Hale Mahiai
Preliminary Information – Full Audit Pending
This buildings features were determined from publicly available data, including MLS listings. While we cross-referenced additional data sources, it still likely contains incomplete or inaccurate information, as it has not yet been personally verified.
Once a building has been fully audited, this page will be replaced with an in-depth analysis featuring verified details and photos of every key feature.
Until then, we provide a data‑driven overview that blends statistical analysis of the checkbox selections agents make in MLS with an AI‑powered read of their public remarks—yielding a clearer picture of the building than raw listings alone.
If this building is important to your search, you can help prioritize it for a full audit by requesting one below. To see what a complete report looks like, check out the example full report.
Hale Mahiai
Building Overview
Hale Mahiai in Manoa — concrete building (1969) with covered, assigned parking; pets and short-term rentals not allowed.
About Hale Mahiai
Hale Mahiai is a concrete residential building located in the Manoa neighborhood, built in 1969. Specific size details such as unit count or number of floors are not provided in the available MLS records.
The building is noted as concrete construction and is situated in Manoa. No additional on-site amenities or common-area features are listed in the provided MLS data.
According to available records, parking is available, covered, and assigned. Pets are not allowed and short-term rentals are not allowed. The management company is listed as unknown in the MLS data. This summary is based on MLS data; buyers should verify all details, policies, and any fees with the listing agent or management.
Building Features & Data Confidence
All features from MLS data with AI-assisted confidence analysis. Click each category to expand and see details.
No analysis available
I searched for any owner-occupancy indicators such as a percentage, majority owner-occupied wording, or highly owner-occupied phrasing. The remarks do not include any such information, so the owner-occupancy rate remains unknown.
I looked for explicit mentions such as elevator count, multiple elevators, or any indication of lift access. Instead, the remarks repeatedly describe the building as a walk-up and reference the staircase, supporting a value of 0 elevators.
Calculated from the lowest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from the highest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from association fees observed in penthouse unit listings for this building.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Across the available listings, none explicitly say hot water is included, and the current MLS data is 0/4 for HOTWAT while 3/4 list WTRHTR. One remark specifically mentions a "newer tankless water heater," which is consistent with hot water being handled within the unit rather than by the maintenance fee.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Sewer inclusion appears consistent across all available listings: 4/4 MLS records include SEWER. The public remarks do not challenge this, so this is strong building-level evidence that sewer is covered by the maintenance fee.
Water is consistently shown as included in the association fees across all 4 listings. There are no contradictory public remarks, so this is strong evidence that water is a building-level included utility.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Strong evidence that in-unit laundry is available in this building. Two of the remarks explicitly mention it, and the current MLS data matches across all 4 listings with washer/dryer included, which suggests this is not a copy-paste error but a consistent building feature.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Parking is clearly available at this building. Evidence is strong across the listings and reinforced by remarks that mention "assigned parking" and "1-parking," not just a copied checkbox.
Assigned parking is consistently supported by both MLS data and remarks. Multiple listings reference it directly, so this appears to be a stable building feature rather than a one-off agent entry.
No analysis available
I searched for phrases like deeded parking, owned stall, or parking included in deed, but the remarks only say assigned parking. Assigned does not confirm deeded ownership, so this is left as not evidenced.
No analysis available
I looked for any parking cost details such as a monthly fee, parking rental, or additional charge, but found none. The remarks confirm parking exists, but they do not provide pricing information.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
I searched for references to a parking waitlist, parking waiting list, or joining a list for parking, and found nothing. The listing mentions assigned parking, which suggests parking is available, but not a waitlist process.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Concrete appears to be a stable building feature. The current MLS data shows 4 of 4 listings marked CONCRE, and the remarks do not suggest any different construction type. With full consistency in the listings, this is strong evidence even though the public remarks do not spell it out.
No analysis available
Hollow tile shows up in some of the listings, but not all of them: 2 of 4 current MLS entries include HOLTIL. Because the public remarks do not mention construction material, this looks like partial MLS evidence rather than explicit confirmation, so confidence is moderate.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Above-ground construction appears only once in the current MLS data, with 1 of 4 listings showing ABOGRO. Since none of the remarks mention this feature or any change in construction, the evidence is limited and may reflect inconsistent MLS entry rather than a clearly documented building characteristic.
No analysis available
No analysis available
I looked for any indication that short-term rentals are allowed, including STR, NUC, TVU, or vacation rental language, but there were no relevant remarks. With no evidence of STR permission, this is not confirmed from the public remarks.
I searched for hotel pool references such as hotel rental program, hotel-managed units, or branded pool participation, and found none. Since STR is not evidenced as allowed, hotel pool participation is also not supported by the remarks.
I looked for language suggesting a required hotel pool or mandatory rental program, but there was no such mention. There is also no evidence in the remarks that short-term rentals are allowed, so mandatory pool participation is not supported.
No analysis available
No analysis available
I looked for any reference to leasehold status, ground lease terms, or an expiration year such as 'lease expires' or 'renewed through,' but none were provided. Because there is no lease-year information in the remarks, the expiry year cannot be determined from this data.
I searched the remarks for any language indicating VA loan approval or VA financing acceptance, but found nothing. With no public mention, this remains unconfirmed and is treated as not evidenced in the listing text.
I looked for explicit insurance language that would indicate the HOA provides full walls-in coverage or comprehensive building insurance. The remarks do not mention insurance at all, so there is no evidence to support a fully insured status.
No analysis available
I searched the remarks for phrases like FLSE passed, fire/life safety evaluation passed, life safety compliant, and fire inspection references. None were found, so there is no evidence here that the building has passed this evaluation.
Flood zone determined from official FEMA Digital Flood Insurance Rate Map (DFIRM) data using building coordinates, not from agent-reported listing data.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
City views are supported by the current MLS data: 3 of 4 listings list CITY in the view description, while 1 of 4 lists NONE. There are no public remarks discussing the view, so this is based primarily on the MLS view fields and may reflect unit-specific availability rather than every unit in the building.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Confidence levels are based on MLS checkbox data and AI analysis of listing remarks. High = strong evidence, Medium = some evidence, Low = limited or conflicting evidence. Buyers should always verify critical details independently.