Emerson Plaza
Preliminary Information – Full Audit Pending
This buildings features were determined from publicly available data, including MLS listings. While we cross-referenced additional data sources, it still likely contains incomplete or inaccurate information, as it has not yet been personally verified.
Once a building has been fully audited, this page will be replaced with an in-depth analysis featuring verified details and photos of every key feature.
Until then, we provide a data‑driven overview that blends statistical analysis of the checkbox selections agents make in MLS with an AI‑powered read of their public remarks—yielding a clearer picture of the building than raw listings alone.
If this building is important to your search, you can help prioritize it for a full audit by requesting one below. To see what a complete report looks like, check out the example full report.
Emerson Plaza
Building Overview
Emerson Plaza in Makiki-Tantalus — concrete construction from 1967 with covered, assigned parking. Pets and short-term rentals not allowed.
About Emerson Plaza
Based on MLS data, Emerson Plaza is located in the Makiki-Tantalus neighborhood and was built in 1967. The building is constructed of concrete and reflects the era of its construction.
Key features reported in the MLS include available covered, assigned parking. According to available records, pets are not allowed in the building and short-term rentals are not permitted. The management company is listed as unknown in the MLS data.
This information is drawn from MLS records and may be incomplete. Buyers should verify parking arrangements, pet and rental policies, management details, and any applicable fees or rules with the listing agent or management prior to making decisions.
Building Features & Data Confidence
All features from MLS data with AI-assisted confidence analysis. Click each category to expand and see details.
No analysis available
I looked for explicit owner-occupancy clues such as a percentage or descriptors like majority owner occupied, but none were stated. The remarks describe the building as a boutique 12-unit condominium, which does not provide a reliable owner-occupancy figure.
I searched the public remarks for any explicit elevator reference, including counts and phrases like multiple elevators, but found none. The building is described as a small boutique condominium with 12 total units and 4 units per floor, but that does not confirm whether an elevator exists.
Calculated from the lowest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from the highest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from association fees observed in penthouse unit listings for this building.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Common-area electricity is only intermittently tagged in the current MLS data (2 of 5 listings show OTCOEX). None of the public remarks explicitly mention common electric or building power being included, so this looks like partial MLS evidence rather than strong textual confirmation.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Sewer appears consistently across the current MLS data (5 of 5 listings). The remarks do not mention sewer directly, but there is no conflicting evidence, making this a very strong building-level feature.
Water is listed in association fees for all 5 of 5 current listings. The public remarks do not explicitly mention water, but the MLS consistency provides very high confidence that water is included.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No listings in the provided remarks describe a recreation area or similar shared amenity. With only 1/4 MLS records checking RECARE and no agent descriptions to back it up, the evidence points to the feature likely not being reliably present in the building.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
One listing explicitly says the building offers a 'trash chute.' The remark is clear and direct, and although only 1/4 MLS listings have TRACHU checked, the text evidence is strong enough to confirm the building has this feature.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
In-unit laundry is supported by explicit remarks in multiple listings: 'washer/dryer on the lanai' and 'washer on the lanai.' The MLS inclusions also show washer/dryer in 2 of 5 listings, which suggests this is a real unit-level feature rather than a one-off error. Evidence is consistent across listings and not just a single agent's copy/paste note.
Multiple public remarks confirm shared laundry for Emerson Plaza, including an explicit mention of "community laundry" in the building amenities. This is strong evidence from the remarks rather than just checkbox data, so the feature should be included with high confidence.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Parking is strongly supported across all current listings and remarks. 4/4 MLS entries show parking-related features, and several remarks explicitly confirm it with phrases like "assigned parking stall included" and "one parking stall." This appears consistent rather than a copy-paste error.
Assigned parking is strongly supported. Multiple listings explicitly say "assigned parking stall" or "one assigned parking stall," and the MLS data is consistent across all current listings. This appears to be a reliable building-level feature, not a one-off agent error.
Covered parking is supported by both MLS data and remarks. At least two listings explicitly use phrases like "assigned covered parking" and "assigned covered parking stall," while the current MLS data shows covered parking in most listings. The evidence suggests this is a real building feature.
I searched for explicit deeded/owned parking language such as 'deeded parking,' 'owned stall,' or 'parking included in deed.' The listings only indicate assigned parking, which is not enough to confirm deeded parking.
No analysis available
I looked for any stated monthly parking cost, parking rent, or additional parking charge and found none. The only fee mentioned is an unrelated offer processing fee, so there is no evidence of a parking fee.
Guest parking is not supported by the remarks. None of the provided listings mention guest or visitor parking, and the current MLS data shows only 1/5 listings marked for it, which is weak and isolated. This likely reflects a copy/paste or checkbox inconsistency rather than a verified amenity.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
I searched for references to joining a parking waitlist or limited parking availability requiring a waitlist. The remarks only say the unit has an assigned stall, with no mention of a waitlist system.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Window AC appears in the current MLS data for 2/5 listings, but none of the public remarks explicitly mention window air conditioners, wall AC, or window units. This looks like moderate MLS-level evidence rather than confirmed firsthand commentary, so confidence is limited.
Concrete construction appears consistently across all current MLS listings, which is strong building-level evidence. None of the public remarks mention a different construction type, so this looks like a stable, building-wide attribute rather than copy-paste error.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Masonry/stucco appears in 3 of 5 current listings, so it is present in the building’s MLS record but not uniformly entered. Because the remarks are silent on construction, this looks like moderate building-level evidence rather than a confirmed correction.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Above-ground construction appears in only 2 of 5 current MLS listings and is not supported by the public remarks. This is weak, inconsistent MLS evidence, so it should be treated cautiously as a possible listing-entry artifact rather than a confirmed building feature.
No analysis available
No analysis available
I looked for STR-related terms such as 'short-term rental allowed,' 'legal vacation rental,' 'NUC,' or 'TVU,' and found none. There is also no owner-occupant-only or 30-day-minimum language, so STR is not evidenced in the public remarks.
I searched for hotel pool language such as 'hotel rental pool,' brand pool participation, or hotel-managed operations and found none. Since STR is not evidenced, this also remains false.
I looked for wording like 'mandatory pool,' 'required to participate,' or 'cannot opt out' and found none. There is no public evidence that any rental-pool program exists, so mandatory participation is not supported.
No analysis available
No analysis available
I looked for leasehold wording such as 'lease expires,' 'ground lease ends,' or a renewal year, but the remarks only describe the property as fee simple. Since no lease expiration year is stated, the value remains unknown.
I searched the public remarks for any explicit VA-loan language such as 'VA approved' or 'VA financing accepted' and found none. With no public reference to VA eligibility, this is treated as not evidenced.
I searched the remarks for insurance coverage language suggesting the HOA provides full or walls-in insurance, but found nothing. There is no public remark evidence to support this feature.
No analysis available
I looked for any public-remarks language indicating the building passed fire/life safety evaluation, but there were no such references. With no explicit mention and no prior value, this is treated as not confirmed in the remarks.
Flood zone determined from official FEMA Digital Flood Insurance Rate Map (DFIRM) data using building coordinates, not from agent-reported listing data.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Across the provided remarks, there are no explicit mountain-view references such as "mountain view," "Koolau view," or "mauka view." The only view language is "partial ocean view from your kitchen window," so the evidence does not support a mountain-view offering for the building.
No analysis available
City views appear in the MLS data for 3 of 5 listings, while 1 of 5 explicitly shows NONE. The public remarks do not consistently say 'city view' or 'downtown view'—one mentions a 'partial ocean view from your kitchen window' instead—so this looks more like mixed MLS input than a strong remark-based confirmation. Overall, the building likely offers some city-view units, but the evidence is moderate rather than explicit across remarks.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
1 listing explicitly mentions "resident manager" as a building amenity. The wording appears as a straightforward amenity statement rather than copy-paste uncertainty, and there is no evidence in the remarks that this feature is absent.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Confidence levels are based on MLS checkbox data and AI analysis of listing remarks. High = strong evidence, Medium = some evidence, Low = limited or conflicting evidence. Buyers should always verify critical details independently.