Emerson Court
Preliminary Information – Full Audit Pending
This buildings features were determined from publicly available data, including MLS listings. While we cross-referenced additional data sources, it still likely contains incomplete or inaccurate information, as it has not yet been personally verified.
Once a building has been fully audited, this page will be replaced with an in-depth analysis featuring verified details and photos of every key feature.
Until then, we provide a data‑driven overview that blends statistical analysis of the checkbox selections agents make in MLS with an AI‑powered read of their public remarks—yielding a clearer picture of the building than raw listings alone.
If this building is important to your search, you can help prioritize it for a full audit by requesting one below. To see what a complete report looks like, check out the example full report.
Emerson Court
Building Overview
Emerson Court in Makiki-Tantalus — concrete construction, built 1961; pets and short-term rentals are not allowed.
About Emerson Court
Emerson Court is a residential building located in the Makiki-Tantalus neighborhood. According to available records, the building was constructed in 1961 and is of concrete construction. MLS-derived data provided for this property is limited to basic building-level details.
Based on MLS data, key policies for Emerson Court include no pets allowed and no short-term rentals allowed. The listing information does not include specific amenity listings, unit layouts, or HOA details.
Additional details such as parking availability, maintenance fees, unit square footage, and the management company are not specified in the MLS data (management company listed as unknown). Buyers should verify all building features, policies, fees, and other material facts with the listing agent or management prior to making decisions.
Building Features & Data Confidence
All features from MLS data with AI-assisted confidence analysis. Click each category to expand and see details.
No analysis available
Calculated from the lowest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from the highest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from association fees observed in penthouse unit listings for this building.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
There is no meaningful support in the public remarks for hot water being included in the maintenance fee. Across the listings, the MLS pattern leans the other way, with multiple units showing WTRHTR and only a single HOTWAT checkbox, which looks like a likely agent data inconsistency or copy-paste error.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Sewer is consistently present across all current MLS listings (6/6), which is strong building-level evidence. The public remarks do not contradict this, so it should be treated as included in the maintenance fee.
Water is consistently listed across all current MLS records (6/6), indicating a stable building-level inclusion. The remarks do not mention any exception, so this should be considered included in the maintenance fee.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Storage is clearly available in this building. At least 4 of the 7 remarks explicitly mention 'additional storage space,' 'extra storage unit,' 'on-property storage,' or 'additional storage,' indicating the feature is real and not just copy-paste MLS noise. The evidence is strong across multiple listings and aligns with current MLS amenities data showing storage in several entries.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Community laundry appears to be a stable building feature: historical MLS data shows 7/7 listings with COMLAU in amenities. The current public remarks do not explicitly mention shared laundry, but they also do not contradict it; one remark mentions a washer and dryer in the unit, which is compatible with the building still having community laundry as well. Overall this looks like strong, repeated MLS-level evidence rather than a one-off agent entry.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Assigned parking is clearly supported by the listings. At least 3-4 remarks mention it directly with phrases like '1 covered assigned parking space,' 'one covered parking stall,' and 'covered parking in secured gate,' indicating this is not just an MLS checkbox copy/paste.
Covered parking is strongly supported across the listings. Multiple agents describe it in plain language, including garage/gated/partial covered parking references, so this appears to be a consistent building feature rather than a data entry error.
I searched for explicit deeded parking language like "deeded parking," "owned stall," or "parking included in deed." The listings only say the unit has assigned or covered parking, which is not enough to confirm that the stall is deeded.
No analysis available
I looked for any monthly parking fee, parking rental, or additional parking charge language and found none. The remarks describe parking as included/assigned but do not mention any separate cost.
No analysis available
Secured parking is mentioned in multiple listings by different agents, with language such as 'secured entry and parking' and 'gated parking garage.' The repeated references across remarks make this a strong building-level feature, not just an MLS checkbox artifact.
No analysis available
No analysis available
I searched for phrases like "parking waitlist," "waiting list," or "join waitlist for parking" and found nothing. The remarks instead indicate that the unit comes with parking.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Window AC appears in 2 of 7 current MLS listings, but none of the public remarks explicitly mention window air conditioners, wall units, or similar wording. This looks more like a partial building/unit feature than a fully documented amenity, so confidence is moderate rather than high.
Concrete construction is supported by the current MLS metadata: 4 of 6 listings show CONCRE in construction_materials. The public remarks do not mention construction type, so this is driven primarily by MLS data rather than copy-paste marketing text.
There are no public remarks confirming double-wall construction, and only 2 of 7 current listings have the MLS code checked. That pattern looks more like inconsistent agent input than verified building information, so the feature is not validated from the available evidence.
No analysis available
No listing remarks explicitly describe the building as masonry/stucco, and the limited MLS support (3 of 7) is not strong enough to validate the feature. Because agents often copy unchecked/checked construction fields without verification, this does not appear reliable from the public remarks alone.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
I looked for short-term rental indicators such as "STR permitted," "vacation rental allowed," "NUC," "TVU," or similar language, and found none. There is also no language suggesting the building allows short-term rentals.
I searched for hotel rental pool references like "hotel pool," "managed by hotel," or branded rental programs and found none. Since there is no evidence that STR is allowed, a hotel pool is not supported here.
I looked for language indicating a required rental pool or mandatory participation, such as "must be in rental program" or "cannot opt out," and found nothing. There is no evidence of any mandatory hotel or rental pool arrangement.
No analysis available
No analysis available
I looked for leasehold wording such as "lease expires," "ground lease ends," "leasehold expiring," or a renewal year, but none were present. The remarks do not provide any land tenure expiry information.
I searched the public remarks for VA-related language such as "VA approved," "VA financing," or "VA loans accepted" and found nothing. There is no evidence in these listings that the building is VA loan approved.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Flood zone determined from official FEMA Digital Flood Insurance Rate Map (DFIRM) data using building coordinates, not from agent-reported listing data.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
2 of 6 listings explicitly indicate city views, while 3 of 6 list NONE. Remarks support the MLS data with phrases like “view of Downtown Honolulu” and “town living,” suggesting the feature exists in some units rather than across the entire building. The evidence appears consistent but limited, with some room for agent copy/paste variance.
No analysis available
Garden/courtyard-oriented views appear to exist in some units of this building. Two of seven current listings explicitly mark GARDEN, and several remarks mention a "spacious garden courtyard," "courtyard," and "herb gardens," which is consistent with garden-view exposure. The evidence is moderate and building-wide availability is uneven, so this should be treated as an available feature for some units rather than every unit.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Confidence levels are based on MLS checkbox data and AI analysis of listing remarks. High = strong evidence, Medium = some evidence, Low = limited or conflicting evidence. Buyers should always verify critical details independently.