Ewalani Village
Preliminary Information – Full Audit Pending
This buildings features were determined from publicly available data, including MLS listings. While we cross-referenced additional data sources, it still likely contains incomplete or inaccurate information, as it has not yet been personally verified.
Once a building has been fully audited, this page will be replaced with an in-depth analysis featuring verified details and photos of every key feature.
Until then, we provide a data‑driven overview that blends statistical analysis of the checkbox selections agents make in MLS with an AI‑powered read of their public remarks—yielding a clearer picture of the building than raw listings alone.
If this building is important to your search, you can help prioritize it for a full audit by requesting one below. To see what a complete report looks like, check out the example full report.
Ewalani Village
Building Overview
Ewalani Village in Ewa, built 1974; pets not allowed and short-term rentals prohibited per MLS.
About Ewalani Village
Ewalani Village is a condominium property located in the Ewa neighborhood. According to available records, the building was constructed in 1974. Size (number of units, square footage) and construction type are not specified in the MLS data provided.
Key policies recorded in the MLS indicate that pets are not allowed and short-term rentals are not permitted at Ewalani Village. The management company is listed as unknown in the available MLS information. No specific common-area amenities or unit-level features are detailed in the provided data.
Information on parking, maintenance fees, assessments, leasing rules, or other community policies is not included in the MLS excerpt supplied. Based on MLS data, prospective buyers should verify current rules, management details, fees, and physical characteristics with the listing agent or association documents before making decisions.
Building Features & Data Confidence
All features from MLS data with AI-assisted confidence analysis. Click each category to expand and see details.
No analysis available
The public remarks do not provide any numeric or qualitative owner-occupancy information. I searched for phrases indicating owner-occupancy percentage or descriptors but found none; without explicit data, an occupancy percentage cannot be determined.
The public remarks contain no explicit elevator count or references to elevators. I searched the entire remarks text for terms like 'elevator', 'elevators', 'four elevators', and 'multiple elevators' and found nothing. Without an explicit numeric statement or a provided current value, I cannot infer a number.
Calculated from the lowest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from the highest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from association fees observed in penthouse unit listings for this building.
No analysis available
No analysis available
MLS checkbox data indicates maintenance fees include common-area electricity in 10 of 12 current listings (OTCOEX). None of the public remarks explicitly state common-area electric is included; one listing says 'Utilities are owner’s responsibilities' and another notes 'Other Fees includes Water/Sewer.' Evidence is therefore mixed and may reflect copy/paste of MLS checkboxes rather than consistent remark confirmation.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Multiple listings for this building explicitly reference private/outdoor enclosed space: 4 listings mention phrases like 'private gated yard', 'fenced in patio', 'fencing in front and back', and 'gated patio area'. While the MLS amenities checkbox currently shows PRIYAR for 1/12 listings, the repeated explicit remarks across different agent listings indicate that some units do offer private yard/patio space, so the building should be listed as having private_yard.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Evidence from the MLS and remarks supports that some units have in-unit laundry: 7 of 11 current MLS listings list WASHER/DRYER in inclusions and at least three remarks explicitly state 'in-unit washer and dryer' or 'Full size washer and dryer included'. Mentions appear across multiple listings/agents rather than being limited to a single copy-paste, so the building should be listed as offering in-unit laundry.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
All 11 MLS records show parking checkbox values (various types). Public remarks repeatedly mention parking stalls or spots (e.g., "2 Parking Stall directly located at the back entry door", "parking stall is located directly in front of the unit", "TWO open parking side by side", "one dedicated parking stall"). Evidence is consistent across multiple agents and listings, indicating the building offers parking.
Strong evidence that the building offers assigned parking: at least 6 separate public remarks explicitly state assigned or '2 assigned parking' (e.g., 'Enjoy assigned parking for two vehicles', '3 bedroom 1 bath 2 assigned parking'). Current MLS checkbox data also shows 9/12 listings with ASSIGN checked. Phrasing repeats across listings (some likely copy/paste) but the consistency across many agents and records supports inclusion.
10 listings reviewed: 0/10 public remarks describe covered parking, garages, carports, or enclosed stalls. Multiple remarks explicitly state assigned or open stalls—examples: 'assigned parking for two vehicles', 'parking stall is located directly in front of the unit', 'TWO open parking side by side in front'. Only 1/10 MLS entries checked a covered-parking box, suggesting a likely checkbox error rather than building-level covered parking.
Multiple listings reference 'assigned' parking stalls and locations (in front, behind, back entry), indicating reserved stalls. There is no explicit language stating parking is deeded/owned with the unit, so deeded parking cannot be confirmed from remarks.
No analysis available
Searched for phrases like 'monthly parking fee', 'parking charge', or 'parking rental'. No listings mention any parking fees, so monthly parking fee is unknown from remarks.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Looked for 'parking waitlist', 'waiting list', or similar language. None of the listings mention a waitlist system for parking, so no evidence of a waitlist exists in the remarks.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
0 of 10 remarks mention 'central air' or 'central AC'; 2 listings explicitly state 'Split AC' (unit-level). MLS checkbox appears in only 1/10 listings, suggesting a data-entry error rather than a building-wide central system. Evidence indicates the building does not offer central air conditioning to units.
No analysis available
Two of the 11 current listings include the ACWIUN inclusion (indicating window/wall AC units). None of the public remarks explicitly state 'window AC', 'window unit', or 'wall AC' (remarks instead reference 'Split AC' in a couple units), so the feature is indicated by MLS checkbox entries for some units but not corroborated in agent remarks.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Four of 12 current MLS listings show MASSTU (masonry/stucco) in construction_materials, but none of the public remarks mention 'masonry' or 'stucco'. The evidence is modest and stems from MLS checkbox data across multiple listings rather than explicit remarks; it could reflect inconsistent agent checkbox usage rather than confirmed building construction.
No analysis available
Five of the ten current MLS listings for this building have 'SLAB' checked in construction materials, but none of the public remarks include phrases like 'concrete slab' or 'solid concrete foundation.' The evidence is mixed (multiple listings show the checkbox) but uncorroborated by agent remarks, so inclusion is tentative and should be verified with owner/site visit.
No analysis available
Only 1 of 12 current MLS listings shows WOOFRA (wood frame) in construction_materials. No public remarks reference 'wood', 'wood frame', or wood frame construction, and the mentions appear isolated (likely agent checkbox use). Evidence is weak and based solely on one MLS listing rather than corroborating remarks.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Searched for explicit STR language (e.g., 'short-term rental allowed', 'vacation rental', 'TVU', '30-day minimum exceptions'). None of the listings reference STR permissions or programs, so STR allowance is not supported by the remarks.
Searched for 'hotel rental pool', 'hotel rental program', or references to hotel-managed rentals. No listings mention participation in a hotel rental pool. Because STR is not indicated in remarks, hotel pool cannot apply.
Looked for 'mandatory hotel pool', 'required to participate', or 'cannot opt out' language. No listings mention any rental program—mandatory or optional—so mandatory pool participation is not supported by the remarks.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Searched for leasehold/ground lease language and explicit four-digit expiry years (e.g., 'lease expires 2050', 'land lease to 2065'). None of the listings mention leasehold status or a lease expiry year.
Searched all remarks for explicit VA loan language (e.g., 'VA approved', 'VA loans accepted'). No listings reference VA approval or VA financing, so cannot confirm VA-approval from remarks.
There is no reference in the public remarks to the HOA fully insuring the building or providing walls-in/full coverage. With no explicit mention or supporting current value, this is set to false with medium confidence based on absence of indication in the remarks.
No analysis available
The remarks do not state that the building passed a fire/life safety evaluation or passed any fire inspection. Because there is no explicit statement and no current verified value, the field is set to false with medium confidence (absence of mention suggests it likely hasn't been declared in the listing remarks).
Flood zone determined from official FEMA Digital Flood Insurance Rate Map (DFIRM) data using building coordinates, not from agent-reported listing data.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No listings (0 of 12) mention 'sunset' or western/exposure language and 4 listings explicitly list View=NONE. None of the public remarks reference 'sunset view', 'evening sun', or similar phrases, suggesting the feature is not present rather than omitted by agents. Given the MLS checkbox data and absence of any supporting remarks across multiple listings, we conclude view_sunset = FALSE with high confidence.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Confidence levels are based on MLS checkbox data and AI analysis of listing remarks. High = strong evidence, Medium = some evidence, Low = limited or conflicting evidence. Buyers should always verify critical details independently.