Hale Luana
Preliminary Information – Full Audit Pending
This buildings features were determined from publicly available data, including MLS listings. While we cross-referenced additional data sources, it still likely contains incomplete or inaccurate information, as it has not yet been personally verified.
Once a building has been fully audited, this page will be replaced with an in-depth analysis featuring verified details and photos of every key feature.
Until then, we provide a data‑driven overview that blends statistical analysis of the checkbox selections agents make in MLS with an AI‑powered read of their public remarks—yielding a clearer picture of the building than raw listings alone.
If this building is important to your search, you can help prioritize it for a full audit by requesting one below. To see what a complete report looks like, check out the example full report.
Hale Luana
Building Overview
Hale Luana in McCully-Moiliili (built 1974) — concrete construction, resident manager and window AC.
About Hale Luana
Hale Luana is a residential building located in the McCully-Moiliili neighborhood. According to available records, the building was constructed in 1974 and is of concrete construction. Unit count or square footage information is not provided in the MLS data.
Key features reported in the MLS include a resident manager and window air conditioning units. The listing data indicates pets are not allowed and short-term rentals are not permitted. The management company is listed as unknown in the available records.
Additional details from the MLS note covered parking is available. Buyers should verify parking specifics, any maintenance fees, and other building policies directly with the managing entity or listing agent. Based on MLS data, prospective purchasers should confirm all information independently before making decisions.
Building Features & Data Confidence
All features from MLS data with AI-assisted confidence analysis. Click each category to expand and see details.
No analysis available
I searched for explicit percentages or statements about owner-occupancy (such as '80% owner occupied', 'majority owner occupied', or 'highly owner occupied'). The remarks mention some tenant-occupied units (month-to-month) but do not provide an overall owner-occupancy percentage, so the numeric value is unknown.
I searched all public remarks for explicit elevator counts (e.g., '4 elevators', 'two elevators'). Multiple remarks confirm secure/key-fob/keyed elevator access, but no listing provides a numeric count. Without an explicit number in the remarks, I cannot infer or change a numeric value.
Calculated from the lowest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from the highest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from association fees observed in penthouse unit listings for this building.
No analysis available
No analysis available
12 of 13 current MLS listings list OTCOEX in association_fee_includes, indicating common-area electricity is included. None of the public remarks explicitly state 'common area electricity' or similar phrasing, so the MLS checkbox appears to be an implied but consistent indication across agents rather than explicitly called out in remarks.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
All 13 current MLS listings list SEWER in association_fee_includes, strongly suggesting sewer is included in maintenance fees. However, none of the public remarks explicitly say 'sewer included' or similar, so the evidence is MLS-checkbox consistency rather than explicit agent remarks.
All 13 current MLS listings list WATER in association_fee_includes, indicating water is included in maintenance fees. There are no explicit mentions in the public remarks (e.g., 'water included'), so this determination relies on consistent MLS checkbox entries rather than confirmatory language in agent remarks.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Multiple sources indicate building storage is available: 9/13 current listings have the storage amenity checked and 3/13 show storage in unit features. Public remarks explicitly state 'extra storage' and 'assigned storage' in several separate listings (e.g., 'extra storage' and 'assigned storage in Hale Luana'), providing corroborating evidence across agents rather than a single copy/paste instance.
I looked for phrases such as 'surfboard storage', 'board storage', and 'surf storage' but found no explicit references. While assigned storage is noted, there is no indication that surfboard-specific storage is provided.
No analysis available
12 out of 13 current MLS listings list TRACHU in amenities, indicating the building likely has a trash/garbage chute. None of the provided public remarks mention 'trash chute', 'garbage chute', or similar terms, suggesting agents may have copy/pasted the amenity box without elaboration. Because the checkbox prevalence is strong across multiple listings but remarks do not explicitly confirm installation or use, inclusion is implied rather than explicitly verified.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
The building context indicates there is no pool, and the public remarks provide no references to a pool or to a salt/saline pool. Given no pool exists, a saltwater pool is not present.
The MLS checkbox shows WASHER/DRYER in all 13 listings and at least 7 separate public remarks explicitly state in-unit laundry (phrases include 'in-unit washer/dryer', 'washer and dryer in unit', and 'washer/dryer'). Evidence is consistent across multiple agents and matches the MLS inclusions, supporting a high confidence that some units in the building have in-unit laundry.
No analysis available
I searched for terms such as 'coin laundry', 'paid laundry', 'card operated', and 'quarters' and found no references. Remarks repeatedly state the unit has its own washer/dryer, and there is no indication of community paid laundry.
I searched the remarks for phrases like 'laundry on each floor', 'laundry room on every floor', and 'floor-by-floor laundry' but found none. Listings repeatedly emphasize an in-unit washer/dryer, indicating laundry is provided in units rather than community facilities on each floor.
No analysis available
Multiple agent remarks consistently mention assigned/dedicated parking stalls (e.g., 'dedicated parking stall in a secured garage', 'Includes 1 assigned parking stall', 'comes with an assigned, secured parking stall'). The MLS checkbox is set for 9 of 13 listings and the remarks corroborate assigned parking across many independent listings, indicating strong, building-level availability of assigned parking.
No analysis available
Listings repeatedly mention 'assigned parking stall', 'dedicated parking stall', and 'secured/covered parking', which indicates designated stalls but not explicit deeded ownership. No remark uses 'deeded', 'owned', or 'included in deed', so parking_deeded is set false with medium confidence.
No analysis available
I looked for phrases like 'monthly parking fee', 'parking rental', or specific dollar amounts for parking and found none. Because there is no information about any parking fee, the value is unknown (null) with low confidence.
Guest/visitor parking is repeatedly mentioned in the remarks (e.g., 'guest parking', '6 guest parking total', 'guest stalls out front', 'additional guest parking'), and 8 of 13 MLS records have the GUEST checkbox set. The consistent language across multiple listings supports a high-confidence conclusion that the building offers guest parking.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
I searched for 'parking waitlist', 'waiting list', or similar language and found no references. In absence of any mention across listings, parking_waitlist is set to false with medium confidence.
No analysis available
Public remarks repeatedly mention key-fob/fob-activated access and keyed elevator access, clearly indicating electronic card/fob entry systems are in use for building access.
No analysis available
I searched the remarks for terms like 'security patrol', 'roving security', and 'patrolled building' and found none. The listings emphasize gated entry, cameras, and an on-site resident manager but do not describe a security patrol service.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
All 13 current MLS listings list concrete construction (13/13 CONCRE). None of the public remarks explicitly state 'concrete' or 'reinforced concrete', so confirmation is implied from unanimous MLS checkbox across agents rather than explicit agent remarks. Evidence is consistent across listings but not explicitly described in the remarks, so confidence is moderate (implied).
Five of 13 MLS records list double-wall construction (5/13 DOUWAL), but 0/13 public remarks mention 'double wall' or similar phrasing. Given the lack of any remark-level confirmation and the likelihood of copy/paste MLS checkbox errors, the feature is omitted for the building with high confidence.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
I looked for explicit STR-permitting language and found none in any listing. Given no evidence permitting short-term rentals, str_allowed is set to false with medium confidence. Per rules, downstream STR pool fields are also set false.
I searched the remarks for 'hotel rental pool', 'hotel rental program', or hotel-managed rental language and found none. Because STR is not shown as allowed, str_hotel_pool is false with medium confidence.
I looked for wording such as 'mandatory hotel pool' or 'required to participate' and found none. As STR is not indicated as allowed, str_mandatory_pool is false with medium confidence.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Multiple remarks explicitly call this a 'Leasehold apartment' and reference lease/leased fee availability (e.g., 'A must see Leasehold apartment' and 'Leased Fee interest available for purchase'), but no specific lease expiration year (4-digit) or renewal year is stated in any public remarks. Because no year is present, the lease expiry is unknown (null).
I searched the public remarks for explicit VA financing language (e.g., 'VA approved', 'VA loans accepted') and found none. With no evidence in any listing, VA approval is set to false with medium confidence.
Multiple remarks explicitly state '100% Hurricane insurance covered,' indicating comprehensive building insurance (walls-in/full coverage) provided by the HOA. Because the coverage is directly mentioned in the public remarks, this is reported true with high confidence.
No analysis available
I searched the remarks for phrases indicating the building passed a fire/life safety evaluation (FLSE) or related certifications. There are no references to any fire/life safety evaluation or certification in the public remarks, so this feature is set to false with medium confidence due to lack of evidence.
Flood zone determined from official FEMA Digital Flood Insurance Rate Map (DFIRM) data using building coordinates, not from agent-reported listing data.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Multiple unit remarks explicitly mention mountain or mauka views (examples: "panoramic city and mountain views", "mountain and city views", "cool breezes coming off the mountains"). While only 2/13 CURRENT MLS entries list MOUNTA, the repeated explicit language across different listings indicates some units offer mountain views. Evidence is strong across multiple agent listings and appears consistent rather than a single copy/paste error.
CURRENT MLS shows 3/13 listings with Diamond Head (DIAHEA) in view_descriptions, but the compiled public remarks contain no explicit "Diamond Head" references. Because some MLS entries claim Diamond Head views, the building appears to offer units with Diamond Head views; however, the lack of corroborating remarks yields moderate confidence and suggests agents may have used checklist entries without emphasizing it in remarks.
City views are widely documented: 8/13 CURRENT MLS entries list CITY, and many remarks state "city views", "view of Honolulu City", "city and mountain views", and "unobstructed views of Honolulu City". The evidence is strong and consistent across many listings and agents.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No MLS listings (0/13) list sunrise and none of the public remarks mention "sunrise", "morning sun", or eastern exposure. There is strong evidence the building is not marketed as having sunrise views, so the feature is omitted with high confidence.
Sunset views are referenced several times in the remarks (examples: "heart warming sunsets", "Enjoy the sunset and city views", "Enjoy watching fireworks") and 4/13 CURRENT MLS entries list SUNSET. The combined MLS checkbox presence and explicit agent remarks across listings provide strong evidence that some units offer sunset/western views.
No analysis available
Multiple public remarks explicitly state residents can 'Enjoy watching fireworks' from the unit/lanai, which directly indicates a fireworks view from the building. This is clear, direct language in the listings.
No analysis available
No analysis available
10 of 13 current MLS listings have the RESMAN amenity checked and at least 5–6 separate public remarks explicitly mention an on-site or resident manager (e.g., 'dedicated on-site resident manager', 'support of an on-site resident manager', 'on-site resident manager'). Evidence is consistent across multiple listings and agents rather than isolated, so the building is very likely to have a resident manager on-site.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Confidence levels are based on MLS checkbox data and AI analysis of listing remarks. High = strong evidence, Medium = some evidence, Low = limited or conflicting evidence. Buyers should always verify critical details independently.