Dominis West
Preliminary Information – Full Audit Pending
This buildings features were determined from publicly available data, including MLS listings. While we cross-referenced additional data sources, it still likely contains incomplete or inaccurate information, as it has not yet been personally verified.
Once a building has been fully audited, this page will be replaced with an in-depth analysis featuring verified details and photos of every key feature.
Until then, we provide a data‑driven overview that blends statistical analysis of the checkbox selections agents make in MLS with an AI‑powered read of their public remarks—yielding a clearer picture of the building than raw listings alone.
If this building is important to your search, you can help prioritize it for a full audit by requesting one below. To see what a complete report looks like, check out the example full report.
Dominis West
Building Overview
Dominis West in Downtown-Chinatown; concrete building (1975) with pool and mountain views.
About Dominis West
Dominis West is a residential building located in the Downtown-Chinatown neighborhood. According to available records, it was built in 1975 and constructed of concrete; size information is not provided in the MLS data.
Based on MLS data, building amenities include a pool, a fitness center, and a BBQ area. Units are equipped with window air conditioning. Mountain views are reported for the property.
Additional details from MLS: parking is available and assigned. Pets and short-term rentals are not allowed. The management company is listed as unknown in the MLS. Buyers should verify all details, fees, and policies with official records or the managing agent before making any decisions.
Building Features & Data Confidence
All features from MLS data with AI-assisted confidence analysis. Click each category to expand and see details.
No analysis available
I searched the remarks for owner-occupancy figures and descriptive phrases, but nothing was provided. Since there is no explicit percentage or qualitative statement about owner occupancy, the value remains unknown.
I found clear evidence that the building has elevator access, but the public remarks do not state how many elevators there are. Because the feature asks for a number and no explicit count such as '4 elevators' appears, I cannot reliably assign an exact value.
Calculated from the lowest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from the highest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from association fees observed in penthouse unit listings for this building.
No analysis available
Cable TV inclusion is supported by the public remarks in one listing and by current MLS data showing 9/12 listings with CABTV. The evidence is fairly consistent across listings, though the remarks only explicitly mention it once, suggesting some agent copy/paste may be occurring.
Common-area electricity appears in a minority of current MLS entries (5/12) but is not described in the public remarks. Because there is no explicit remark support, confidence is moderate and this may reflect checkbox inconsistency rather than a repeatedly verified amenity.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Hot water is explicitly mentioned in 1 public remark: "hot water included in HOA dues." Additionally, 4 of 11 current MLS entries have HOTWAT in association_fee_includes and there are 0/11 WTRHTR inclusions (which would indicate unit hot water heaters). Evidence is explicit in at least one agent remark and supported by multiple MLS entries.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Sewer is listed in a majority of current MLS entries (8/12), even though the public remarks do not call it out directly. That pattern suggests it is likely included, but the evidence is primarily checkbox-based rather than remark-verified.
Water inclusion is strongly supported by current MLS data, with 10/12 listings showing WATER in association_fee_includes. One public remark also states 'hot water included in HOA dues,' reinforcing that the building's maintenance fees typically cover water-related service.
BBQ/grilling facilities are very well supported by the public remarks and MLS amenities. Several listings independently describe a shared BBQ area, including versions with picnic tables and gas grills, indicating a common building amenity.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Car wash facilities appear in a small minority of MLS records, but there is no corroborating language in the public remarks. This looks like a weakly supported MLS-only amenity and may be inconsistently entered.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Strong, repeated evidence across many listings confirms a shared exercise amenity. Remarks use multiple equivalent phrases such as "exercise room," "fitness room," "gym," and "fitness center," which looks like consistent building-level copy rather than a one-off mention.
No analysis available
No analysis available
10+ of the provided listings mention a covered lanai, patio-like outdoor space, or lanai use for dining/relaxing outdoors. Phrases like "covered lanai," "spacious covered lanai," "enjoy morning coffee and evening dinners outdoors," and "large lanai" appear across multiple agents, so this looks like a real building/unit feature rather than a copy-paste MLS checkbox issue.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
There is limited but direct support for a recreation area amenity. The feature appears in current MLS data on 3 of 12 listings and is explicitly named in at least one public remark, so it is likely a shared but inconsistently reported building amenity.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Sauna is strongly confirmed by both MLS data and repeated listing remarks. Multiple agents independently mention it alongside other shared amenities, making this a reliable building feature.
No analysis available
I looked for surfboard storage or related board-storage language. The remarks discuss general storage in the unit, but no dedicated surfboard storage facility is mentioned.
No analysis available
The MLS amenity data strongly suggests a trash chute system is present, but the public remarks provide no direct confirmation. Because this is repeated in 11 of 12 listings, it is likely a building feature even though the remarks appear to be copy/paste or simply omit it.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
The pool feature is strongly supported by the current public remarks: 10+ listings mention it directly, with phrases such as "pool," "swimming pool," and "recently updated pool." This is consistent with the historical MLS data showing pool amenities in all current listings, so there is no sign this feature has changed or been incorrectly copied in.
No analysis available
I looked for any indication that the building pool is salt water. The listings only say there is a pool and do not describe it as saltwater, so this cannot be confirmed.
No analysis available
All 11 current MLS listings include the COMLAU amenity checkbox, and multiple public remarks explicitly state 'community laundry', 'laundry room', or 'large community laundry facility' (appearing across listings from different agents). Evidence is strong and consistent across listings, so the building is very likely to have shared/community laundry facilities.
I searched for public remarks stating whether laundry is coin-operated, paid, or free. Nothing in the listings identifies a payment requirement for the community laundry, so this is not established from the remarks.
I looked for language indicating laundry rooms on each floor, floor-by-floor laundry, or similar wording. The remarks only mention a first-floor community laundry facility, so there is no support for laundry on every floor.
Parking is clearly available in this building. Across the provided remarks, every listing references parking in some form, and many explicitly say 'one assigned parking stall,' 'one assigned covered parking stall,' or 'deeded, uncovered parking stall.' The evidence is consistent across multiple listings and does not look like a one-off copy-paste error.
Assigned parking appears to be a true building feature. Most listings reference assigned or deeded stalls, with several explicit mentions across different remarks, including 'one assigned parking stall,' 'one assigned covered parking stall,' and 'deeded, uncovered parking stall included.' This is strong, repeated evidence rather than isolated MLS checkbox noise.
Moderate evidence that the building provides covered parking: 6/10 MLS parking entries indicate covered parking and multiple remarks state 'covered parking' or 'covered parking stall' (e.g., 'Comes with one covered, assigned parking stall', '1 COVERED parking'). However, several other remarks reference 'uncovered' or 'deeded, uncovered' stalls, so the building appears to offer a mix of covered and uncovered assigned stalls rather than exclusively covered parking.
The remarks directly confirm that the parking is deeded. Multiple listings also describe an assigned or included stall, and one listing explicitly says the stall is deeded.
No analysis available
I searched for parking fee language such as monthly parking charge, parking rental, or additional parking cost and found nothing. Listings consistently say the parking stall is included or assigned, with no separate parking price mentioned.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
I looked for phrases like parking waitlist, waiting list, or join a waitlist for parking and found no evidence. The remarks instead describe parking as included/assigned, which does not suggest a waitlist process.
No analysis available
The remarks directly describe key fob access, which is clear evidence of a card/fob-based security system. This is strongly supported and consistent across the listings.
No analysis available
I searched for any mention of patrol service or roving security. The listings describe a secured building and resident manager, but nothing indicates a security patrol.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Window AC is clearly supported for this building. At least 2 listing remarks explicitly say "window AC," and the historical MLS checkbox data shows 7 of 12 listings with ACWIUN checked. The evidence appears consistent across listings and does not look like an isolated agent error.
Concrete construction is strongly supported by the MLS data: 12 of 12 current listings list 'CONCRE' as the construction material. None of the public remarks explicitly discuss the building structure, but the MLS consistency is strong and appears to reflect stable listing data rather than a copy-paste anomaly.
No analysis available
No analysis available
2 of 11 listings list 'MASSTU' but none of the public remarks mention masonry or stucco. This is weak evidence and may reflect copy/paste or a portion of the building using masonry/stucco, so confidence is low.
No analysis available
3 of 11 listings list 'SLAB' but there are no mentions of a concrete slab foundation in the public remarks. The evidence is limited and could reflect partial building characteristics or inconsistent checkbox usage, so confidence remains low.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Only 2 of 11 listings checked 'ABOGRO' and none of the public remarks reference above-ground construction. This provides minimal evidence and may be due to inconsistent agent reporting, so confidence is very low.
No analysis available
No analysis available
I searched for indicators such as STR permitted, legal short-term rental, vacation rental allowed, NUC, TVU, or hotel-style rental language and found none. There is also no contrary language suggesting 30-day minimums or other STR-friendly rules, so public remarks do not support STR allowance.
I looked for hotel pool references such as hotel rental pool, Hilton pool, Ritz pool, managed by hotel, or similar brand-managed programs and found nothing. Since the remarks do not show STR being allowed, hotel pool participation is not supported either.
I searched for language indicating mandatory participation, such as must be in the rental program, required to rent, cannot opt out, or mandatory hotel pool, and found none. There is also no evidence that STR is allowed, so mandatory pool participation is not supported.
No analysis available
No analysis available
I found a reference to the property being leasehold, which makes this field applicable. I looked for phrases like lease expires, ground lease ends, renewed through, or expiry year, but no 4-digit expiration year was provided.
I searched the public remarks for explicit VA language such as "VA approved" or "VA financing" and found none. With no supporting evidence in the listings, this is treated as not indicated in the public remarks.
I looked for language indicating full HOA insurance coverage or walls-in coverage, but the remarks do not mention it. Without explicit insurance wording, there is no basis to mark the building as fully insured.
No analysis available
I searched the remarks for explicit fire/life safety evaluation or inspection pass language and found none. With no direct mention, there is no evidence here that the building has passed FLSE or a comparable fire/life safety review.
Flood zone determined from official FEMA Digital Flood Insurance Rate Map (DFIRM) data using building coordinates, not from agent-reported listing data.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Strong, repeated evidence that the building offers mountain views. Across the listing set, 10 of 12 current MLS records include mountain in view descriptions, and remarks explicitly reference 'mountain views,' 'lush mountain vistas,' and 'Manoa Valley' views. This looks consistent across multiple agents rather than a one-off copy-paste error.
Multiple listings (at least 4 remarks) explicitly mention Diamond Head: phrases include 'Diamond Head views from a large lanai', 'iconic views of Diamond Head', and 'spacious covered lanai to enjoy the Diamond Head...'. Evidence is strong across several agent remarks rather than a single outlier, supporting that the building offers Diamond Head views.
There is clear evidence the building offers city-view units. Seven of 12 current MLS records include city in the view descriptions, and several remarks explicitly say 'city views' or 'sparkling city lights.' The consistency across multiple listings supports this as a genuine building feature, not just agent copy-paste.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
At least one listing explicitly advertises 'Enjoy stunning sunrises' and references 'morning sun', indicating some units/lanai exposures face east. However, this is only present in a small number of remarks (1–2) and not reflected in MLS view checkboxes, so evidence is moderate rather than strong.
No analysis available
No analysis available
I looked for explicit references to fireworks views from the unit, lanai, or building. The listings only describe scenic views and city lights, so there is no evidence of a fireworks view.
No analysis available
Very strong evidence across the listings: several remarks explicitly say "on-site resident manager," "on-site building manager," or "resident manager on-site." This aligns with the historically high MLS support, so the feature should be retained with very high confidence.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Confidence levels are based on MLS checkbox data and AI analysis of listing remarks. High = strong evidence, Medium = some evidence, Low = limited or conflicting evidence. Buyers should always verify critical details independently.