Hale Makalei
Preliminary Information – Full Audit Pending
This buildings features were determined from publicly available data, including MLS listings. While we cross-referenced additional data sources, it still likely contains incomplete or inaccurate information, as it has not yet been personally verified.
Once a building has been fully audited, this page will be replaced with an in-depth analysis featuring verified details and photos of every key feature.
Until then, we provide a data‑driven overview that blends statistical analysis of the checkbox selections agents make in MLS with an AI‑powered read of their public remarks—yielding a clearer picture of the building than raw listings alone.
If this building is important to your search, you can help prioritize it for a full audit by requesting one below. To see what a complete report looks like, check out the example full report.
Hale Makalei
Building Overview
Hale Makalei in Kailua — concrete construction built in 1995. Pets allowed; short-term rentals not permitted.
About Hale Makalei
Hale Makalei is a concrete residential building located in the Kailua neighborhood. According to available records, the building was constructed in 1995. Specific building size, unit counts, and individual unit dimensions are not provided in the MLS data supplied.
Key policy details reported in MLS records include that pets are allowed and short-term rentals are not permitted. The listing data does not include a detailed amenities list, common-area descriptions, or information about on-site facilities.
Information about management, parking, maintenance fees, and other homeowner association policies is not specified in the provided MLS data (management company is listed as unknown). Based on MLS data, buyers should verify parking, fees, rules, and any additional building features with the listing agent or management prior to making decisions.
Building Features & Data Confidence
All features from MLS data with AI-assisted confidence analysis. Click each category to expand and see details.
No analysis available
I searched the remarks for owner-occupancy clues such as a percentage, majority owner-occupied language, or references to a predominantly resident-owned building. None were found, so the owner occupancy rate remains unknown from these remarks.
I searched the remarks for any reference to elevator count or elevator availability, but nothing was stated. Because this is not mentioned in the public remarks, the number of elevators cannot be confirmed from the provided text.
Calculated from the lowest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from the highest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from association fees observed in penthouse unit listings for this building.
No analysis available
No analysis available
There is no strong evidence that maintenance includes common area electricity. Across the provided remarks, no agent explicitly mentions hallway/elevator/amenity electricity being included, and the MLS signal appears to be a different fee code rather than a direct match.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Evidence points against maintenance including hot water. The MLS pattern is consistent with unit water heaters being present, and the remarks are silent on any building-provided hot water benefit.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Sewer inclusion is strongly confirmed by the MLS data: 4 of 4 listings include SEWER. No remarks suggest otherwise, and this appears to be a stable building-level fee inclusion.
Water is clearly included in the maintenance/HOA fees. All 4 listings show WATER in the fee inclusions, making this a consistent building-level feature.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
There is no remark evidence for a car wash facility in any of the listings reviewed. Since only 1 of 4 MLS entries has the CRWSH amenity checked and the rest are silent, the feature is not supported as a building amenity based on the available public remarks.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Strong building-level evidence for a dog park/pet area. Multiple listings independently mention it with direct phrases like "dog park located on the ground floor" and "dog park on site," which looks like more than copy-paste because the wording appears across different remarks. This is consistent with the current MLS amenities data showing DGPRK in all 4 listings.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
4 listings were provided and at least 3 explicitly mention a private lanai, which fits the patio/deck feature definition. The repeated phrasing across different remarks suggests this is a real building/unit amenity rather than an unchecked MLS assumption.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
This feature is clearly supported by multiple remarks. The building has surfboard storage via a community storage area and on-site bike/surfboard racks.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
I looked for references to a saltwater or saline pool, but none were found. Given the current building context indicates there is no pool, this feature is marked false.
In-unit laundry is supported by the MLS inclusions across all 4 current listings, with washer/dryer included every time. None of the public remarks mention laundry directly, but there is no evidence against it, so this appears to be a consistent building feature rather than a one-off agent entry.
No analysis available
I searched for language indicating that community laundry requires payment, such as coin laundry or card-operated machines. The remarks do not mention any laundry payment terms, so this feature is not supported by the public remarks.
I looked for explicit references to community laundry being available on every floor, such as 'laundry on each floor' or 'floor-by-floor laundry.' The remarks do not mention any laundry placement, so there is no evidence to support this feature.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Covered parking is clearly supported by 2 of the 4 remarks, including direct phrases like "covered parking" and "secure, gated garage." The evidence appears consistent across listings rather than a one-off copy/paste error, so this feature should be treated as present for the building.
I searched for explicit deeded-parking language such as "deeded parking," "owned stall," or "parking included in deed." The remarks only confirm assigned/covered parking, which is not enough to classify it as deeded.
No analysis available
I looked for any parking cost terms such as monthly parking fee, parking rental, or separate stall charge. The public remarks do not mention any fee, so this is unknown.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
I searched for phrases like "parking waitlist," "parking waiting list," or "join waitlist for parking." Nothing in the remarks indicates a waitlist process, so this is marked false by lack of evidence.
No analysis available
I searched for card/fob access terms such as keycard entry, fob access, or electronic card readers. The remarks indicate the building is secure, but they do not describe a card-based access system.
No analysis available
I looked for language about security patrol services, including patrol, roving security, or patrolled grounds. The remarks only mention a secure building and gated garage, with no indication of patrol service.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Window AC appears to be present in the building based on current MLS data, with 3 of 4 listings checked for ACWIUN. Public remarks only mention generic "A/C" once and do not clearly say "window AC" or "window unit," so this looks like a moderate-confidence MLS feature rather than a strongly described amenity across multiple agents.
Concrete construction is supported by the MLS data in all 4 of 4 listings. The public remarks do not explicitly mention concrete or reinforced concrete, so this is based on consistent listing data rather than agent commentary. Confidence is high from the repeated MLS material entry, but slightly below explicit-mention level because the remarks are silent.
Double wall construction appears in 3 of 4 listings via the MLS construction materials field. None of the public remarks mention 'double wall' or similar phrasing, so there is no direct corroboration from agent comments. The evidence is moderate-to-strong from MLS consistency, but not strong enough for a higher confidence without explicit remarks.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
I looked for STR indicators such as legal short-term rental, NUC, TVU, or vacation-rental language, as well as any minimum-stay rules that would clarify restrictions. The remarks contain none of these, so STR permission is not evidenced here.
I searched for hotel-pool terms like hotel rental pool, managed by hotel, Hilton pool, Trump pool, or Ritz pool. There is no indication of any hotel rental pool participation in the remarks.
I looked for language showing mandatory participation such as "required to rent," "must be in rental program," or "cannot opt out." The remarks do not mention any rental pool requirement, so this remains unconfirmed and is set to false by absence of evidence.
No analysis available
No analysis available
I looked for any reference to land tenure, leasehold status, ground lease, or an expiration year such as "lease expires 2050" or "renewed through 2075." The remarks do not mention a lease expiry date, so this is unknown.
I searched the remarks for VA approval language such as "VA approved," "VA financing," and "VA loans accepted." Nothing in the public remarks confirms VA eligibility, so this remains unverified and is marked false by absence of evidence.
The remarks directly state that the development is "100% insured," which indicates full building insurance coverage. This is strong explicit evidence, so the feature is marked true with high confidence.
Fire sprinklers appear in 2 of 4 MLS records via the FIRSPR amenity checkbox, but the public remarks do not mention sprinklers, sprinkler systems, or fire suppression anywhere. Because real estate agents often copy/paste amenity fields without verification, this is only moderate evidence and could be a data-entry inconsistency rather than a confirmed building feature.
I looked for explicit references to fire/life safety compliance, FLSE passed status, or fire safety certification and found none. With no public remark evidence, this feature cannot be verified from the listings.
Flood zone determined from official FEMA Digital Flood Insurance Rate Map (DFIRM) data using building coordinates, not from agent-reported listing data.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Multiple listings describe mountain views, including direct references to "Ko'olau Mountains" and "beautiful mountain and sunset views." The evidence appears consistent across several remarks from different listings, so this looks like a real building feature rather than copy-paste checkbox noise.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Several listings mention sunset views, including phrases like "colorful sunsets over the Ko'olau range" and "beautiful mountain and sunset views from your private lanai." The repeated language across listings makes this strong evidence that sunset views are available in the building.
No analysis available
I looked for explicit statements that units can see Friday night fireworks, such as 'fireworks view' or 'watch fireworks from the lanai.' The remarks mention mountain, marsh, sunset, and ocean-area access, but nothing about fireworks views.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Confidence levels are based on MLS checkbox data and AI analysis of listing remarks. High = strong evidence, Medium = some evidence, Low = limited or conflicting evidence. Buyers should always verify critical details independently.