Elms
Preliminary Information – Full Audit Pending
This buildings features were determined from publicly available data, including MLS listings. While we cross-referenced additional data sources, it still likely contains incomplete or inaccurate information, as it has not yet been personally verified.
Once a building has been fully audited, this page will be replaced with an in-depth analysis featuring verified details and photos of every key feature.
Until then, we provide a data‑driven overview that blends statistical analysis of the checkbox selections agents make in MLS with an AI‑powered read of their public remarks—yielding a clearer picture of the building than raw listings alone.
If this building is important to your search, you can help prioritize it for a full audit by requesting one below. To see what a complete report looks like, check out the example full report.
Elms
Building Overview
Elms in Ala Moana-Kakaako — built 1979; pets not allowed and short-term rentals prohibited (based on MLS data).
About Elms
Based on MLS data, Elms is a condominium building located in the Ala Moana-Kakaako neighborhood. The building was built in 1979. Size and construction type are not specified in the available MLS records.
According to available records, key policies for Elms include no pets allowed and no short-term rentals permitted. The MLS data does not list specific on-site amenities or common-area features.
Management company, parking provisions, maintenance fees, and other operational details are not provided in the MLS data available for this listing. Buyers should verify all building specifics, rules, and fee information with their agent or the managing entity before making any decisions.
Building Features & Data Confidence
All features from MLS data with AI-assisted confidence analysis. Click each category to expand and see details.
No analysis available
I searched for owner-occupancy indicators such as "80% owner occupied," "majority owner occupied," or similar phrasing, but found none. The remarks do mention tenant-occupied status for one unit, but that does not establish the building's overall owner-occupancy percentage.
I searched the remarks for elevator-related language such as "elevator," "elevators," "4 elevators," and similar wording, but found none. There is no public-remarks evidence to confirm the number of elevators in the building.
Calculated from the lowest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from the highest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from association fees observed in penthouse unit listings for this building.
No analysis available
Explicit agent remark in one listing: 'the HOA fee includes Cable/Internet.' While CABTV is checked across MLS listings, this one clear public-remarks confirmation supports including cable. Evidence is from a single agent remark but is explicit and aligns with MLS checkboxes.
MLS shows OTCOEX on some listings, but 0/8 public remarks reference common area electricity or building power. No agents explicitly state 'common electric included,' so evidence is weak and likely a copy/paste checkbox rather than a confirmed included fee.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Although HOTWAT is checked on MLS records, 0/8 public remarks mention 'hot water included' or similar. Given low historical confidence and no corroborating agent remarks, inclusion of hot water in the fee is unconfirmed and likely a checkbox error.
Explicit agent remark in one listing: 'the HOA fee includes Cable/Internet.' While INTSER is checked on some MLS listings, the direct public-remarks confirmation supports including internet in the maintenance fee.
No analysis available
SEWER appears checked in MLS on several listings, but 0/8 public remarks reference sewer being included. No explicit agent confirmations were found, so evidence for sewer being included in fees is weak and likely copy/paste.
WATER is checked on MLS listings, but 0/8 public remarks mention 'water included' or similar. With no agent remarks confirming water in the fees and prior low confidence, the claim is uncorroborated and likely a checkbox error.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
7 of 8 current MLS listings list TRACHU in amenities, but none of the public remarks mention a 'trash chute', 'garbage chute', or 'refuse chute'. This is moderate evidence (likely MLS checkbox propagation/copy-paste) that the building offers a trash chute; no agent remarks or owner/site verification were found to confirm it explicitly.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Strong evidence the building offers in-unit laundry: 5+ of the provided public remarks explicitly mention washer/dryer (quotes: 'sleek LG washer/dryer', 'washer/dryer tucked in-kitchen', 'in-unit washer/dryer'). Combined with MLS inclusions showing 8/8 listings listing washer/dryer, this is a consistent, building-level offering rather than a one-off listing. Confidence is high due to repeated, specific mentions across multiple agents/listings.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Assigned parking is consistently reported: 6 of the 8 listing remarks explicitly mention assigned/assigned covered parking (examples: 'assigned parking', '1 assigned covered parking', 'assigned covered parking stall'). Evidence is strong and repeated across multiple agent remarks, matching prior high-confidence MLS checkbox data, so the building offers assigned parking.
Public remarks across multiple listings repeatedly reference covered parking (e.g., 'assigned covered parking', 'assigned-covered parking stall', 'assigned, covered parking stall'), and the MLS parking features show covered parking in 5 of 7 listings. The consistent language across listings supports inclusion of covered parking as a building feature.
I found repeated references to assigned parking stalls, including covered parking, but nothing that clearly states the stall is deeded or owned with the unit. Because the remarks stop at "assigned," this feature cannot be confirmed as deeded from public remarks alone.
No analysis available
I searched for parking fee language such as "monthly parking charge," "parking rental," or an added parking cost. The listings only say parking is assigned/included, so no fee amount is provided in the remarks.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
I looked for references to a parking waitlist, waiting list, or instructions to join one. The remarks do not mention any waitlist process for parking.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
MLS inclusions show 4 of 8 listings checked ACWIUN, and at least one public remark explicitly states '2 window unit ACs.' One other remark mentions 'highly efficient air conditioning' while several units note only cross-breezes/trade winds. Given multiple MLS checkboxes plus an explicit remark, there is strong evidence that some units in the building have window/wall air conditioners.
All 8 current MLS listings for the building list construction_materials='CONCRE', though none of the public remarks (0/8) explicitly mention concrete or 'reinforced concrete'. Historical confidence was Medium; MLS checkbox consistency across all listings supports including this feature, but the lack of explicit agent remarks suggests a moderate (not maximal) confidence level.
A single MLS listing (1/7) flags 'DOUWAL' (double wall) in construction materials, but the collective public remarks make no mention of double-wall or two-wall construction. The evidence is limited to one checkbox and not supported by agent remarks, so confidence is moderate.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Two of the seven MLS listings include 'SLAB' in construction materials (2/7), but none of the public remarks mention 'concrete slab' or a slab foundation. The feature is present in MLS checkbox data only and lacks corroborating remarks, so confidence is moderate and cautious.
No analysis available
No analysis available
One of seven current MLS entries lists 'ABOGRO' (above ground) as a construction material (1/7), but none of the public remarks mention 'above ground' construction or related phrasing. This is based solely on a single MLS checkbox and is not corroborated in the remarks.
One of the seven current MLS listings includes 'BRICK' in construction materials (1/7), but none of the public remarks reference brick exterior or brick-and-mortar construction. This feature appears only in a single MLS checkbox entry and is not corroborated by listing remarks, so confidence is moderate but limited.
No analysis available
I searched for STR-related wording such as "short-term rental allowed," "TVU," "NUC," or hotel-style rental permissions. There is no public-remarks evidence that short-term rentals are allowed, so this is treated as not supported by the remarks.
I looked for hotel rental pool references like "hotel program," "managed by hotel," or branded pool participation. None were found, and there is no evidence from the remarks that short-term rentals are allowed in the first place.
I searched for language indicating a required hotel rental pool or compulsory participation. The remarks contain no such references, so mandatory pool participation is not supported.
No analysis available
No analysis available
I looked for leasehold language and specific expiration years such as "lease expires 2050," "ground lease ends," or "renewed through" phrasing. The remarks do not mention any land tenure or lease expiry date, so this remains unknown.
I searched the remarks for explicit VA loan approval language such as "VA approved" or "VA financing accepted." None of the listings mention VA eligibility, so there is no public-remarks evidence to support this feature.
Multiple listing remarks explicitly say the building has "100% hurricane insurance" and "100% Hurricane insured," which is strong evidence of comprehensive building insurance coverage. This is direct public-remarks support for the building being fully insured.
No analysis available
I searched for fire/life safety evaluation or inspection language such as "FLSE passed," "fire life safety evaluation passed," "fire safety certified," and "passed fire inspection." No such references appear in the remarks, so the status cannot be confirmed from this data.
Flood zone determined from official FEMA Digital Flood Insurance Rate Map (DFIRM) data using building coordinates, not from agent-reported listing data.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Three of seven current MLS listings reference mountain views (3/7 include MOUNTA). Public remarks explicitly mention 'mountain view' and 'mauka' in multiple agent descriptions, indicating several units offer mountain views rather than a single mistaken checkbox.
No analysis available
Strong building-level evidence for city views: many remarks (at least 6–8 listings) explicitly mention city or skyline views, with phrases like 'unobstructed city views', 'vibrant skyline', and 'city views that are calming by day and sparkle by night.' Evidence is consistent across multiple listings and agents, aligning with prior MLS data.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Although none of the seven MLS view_descriptions include SUNRIS (0/7), at least one public remark explicitly advertises 'sunrise views' alongside city and mountain views. This explicit agent remark indicates some units offer sunrise/eastern exposures even if the MLS checkbox field currently shows none.
No explicit mentions of sunset or western/exposure in the remarks provided; remarks refer to 'sunrise' or morning views in a couple of listings but not sunsets. Only 1 of 8 MLS view_descriptions lists SUNSET historically, and current agent remarks do not corroborate it, so sunset views are unlikely to be a building-level feature.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
7 of 8 current MLS listings for the building have the RESMAN amenity checked, and one listing's public remarks explicitly says "Well-managed building with the resident manager on site." Because the checkbox is widespread but only one remark explicitly mentions it, confidence is moderate (possible copy/paste across listings). Buyers should consider the building likely has an on-site/resident manager but verify with the HOA or listing agent.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Confidence levels are based on MLS checkbox data and AI analysis of listing remarks. High = strong evidence, Medium = some evidence, Low = limited or conflicting evidence. Buyers should always verify critical details independently.