is a residential building located in the Mililani Mauka–Launani Valley neighborhood. According to available MLS records, the building was constructed in 2004. Size (unit mix/square footage) and construction type are not specified in the MLS information provided.
Based on MLS data, key policies for the building include allowance of pets and a prohibition on short-term rentals. No additional amenity, common-area, or HOA service details are listed in the available records.
Management company information and specifics about parking, maintenance fees, or special assessments are shown as unknown or not provided in the MLS data. Buyers should verify all building details, rules, and fees with the listing agent or management prior to purchase.
Building Features & Data Confidence
All features from MLS data with AI-assisted confidence analysis. Click each category to expand and see details.
No analysis available
I searched the remarks for any numeric or descriptive statements about owner-occupancy but found none. With no prior/current value and no supporting remarks, the owner-occupancy percentage is unknown.
I searched the remarks for explicit elevator counts or references to multiple elevators but found none. Because there is no prior/current numeric value and no mention in the remarks, the number of elevators is unknown.
Calculated from the lowest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from the highest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from association fees observed in penthouse unit listings for this building.
No analysis available
No analysis available
MLS data shows 6 of 9 listings checked OTCOEX ('common electric' / building power included). None of the public remarks explicitly state whether common area electricity is included, so evidence relies on multiple agent-entered MLS checkboxes across listings rather than remarks; this is moderately strong but not independently confirmed in remarks.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No listings indicate hot water is included (0 of 9 HOTWAT), while 5 listings list WTRHTR (water heater) and remarks state a 'new water heater in 2022.' This strongly indicates hot water is provided by individual unit heaters and not included in HOA fees.
No analysis available
No analysis available
MLS checkboxes show 7 of 9 listings include SEWER in association fees. Public remarks do not explicitly confirm or deny sewer inclusion, so the conclusion is based primarily on consistent MLS entries across multiple listings rather than explicit remarks.
A majority of listings (7 of 9) have WATER checked in association_fee_includes. Public remarks lack explicit statements about water being included; the determination relies on multiple MLS entries rather than corroborating remarks.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Four of nine current MLS listings list a walking/jogging path (WAJOPA) in the amenities, but none of the public remarks mention a jogging/walking path or running trail. Evidence is mixed: checkbox data suggests some units/agents report the feature, but agent remarks do not corroborate it, so inclusion is tentative pending owner/manager verification or clearer listing text.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Multiple listing remarks (at least 2 separate listings) explicitly state residents have access to seven recreation centers with six pools and that Rec Center #7 includes a pool ('six of which include swimming pools', 'Rec #7... featuring a... pool'). The pool amenity is also checked in 4/9 current MLS listings, and the repeated explicit mentions across different agent remarks provide strong evidence that the building/community offers swimming pools.
No analysis available
No analysis available
All 9 current MLS listings list WASHER/DRYER in the inclusions (9/9). Public remarks include explicit language such as 'washer & dryer' and 'washer/dryer in unit' in multiple listings, so the building offers in-unit laundry. The consistency across every MLS inclusion plus matching remarks from different listings indicates strong evidence rather than isolated copy/paste errors.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
All 9 current MLS listings include parking in the ParkingFeatures checkbox and every public remark mentions parking stalls (phrases like 'two parking stalls', 'two parking stalls right in front of your door'). Evidence is consistent across multiple agents and listings, indicating building-level parking is available.
Majority of MLS checkbox data (6 of 9 listings) mark assigned parking and multiple remarks explicitly state 'assigned' or 'dedicated' stalls (e.g., '2 assigned parking stalls - one covered & one open'). This consistent evidence across listings supports that some stalls are assigned.
All MLS listings indicate covered parking and multiple public remarks explicitly note covered stalls (phrases like 'one covered & one open', '1 covered and 1 open parking stall'), showing covered parking is a building feature.
Listings consistently note assigned/dedicated parking stalls included with units, which indicates reserved stalls, but there is no explicit language stating parking is deeded/owned. Based on the absence of the word 'deeded' in the remarks, deeded parking is not confirmed.
No analysis available
Public remarks describe parking stalls assigned to units and abundant guest parking, but do not mention any separate parking fee. There is no evidence in the remarks to determine a monthly parking fee.
Guest parking is noted in 4 of 9 MLS parking feature entries and is explicitly mentioned in some remarks ('Lots of guest parking'). Evidence is present but less widespread than other parking features, so confidence is moderate.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Remarks describe assigned/dedicated stalls and guest parking but do not mention a waitlist system. In the absence of any reference to a waitlist, it is assumed there is no parking waitlist based on the remarks.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
6 of 9 current MLS listings include the ACWIUN inclusion. Public remarks in at least two listings state 'A/C' or 'A/C unit' (e.g., 'fresh paint, A/C, and ceiling fans throughout' and 'enhanced with an A/C unit and ceiling fans'), supporting that some units have air conditioning—likely window units per the MLS inclusions, though remarks do not explicitly say 'window'.
No analysis available
8 of 9 current MLS listings list 'DOUWAL' (double wall) as a construction material, which is a strong signal across agents. However, none of the public remarks explicitly reference 'double wall' or 'double-wall construction', so confirmation comes from MLS metadata rather than descriptive remarks; confidence is high-moderate.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
4 of 9 current MLS listings indicate 'WOOFRA' (wood frame) in construction materials, but none of the public remarks explicitly state 'wood frame' or similar phrases. The evidence relies on MLS checkbox data (multiple agents) rather than explicit agent remarks, so confidence is moderate and the building is reported as having some wood-frame construction.
3 of 9 MLS listings list 'ABOGRO' (above ground) in construction materials, but none of the public remarks use phrases like 'above ground construction' or 'above ground materials'. The feature may apply to some units/portions per MLS checkboxes, but lack of descriptive confirmation keeps confidence moderate-low.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Public remarks do not reference short-term rental (STR) allowance or prohibition. Because there is no explicit mention permitting STRs, STR allowance cannot be confirmed and is set to false based on absence of evidence in the remarks.
There is no indication in the public remarks that units participate in a hotel rental pool or are managed as part of a hotel's rental program. Since STRs are not indicated as allowed, hotel-pool participation is set to false.
Public remarks do not reference any mandatory hotel/rental-pool participation or inability to opt out. With no evidence of STR or hotel-pool programs, mandatory pool participation is set to false.
No analysis available
No analysis available
There is no reference to leasehold/land-lease status or any lease expiry year in the public remarks. Without explicit mention, the lease expiry year cannot be determined from the provided remarks.
Multiple listings explicitly state the property/building is VA-approved. This is strong direct evidence from the public remarks that VA financing is accepted for units in this building.
I looked for explicit language about the HOA providing full/walls-in or comprehensive building insurance but found none. In the absence of any remark or prior value, this is set to false with medium-low confidence.
No analysis available
I searched the remarks for phrases indicating a passed fire/life safety evaluation or certification and found no mentions. With no prior data and no explicit statement in the remarks, I record this as false with medium-low confidence (absence of evidence).
Flood zone determined from official FEMA Digital Flood Insurance Rate Map (DFIRM) data using building coordinates, not from agent-reported listing data.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
0 of 9 current listings mention 'sunset' or related phrases; 2 of 9 list view as NONE. Public remarks do not describe western/exposure or 'sunset view'—only one listing notes 'Pretty views of the Waianae Range,' which is not an explicit sunset claim. Given the lack of any supporting remarks and the MLS checkboxes showing no SUNSET, we conclude the building does not offer a documented sunset view.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Confidence levels are based on MLS checkbox data and AI analysis of listing remarks. High = strong evidence, Medium = some evidence, Low = limited or conflicting evidence. Buyers should always verify critical details independently.