Diamond Head Alii
Preliminary Information – Full Audit Pending
This buildings features were determined from publicly available data, including MLS listings. While we cross-referenced additional data sources, it still likely contains incomplete or inaccurate information, as it has not yet been personally verified.
Once a building has been fully audited, this page will be replaced with an in-depth analysis featuring verified details and photos of every key feature.
Until then, we provide a data‑driven overview that blends statistical analysis of the checkbox selections agents make in MLS with an AI‑powered read of their public remarks—yielding a clearer picture of the building than raw listings alone.
If this building is important to your search, you can help prioritize it for a full audit by requesting one below. To see what a complete report looks like, check out the example full report.
Diamond Head Alii
Building Overview
Diamond Head Alii in Diamond Head-Kapahulu-St. Louis: concrete building from 1961 with no pets and no short-term rentals, per MLS data.
About Diamond Head Alii
Diamond Head Alii is located in the Diamond Head-Kapahulu-St. Louis neighborhood and was built in 1961. According to available records, the building is constructed of concrete. This overview is based on MLS data and reflects the basic building characteristics available in those records.
Key features and policies recorded in the MLS indicate that pets are not allowed and short-term rentals are not permitted. The management company is listed as unknown in the MLS data. Beyond construction type, year built, and these policies, no additional amenity or unit-size details are provided in the available MLS information.
Based on MLS data, potential buyers should verify details such as parking, maintenance fees, specific amenities, and management information with the listing agent or association, as those items are not specified in the provided records.
Building Features & Data Confidence
All features from MLS data with AI-assisted confidence analysis. Click each category to expand and see details.
No analysis available
I searched for occupancy information such as a percentage of owner-occupied units or phrases like "mostly owner occupied," but none were present. Without explicit remarks, the owner-occupancy rate cannot be determined from this data.
The listings consistently refer to the building as a walk-up, which is strong evidence that there are no elevators. I looked for explicit elevator mentions such as "elevator," "lift," or "multiple elevators," but found none.
Calculated from the lowest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from the highest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from association fees observed in penthouse unit listings for this building.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Four of six listings include OTCOEX, which points to a building-level common expense being included in maintenance. There are no explicit remarks confirming common electric, so this looks like moderate MLS evidence rather than direct agent verification.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Gas is not supported across the listing set: just 1 of 6 MLS records shows GAS, while the public remarks are silent on it. Given the weak MLS signal and lack of corroborating remarks, this is most likely not a standard fee inclusion for the building.
Hot water is strongly supported: 5 of 6 MLS listings include HOTWAT, and one listing spells it out in remarks. The absence of WTRHTR further reinforces that this is building-supplied hot water included in maintenance fees.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Sewer is consistently included across all six MLS listings, which is extremely strong building-level evidence. The remarks directly confirm it, so this feature should be treated as a reliable inclusion.
Water is included in maintenance fees across all six MLS records, making this a highly reliable building feature. The public remarks also directly confirm the inclusion.
BBQ/grilling facilities are supported by the current remarks, which mention an "pool/BBQ area." Historical MLS data also shows BBQ in 4 of 6 listings, reinforcing that this is a building amenity and not just copy-paste noise. Evidence is present in at least one listing remark and aligns with the MLS checkbox trend.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Patio/deck-style outdoor space is supported by the remarks in several listings, including phrases like "private lanai" and "open lanai." Combined with current MLS amenities showing 3 of 6 listings checked for PATDEC/COVPAT, the evidence suggests this is a real building feature available in some units rather than an isolated agent error.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Across the 6 public remarks, there is no explicit mention of storage units, lockers, or extra storage. The only evidence is sparse MLS checkbox data (1/6 in amenities and 1/6 in unit features), which is too weak to support the feature and is consistent with unverified agent input.
The remarks describe amenities such as pool, BBQ area, parking, pet-friendliness, and in-unit washer/dryer, but do not reference any dedicated surfboard or board storage. I searched for phrases like surfboard storage, board storage, surf storage, and bike & surfboard storage and found no matches. Based on this absence across several listings, the building likely does not offer dedicated surfboard storage.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Pool is strongly supported by both MLS amenities and public remarks. At least 2 listings explicitly mention it, including phrases like "on-site pool" and "pool/BBQ area," while current MLS data shows the pool amenity checked in all 6/6 listings. This looks like consistent building-level information rather than a one-off agent error.
No analysis available
The remarks confirm the presence of a pool but provide no indication that it is a salt water pool. I searched for terms such as 'salt water pool', 'saltwater', 'salt pool', and 'saline' and found no matches. In the absence of any explicit description, the pool is assumed not to be salt water.
Strong evidence across the listings confirms in-unit laundry. Multiple remarks explicitly say 'washer/dryer in the unit,' 'your own IN-UNIT washer/dryer,' and 'upgraded washer & dryer,' appearing in several separate listings rather than a single copy-paste mention. This aligns with the current MLS inclusions (6/6), so the feature should be included with very high confidence.
No analysis available
Across all provided remarks, there are no references to coin-op, card-op, or pay-per-use community laundry facilities. The only laundry described is in-unit, with no indication of any payment mechanism for shared machines. In the absence of such mentions, the building is treated as not having paid community laundry.
Listings for multiple units in the building only mention private in-unit washer/dryers and never refer to shared laundry rooms or laundry on each floor. Phrases like 'laundry on every floor' or 'common laundry room' are absent, suggesting there is no community laundry on every floor. Based on this lack of evidence, the feature is marked as not present.
Parking is strongly supported by both MLS data and remarks. Multiple listings mention "deeded parking," "dedicated parking," and a "covered, deeded parking stall," indicating the building offers parking for buyers searching for it. Evidence appears consistent across several listings rather than a one-off agent copy/paste.
Assigned parking is well supported. Several remarks use direct language like "deeded parking" and "dedicated parking," and the MLS data shows ASSIGN in most listings. This looks like a consistent building feature rather than checkbox noise.
No analysis available
Multiple listings directly describe the parking as deeded, including a covered deeded stall and dedicated parking language. This is strong, repeated evidence that the parking is owned with the unit.
No analysis available
I searched for explicit parking cost language such as "parking fee," "monthly parking," or "parking rental" and found none. The remarks only mention deeded/dedicated parking, so no separate monthly parking fee is documented.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
I looked for phrases like "parking waitlist," "parking waiting list," or "join waitlist for parking" and found nothing. The remarks describe deeded parking instead, with no indication that parking access is managed through a waitlist.
No analysis available
I searched all provided remarks for terms like key card access, fob access, keycard entry, electronic access, or controlled/card-reader entry and found no references. There is no evidence from current listings that a card/fob access system is present, so I retain the existing value as false with low confidence due to lack of explicit confirmation.
No analysis available
I reviewed all remarks for any indication of a security patrol, such as roving guards, patrol service, or a patrolled building, and found none. With no evidence that a patrol service exists, I keep the value as false with low confidence, as the remarks neither confirm nor explicitly deny this feature.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
The building should be marked as concrete construction with very high confidence based on MLS property data: 6 out of 6 listings list construction material as CONCRE. None of the public remarks contradict this, and the consistency across all listings suggests this is not a copy-paste anomaly but a stable building-level attribute.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
The remarks explicitly set a 30-day minimum rental period, which rules out short-term vacation-style rentals. Based on that language, STRs are not allowed in this building.
Because the building does not permit short-term rentals, it cannot participate in a hotel rental pool program. I also found no references to hotel management, Hilton/Trump/Ritz-style pool programs, or any similar rental pool arrangement.
A mandatory hotel pool would require both STR eligibility and explicit pool program language, neither of which appears here. The remarks contain no wording suggesting units must participate in a rental pool.
No analysis available
No analysis available
I looked for terms such as "lease expires," "leasehold," "ground lease ends," or any 4-digit lease expiration year and found nothing. Since the remarks do not reference a lease tenure or expiry date, the lease expiry year cannot be determined.
I searched the remarks for phrases like "VA approved," "VA financing," and "VA loans accepted" and found none. With no public remark evidence, this remains unconfirmed and is treated as not indicated by the listings.
The remarks only mention what the maintenance fee includes, but do not say anything about HOA master insurance or walls-in coverage. I looked for explicit insurance language and found no evidence to confirm the building is fully insured.
No analysis available
I searched the remarks for any reference to fire/life safety evaluation status, certification, or inspection results, and found nothing. Because there is no explicit mention, this remains unverified and is treated as false with low confidence.
Flood zone determined from official FEMA Digital Flood Insurance Rate Map (DFIRM) data using building coordinates, not from agent-reported listing data.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
1 of 6 listings explicitly mentions sunset views, with the phrase 'breathtaking sunsets from your private lanai.' Other remarks describe breezes and views of the valley/Waikiki, but only one listing directly confirms sunset exposure. Evidence is moderate and appears in agent remarks rather than just the checkbox data.
No analysis available
I looked for phrases like 'fireworks view', 'watch fireworks from lanai', or similar and none appeared. Since fireworks views are not explicitly advertised, it's assumed they are not a notable feature.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Confidence levels are based on MLS checkbox data and AI analysis of listing remarks. High = strong evidence, Medium = some evidence, Low = limited or conflicting evidence. Buyers should always verify critical details independently.