Hale Ola
Preliminary Information – Full Audit Pending
This buildings features were determined from publicly available data, including MLS listings. While we cross-referenced additional data sources, it still likely contains incomplete or inaccurate information, as it has not yet been personally verified.
Once a building has been fully audited, this page will be replaced with an in-depth analysis featuring verified details and photos of every key feature.
Until then, we provide a data‑driven overview that blends statistical analysis of the checkbox selections agents make in MLS with an AI‑powered read of their public remarks—yielding a clearer picture of the building than raw listings alone.
If this building is important to your search, you can help prioritize it for a full audit by requesting one below. To see what a complete report looks like, check out the example full report.
Hale Ola
Building Overview
Hale Ola in Pearl City (built 1971) — wood-frame building with a resident manager, window AC and assigned parking. No pets or short-term rentals.
About Hale Ola
Hale Ola is a residential building located in Pearl City, originally built in 1971. According to available records the building is wood frame construction. MLS data does not specify unit count, square footage ranges, or floor plan details, so those items should be confirmed with the listing agent or management.
Based on MLS data, on-site features include a resident manager and window air-conditioning units. The property rules listed in MLS indicate that pets are not allowed and short-term rentals are not permitted. The management company is shown as unknown in the MLS information provided.
Parking is listed as assigned in the MLS. Buyers should verify any association fees, maintenance assessments, exact parking stall assignment, appliance inclusions, and other rules directly with the seller, HOA or management. This summary is based on MLS data and available records; prospective buyers should confirm all details independently before making decisions.
Building Features & Data Confidence
All features from MLS data with AI-assisted confidence analysis. Click each category to expand and see details.
No analysis available
Multiple listings directly support a high owner-occupancy rate, including a clear statement of "85% owner occupancy" and another noting "over 80% owner occupancy." This matches the current value and is strongly supported by the remarks.
I searched the public remarks for elevator references and found none. The listings consistently describe the property as a split-level townhome/walk-up, which makes elevators unlikely, but there is no explicit remark confirming them.
Calculated from the lowest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from the highest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from association fees observed in penthouse unit listings for this building.
No analysis available
No analysis available
In the current MLS data, 8 of 14 listings include OTCOEX (other common expenses) in association_fee_includes, which typically covers common-area electricity. Remarks mention a PV solar project 'to save on electricity in the future' and special assessments handled by the AOAO, indicating that the association centrally manages building energy costs consistent with common-area power being included.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Only 1 of 15 listings currently shows hot water included, while 8 of 15 list WTRHTR, suggesting most units rely on individual water heaters. No public remarks mention hot water being included in the maintenance fee. This looks more like inconsistent MLS checkbox data than a building-wide amenity.
No analysis available
No analysis available
All 15 of 15 current listings include sewer in the association fee. None of the public remarks contradict this, and there is no sign of copy-paste inconsistency across agents. Confidence is very high that sewer is included.
All 15 of 15 current listings include water in the association fee. Public remarks do not contradict this, and the MLS data is fully consistent across listings. Confidence is very high that water is included.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
I searched for surfboard storage, board storage, surf storage, and similar amenity descriptions. The listings mention general storage closets and a storage area behind the front door, but nothing that indicates dedicated surfboard storage.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
I searched for references to a pool and specifically saltwater or saline pool language. There is no pool mentioned in the remarks, and the current building context already says the property has no pool.
In-unit laundry is strongly supported across the listing history and current remarks. Multiple agents explicitly mention washer/dryer inside the unit, including "Enjoy new appliances including... washer, and dryer" and "a full-size washer and dryer," indicating this is a real and recurring building feature rather than a copy-paste checkbox issue.
No analysis available
I looked for terms such as coin laundry, quarters, coin-op, card-operated, or laundry fee. The remarks do not mention any community laundry system or payment requirement, so this feature is not supported by the available text.
I searched the public remarks for references to community laundry facilities, including phrases like laundry on every floor or laundry room on each floor. Nothing in the listings mentions shared laundry placement, so there is no evidence to support this feature.
Parking is clearly available for this building, with current MLS data showing parking features on all 15/15 listings. Public remarks consistently mention stalls, deeded spaces, visitor parking, and rentable extra stalls, which reinforces that parking is a building-level amenity rather than a copied checkbox.
Assigned/reserved parking is well supported across the remarks and MLS data. At least several listings explicitly describe assigned or deeded spaces, while others mention parking stalls located near the unit or designated parking, indicating this is a real and repeatable feature of the building.
No analysis available
The listings clearly describe deeded parking tied to the unit. I also saw supporting references to an assigned stall in front of the unit, which is consistent with deeded parking ownership.
No analysis available
The public remarks show inconsistent parking rental prices, with separate listings citing $50/month and $30/month for extra stalls. Because there is no single building-wide fee stated, I used the clearest explicit monthly amount while noting the variation.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Multiple listings confirm a parking waitlist for additional stalls. This is directly supported by the remarks and does not appear to be disputed.
No analysis available
I looked for access-control language such as keycard entry, fob access, or card-reader security. The remarks mention a gated entrance/exit and a pedestrian gate, but nothing about card or fob access.
Evidence supports security service at Hale Ola: 10 of 15 current MLS listings include the SECGUA amenity, and one remark specifically notes 'Security patrol from 9:00 PM - 5:00 AM.' The repeated checkbox data plus the explicit patrol description suggest this is a real building feature rather than a copy-paste error.
The remarks directly confirm security patrol service with a specific schedule. This is strong evidence and aligns with the previously noted high-confidence analysis.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
One listing clearly states 'Each room has a window AC,' and 6/14 MLS listings include ACWIUN in inclusions, indicating window or wall AC units are present in multiple units.
No analysis available
Across the provided listings, 0 remarks explicitly mention double-wall construction. A few listings say things like 'one neighbor connecting wall' or 'no neighbors above or below,' but that describes unit adjacency, not double-wall building construction. The evidence looks like generic copy/paste MLS data rather than verified building construction details.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No public remarks explicitly mention construction type, but 4/14 MLS listings specify WOOFRA (wood frame) in construction_materials, and the building’s age/type (Pearl City walk-up townhomes) is consistent with wood frame construction.
Across the provided listings, 0 remarks explicitly mention above-ground construction. There are no phrases like 'above ground construction' or 'above ground materials' in the public remarks, and the descriptions read like standard townhouse marketing copy. This feature appears unverified and likely reflects unchecked or copied MLS data.
No analysis available
No analysis available
I searched the remarks for STR language such as short-term rental allowed, legal vacation rental, NUC/TVU, or minimum-rental-period restrictions, but found nothing. With no evidence that STR is allowed, the default interpretation is false.
I looked for hotel pool, rental program, hotel-managed, Hilton/Trump/Ritz-style pool references, and found none. Since there is also no evidence that STR is allowed, this must be false.
The remarks do not mention any hotel-pool requirement or mandatory rental participation. With no STR/hotel-pool evidence at all, this is false.
No analysis available
No analysis available
I searched for leasehold, ground lease, lease expiry, and renewal language, but nothing in the public remarks mentions land tenure or an expiration year. Without a specific lease year, this remains unknown.
The remarks directly confirm VA approval. I found no contradictory language, so this is a strong match for the building.
I searched the remarks for insurance-related phrases such as "fully insured," "full insurance," and "walls-in coverage," but found nothing explicit. The mention of a special assessment related to insurance costs does not confirm full HOA insurance coverage.
No analysis available
I looked for explicit statements about fire/life safety compliance or a passed inspection and found none. Because this feature is only confirmed from public remarks, it remains unverified and is treated as not indicated in the listings.
Flood zone determined from official FEMA Digital Flood Insurance Rate Map (DFIRM) data using building coordinates, not from agent-reported listing data.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No listings mention sunset views or comparable western-facing exposure. Across the provided remarks, there are 0 explicit references to sunset/evening-sun views, and the MLS view data shows 0/15 SUNSET with many listings marked NONE, suggesting the building does not offer sunset-view units.
No analysis available
I searched for explicit view language such as seeing fireworks from the lanai, unit, or building. The remarks discuss lanai space and nearby amenities, but nothing indicates a fireworks view from the property.
No analysis available
Public remarks explicitly mention 'approval from resident manager' for extra parking, and 11/14 current MLS listings have RESMAN checked, indicating an on-site manager for the complex.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Confidence levels are based on MLS checkbox data and AI analysis of listing remarks. High = strong evidence, Medium = some evidence, Low = limited or conflicting evidence. Buyers should always verify critical details independently.