Ewalani Village
Preliminary Information – Full Audit Pending
This buildings features were determined from publicly available data, including MLS listings. While we cross-referenced additional data sources, it still likely contains incomplete or inaccurate information, as it has not yet been personally verified.
Once a building has been fully audited, this page will be replaced with an in-depth analysis featuring verified details and photos of every key feature.
Until then, we provide a data‑driven overview that blends statistical analysis of the checkbox selections agents make in MLS with an AI‑powered read of their public remarks—yielding a clearer picture of the building than raw listings alone.
If this building is important to your search, you can help prioritize it for a full audit by requesting one below. To see what a complete report looks like, check out the example full report.
Ewalani Village
Building Overview
Ewalani Village in Ewa, built 1974; pets not allowed and short-term rentals prohibited per MLS.
About Ewalani Village
Ewalani Village is a condominium property located in the Ewa neighborhood. According to available records, the building was constructed in 1974. Size (number of units, square footage) and construction type are not specified in the MLS data provided.
Key policies recorded in the MLS indicate that pets are not allowed and short-term rentals are not permitted at Ewalani Village. The management company is listed as unknown in the available MLS information. No specific common-area amenities or unit-level features are detailed in the provided data.
Information on parking, maintenance fees, assessments, leasing rules, or other community policies is not included in the MLS excerpt supplied. Based on MLS data, prospective buyers should verify current rules, management details, fees, and physical characteristics with the listing agent or association documents before making decisions.
Building Features & Data Confidence
All features from MLS data with AI-assisted confidence analysis. Click each category to expand and see details.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
I searched for explicit percentages such as "80% owner occupied" and descriptions such as "majority owner occupied" or "highly owner occupied." No owner-occupancy information was provided, and no current percentage is available to retain.
I searched for explicit counts such as "4 elevators" or "four elevators," as well as general terms such as "elevator" and "multiple elevators." No mentions were found, and no current numeric value is available to retain.
Calculated from the lowest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from the highest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from association fees observed in penthouse unit listings for this building.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Common-area electricity is supported by the MLS inclusion code OTCOEX in 13 of 15 listings. Although the public remarks do not explicitly quote common-area electricity, the repeated checkbox evidence across most listings is strong and consistent with the prior high-confidence assessment.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
There are no listings mentioning or checking HOTWAT, and 8 of 15 listings identify WTRHTR. Remarks provide no support for included hot water; one states that utilities are the owner's responsibility and another specifies only water/sewer in other fees, strongly supporting that hot water is not included.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
At least 6 of the 15 current remarks explicitly mention patio or lanai features, including “front and back patios,” “fully enclosed lanai,” “fenced in patio,” “gated patio area,” and “private lanai.” Although some remarks appear duplicated or copied across listings, the feature is also described by multiple listing records and is consistent with the historically high confidence and current MLS amenity data.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Strong evidence the building offers private yard space. At least 5 listings explicitly mention it, including 'private gated yard,' 'fully fenced in' front and back patios, and 'fenced in patio' / 'gated patio area.' The repeated references across multiple remarks support the feature despite only 2/14 current MLS amenities showing PRIYAR.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Evidence from the MLS and remarks supports that some units have in-unit laundry: 7 of 11 current MLS listings list WASHER/DRYER in inclusions and at least three remarks explicitly state 'in-unit washer and dryer' or 'Full size washer and dryer included'. Mentions appear across multiple listings/agents rather than being limited to a single copy-paste, so the building should be listed as offering in-unit laundry.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Parking is strongly confirmed across the building: all 15 listings contain parking-related MLS features, and multiple remarks from different listings describe parking stalls or open parking. Examples include two stalls at the back entry, a stall directly in front of the unit, and two open side-by-side spaces.
Assigned parking is strongly supported by both MLS data and repeated remarks from multiple listings. At least five current remarks explicitly mention assigned or directly designated stalls, including two assigned spaces, two stalls behind the home, and a stall directly in front of the unit.
10 listings reviewed: 0/10 public remarks describe covered parking, garages, carports, or enclosed stalls. Multiple remarks explicitly state assigned or open stalls—examples: 'assigned parking for two vehicles', 'parking stall is located directly in front of the unit', 'TWO open parking side by side in front'. Only 1/10 MLS entries checked a covered-parking box, suggesting a likely checkbox error rather than building-level covered parking.
Multiple listings describe assigned, open, or directly located parking stalls, including two stalls behind or in front of units. None states that the parking is deeded, owned, included in the deed, or separately conveyed with the unit.
No analysis available
The remarks do not state a monthly parking fee, parking rental charge, or additional cost for parking. Parking is described as assigned or available without a stated fee.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
The remarks do not mention a parking waitlist, waiting list, or a process for joining one. They describe assigned or open parking but provide no waitlist information.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
0 of 10 remarks mention 'central air' or 'central AC'; 2 listings explicitly state 'Split AC' (unit-level). MLS checkbox appears in only 1/10 listings, suggesting a data-entry error rather than a building-wide central system. Evidence indicates the building does not offer central air conditioning to units.
No analysis available
Two of the 11 current listings include the ACWIUN inclusion (indicating window/wall AC units). None of the public remarks explicitly state 'window AC', 'window unit', or 'wall AC' (remarks instead reference 'Split AC' in a couple units), so the feature is indicated by MLS checkbox entries for some units but not corroborated in agent remarks.
0 of 15 listings mention concrete or reinforced concrete. The 8/15 MLS checkbox count is not supported by agent remarks and conflicts with the previously Low-confidence assessment, so the feature is excluded as an apparent MLS-data artifact.
No analysis available
No analysis available
0 of 15 listings mention masonry or stucco. The current 7/15 checkbox pattern is mixed and unsupported by remarks, suggesting copied or unverified MLS construction data rather than reliable confirmation.
No analysis available
Five of the ten current MLS listings for this building have 'SLAB' checked in construction materials, but none of the public remarks include phrases like 'concrete slab' or 'solid concrete foundation.' The evidence is mixed (multiple listings show the checkbox) but uncorroborated by agent remarks, so inclusion is tentative and should be verified with owner/site visit.
No analysis available
Across the provided public remarks, 0 listings explicitly mention wood frame construction. The only evidence is weak current MLS checkbox activity (2/14 listings), which is not reinforced by agent remarks and is likely copy-paste noise. Based on the absence of supporting remarks, this feature should be treated as not confirmed for the building.
0 of 15 listings mention above-ground construction. The sparse 2/15 MLS checkbox presence has no supporting remarks and is treated as unverified rather than evidence that the building offers this feature.
No analysis available
No analysis available
The remarks do not mention short-term rentals, vacation rentals, STR permits, NUCs, TVUs, or legal transient rentals. Although one listing says to 'Rent out one side,' this describes potential long-term or unspecified rental use and does not establish short-term rental permission.
The remarks contain no reference to a hotel rental pool, hotel management, branded rental program, or participation in hotel operations. Because short-term rental allowance is not established, this feature is also false under the prerequisite rule.
The remarks do not state that owners must participate in a rental program, cannot opt out, or are required to place units in a hotel pool. Because short-term rental allowance is not established, mandatory pool participation must also be false.
No analysis available
No analysis available
The remarks contain no leasehold, ground lease, lease expiration, or renewal language. No specific four-digit lease-expiry year can be extracted.
The remarks do not mention VA approval, VA financing, or acceptance of VA loans. Therefore, there is no public-remarks evidence that the building is VA loan approved.
I searched for terms such as "fully insured," "full insurance," "fully covered insurance," "comprehensive building insurance," and "walls-in coverage." No insurance coverage language was found in the remarks.
No analysis available
I searched for phrases including "fire life safety evaluation passed," "FLSE passed," "fire safety certified," "life safety compliant," and "passed fire inspection." None appeared in the public remarks, so this feature is not evidenced.
Flood zone determined from official FEMA Digital Flood Insurance Rate Map (DFIRM) data using building coordinates, not from agent-reported listing data.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Two of 15 current listings identify GARDEN in the view data, but most listings (11 of 15) state NONE. Remarks do not provide clear, repeated confirmation of garden views; the closest phrase is "private garden spaces," which describes patio use rather than an existing view.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No listings (0 of 12) mention 'sunset' or western/exposure language and 4 listings explicitly list View=NONE. None of the public remarks reference 'sunset view', 'evening sun', or similar phrases, suggesting the feature is not present rather than omitted by agents. Given the MLS checkbox data and absence of any supporting remarks across multiple listings, we conclude view_sunset = FALSE with high confidence.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Zero of 15 listings explicitly mention a resident manager or on-site management. RESMAN appears in 6 of 15 MLS amenity records, but the lack of confirmation across multiple agents and the historically weak evidence make the checkbox data unreliable; the feature is omitted.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Confidence levels are based on MLS checkbox data and AI analysis of listing remarks. High = strong evidence, Medium = some evidence, Low = limited or conflicting evidence. Buyers should always verify critical details independently.