Diamond Head Ambassador B
Preliminary Information – Full Audit Pending
This buildings features were determined from publicly available data, including MLS listings. While we cross-referenced additional data sources, it still likely contains incomplete or inaccurate information, as it has not yet been personally verified.
Once a building has been fully audited, this page will be replaced with an in-depth analysis featuring verified details and photos of every key feature.
Until then, we provide a data‑driven overview that blends statistical analysis of the checkbox selections agents make in MLS with an AI‑powered read of their public remarks—yielding a clearer picture of the building than raw listings alone.
If this building is important to your search, you can help prioritize it for a full audit by requesting one below. To see what a complete report looks like, check out the example full report.
Diamond Head Ambassador B
Building Overview
Diamond Head Ambassador B in Diamond Head-Kapahulu-St. Louis — concrete building (1959); pets allowed, short-term rentals not permitted.
About Diamond Head Ambassador B
Diamond Head Ambassador B is located in the Diamond Head-Kapahulu-St. Louis neighborhood. According to available records, the building was constructed in 1959 and is of concrete construction.
Key features noted in MLS data include a pet-friendly policy and a prohibition on short-term rentals. No specific on-site amenities are listed in the provided data.
Management company, parking, monthly maintenance fees, and other operational details are not specified in the MLS information supplied. Based on MLS data — buyers should verify all building details, policies, and fees with the listing agent or management prior to making decisions.
Building Features & Data Confidence
All features from MLS data with AI-assisted confidence analysis. Click each category to expand and see details.
No analysis available
Calculated from the lowest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from the highest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from association fees observed in penthouse unit listings for this building.
No analysis available
No analysis available
I do not see direct evidence that maintenance fees include common area electricity. The only MLS indicator provided is OTCOEX in 4/6 listings, which appears more like a generic other-common-expenses code than a clear electricity inclusion, and the remarks are silent on this point.
No analysis available
This is strongly supported by the MLS data: 6 out of 6 listings include ELECTR in association_fee_includes. None of the public remarks contradict this, so the evidence is consistent and likely reflects a building-level HOA inclusion.
No analysis available
All 6 listings include HOTWAT, and there are 0/6 WTRHTR inclusions, which supports building-supplied hot water rather than in-unit heaters. The public remarks do not mention any contrary setup, so this appears to be a stable building amenity.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Sewer inclusion is strongly supported by the MLS data, with 6 out of 6 listings showing SEWER in association_fee_includes. There is no contradictory language in the remarks, making this a high-confidence building-level feature.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Current listings repeatedly describe outdoor lanai space: "private lanai," "large covered lanai," and "large wrap-around lanai." The evidence appears in multiple remarks from different listings, so this is not just a single-agent copy/paste issue. This strongly supports patio/deck being available in the building.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Storage is clearly available at this building: 5 of 6 listings mention it directly, often in multiple ways such as "secured storage," "secured assigned storage," and "secure storage area." The remarks are consistent across listings and appear to confirm the MLS storage checkbox rather than copy-paste noise.
The building clearly offers surfboard storage or rack space. Multiple remarks explicitly reference surfboard racks, which satisfies the surfboard storage feature.
No analysis available
Trash chute is indicated in all 6/6 current MLS listings via the TRACHU amenity field. None of the public remarks explicitly mention or contradict a trash chute, but the consistent checkbox data across multiple listings suggests the building does offer this feature.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
The building clearly has a shared pool amenity. Five of six public remarks mention it directly, with consistent descriptions such as 'saltwater pool' and 'renovated saltwater pool,' suggesting this is not a copy-paste error. The MLS amenities also show pool-related codes on all listings, reinforcing high confidence.
No analysis available
This is directly stated in several listings. The pool is repeatedly described as saltwater/salt water, leaving little ambiguity.
No analysis available
Strong evidence supports shared laundry facilities in the building. The current MLS data has COMLAU checked on all 6/6 listings, and several independent remarks explicitly mention "community laundry." This looks consistent across listings rather than a copy-paste anomaly.
I searched for indicators that laundry requires payment, such as coin laundry, paid laundry, or card-operated machines. The public remarks mention community laundry but give no evidence that it is a paid facility.
I looked for wording like laundry on each floor, laundry on every level, or floor-by-floor laundry. The listings only confirm the presence of community laundry somewhere in the building, not that it is available on every floor.
Parking is mentioned in 1 of the 6 listings, but the remark is explicit: "Parking is not conveyed, but can be rented on a first come basis." Even though all current MLS parking_features are marked NONE, the public remarks clearly indicate parking is available for residents to rent, so the building should be treated as having parking.
No analysis available
No analysis available
The remarks directly state that parking is not conveyed with the unit, which indicates it is not deeded/owned parking. Instead, parking appears to be rented as available rather than included as an owned stall.
No analysis available
I looked for any stated parking rent, monthly parking charge, or additional parking cost and found no dollar amount. The remarks imply parking may be rented, but they do not specify the fee.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
I searched for a parking waitlist or waiting list mention and did not find one. The only parking detail is that it can be rented on a first-come basis, which suggests availability depends on openings rather than a formal waitlist system.
No analysis available
I searched for card/fob access language such as keycard entry, fob access, or card readers. The remarks mention secured storage and a manager on site, but not a card-based security system.
No analysis available
I looked for any public remark indicating a security patrol service. The listings do not mention patrols, roving security, or a patrolled building.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
All 6 current listings are marked CONCRE, suggesting this is a stable building-level construction detail rather than a one-off unit entry. None of the remarks explicitly mention concrete or reinforced concrete, so the evidence comes mainly from consistent MLS data rather than the marketing copy.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Only 2 of 6 current listings carry MASSTU, while the remarks for all listings focus on location, ocean views, pool, and amenities with no mention of masonry or stucco. That weak, inconsistent pattern does not support treating masonry/stucco as a reliable building feature.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
I looked for any language indicating short-term rentals are allowed, such as STR permitted, vacation rental allowed, NUC, or TVU, and found none. The remarks mention vacation getaway and investment opportunity, but that is not the same as explicit STR approval.
I searched for hotel pool, rental program, Hilton/Trump/Ritz pool, or similar hotel-management language and found nothing. Because there is no evidence that short-term rentals are allowed, this must remain false.
I looked for statements that participation in a rental pool is required or mandatory, and found none. Since the remarks do not establish short-term rental eligibility, a mandatory hotel pool is not supported.
No analysis available
No analysis available
I searched for phrases like lease expires, ground lease ends, leasehold, or renewed through a specific year and found nothing. The remarks identify the property as a co-op, but they do not provide any land lease expiration information.
I looked for explicit references to VA loan approval or VA financing and found none. The public remarks describe the building, amenities, and parking, but do not mention anything about VA eligibility.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Flood zone determined from official FEMA Digital Flood Insurance Rate Map (DFIRM) data using building coordinates, not from agent-reported listing data.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Mountain-view evidence is present but not explicit: 2 of 6 current MLS listings include MOUNTA in the view field, and multiple remarks describe "Diamond Head views" or "breathtaking views of ocean, Kapiolani Park, Diamond Head." The remarks do not use the exact search terms (mountain/mauka/Koolau), so this looks like an implied rather than directly stated mountain-view feature.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
I looked for explicit statements that units can see Friday night fireworks from the building. The remarks discuss ocean, park, crater, and lanai views, but nothing about fireworks.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Strong evidence that this building has a resident/on-site manager. 1 of the 6 remarks explicitly says there is a "resourceful manager on site," and another references management contact through Hawaiiana; the MLS amenity checkbox is also present in all 6/6 listings. This appears consistent across listings rather than a one-off agent copy/paste entry.
No analysis available
The building is directly identified as a cooperative in multiple remarks, including "Diamond Head Ambassador is a CO-OP" and "one of the first coop buildings." This is reinforced by current MLS data showing COOTAX in association_fee_includes on 6/6 listings. Confidence is extremely high that the building is a co-op.
Confidence levels are based on MLS checkbox data and AI analysis of listing remarks. High = strong evidence, Medium = some evidence, Low = limited or conflicting evidence. Buyers should always verify critical details independently.