Havens Of II Vistas
Preliminary Information – Full Audit Pending
This buildings features were determined from publicly available data, including MLS listings. While we cross-referenced additional data sources, it still likely contains incomplete or inaccurate information, as it has not yet been personally verified.
Once a building has been fully audited, this page will be replaced with an in-depth analysis featuring verified details and photos of every key feature.
Until then, we provide a data‑driven overview that blends statistical analysis of the checkbox selections agents make in MLS with an AI‑powered read of their public remarks—yielding a clearer picture of the building than raw listings alone.
If this building is important to your search, you can help prioritize it for a full audit by requesting one below. To see what a complete report looks like, check out the example full report.
Havens Of II Vistas
Building Overview
Havens Of II Vistas in Mililani Mauka-Launani Valley, built 2004. Pets allowed; short-term rentals not permitted.
About Havens Of II Vistas
Havens Of II Vistas is a residential building located in the Mililani Mauka–Launani Valley neighborhood. According to available MLS records, the building was constructed in 2004. Size (unit mix/square footage) and construction type are not specified in the MLS information provided.
Based on MLS data, key policies for the building include allowance of pets and a prohibition on short-term rentals. No additional amenity, common-area, or HOA service details are listed in the available records.
Management company information and specifics about parking, maintenance fees, or special assessments are shown as unknown or not provided in the MLS data. Buyers should verify all building details, rules, and fees with the listing agent or management prior to purchase.
Building Features & Data Confidence
All features from MLS data with AI-assisted confidence analysis. Click each category to expand and see details.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
I searched for an owner-occupancy percentage and phrases such as "majority owner occupied" or "highly owner occupied." The remarks do not provide any owner-occupancy information, so the percentage is unknown.
The remarks describe townhome units and community amenities but do not state an elevator count or use terms such as "multiple elevators." The number of elevators is therefore unknown.
Calculated from the lowest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from the highest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from association fees observed in penthouse unit listings for this building.
No analysis available
No analysis available
7 of 10 current listings have OTCOEX (common area electricity) checked in association_fee_includes. No public remarks explicitly state 'common electric' (suggesting some agent copy/paste), but the consistent MLS checkbox across multiple listings indicates the maintenance fee likely includes common area electricity.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
The evidence does not support hot water being included in the HOA/maintenance fees. Across the current listings, 0/11 have HOTWAT checked, while 7/11 reference a water heater in the unit; remarks repeatedly mention a "new water heater" or "newer water heater" rather than building-provided hot water. This looks consistent across listings and agents, not like a copy-paste amenity checkbox.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Sewer appears to be included at the building level. The current MLS data shows 9/11 listings with SEWER checked, and none of the public remarks contradict that. This is a fairly consistent checkbox pattern across multiple listings/agents.
Water appears to be included in the maintenance fees. The current MLS data shows 9/11 listings with WATER checked, and the public remarks are silent on the issue, which suggests the MLS pattern is likely reliable. There is no evidence of a recent change or correction in the remarks.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Five of eleven current MLS listings include WAJOPA, but none of the public remarks explicitly mention a jogging or walking path. This makes the feature plausible at the community level, but the evidence is weaker than an explicit remark and could reflect copy/paste MLS entries.
No analysis available
4 of 10 current public remarks explicitly mention private outdoor space: "your own private yard," "private front and back fenced lanais (with no rear neighbors!)," and "two private courtyards." Evidence comes from multiple different listings/agents and explicitly describes fenced/private yard areas, so the building does offer private yard space for some units.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No public remarks (0/10) mention 'storage', 'storage locker', or 'extra storage'. MLS building amenities checkbox for storage is unchecked across all 10 current listings; only 2/10 listings previously had a unit_features code STORAG. Given the lack of remarks and unchecked building-level checkbox, evidence strongly indicates the building does not offer storage lockers.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Strong building-level evidence supports a pool amenity. At least 2 separate remarks explicitly mention 'six pools' across seven recreation centers, and another notes Rec Center #7 includes 'a pool.' This appears consistent across multiple listings and agents, not a one-off copy-paste error.
No analysis available
No analysis available
In-unit laundry is strongly supported across the dataset. At least 3 public remarks explicitly mention it, including "in-unit stackable washer and dryer" and "washer/dryer in unit," which aligns with the MLS inclusions showing WASHER/DRYER on all current listings. This looks like consistent building/unit feature data rather than copy-paste error.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Strong building-level evidence that the property has parking. Across the remarks, multiple listings mention “two parking stalls,” “2 parking stalls,” “1 covered and 1 open,” and “parking stalls right in front of your door.” This appears consistent across many agents rather than a one-off note.
Assigned/reserved parking is well supported. At least several remarks explicitly use terms like “assigned parking stalls,” “two dedicated parking stalls,” and “2 assigned parking stalls,” matching the strong MLS signal. The evidence is consistent across multiple listings.
Covered parking is clearly present at the building level. Multiple remarks explicitly mention a covered stall, including phrases like “one covered & one open” and “1 covered and 1 open parking stall.” This is consistent across the listing set and aligns with the MLS data.
Multiple listings confirm assigned, covered, and open parking, but none use deeded-parking language or say the stalls are included in the deed. Therefore, deeded status is not supported by the remarks.
No analysis available
The listings discuss assigned, covered, open, and guest parking but provide no parking-fee information. The monthly parking cost is unknown.
Guest parking appears to be available for the building. The strongest direct evidence is the remark stating “Lots of guest parking,” supported by the MLS data showing guest parking on a majority of current listings. This is moderately strong and likely reflects a shared complex amenity.
There is some evidence for secured entry related to parking/access, but it is more implied than explicit. Several remarks call the community “gated” or “secure, gated,” and the MLS has a small number of SECENT flags. This supports inclusion with moderate confidence, but it is weaker than the other parking features.
No analysis available
No analysis available
The remarks describe available assigned and guest parking without mentioning a waitlist system. There is no public-remarks evidence that a parking waitlist exists.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Window AC is strongly supported by the current remarks and MLS data. At least 2 listings explicitly describe A/C units in units, and the current MLS checkbox ACWIUN appears in 8 of 11 listings. The evidence looks consistent across multiple agents rather than a one-off copy/paste.
No analysis available
Double wall construction is listed in 10 of 11 current MLS records, making it the strongest construction signal for the building. The public remarks do not spell out 'double wall' or 'two walls,' but the MLS data is highly consistent across listings. This looks like a reliable building-level feature rather than a one-off agent entry.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Only one of ten MLS listings lists STEFRA (steel frame) and none of the public remarks reference steel framing. This low and isolated checkbox is likely an agent outlier or copy/paste error, so steel frame construction is not supported by the available public-remark evidence.
Two of ten MLS listings list SLAB (concrete slab) in construction materials, but none of the public remarks reference a concrete slab foundation. The limited MLS presence suggests at least some units or portions of the building may be on slab, but the evidence is modest and not confirmed in remarks.
No analysis available
Wood frame construction appears in 6 of 11 current MLS listings via the WOOFRA code. None of the public remarks explicitly mention 'wood frame,' so this is supported mainly by the MLS material field rather than copy/pasted narrative text. The signal is moderate and consistent enough to keep as true.
Four of ten current MLS listings indicate above-ground construction (ABOGRO), but none of the public remarks reference above-ground materials or construction. The MLS entries suggest some above-ground construction elements exist, but the evidence is implied and not corroborated in agent remarks.
No analysis available
No analysis available
The remarks present the homes as residential townhomes and do not mention short-term rental rights or programs. Based on the available public remarks, STR permission is not supported.
The references to community pools and recreation centers are residential amenities, not hotel rental-pool participation. Because STR is not supported, hotel-pool participation must also be false.
The remarks contain no mandatory rental-program language. Since STR is not supported and no hotel pool is identified, mandatory hotel-pool participation is false.
No analysis available
No analysis available
The remarks do not mention a leasehold, land lease, lease expiration, or extension. No specific lease expiry year can be determined.
Multiple listings explicitly identify the home/building as VA-approved. This is strong direct evidence that VA financing is accepted.
I searched for terms including fully insured, full insurance, comprehensive building insurance, and walls-in coverage. The remarks contain no statements about HOA building insurance, so full insurance coverage is not confirmed.
No analysis available
I searched for references to a passed fire/life safety evaluation, FLSE, fire safety certification, life safety compliance, or a passed fire inspection. None were found; the mention of a nearby fire station does not establish that the building passed an evaluation.
Flood zone determined from official FEMA Digital Flood Insurance Rate Map (DFIRM) data using building coordinates, not from agent-reported listing data.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Across 11 current listings, none mention sunset or western-facing views, and most list the view as NONE. Public remarks repeatedly describe the building as breezy or offer Waianae Range views, but there are no agent remarks indicating sunset views. This is strong negative evidence that the building should not be flagged for sunset views.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Confidence levels are based on MLS checkbox data and AI analysis of listing remarks. High = strong evidence, Medium = some evidence, Low = limited or conflicting evidence. Buyers should always verify critical details independently.