Hale O Kalani Towers
Preliminary Information – Full Audit Pending
This buildings features were determined from publicly available data, including MLS listings. While we cross-referenced additional data sources, it still likely contains incomplete or inaccurate information, as it has not yet been personally verified.
Once a building has been fully audited, this page will be replaced with an in-depth analysis featuring verified details and photos of every key feature.
Until then, we provide a data‑driven overview that blends statistical analysis of the checkbox selections agents make in MLS with an AI‑powered read of their public remarks—yielding a clearer picture of the building than raw listings alone.
If this building is important to your search, you can help prioritize it for a full audit by requesting one below. To see what a complete report looks like, check out the example full report.
Hale O Kalani Towers
Building Overview
Hale O Kalani Towers in Makiki-Tantalus — concrete building (1965) with pool and a resident manager.
About Hale O Kalani Towers
Hale O Kalani Towers is located in the Makiki-Tantalus neighborhood and was built in 1965. According to available records, the building is constructed of concrete. Size and unit mix information were not provided in the MLS data.
Based on MLS data, on-site amenities include a pool and a resident manager. The building does not allow pets and short-term rentals are not permitted according to the provided listing information.
Parking is available with assigned stalls. The management company is listed as unknown in the MLS data. Buyers should verify all information, including fees, exact unit sizes, parking assignments, and management details, with the listing agent or property management.
Building Features & Data Confidence
All features from MLS data with AI-assisted confidence analysis. Click each category to expand and see details.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
The listings describe the property as suitable for first-time buyers and investors, but provide no owner-occupancy percentage or reliable characterization of the building's occupancy. The value remains unknown.
The current value of 1 is retained because the remarks confirm elevator access but provide no explicit elevator count. No evidence in remarks confirms or denies that the building has more than one elevator.
Calculated from the lowest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from the highest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from association fees observed in penthouse unit listings for this building.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Eight of 10 current listings include OTCOEX in the association fee fields, which indicates common-area electricity is included. No public remarks explicitly mention common-area electric, so the evidence is primarily MLS checkbox data and somewhat weaker than for sewer and water.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
All 10 current listings list SEWER as included in the association fees. One public remark explicitly says the monthly fees cover sewer, providing confirmation beyond repeated MLS fields and supporting high confidence.
All 10 current listings list WATER as included in the association fees. One public remark explicitly says the monthly fees cover water, confirming the consistent MLS data across multiple listings.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Several listings mention building outdoor amenities: one remark describes a 'sliding glass door with a small lanai in front,' and multiple remarks reference the building pool and 'pool deck' or 'lounging on the pool deck.' In total, multiple agent remarks (and 2/9 MLS amenity checkboxes) indicate the building offers patios/decks, so there's strong evidence buyers seeking outdoor space would be interested in this building.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
The remarks do not describe any surfboard or board-storage facility. Mentions of nearby beaches do not establish storage within the building.
No analysis available
9/10 current listings check the TRACHU amenity, providing substantial MLS-based support for a building trash chute. However, 0/10 public remarks mention a trash chute or related phrase, so the evidence may reflect agent copy/paste rather than independently verified building information.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Evidence strongly confirms that Hale O Kalani Towers has a building pool. Six listings explicitly reference it with phrases such as "resort-style amenities including a sparkling pool," "community pool," "beautiful pool," and "swimming pool," while the MLS pool amenity is checked in all 10 current listings. The repeated detailed references across multiple listings and agents indicate a genuine shared building feature rather than an isolated copy-paste error.
No analysis available
A swimming pool is repeatedly described, but its water type is not specified. No saltwater-related wording was found in the public remarks.
In-unit laundry is strongly supported across the listings: at least 8 of 10 current remarks explicitly mention it, including “in-unit washer/dryer,” “new washer and dryer,” and “Washer & Dryer in the unit.” The confirmations appear across multiple distinct listing descriptions and align with the historical high-confidence MLS evidence.
No analysis available
The remarks contain no evidence that community laundry requires payment. References to in-unit washers and dryers provide no indication of paid shared laundry facilities.
The public remarks do not indicate community laundry facilities on every floor. Multiple listings specifically mention in-unit washer/dryer appliances, but that does not confirm or deny whether shared laundry exists elsewhere.
Parking is strongly confirmed across the building: 8 of 10 listings explicitly mention an assigned or included parking stall, and current MLS data indicates parking on all 10 listings. The repeated references across multiple remarks support a building-level parking feature rather than a single listing anomaly.
Assigned parking is strongly supported across multiple listings and agents. Remarks repeatedly state “one assigned parking stall,” “one assigned parking stall near unit,” and “one uncovered assigned parking stall,” confirming that the building offers assigned parking.
Covered parking is not supported by the evidence: 0 of 10 MLS records list covered or garage parking, and at least 2 listings explicitly call the assigned stall 'uncovered.' The consistent absence of covered-parking language across the remarks supports correcting this feature to false.
Assigned parking is consistently mentioned, but assigned does not by itself establish deeded ownership. No remarks say the stall is included in the deed or owned with the unit.
No analysis available
The remarks mention assigned parking but do not identify any separate parking fee. The $748 monthly maintenance fee is stated, but it is not described as a parking charge.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
The public remarks consistently describe an assigned parking stall and contain no waitlist language. There is no indication that parking is obtained through a waiting list.
No analysis available
The building clearly has some form of secured access, but the remarks do not establish that it uses a card or fob system. Because the required card/fob terminology is absent, this feature is not supported.
No analysis available
The public remarks directly identify security patrol as a building amenity. This explicit statement provides strong evidence that the building has patrol service.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Concrete construction is consistently reported in 10 of 10 current listings. No remarks explicitly mention concrete, but the complete agreement across multiple listings and agents makes this strong checkbox evidence rather than an isolated entry.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Four of 10 current listings identify MASSTU in the construction materials field. Public remarks do not mention masonry or stucco, so this is moderate, checkbox-only evidence and may reflect inconsistent agent reporting.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
The remarks do not address short-term rental permissions or restrictions. Because no STR authorization is mentioned, STR allowance cannot be supported from the public remarks.
The listings mention a residential pool amenity, but not participation in a hotel rental pool. Since STR allowance is not established, hotel-pool participation is also false under the prerequisite rule.
The remarks contain no language indicating that owners must participate in a rental program. Because STR allowance and hotel-pool participation are not established, mandatory participation is false.
No analysis available
No analysis available
The remarks contain no land-tenure or lease-expiration information. No specific four-digit lease expiry year can be extracted.
The remarks were searched for explicit VA approval or VA financing language, but none was found. The statement that conventional financing is not an option does not establish VA eligibility.
The remarks mention monthly fees covering sewer and water but do not describe the HOA's insurance coverage. There is no evidence confirming or denying fully insured or walls-in coverage.
No analysis available
The remarks discuss secured entry, security cameras, elevators, and other amenities but contain no affirmative fire or life safety evaluation language. This is treated as false with low confidence because the feature is not mentioned.
Flood zone determined from official FEMA Digital Flood Insurance Rate Map (DFIRM) data using building coordinates, not from agent-reported listing data.
No analysis available
No analysis available
At least 3 listings explicitly mention mountain views, using phrases such as "Mountain views from the 5th floor," "panoramic mountain... views," and "views to the city and mountains." Although one listing reports NONE and views vary by unit and floor, the repeated specific descriptions across multiple listings confirm that mountain-view units are available in the building.
No analysis available
City views are consistently mentioned in 6 of 9 listings and repeatedly in the public remarks — phrases quoted include 'sweeping city views', 'terrific Honolulu city views', and 'panoramic ... city and skyline views'. Evidence comes from multiple listings/agents rather than a single isolated remark, so the building should be marked as offering city views.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
The remarks describe mountain, city, skyline, and peekaboo ocean views, but do not mention fireworks visibility from the units or building. Therefore, a fireworks view is not supported by the public remarks.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Confidence levels are based on MLS checkbox data and AI analysis of listing remarks. High = strong evidence, Medium = some evidence, Low = limited or conflicting evidence. Buyers should always verify critical details independently.