Crystal Park
Preliminary Information – Full Audit Pending
This buildings features were determined from publicly available data, including MLS listings. While we cross-referenced additional data sources, it still likely contains incomplete or inaccurate information, as it has not yet been personally verified.
Once a building has been fully audited, this page will be replaced with an in-depth analysis featuring verified details and photos of every key feature.
Until then, we provide a data‑driven overview that blends statistical analysis of the checkbox selections agents make in MLS with an AI‑powered read of their public remarks—yielding a clearer picture of the building than raw listings alone.
If this building is important to your search, you can help prioritize it for a full audit by requesting one below. To see what a complete report looks like, check out the example full report.
Crystal Park
Building Overview
Crystal Park in McCully-Moiliili, built 1982; pets and short-term rentals not allowed.
About Crystal Park
Crystal Park is a residential building located in the McCully-Moiliili neighborhood, originally built in 1982. According to available records, specific details on building size and construction type are not provided in the MLS data.
Key policies reported in the MLS include that pets are not allowed and short-term rentals are not permitted. The MLS does not list on-site amenities or common-area features, and the management company is recorded as unknown.
Additional items such as parking availability, maintenance fees, and other building rules are not specified in the provided MLS information. This summary is based on MLS data; buyers should verify all details with the listing agent, management, or official records before making decisions.
Building Features & Data Confidence
All features from MLS data with AI-assisted confidence analysis. Click each category to expand and see details.
No analysis available
I searched for explicit percentages such as "80% owner occupied" or descriptions like "majority owner occupied" and found none. Without a stated percentage or clear ownership ratio in the remarks, the owner-occupancy value cannot be determined from this data.
I searched the remarks for explicit elevator counts like "4 elevators" or "multiple elevators" and only found references to elevator access. That confirms the building has elevator service, but not how many elevators there are, so the numeric value remains unknown.
Calculated from the lowest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from the highest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from association fees observed in penthouse unit listings for this building.
No analysis available
Strong evidence cable is included: 12 of 13 MLS listings have CABTV checked and the public remarks explicitly list 'cable' in the HOA inclusions ('Internet, cable, water, garbage, sewer'). Multiple agent remarks repeat the HOA inclusions, suggesting consistent building-level coverage rather than a single-copy error.
No explicit evidence that common-area electricity is included: while some MLS records had OTCOEX checked (7 of 13), agents' public remarks do not mention 'common area electricity' or similar phrases. Given mixed MLS checkboxes and lack of remarks, inclusion is unlikely but not definitively contradicted.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Moderate evidence hot water is included: 12 of 13 MLS records have HOTWAT checked, supporting that hot water is likely part of maintenance fees, but public remarks do not explicitly mention 'hot water included' so confidence is moderate rather than high.
Strong evidence internet is included: 11 of 13 MLS listings check INTSER and the public remarks explicitly state 'Internet' in the HOA inclusions. Multiple agent remarks replicate the inclusion, indicating consistent building-level internet coverage.
No analysis available
Strong evidence sewer is included: 12 of 13 MLS records have SEWER checked and the public remarks explicitly include 'sewer' in the HOA inclusions. The consistency across many listings indicates this is a building-level inclusion.
Strong evidence water is included: 12 of 13 MLS listings check WATER and the public remarks explicitly name 'water' as an HOA inclusion. Multiple agents' remarks consistently list water, supporting that building maintenance fees include water.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
All 13 current MLS listings for this building indicate washer/dryer inclusions and the aggregated public remarks repeatedly state in-unit laundry: key phrases include 'stack washer-dryer', 'in-unit washer and dryer', and 'W/D in the unit'. Evidence is consistent across multiple listings/agents and aligns with prior high-confidence data, so the building should be marked as offering in-unit laundry for some units.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Multiple listings (at least 7 separate remarks) explicitly mention parking: '2 parking', 'one secured parking stall', 'parking is in a secure stall in the basement', and 'gated parking garage'. MLS checkbox data also indicates parking present across all 11 listings, providing strong corroboration across agents and listings.
Multiple current remarks (approximately 8–10 listings) explicitly reference dedicated or reserved stalls—e.g., "dedicated secured covered parking stall", "one secured parking stall", and "1 covered parking space." The MLS parking_features also shows ASSIGN checked in 10 of 13 listings. The repetition across many agent remarks suggests this is a building-level offering rather than isolated to one unit.
Strong, consistent evidence across the dataset: all MLS entries indicate covered/garage parking (13/13), and many remarks (≥10) explicitly say things like "secured covered parking stall" or "gated parking garage." This confirms the building offers covered parking.
I looked for explicit phrases like deeded parking, owned stall, or parking included in deed. The remarks only describe covered, secured, or gated parking, so deeded parking is not supported by the text.
No analysis available
I searched for parking fee language, monthly parking charges, or rental amounts tied to parking. None were found in the remarks, so no fee can be extracted.
None of the public remarks (0 mentions) reference guest/visitor parking, although a few MLS checkboxes list GUEST. Because guest parking is not mentioned in any remarks and appears infrequently in MLS flags, there is weak evidence that the building offers guest parking.
Multiple listings (around 8–9) mention secured access or gated parking—phrases include "secured building," "gated parking garage," and "secured entry and elevator access." MLS parking_features also shows SECENT checked in 9 of 13 listings. The consistency across agents supports marking secured entry as available.
No analysis available
No analysis available
I looked for references to a parking waitlist, joining a list for parking, or similar availability restrictions. The remarks do not mention any waitlist system.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Multiple listings indicate some units have split (ductless) AC: one remark says 'split AC' and another HOA highlight states 'two split AC units'. Several other listings reference AC or window ACs (e.g., 'ACs for year-round comfort', '2 window ACs'), so evidence supports that some units use split systems but the feature is not universal across the building.
10/13 current MLS listings include the ACWIUN inclusion. At least 5 separate public-remarks blocks mention air conditioning (phrases include "2 window ACs", "window ACs for year-round comfort", and "split AC"), with one listing explicitly stating "There are 2 window ACs." Evidence is consistent across multiple agent remarks and aligns with the MLS checkbox data, indicating the building offers units with window AC units.
Strong evidence across MLS checkbox data: 12 of 13 current listings list 'CONCRE' (previously 11 of 12), strongly indicating reinforced concrete construction. Public remarks for the units do not explicitly describe construction materials (no statements like 'masonry' or 'stucco' contradicting concrete). Multiple agents consistently checked the concrete box, suggesting the building is concrete.
No analysis available
No analysis available
MLS checkbox data is inconsistent (7 of 13 listings include 'MASSTU') but public remarks across all listings contain no references to 'masonry' or 'stucco' and do not describe such construction. Given lack of corroborating remarks and no prior high-confidence verification, the masonry/stucco feature is likely incorrect and has been omitted.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
2 of 12 MLS listings list 'ABOGRO' but none of the public remarks mention 'above ground' construction. With no supporting descriptions and minimal MLS prevalence, there is weak evidence for above-ground construction as a building-level feature.
Only 2 of 12 current MLS listings include 'BRICK' and no public remarks mention brick or 'brick exterior.' Given the lack of supporting remarks and only a minority of MLS entries flagging brick (historical medium confidence), the evidence does not convincingly support a brick-built building.
No analysis available
I searched for direct STR indicators like short-term rental allowed, NUC, TVU, or legal vacation rental wording. The remarks do not explicitly allow STRs, and generic investor/rental language is not sufficient to mark it true.
I looked for hotel pool language such as hotel rental pool, hotel-managed program, or brand pool references. None were found, and there is no evidence this building participates in a hotel rental pool.
I searched for phrases like mandatory hotel pool, must participate, or cannot opt out. The remarks contain no such language, so mandatory pool participation is not supported.
No analysis available
No analysis available
I searched for leasehold language such as lease expiry dates, ground lease end dates, or renewal terms, but found none. There is no specific year to extract from the public remarks.
Public remarks directly state that Crystal Park is VA approved, which indicates VA financing is accepted. This is strong direct evidence from the listings.
Multiple remarks directly state the building is fully insured, including all-caps language and a mention of a full hurricane policy. This is strong, explicit evidence and supports a high-confidence true value.
No analysis available
I looked for phrases indicating a passed fire/life safety evaluation, FLSE, or fire inspection compliance and found none. With no explicit remark evidence, this feature is treated as not confirmed in the public remarks.
Flood zone determined from official FEMA Digital Flood Insurance Rate Map (DFIRM) data using building coordinates, not from agent-reported listing data.
No analysis available
No analysis available
MLS data lists mountain views on 7 of 13 listings and one or more public remarks explicitly mention 'panoramic mountain views.' While many remarks describe park views, the explicit phrase 'panoramic mountain views' in the remarks provides strong, corroborating evidence across MLS and agent descriptions that the building offers mountain views.
No analysis available
The building's MLS data indicates city views on 8 of 13 listings and prior historical confidence was High for city views. Public remarks do not explicitly mention 'city view' or 'downtown view', suggesting some agent descriptions may be copy-pasted, but the strong historical and MLS checklist evidence indicates the building offers city-view units.
No analysis available
Only 1 of 11 current MLS entries lists GARDEN, but none of the public remarks use terms like 'garden view', 'courtyard view', or 'landscaped view' (remarks mention a planter box and a park-facing view instead). Given the lack of corroborating remarks and no historical confidence, GARDEN is omitted until further verification.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No listings (0/12) mention 'SUNSET' and one listing explicitly lists 'NONE' for view. None of the public remarks reference sunset views, western exposure, 'evening sun', or similar phrases; descriptions instead note mountain views, park-facing aspects, and floor-to-ceiling windows. Given the lack of any agent remarks across multiple listings and no prior confidence, the evidence supports removing sunset view as a building feature.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Across 13 listings, none of the remarks explicitly describe an on-site or resident manager. Only 3 listings show RESMAN in amenities, and the wording in the remarks does not corroborate it, so this appears unverified and possibly agent-added. No strong evidence indicates the building actually has a resident manager.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Confidence levels are based on MLS checkbox data and AI analysis of listing remarks. High = strong evidence, Medium = some evidence, Low = limited or conflicting evidence. Buyers should always verify critical details independently.