Harbor Lights
Preliminary Information – Full Audit Pending
This buildings features were determined from publicly available data, including MLS listings. While we cross-referenced additional data sources, it still likely contains incomplete or inaccurate information, as it has not yet been personally verified.
Once a building has been fully audited, this page will be replaced with an in-depth analysis featuring verified details and photos of every key feature.
Until then, we provide a data‑driven overview that blends statistical analysis of the checkbox selections agents make in MLS with an AI‑powered read of their public remarks—yielding a clearer picture of the building than raw listings alone.
If this building is important to your search, you can help prioritize it for a full audit by requesting one below. To see what a complete report looks like, check out the example full report.
Harbor Lights
Building Overview
Harbor Lights in neighborhood unknown — concrete building (1974) with ocean and sunset views, pool and BBQ area.
About Harbor Lights
Harbor Lights is a condominium building listed in MLS records; the neighborhood is not specified in the available data. According to available records, the building was constructed in 1974 and is of concrete construction. Size and unit count are not provided in the MLS data.
Based on MLS data, Harbor Lights offers ocean, mountain, and sunset views and includes on-site amenities such as a pool, BBQ area, a resident manager, and a security guard. No pet allowance and no short-term rentals are indicated in the MLS notes.
Parking is listed as assigned with guest parking available. The management company is not identified in the available MLS information. This summary is based solely on MLS data; buyers should verify all details, fees, rules, and current conditions with the listing agent or management.
Building Features & Data Confidence
All features from MLS data with AI-assisted confidence analysis. Click each category to expand and see details.
No analysis available
Public remarks contain no statement of owner-occupancy percentage. I checked for explicit percentages and qualitative phrases indicating owner-occupancy and found none, so the owner-occupancy percentage remains unknown.
Public remarks make no reference to elevators. I searched the remarks for explicit counts/words like 'elevator(s)', '4 elevators', 'four elevators' and found nothing, so the number of elevators is unknown and not reported here.
Calculated from the lowest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from the highest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from association fees observed in penthouse unit listings for this building.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
2 of 3 current MLS listings include HOTWAT in association_fee_includes, while 1 of 3 listings lists WTRHTR in unit inclusions. No public remarks explicitly state 'hot water included.' Evidence is mixed across agents and may reflect copy/paste; therefore included as likely but not confirmed (0/3 remarks mention it).
No analysis available
No analysis available
All 3 current MLS listings have SEWER listed in association_fee_includes; historical data also indicated high confidence. Although public remarks do not explicitly say 'sewer included,' the uniform MLS checkbox across multiple agents strongly indicates sewer charges are covered by the HOA.
All 3 listings list WATER in association_fee_includes and at least two public remarks explicitly state 'includes water' or 'water utilities included in the monthly dues.' The consistency across listings and explicit remarks provides strong evidence that water is included in the HOA fees.
Explicit mention in the public remarks: 'BBQ areas' (1 listing). CURRENT MLS data also shows 2/3 listings with BBQ in the amenities. Evidence includes both listing text and multiple MLS checkboxes, indicating the building offers BBQ/grilling facilities.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No public remarks mention 'jogging path', 'walking path', or similar. Although CURRENT MLS checkboxes list WAJOPA on some listings (2/3), the absence of any explicit remark and the likelihood of checkbox copy/paste mistakes means there is weak evidence for a dedicated jogging/walking path.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Remarks mention a 'spacious courtyard', 'playground', 'maintained grounds', and 'central courtyard' in multiple listing remarks (2+ mentions across variants), and CURRENT MLS shows 2/3 listings with RECARE. Together this provides moderate-to-strong evidence the building has recreation area(s).
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
All three listing remarks for Harbor Lights mention a pool (quotes include "swimming pool" and "Pool, playground"). Current MLS amenity codes also list pool-related flags on 3/3 listings, and the repeated, consistent mentions across multiple agent remarks indicate a shared building amenity rather than a single listing error.
No analysis available
No analysis available
One current listing (1/2) includes WASHER/DRYER in inclusions, indicating that at least some units have in‑unit laundry, even if others rely on community facilities.
All current MLS listings (3/3) include the COMLAU amenity indicating shared/community laundry. None of the public remarks reviewed explicitly mention laundry facilities, but historical data was High confidence for community laundry and there is no contradictory language in agent remarks, so the building is reported to have shared laundry facilities.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Multiple MLS listings (3/3) include ASSIGN in parking_features and the public remarks explicitly state 'secured resident parking' and 'easy access to parking,' indicating reserved/assigned stalls for residents. Evidence is consistent across listings and supported by agents' remarks, giving high confidence that assigned parking exists.
No analysis available
The listings reference secured/resident parking and easy access, but there is no explicit statement that parking is deeded to units. Therefore parking_deeded is set to false with medium confidence.
No analysis available
Remarks mention parking availability but do not state any fee amount or that parking is charged separately. With no evidence, the monthly parking fee is unknown (null) with low confidence.
Two of three current MLS listings list GUEST in parking_features, suggesting the building offers guest/visitor parking, but none of the provided public remarks explicitly reference guest parking. This yields moderate confidence (implied from MLS checkbox data) but lacks direct confirmation in agent remarks.
Current MLS data shows 1/2 listings with SECENT in parking_features, and one remark states the complex offers "secure entry," consistent with gated or controlled-access areas.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Listings discuss secured resident parking and easy access but do not reference a waitlist system. Absence of any waitlist language leads to false with medium confidence.
No analysis available
No analysis available
All 3 current MLS listings include the SECGUA amenity checkbox. The public remarks explicitly state “secure entry” and “secured resident parking,” which supports the presence of building security. While remarks do not spell out “security guard” or “24-hour guard,” the consistent MLS amenity flag across multiple listings plus the secure-entry language from agents indicate the building offers on-site security services.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Two of three current MLS listings for this building have the construction_materials field set to 'CONCRE'. However, none of the public remarks across listings mention 'concrete' or 'reinforced concrete', suggesting the checkbox may reflect agent entry rather than explicit description. Evidence is moderate (MLS flags present across multiple listings) but not corroborated by remarks, so confidence is moderate rather than high.
No analysis available
One of two listings lists HOLTIL in construction_materials; construction type is typically uniform for an entire building.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Although rental income potential is noted, there is no explicit mention that short-term or vacation rentals are allowed. Per rules, absence of STR language yields false with medium confidence.
Listings make no reference to any hotel-managed rental pool or hotel operations. Given no STR allowance and no mention of a hotel pool, this is set to false with medium confidence.
There is no indication of a mandatory hotel rental program; no listing states units 'must' participate or that opt-out is disallowed. Therefore mandatory participation is false with medium confidence.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Remarks do not indicate the property is leasehold nor provide any lease expiry year. Because there is no evidence, the lease expiry year is unknown (null) with low confidence.
Public remarks describe amenities and rental potential but do not mention VA loan approval. Absence of any VA-related language suggests the building is not advertised as VA-approved, so set to false with medium confidence.
The remarks do not state that the HOA provides full (walls-in) insurance. I searched for explicit insurance language and found none, so 'fully insured' is marked false with medium confidence.
No analysis available
There is no public-remarks evidence that the building has passed a fire/life safety evaluation. I looked for phrases such as 'FLSE passed', 'fire life safety evaluation passed', and related terms and found none, so absence is assumed with medium confidence.
Flood zone determined from official FEMA Digital Flood Insurance Rate Map (DFIRM) data using building coordinates, not from agent-reported listing data.
The first listing explicitly notes "ocean views" from the unit, confirming that the building offers ocean-view exposures.
At least one current listing's remarks explicitly states "sweeping West Maui Mountain views" (1 of 3 listings' remarks mention mountain views), confirming building-level availability of mountain vistas for some units. Although the MLS view_descriptions currently do not include MOUNTA (likely checkbox/copy-paste omission), both historical high-confidence data and the explicit agent remark support including view_mountain for the building.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
The first listing promotes "spectacular sunsets" along with West Maui Mountain and ocean views, showing that some units face sunset directions.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
MLS checkbox indicates a resident/on-site manager in 2 of 3 current listings (historical confidence = Medium). None of the provided public remarks mention a resident or on-site manager, so the support is primarily from agent-entered MLS amenities and may be copy/paste; overall evidence is moderate across listings.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Confidence levels are based on MLS checkbox data and AI analysis of listing remarks. High = strong evidence, Medium = some evidence, Low = limited or conflicting evidence. Buyers should always verify critical details independently.