Fountains at Makiki
Preliminary Information – Full Audit Pending
This buildings features were determined from publicly available data, including MLS listings. While we cross-referenced additional data sources, it still likely contains incomplete or inaccurate information, as it has not yet been personally verified.
Once a building has been fully audited, this page will be replaced with an in-depth analysis featuring verified details and photos of every key feature.
Until then, we provide a data‑driven overview that blends statistical analysis of the checkbox selections agents make in MLS with an AI‑powered read of their public remarks—yielding a clearer picture of the building than raw listings alone.
If this building is important to your search, you can help prioritize it for a full audit by requesting one below. To see what a complete report looks like, check out the example full report.
Fountains at Makiki
Building Overview
Fountains at Makiki in Makiki-Tantalus (1991). Pets and short-term rentals not allowed; management company unknown.
About Fountains at Makiki
Based on MLS data, Fountains at Makiki is a residential building located in the Makiki-Tantalus neighborhood, built in 1991. MLS records provided do not specify building size (number of units or floors) or construction type, so those details are currently unavailable in the listing data.
According to available records, the building's stated policies include no pets allowed and no short-term rentals permitted. The management company is listed as unknown in the MLS, and no additional amenities (such as pool, gym, or concierge) are specified in the provided data.
Parking, maintenance fees, exact unit mix, and other building policies are not detailed in the MLS information provided. Buyers and agents should verify parking availability, monthly association fees, management contact, and any other material facts with the listing agent or association prior to making decisions. This summary is based on MLS data and does not replace direct verification of building information.
Building Features & Data Confidence
All features from MLS data with AI-assisted confidence analysis. Click each category to expand and see details.
No analysis available
I looked for explicit owner-occupancy language such as a percentage, "majority owner occupied," or "highly owner occupied." The remarks do not include any such information, so the owner-occupancy rate is unknown.
I searched the remarks for explicit elevator counts such as "4 elevators," "multiple elevators," or similar wording. The listings only reference an elevator in passing, so the building clearly has elevator service but the count is not stated.
Calculated from the lowest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from the highest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from association fees observed in penthouse unit listings for this building.
No analysis available
Cable inclusion is directly confirmed in the public remarks, with at least 2 listings explicitly saying "Internet & basic cable included in maintenance fee." The repeated wording across listings suggests this is not a one-off copy-paste error and supports inclusion with very high confidence.
There is not enough support to treat common-area electricity as a confirmed included fee. The current MLS signal is only 4/7, and the remarks do not corroborate it, so this appears more likely to be inconsistent checkbox data than a verified building feature.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Internet inclusion is clearly supported by the remarks, with at least 2 listings using the same explicit phrase. Because the statement is repeated and specific, confidence is very high that the HOA/maintenance fee includes internet.
No analysis available
Sewer appears to be included in the maintenance fee based on the MLS pattern: 6 of 7 listings check SEWER. While the public remarks are silent, the majority of recent listings make this a strong building-level feature.
Water is strongly suggested by the MLS data, with 6 out of 7 listings including WATER in the fee breakdown. The public remarks do not mention water directly, but the repeated MLS pattern supports treating it as included.
BBQ is strongly supported: all 7 public remarks reference it directly, with phrases like 'BBQ area' and 'BBQ'. This appears consistent across multiple agents and is not just a single copy-paste mention.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Recreation room is clearly present in the building amenities. Multiple listings describe a 'recreation room' or 'recreational room,' and one also adds 'game room' and 'media room,' reinforcing that this is a real shared amenity.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Sauna is very strongly confirmed by the remarks. Listings repeatedly mention 'sauna,' including explicit wording such as 'men & women’s sauna' and 'separate men and women Saunas,' showing consistent cross-listing support.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Trash chute is not supported by the public remarks provided. With only 2 of 7 listings showing the amenity in MLS and no remarks referencing a 'trash chute,' 'garbage chute,' or similar, this appears to be a weak MLS checkbox signal rather than confirmed building amenity.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
The pool is confirmed by many listings: remarks say "resort-style amenities including a swimming pool," "full suite of amenities, including a pool," and "Private Pool area." This appears consistently across multiple agents and descriptions, so the evidence is very strong that the building offers a shared pool amenity.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Covered parking is strongly supported across the listings. At least 5 remarks explicitly mention '2 covered parking stalls,' 'secured garage parking,' or 'gated garage,' and the current MLS data shows covered/garage parking in 6 of 7 listings. This looks consistent across multiple agents rather than a one-off copy/paste issue.
I searched for explicit wording like deeded parking, owned stall, or parking included in deed and found none. The listings only confirm that parking exists, not that it is deeded.
No analysis available
I looked for any reference to a parking fee or monthly parking charge, but nothing was stated in the listings. Without explicit mention, the parking fee cannot be determined from these remarks.
Guest parking is clearly present at the building. Several listings explicitly mention 'guest parking,' including one that states '8 guest parking stall,' and the current MLS data shows GUEST in 6 of 7 listings. The evidence is consistent across multiple remarks and appears reliable.
Secured entry for parking/building access is supported by repeated remarks describing a 'secure, gated community' and 'gated entry,' plus 'secured garage parking.' While the MLS checkbox appears in only 4 of 7 listings, the explicit wording across multiple remarks makes this feature highly credible.
No analysis available
No analysis available
I searched for parking waitlist language such as join the waitlist or parking waiting list and found none. The listings only describe available parking stalls and guest parking.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Strong evidence that the building offers split AC: 7/7 current MLS listings include ACSPL, and at least 2 remarks explicitly say "split A/C" or "Split A/C system." The remarks appear consistent across listings rather than a one-off copy/paste error, so this feature should be included.
No analysis available
The building is very likely concrete construction. Current MLS data is unanimous: 7 out of 7 listings show CONCRE in construction_materials, which is strong direct evidence. None of the public remarks contradict this, and the repeated copy-paste-style listings appear to be about unit details rather than changing the building's construction type.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
I looked for terms like short-term rental allowed, STR permitted, legal vacation rental, NUC, or TVU, but found no supporting language. Because the remarks are silent on STR rights, I cannot confirm that short-term rentals are allowed.
I searched for hotel pool language such as hotel rental pool, managed by hotel, or brand-specific rental programs and found nothing. Since STR is not established from the remarks, hotel-pool participation is not supported.
I looked for wording indicating mandatory participation in a rental pool, but the listings contain no such statements. There is also no evidence of any hotel or short-term rental program from the public remarks.
No analysis available
No analysis available
I looked for leasehold language such as lease expires, ground lease, or lease renewal years, but the listings identify the property as fee simple. That means there is no land lease expiry to extract.
I searched the remarks for any VA-related language such as VA approved or VA financing, but found none. With no public mention, I cannot confirm VA loan eligibility from the listings.
I searched for terms like fully insured, full insurance, walls-in coverage, and comprehensive building insurance. The remarks only mention hurricane coverage, so there is not enough evidence to conclude the HOA provides full walls-in insurance.
No analysis available
I looked for any explicit references to fire/life safety evaluation passed, FLSE, or related compliance language. Nothing in the public remarks mentions this, so there is no evidence to mark it as passed.
Flood zone determined from official FEMA Digital Flood Insurance Rate Map (DFIRM) data using building coordinates, not from agent-reported listing data.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Sunset views appear in 2 of 7 current listings, while 3 of 7 explicitly show NONE in view_descriptions. There are no remark-level mentions of sunset, western exposure, or evening sun, so this looks like unit-dependent MLS view data rather than a building-wide guarantee. Still, because some units do have SUNSET views, the feature should be included for buyers searching for sunset-view units.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Resident manager is strongly supported: 5 of 7 MLS listings show RESMAN, and multiple public remarks explicitly mention an "on-site resident manager." The wording is repeated by different listings/agents, making this a high-confidence building feature.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Confidence levels are based on MLS checkbox data and AI analysis of listing remarks. High = strong evidence, Medium = some evidence, Low = limited or conflicting evidence. Buyers should always verify critical details independently.