Harbor Vista
Preliminary Information – Full Audit Pending
This buildings features were determined from publicly available data, including MLS listings. While we cross-referenced additional data sources, it still likely contains incomplete or inaccurate information, as it has not yet been personally verified.
Once a building has been fully audited, this page will be replaced with an in-depth analysis featuring verified details and photos of every key feature.
Until then, we provide a data‑driven overview that blends statistical analysis of the checkbox selections agents make in MLS with an AI‑powered read of their public remarks—yielding a clearer picture of the building than raw listings alone.
If this building is important to your search, you can help prioritize it for a full audit by requesting one below. To see what a complete report looks like, check out the example full report.
Harbor Vista
Building Overview
Harbor Vista in Aiea — concrete building built in 1966; pets and short-term rentals not allowed.
About Harbor Vista
Harbor Vista is a residential building located in the Aiea neighborhood. According to available records, the building was constructed in 1966 and is of concrete construction. Specific unit counts, square footage, and parking details are not provided in the MLS data available for this summary.
Key features noted in the MLS-derived information include policies that pets are not allowed and short-term rentals are not allowed. The management company is listed as unknown in the available records. No additional amenity details (such as pool, gym, or common areas) are provided in the MLS data supplied.
Buyers should verify all details, including unit sizes, parking availability, maintenance fees, and management information, as this narrative is based solely on the MLS data provided and may be incomplete.
Building Features & Data Confidence
All features from MLS data with AI-assisted confidence analysis. Click each category to expand and see details.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
I searched for owner-occupancy indicators such as percentages, 'majority owner occupied,' or similar wording, but none appeared in the remarks. Since there is no explicit numeric or descriptive evidence, the owner-occupancy rate cannot be determined from these listings.
The public remarks clearly confirm that the building has elevator access. I looked for explicit elevator counts or references such as "multiple elevators," but only a single elevator is mentioned. Because the feature definition is about the presence of elevators, this is enough to mark it true.
Calculated from the lowest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from the highest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from association fees observed in penthouse unit listings for this building.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
All 5 current listings include sewer in the association fees, and there are no remarks suggesting otherwise. This appears to be a consistent building-level HOA inclusion rather than a one-off agent entry.
All 5 current listings include water in the association fees, and none of the public remarks contradict that. The repeated inclusion across all listings strongly suggests this is a stable building-level amenity.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
The feature is explicitly mentioned in the remarks, with 1 listing saying 'Community laundry on-site.' Current MLS data also shows 4/5 listings have COMLAU checked, which strongly supports that the building offers shared laundry facilities. The evidence appears consistent rather than copy-paste noise because the remark is direct and specific.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Parking is strongly supported. All 5/5 current MLS listings show parking features, and multiple remarks explicitly mention an "assigned, open parking stall" or "assigned parking stall". This appears consistent across listings rather than a copy-paste anomaly.
Assigned parking is clearly supported. Four of five current listings have ASSIGN checked in MLS, and the remarks repeatedly state "assigned parking stall," including one note that the stall is directly in front of the unit. The evidence is consistent across multiple listings and agents.
No analysis available
I searched for deeded/owned parking language such as "deeded parking," "owned stall," or "parking included in deed." The remarks only describe an assigned stall, which supports false for deeded parking.
No analysis available
I looked for any mention of a parking fee, monthly parking rental, or additional cost for parking. The remarks only note an assigned stall and do not mention any fee, so this remains unknown.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
I searched for "parking waitlist," "parking waiting list," or similar wording. Since the remarks only state that the unit has an assigned stall and do not mention a waitlist system, this is marked false by default.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No public remark references hollow tile construction or similar language. With only 2 of 5 current listings showing HOLTIL and no corroborating remarks, this looks more like inconsistent MLS entry than verified building construction.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
There are no public remarks describing above-ground construction or materials. Since just 1 of 5 current listings carries ABOGRO and the agent remarks are otherwise focused on unit upgrades and location, this appears unverified and likely checkbox noise.
No analysis available
No analysis available
I looked for STR indicators such as "short-term rental allowed," "legal vacation rental," "NUC," or "TVU," as well as denial phrases like "30-day minimum" or "owner-occupant only." There is no STR-related language in the remarks, so this is marked false by default.
I searched for hotel-pool terms such as "hotel rental pool," "hotel program," or branded pool references. Nothing in the remarks suggests a hotel rental pool, and with no STR allowance mentioned, this remains false.
I looked for language indicating mandatory participation, such as "must be in rental program" or "cannot opt out." There is no evidence of any rental pool in the remarks, so this is marked false.
No analysis available
No analysis available
I looked for references to leasehold, ground lease, lease expiry, or an end year such as "expires 2050" or "through 2075." Nothing in the remarks indicates the land tenure or a lease expiration year, so the value remains unknown.
I searched the listing remarks for any VA-related language such as "VA approved," "VA financing," or "VA loans accepted" and found none. With no public remark evidence, this is left as false by default.
I checked the listings for any HOA insurance wording such as fully insured, walls-in coverage, or full building insurance. There were no references to insurance coverage in the public remarks, so this feature is treated as not evidenced.
No analysis available
I searched the remarks for fire/life safety compliance language, including FLSE, fire inspection, and safety certification terms, but found nothing. With no explicit mention and no prior value provided, this remains unconfirmed and is set to false at low-to-medium confidence.
Flood zone determined from official FEMA Digital Flood Insurance Rate Map (DFIRM) data using building coordinates, not from agent-reported listing data.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Evidence for city views is weak but present: 1 of 5 listings has CITY in the MLS view field, and no remarks explicitly confirm or deny it. Because this is a buyer-searchable building feature that may apply to some units, it should be retained with modest confidence rather than treated as absent.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Confidence levels are based on MLS checkbox data and AI analysis of listing remarks. High = strong evidence, Medium = some evidence, Low = limited or conflicting evidence. Buyers should always verify critical details independently.