Halelani Village at Puhi
Preliminary Information – Full Audit Pending
This buildings features were determined from publicly available data, including MLS listings. While we cross-referenced additional data sources, it still likely contains incomplete or inaccurate information, as it has not yet been personally verified.
Once a building has been fully audited, this page will be replaced with an in-depth analysis featuring verified details and photos of every key feature.
Until then, we provide a data‑driven overview that blends statistical analysis of the checkbox selections agents make in MLS with an AI‑powered read of their public remarks—yielding a clearer picture of the building than raw listings alone.
If this building is important to your search, you can help prioritize it for a full audit by requesting one below. To see what a complete report looks like, check out the example full report.
Halelani Village at Puhi
Building Overview
Halelani Village at Puhi in Puhi — built 1993; pets allowed; short-term rentals not permitted.
About Halelani Village at Puhi
Based on MLS data, Halelani Village at Puhi is a residential building located in the Puhi neighborhood, built in 1993. Size (unit counts or square footage) and construction type are not specified in the available MLS records.
According to available records, the building allows pets and does not permit short-term rentals. No specific common-area amenities (pools, fitness centers, etc.) are listed in the MLS data provided.
The MLS listing indicates the management company is unknown; information on parking, maintenance fees, condo association rules, and other policies is not provided in the data set. Buyers should verify all building details, fees, and rules with the listing agent or association, as this summary is based solely on the MLS information available.
Building Features & Data Confidence
All features from MLS data with AI-assisted confidence analysis. Click each category to expand and see details.
No analysis available
There is no information in the public remarks about the percentage of owner-occupied units. Because numeric occupancy requires explicit evidence and there is no prior value, this field is unknown (null) and not estimated.
No explicit elevator count is given in the remarks. I searched the remarks for phrases indicating number of elevators or multiple elevators but found nothing. Because there is no prior numeric value and no explicit statement, the elevator count is unknown and not guessed.
Calculated from the lowest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from the highest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from association fees observed in penthouse unit listings for this building.
No analysis available
No analysis available
One of two current listings includes OTCOEX in association_fee_includes (1/2 listings). No public remarks mention 'common area electricity' or similar, so inclusion is based solely on a single MLS checkbox entry and appears to be weak/moderate evidence rather than corroborated by agent remarks.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No listings show HOTWAT in association_fee_includes (0/2), and one listing lists WTRHTR in inclusions—strong evidence that hot water is provided by individual water heaters, not included in HOA fees. Public remarks do not state 'hot water included.'
No analysis available
No analysis available
SEWER is listed in association_fee_includes for 2 of 2 current listings, providing consistent MLS-level evidence that sewer is included in maintenance fees. Public remarks do not reference sewer, but the checkbox consistency across listings is strong support.
WATER appears in association_fee_includes for 2 of 2 current listings, indicating water is included in HOA/maintenance fees. Remarks supplied do not mention this, but the unanimous MLS checkbox across listings yields strong evidence.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Both MLS listings indicate parking (2/2). The public remarks for this unit explicitly state '2 parking stalls' and repeat '2 parking stalls' in a second remark, so there is strong, direct evidence the building offers parking.
Both MLS listings (2/2) list 'ASSIGN' in parking features, indicating assigned/reserved stalls. The public remarks mention two parking stalls but do not specify 'assigned'; evidence is consistent across MLS checkboxes but not explicitly described in agent remarks.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
One of the two MLS listings includes 'GUEST' in parking features (1/2). The public remarks provided do not reference guest or visitor parking, so the presence of guest parking is possible but only implied by MLS checkbox data and therefore has moderate confidence.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
One listing's remarks explicitly state 'a new window A/C unit in the bedroom', and the MLS checkbox ACWIUN is checked in 1 of 2 current listings. This is a clear, explicit mention of a window air conditioner (confirmed by the listing text) and is supported by the inclusion flag in another listing, so the building should be marked as offering window AC.
One of two current MLS listings for this building includes 'CONCRE' in construction materials, but none of the public remarks reviewed mention concrete or reinforced concrete. Evidence is limited and may reflect agents checking a box or copy/paste; include the feature for buyer searches but with moderate confidence pending stronger confirmation.
Both current MLS listings list 'DOUWAL' (double wall) in construction materials, but the public remarks reviewed do not mention 'double wall' or similar phrasing. The evidence comes solely from MLS checkbox data across listings and appears potentially copy/pasted, so include the feature with moderate confidence until confirmed by agent/owner/site-visit details.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
The remarks focus on unit features and community location and do not mention HOA insurance coverage. With no explicit statement and no prior data, I report fully insured as false with medium confidence.
No analysis available
The public remarks do not reference any fire/life safety evaluation or certification. In the absence of any mention and with no prior data, I report this as false with medium confidence (absence likely indicates not stated publicly).
Flood zone determined from official FEMA Digital Flood Insurance Rate Map (DFIRM) data using building coordinates, not from agent-reported listing data.
No analysis available
At least one current listing's public remarks explicitly state "beautiful mountain views" and "mountain views" (quotes from agent remarks), giving strong direct evidence despite no prior MLS view_descriptions. Evidence comes from one listing's agent remarks rather than the MLS view checkbox; appears to be a legitimate feature of some units.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No listings' public remarks (0/1 provided) mention a resident or on-site manager. MLS checkbox RESMAN appears in only 1 of 2 listings, suggesting inconsistent agent entry or copy/paste rather than an actual building feature. Because there's no corroborating remark or broad checkbox confirmation, the building is treated as not having a resident manager.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Confidence levels are based on MLS checkbox data and AI analysis of listing remarks. High = strong evidence, Medium = some evidence, Low = limited or conflicting evidence. Buyers should always verify critical details independently.