Hale O Pumehana
Preliminary Information – Full Audit Pending
This buildings features were determined from publicly available data, including MLS listings. While we cross-referenced additional data sources, it still likely contains incomplete or inaccurate information, as it has not yet been personally verified.
Once a building has been fully audited, this page will be replaced with an in-depth analysis featuring verified details and photos of every key feature.
Until then, we provide a data‑driven overview that blends statistical analysis of the checkbox selections agents make in MLS with an AI‑powered read of their public remarks—yielding a clearer picture of the building than raw listings alone.
If this building is important to your search, you can help prioritize it for a full audit by requesting one below. To see what a complete report looks like, check out the example full report.
Hale O Pumehana
Building Overview
Hale O Pumehana in Downtown-Chinatown (built 1975), concrete construction with ocean and sunset views and an on-site pool.
About Hale O Pumehana
Based on MLS data, Hale O Pumehana is located in the Downtown–Chinatown neighborhood and was built in 1975. The building is noted as concrete construction. Specifics on unit count and individual unit sizes were not provided in the available MLS records.
According to available records, the building offers ocean and sunset views and includes an on-site pool as an amenity. No short-term rental use is allowed, and pets are not permitted per the MLS data.
The MLS indicates covered parking is available; additional details such as assigned parking counts, maintenance fees, or the management company are not listed (management company is shown as Unknown). Buyers should verify all building features, rules, and fee information with the listing agent or management, as this summary is based solely on the MLS data available.
Building Features & Data Confidence
All features from MLS data with AI-assisted confidence analysis. Click each category to expand and see details.
No analysis available
I searched for owner-occupancy indicators such as percentages, 'majority owner occupied,' or 'highly owner occupied,' but found no such language. The remarks do not provide any evidence to estimate the owner-occupancy rate.
I searched the remarks for explicit elevator references such as a count ('4 elevators'), 'elevator,' or 'multiple elevators,' but found nothing. There is no evidence in the public remarks to confirm the building has elevators or to state how many it has.
Calculated from the lowest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from the highest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from association fees observed in penthouse unit listings for this building.
No analysis available
The majority of current MLS records for this building do NOT show cable included in the HOA, and public remarks across multiple listings never note cable as an included utility. Given the mixed but mostly negative checkbox data and silence in remarks, cable TV is likely not included in the maintenance fees.
Most MLS records (8/10) indicate common area electricity is included via OTCOEX, but the public remarks do not directly say "common area electricity" or similar. Because this is building-level fee data and the MLS pattern is fairly consistent, it is reasonable to retain it as included, though the copy/paste remarks provide little direct confirmation.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Hot water inclusion is not supported by the public remarks. Across the listings provided, no agent explicitly says hot water is included in the maintenance fee, and the current MLS data is inconsistent at only 4/9 listings. With no WTRHTR signals and no corroborating remarks, this feature should be treated as not verified for the building.
The data overwhelmingly show internet not being listed as an included utility (1/8 vs 7/8), and no listing remarks market internet as part of the fees. This strongly suggests that residents pay for their own internet service separately from the HOA dues.
No analysis available
Sewer inclusion is strongly supported by the MLS data, with 10/10 current listings showing SEWER. While remarks mostly discuss sewer-line repairs rather than fees, multiple listings mention "replaced sewer lines" and plumbing updates, reinforcing that sewer is a building-level included expense.
Water inclusion is strongly supported by current MLS data, with 10/10 listings showing WATER in association_fee_includes. The remarks do not explicitly mention water, but they also contain no evidence against it, and the repeated MLS pattern suggests this is a stable building-level fee inclusion.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Multiple listings describe deeded or assigned storage, such as a "Large (4x8) storage unit," "good-sized storage on the same floor," and "generous sized storage located outside of the unit." Building-level remarks also reference "additional storage" and a "private storage area," confirming that storage units/lockers are an established amenity. Combined with 8/8 MLS amenities indicating storage, the evidence strongly supports that the building offers storage units.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Trash chute appears to be a building amenity based on MLS data rather than the remarks. 9 of 10 recent listings mark TRACHU, while none of the public remarks explicitly mention a trash chute or garbage chute. This looks like a consistently checked MLS amenity across multiple agents, so the building should be treated as offering it.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Pool is strongly confirmed across the listings. Multiple remarks explicitly say "swimming pool," "pool onsite," and "features a pool," often alongside other shared building amenities like clubhouse, party room, and resident manager. This looks like consistent building-level amenity information rather than a one-off unit feature.
No analysis available
No analysis available
In-unit laundry is strongly supported and appears consistently across the listing history. Multiple remarks explicitly say 'In-unit washer and dryer,' 'washer and dryer in the unit,' and 'wash/dryer in the unit,' making this a high-confidence building feature rather than a checkbox artifact. The evidence is repeated across several listings and aligns with the prior MLS inclusions data.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Parking is strongly supported across the listings. Remarks mention "two assigned and covered parking stalls," "assigned parking," "secured parking stall," and guest stalls, while MLS data shows parking features present in all current listings. This looks consistent across multiple agents rather than a one-off checkbox.
Assigned parking is well supported by both MLS data and remarks. At least several listings explicitly say "assigned parking" or "two assigned and covered parking stalls," which aligns with the 7/10 current MLS signals. The evidence is consistent and not just a single agent’s wording.
Covered parking is clearly supported. Multiple remarks use direct phrases like "covered parking stalls," "covered stall," and "1 secured/covered parking stall," while current MLS data shows covered/garage-related parking in 8/10 listings. This is strong, repeated evidence across listings.
The remarks directly indicate the parking is deeded, meaning it is owned with the unit. This is strong, explicit evidence from the public remarks.
No analysis available
I looked for any stated parking fee or monthly parking charge, but none was mentioned. The remarks describe assigned, covered, secured parking, but do not provide a cost.
No analysis available
Secured entry for parking is strongly implied by the repeated "gated, secure" wording and direct mentions of "secured entry" and "secured parking stall." The current MLS checkbox data also supports this, with 7/10 listings showing SECENT. The consistency across listings suggests this is a real building feature, not a copy-paste error.
No analysis available
No analysis available
I searched for parking waitlist language such as waiting list or join a list for parking and found no evidence. With no remarks indicating a waitlist, this is treated as not shown in the public listing remarks.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Across eight recent listings, no agents selected central AC in MLS features or described any building-wide air conditioning system in the remarks. One listing specifically highlights a split AC system in the unit, which strongly implies cooling is provided by individual systems rather than central air for the building.
Split AC is clearly supported by the remarks, with 2 listings explicitly describing it and one noting it was 'newly installed'. The repeated, detailed mentions across separate descriptions make this a strong building feature for buyers searching for ductless/mini-split cooling.
Across the provided remarks, 0 listings mention window AC or window units, while 2 listings explicitly say the unit has "newly installed split AC units" or a "Split AC system." Because the only AC described is split AC—not window AC—there is no supporting evidence that the building offers window air conditioning.
Concrete construction is strongly supported by the MLS history, with 9 of 10 listings marking CONCRE. None of the current remarks mention a different building material or any change to the structure, so there is no reason to override the historical signal. This appears to be consistent MLS data rather than a one-off agent copy-paste issue.
No analysis available
Across eight recent listings for this building, only one MLS entry checked the HOLTIL (hollow tile) construction box, and none of the public remarks reference hollow tile construction. Given the strong majority of listings omitting this construction type and the absence of any descriptive confirmation, the evidence indicates the building is not represented as hollow tile in practice, and the lone HOLTIL entry is likely a misclassification.
No analysis available
Steel frame construction appears in only 2 of 9 current listings and is not supported by the public remarks. Because the evidence is sparse and may be inconsistent MLS checkbox data, confidence is low and this should be treated cautiously.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
I searched for STR indicators like NUC, TVU, legal vacation rental language, or 30-day minimum rules, but found none. There is no public-remarks evidence that short-term rentals are allowed.
I searched for hotel rental pool language, branded hotel programs, or hotel-managed operations and found none. Since there is no evidence STR is allowed, this feature must also be false.
I looked for language indicating owners must participate in a rental pool or cannot opt out, and found nothing. Because STR is not evidenced as allowed in the remarks, mandatory pool participation is also false.
No analysis available
No analysis available
I searched for leasehold/ground-lease language and any 4-digit lease expiration year, but found nothing. There is no public-remarks evidence to identify a lease expiry date.
The listings directly confirm VA financing is accepted. This appears multiple times across the remarks, including explicit VA-approved language and a reference to a buyer using VA.
The public remarks directly support full building insurance coverage with the phrase "100% hurricane insurance." This is strong evidence that the HOA has comprehensive/walls-in style insurance coverage.
No analysis available
I looked for language indicating the building passed a fire/life safety evaluation or similar certification, but the remarks only mention items like updated fire alarm work and plumbing repairs. Those references do not confirm a passed evaluation, so this remains unverified and is treated as absent in the remarks.
Flood zone determined from official FEMA Digital Flood Insurance Rate Map (DFIRM) data using building coordinates, not from agent-reported listing data.
No analysis available
Ocean views are well supported. At least 2 remarks explicitly mention ocean views, including 'beautiful views of ocean, city and mountain' and 'city and partial ocean views,' and the MLS data shows OCEAN in 6 of 10 current listings. This looks consistent across multiple agents rather than a one-off copy/paste error.
Mountain views are supported, though less consistently than ocean or city views. The strongest current evidence is the remark describing 'beautiful views of ocean, city and mountain,' while MLS data shows mountain views in 4 of 10 listings. This suggests the building offers mountain-view units, but not all agents mention it.
No analysis available
City views are very strongly supported. Multiple listings describe 'beautiful city and sunset views,' 'city surroundings,' 'city living,' and 'beautiful city and partial ocean views,' and the MLS data tags CITY in 7 of 10 listings. The evidence is consistent across several remarks and agents, not just a single copied entry.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Sunset views appear to be available in some units, based on MLS view data: 4 of 9 listings explicitly mark SUNSET, while 2 of 9 show NONE. The public remarks mostly describe city, ocean, and mountain views, with phrases like "beautiful views of ocean, city and mountain" and "partial ocean views," which are consistent with west-facing or evening light exposure but do not repeatedly confirm it across all agents.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Confidence levels are based on MLS checkbox data and AI analysis of listing remarks. High = strong evidence, Medium = some evidence, Low = limited or conflicting evidence. Buyers should always verify critical details independently.