Haleloa 1
Preliminary Information – Full Audit Pending
This buildings features were determined from publicly available data, including MLS listings. While we cross-referenced additional data sources, it still likely contains incomplete or inaccurate information, as it has not yet been personally verified.
Once a building has been fully audited, this page will be replaced with an in-depth analysis featuring verified details and photos of every key feature.
Until then, we provide a data‑driven overview that blends statistical analysis of the checkbox selections agents make in MLS with an AI‑powered read of their public remarks—yielding a clearer picture of the building than raw listings alone.
If this building is important to your search, you can help prioritize it for a full audit by requesting one below. To see what a complete report looks like, check out the example full report.
Haleloa 1
Building Overview
Haleloa 1 in Kuliouou-Kalani Iki, built 1973. Pets allowed; short-term rentals not permitted.
About Haleloa 1
Haleloa 1 is a residential building located in the Kuliouou-Kalani Iki neighborhood, originally built in 1973. Based on MLS data, specific details such as unit count, square footage, and construction type are not listed in the available records.
According to available records, the MLS does not provide a listing of onsite amenities or common-area features for Haleloa 1. Prospective buyers should be aware that amenity information (for example, pools, fitness facilities, or clubhouse) was not included in the MLS summary provided.
MLS data indicates that pets are allowed at Haleloa 1 and that short-term rentals are not permitted. The management company is listed as unknown in the MLS. Buyers should verify pet policies, rental restrictions, management details, parking, maintenance fees, and any other material facts with the listing agent or homeowners association, as this description is based solely on the MLS data available.
Building Features & Data Confidence
All features from MLS data with AI-assisted confidence analysis. Click each category to expand and see details.
No analysis available
I searched for owner-occupancy percentages or descriptive phrases like 'majority owner occupied' or 'highly owner occupied,' but none appeared in the remarks. The listings focus on the unit features and community amenities, so there is no basis to estimate owner occupancy from this text.
I searched the public remarks for any elevator count or references such as 'elevators,' 'multiple elevators,' or a numeric elevator listing, and found none. Because this is a townhome community and the remarks only describe carports, courtyards, pool, and views, there is no evidence to confirm a building elevator count.
Calculated from the lowest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from the highest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from association fees observed in penthouse unit listings for this building.
No analysis available
Cable TV is included based on 5 of 5 current MLS listings showing CABTV. The public remarks are silent on cable, but the MLS pattern is fully consistent across listings, suggesting this is a stable building-level inclusion rather than a one-off agent note.
Common area electricity is not supported by the current evidence: just 1 of 5 listings shows OTCOEX, and the remarks do not describe common electric or building power being covered. This looks more like a possible MLS checkbox inconsistency than a confirmed building feature.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Hot water is not indicated as a fee inclusion in the current MLS data: 0 of 5 listings show HOTWAT, and 4 of 5 show WTRHTR. That water-heater signal strongly suggests hot water is unit-based, not covered by maintenance fees.
Internet inclusion is shown on all current listings: 4/4 MLS entries include INTSER in the maintenance fee breakdown. The remarks do not mention internet, but the MLS data is fully consistent across listings and supports this as a building-level amenity.
No analysis available
Sewer appears to be included based on 4 of 5 current listings showing SEWER. While not perfectly unanimous, the repeated MLS pattern across listings is strong enough to support this as a building amenity/fee inclusion.
Water inclusion is fully supported by the current MLS data, with 5 of 5 listings showing WATER. The remarks do not address utilities, but the complete MLS consistency makes this a very strong building-level feature.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
The pool feature is strongly supported. Multiple remarks explicitly describe a shared amenity as a 'large pool' / 'large swimming pool' / 'large community swimming pool,' across several listings and agents, which is consistent with the historical high-confidence MLS data. This appears to be a stable shared community amenity rather than copy-paste error.
No analysis available
No analysis available
In-unit laundry should be included for this building. The MLS history shows washer/dryer in inclusions on 5 of 5 listings, which is strong, repeated evidence across multiple listings and not just a one-off agent entry. None of the public remarks mention laundry directly, but there is also no evidence suggesting it has been removed.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Covered parking is clearly present. Across the remarks, 3 listings explicitly mention a carport/covered parking, including phrases like "attached 2-car carport" and "2 covered carport parking." This aligns with the historical MLS pattern showing covered parking in 5/5 listings, so the evidence is strong and consistent.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Guest parking appears to be available based on MLS data, with 4 of 5 current listings checking the GUEST box. None of the public remarks explicitly mention guest or visitor parking, so this looks more like consistent MLS input than text-confirmed evidence. The feature is still likely building-level, but the support is weaker than for covered parking.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Across the provided remarks, 0 listings explicitly mention window AC; one listing instead says "efficient split AC units." The only MLS signal is a single ACWIUN inclusion on 1 of 4 listings, which is too sparse to support the feature and is likely an agent checkbox inconsistency.
Across the provided listings, there are 0 explicit mentions of concrete construction. The only evidence is a weak MLS signal (1/4 checking CONCRE), which looks more like inconsistent agent input than verified building construction.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Slab construction appears present in the MLS data for this building, with 3 of 5 listings marked SLAB. No public remarks explicitly mention 'concrete slab' or a foundation type, so this is based on the MLS pattern rather than descriptive confirmation.
No analysis available
Wood frame construction appears to be a real building characteristic. The current MLS data shows WOOFRA in 3 of 5 listings, and there are no remark-level contradictions; however, the public remarks do not explicitly say 'wood frame,' so this is supported more by MLS data than by agent descriptions.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
The remarks directly say "Fully insured," which is a clear match for walls-in/full HOA insurance coverage. This is explicit enough to treat as true with very high confidence.
No analysis available
I looked for language indicating a passed fire/life safety evaluation, FLSE, fire safety certification, or a passed fire inspection, and found nothing in the public remarks. With no explicit mention, I cannot verify that the building passed such an evaluation from the listing text.
Flood zone determined from official FEMA Digital Flood Insurance Rate Map (DFIRM) data using building coordinates, not from agent-reported listing data.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Mountain views are strongly supported across the remarks and align with the prior MLS pattern. Multiple listings explicitly mention "mountain views" or "garden and mountain views," suggesting this is a consistent building-level feature rather than a one-off agent note.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Garden views are clearly supported by both the MLS history and the current public remarks. Several listings reference lush landscaping, mature trees, and "garden views," which is consistent across multiple agents and does not look like a copy-paste anomaly.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
None of the provided listing remarks mention a resident manager, on-site manager, or live-in manager. The only evidence is a single MLS amenity checkbox out of four listings, which is too thin to treat as reliable building-level proof.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Confidence levels are based on MLS checkbox data and AI analysis of listing remarks. High = strong evidence, Medium = some evidence, Low = limited or conflicting evidence. Buyers should always verify critical details independently.