Haiku Point 2
Preliminary Information – Full Audit Pending
This buildings features were determined from publicly available data, including MLS listings. While we cross-referenced additional data sources, it still likely contains incomplete or inaccurate information, as it has not yet been personally verified.
Once a building has been fully audited, this page will be replaced with an in-depth analysis featuring verified details and photos of every key feature.
Until then, we provide a data‑driven overview that blends statistical analysis of the checkbox selections agents make in MLS with an AI‑powered read of their public remarks—yielding a clearer picture of the building than raw listings alone.
If this building is important to your search, you can help prioritize it for a full audit by requesting one below. To see what a complete report looks like, check out the example full report.
Haiku Point 2
Building Overview
Haiku Point 2 in Kaneohe (built 1988). Pets and short-term rentals are not allowed, management company unknown.
About Haiku Point 2
Haiku Point 2 is located in the Kaneohe neighborhood and was built in 1988. Based on MLS data, specific building size and construction type are not provided in the available records.
Key policies listed for the building include no pets and no short-term rentals. The MLS listing does not include other amenity details or common area descriptions; no management company information is provided in the available data.
Additional details such as parking arrangements, maintenance fees, and other building rules are not specified in the MLS-derived data. Buyers should verify all building features, policies, and fees with the listing agent or management prior to making any decisions; this summary is based solely on the MLS information available.
Building Features & Data Confidence
All features from MLS data with AI-assisted confidence analysis. Click each category to expand and see details.
No analysis available
I searched for owner-occupancy clues such as "80% owner occupied," "majority owner occupied," or similar qualitative/percentage indicators and found none. The remarks do mention owner-occupants and investors as target buyers, but that does not indicate the actual occupancy percentage.
I searched the public remarks for explicit elevator references such as "4 elevators," "multiple elevators," or similar wording and found none. Nothing in the listings confirms whether the building has elevators, so this remains unknown from remarks alone.
Calculated from the lowest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from the highest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from association fees observed in penthouse unit listings for this building.
No analysis available
Cable TV inclusion is strongly supported for Haiku Point/Haiku Point 2. At least two current remarks directly state the HOA fee includes cable or basic cable TV, and the MLS data shows CABTV in 15 of 20 listings. This looks consistent across multiple agents rather than a one-off copy-paste error.
There is no clear public-remark support for common area electricity in these listings. Although the current MLS data shows OTCOEX in 11 of 20 listings, none of the remarks explicitly describe common electrical costs being included, so this appears to be unverified/possibly copy-paste data.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Hot water is not supported for this building. The MLS data shows 0/20 listings with HOTWAT and 18/20 with WTRHTR, and the remarks repeatedly reference unit water heaters or replacement of a water heater instead of building-provided hot water. That pattern strongly points to false for hot-water inclusion.
At least two or more public remarks explicitly state 'internet included' or 'cable/internet' as part of the HOA fee (e.g., 'HOA fee includes cable TV, internet, water, sewer, trash'). Combined with 7 of 20 MLS checkboxes, this provides solid evidence that internet is included for some units.
No analysis available
Sewer inclusion is very strongly supported. One current listing explicitly says the HOA fee covers sewer, and the MLS history shows SEWER in 19 of 20 listings. This is consistent enough to treat as a standard building expense.
Water inclusion is clearly supported for this building. One current remark directly says the HOA fee covers water, and the MLS data shows WATER in 19 of 20 listings. The evidence is consistent and high confidence.
BBQ is directly supported by several remarks, including phrases like "community clubhouse and BBQ area" and "BBQ area". The feature appears in multiple listings, alongside current MLS checkbox support in 13 of 20 listings, so this looks like a real shared amenity.
No analysis available
No analysis available
The feature is directly supported by remarks, including "a car wash area" and "car wash station." Even though the MLS checkbox appears in only 3/20 listings, the public remarks repeatedly confirm the amenity, so it should be included.
Clubhouse is strongly supported across the listing set. Multiple remarks explicitly say "community clubhouse" or list "Clubhouse" among the amenities, and the current MLS data shows 16 of 20 listings checked for it, indicating a consistent building-level feature.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
At least 16 separate listings' public remarks explicitly mention a lanai/patio/balcony (phrases quoted include “private lanai,” “spacious patio,” “private balcony,” and “enclosed courtyard”). CURRENT MLS amenity checkboxes show 6/20 listings marked PATDEC/COVPAT, and multiple agents’ remarks independently describe outdoor living spaces, indicating the building does offer patios/decks as a common amenity rather than being a single-unit anomaly.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
There is direct evidence of a shared recreation area in the current listing set, including an explicit remark stating "Amenities include a Clubhouse, BBQ area, Recreation Area, and Resident Manager." This is consistent with prior high confidence, and the amenity appears to be a building-level feature rather than a unit-only perk.
CURRENT MLS amenities show RECROO checked in 5/20 listings. At least one listing explicitly states: "Amenities include a Clubhouse, BBQ area, Recreation Area, and Resident Manager." Several other listings mention a clubhouse/BBQ area but do not use the exact phrasing "recreation room." Evidence indicates the building likely offers a shared recreation area but the mentions are limited and could be copy-paste, so confidence is moderate.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Storage is strongly supported across multiple listings for Haiku Point/Haiku Point 2. At least 5+ remarks explicitly mention storage, including 'enclosed extra storage area also located on lanai,' 'storage locker in the lanai area,' and 'extra storage closet on the large lanai.' This appears to be a real building/unit feature rather than copied MLS noise, and it aligns with the prior MLS storage checkboxes.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Strong evidence that Haiku Point / Haiku Point 2 offers in-unit laundry. Current MLS data shows 19/20 listings with washer/dryer included, and numerous remarks explicitly mention features like "in-unit washer/dryer," "full size washer and dryer," and "washer and dryer in the unit." The consistency across many listings and agents indicates this is a real building feature rather than an MLS copy-paste error.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Parking is clearly offered building-wide. Across the provided remarks, many listings mention "2 parking stalls," "1 assigned parking stall," "1 parking space," or "covered parking stall," with no contrary evidence. The consistency across multiple listings suggests this is not a copy-paste error but a real building feature.
Assigned parking is strongly supported across many listings for Haiku Point 2. Multiple remarks explicitly mention "assigned parking stall," "dedicated parking stall," "1 assigned parking stall," and "2 assigned covered parking stalls," indicating this is not a one-off or copy-paste error. Evidence is consistent across many agents and listing types, so this feature should remain included.
Covered parking is very strongly confirmed by both MLS fields and remarks. Multiple listings explicitly reference covered parking, including 'covered parking stall near apartment,' 'one covered parking stall,' and '2 covered parking stalls,' showing this is a building-level feature available to buyers.
I searched for explicit deeded-parking wording like 'deeded parking,' 'owned stall,' or 'parking included in deed' and found none. The listings consistently describe assigned or dedicated stalls, which suggests parking is included but not explicitly deeded.
No analysis available
I looked for parking fee language, including monthly parking charges or rented stalls, and found nothing. The remarks emphasize included assigned or covered parking, with no separate parking cost mentioned.
Guest parking is well supported by both the MLS data and current remarks for Haiku Point 2. Several listings directly state "guest parking," "guest parking stalls for guests located close to unit," and "ample guest parking throughout the property," which suggests a shared building amenity rather than an isolated agent note. The repeated mentions across multiple listings make this feature reliable to include.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
I searched for references to a parking waitlist, join-a-waitlist language, or parking shortages requiring a queue. The remarks instead describe included parking stalls and guest parking, with no waitlist mentioned.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Window AC is very strongly supported for this building. At least 5+ current listings explicitly mention it, with phrases like 'new window A/C unit,' 'Window AC in each room,' and '2 Window A/C,' spanning different units and agents. This aligns with the historical MLS pattern (19/20 listings), so the feature appears consistently present rather than a copy-paste error.
No analysis available
Double wall construction is supported by a strong MLS majority, with 16 of 20 listings marked DOUWAL. The remarks across listings are silent on construction specifics, which suggests this is stable building data rather than copied marketing language about a recent change.
No analysis available
Masonry/stucco is not supported by the remarks, which repeatedly focus on unit updates, views, parking, and community amenities rather than construction type. With only 4 of 20 listings checking MASSTU and no explicit corroboration, the evidence points to this being an unreliable MLS checkbox rather than a confirmed building feature.
No analysis available
Concrete slab foundation is not supported by the current remarks and has very weak MLS backing, with only 3 of 20 listings marked SLAB. Because there is no explicit mention of a slab or solid concrete foundation across the remarks, this is best treated as a correction to false MLS data rather than a confirmed feature.
No analysis available
Wood-frame construction is strongly supported by the MLS pattern, with 19 of 20 current listings marked WOOFRA. None of the public remarks suggest a different construction type, and the consistency across listings looks like building-level data rather than a one-off agent error.
Above-ground construction is only weakly supported by the MLS pattern, appearing in 6 of 20 listings. The public remarks mention both ground-floor and second-floor units, which fits a multi-level above-ground structure, but there is no explicit statement that the building itself is above-ground constructed.
No analysis available
No analysis available
I reviewed the remarks for affirmative STR indicators such as 'short-term rental allowed,' 'STR permitted,' 'NUC,' or 'TVU' and found none. There is also no hotel-rental or vacation-rental language, so the remarks do not support STR allowance.
I searched for hotel pool terminology like hotel rental program, hotel-managed units, or branded rental pools and found nothing. Since STR itself is not supported by the remarks, hotel-pool participation is also not indicated.
I looked for phrases such as mandatory pool participation, required rental program, or cannot opt out and found none. With no evidence of any hotel or STR program, there is also no basis for a mandatory pool requirement.
No analysis available
No analysis available
I looked for leasehold language such as a lease end date, ground lease term, or renewal year, but found none. The explicit 'Fee simple' wording points away from leasehold ownership, so there is no lease expiry year to extract.
I searched the public remarks for VA-specific financing language and found none. The listings discuss fee simple ownership, parking, amenities, and fees, but nothing indicating VA loan approval.
The remarks explicitly say the project has "100% Hurricane Insurance Coverage," which is strong evidence that the building is fully insured. This is a direct, high-confidence match to the fully insured/walls-in coverage concept.
No analysis available
I looked for fire/life safety evaluation language such as FLSE passed, fire safety certified, life safety compliant, or passed fire inspection, and found no such references. Because there is no explicit confirmation in the remarks, this is treated as not evidenced from the listing text.
Flood zone determined from official FEMA Digital Flood Insurance Rate Map (DFIRM) data using building coordinates, not from agent-reported listing data.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Strong, repeated evidence supports mountain views in this building. At least 8-10 listings in the current remarks mention 'Ko'olau,' 'Koolau,' 'mountain views,' or similar phrases, often from different listing descriptions and units. This appears consistent across multiple agents, not just copy-paste MLS checkbox data.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Garden-view evidence appears in a meaningful subset of listings: 10/20 current MLS view descriptions include GARDEN, while a few others show NONE. Public remarks repeatedly describe 'garden views,' 'courtyard,' 'lush greenery,' 'tropical garden settings,' and units overlooking green areas, indicating the building offers some garden-view units. The evidence is spread across multiple listings and agents, so this looks like a genuine feature rather than isolated MLS copying.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Resident manager is strongly supported for this building. Current public remarks explicitly mention it in multiple listings, and the MLS checkbox history shows it on 17/20 listings, which suggests this is a real building-level amenity rather than a copy-paste error. The evidence is consistent across agents and aligns with the prior high-confidence classification.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Confidence levels are based on MLS checkbox data and AI analysis of listing remarks. High = strong evidence, Medium = some evidence, Low = limited or conflicting evidence. Buyers should always verify critical details independently.