Crosspointe C
Preliminary Information – Full Audit Pending
This buildings features were determined from publicly available data, including MLS listings. While we cross-referenced additional data sources, it still likely contains incomplete or inaccurate information, as it has not yet been personally verified.
Once a building has been fully audited, this page will be replaced with an in-depth analysis featuring verified details and photos of every key feature.
Until then, we provide a data‑driven overview that blends statistical analysis of the checkbox selections agents make in MLS with an AI‑powered read of their public remarks—yielding a clearer picture of the building than raw listings alone.
If this building is important to your search, you can help prioritize it for a full audit by requesting one below. To see what a complete report looks like, check out the example full report.
Crosspointe C
Building Overview
Crosspointe C in Aliamanu-Salt Lake (built 1985). Pets not allowed; short-term rentals prohibited.
About Crosspointe C
Based on MLS data, Crosspointe C is a residential building located in the Aliamanu-Salt Lake neighborhood and was built in 1985. Specifics such as unit sizes, number of units, and construction type are not listed in the available MLS records.
According to available records, key building policies include a prohibition on pets and a ban on short-term rentals. The MLS listing does not provide details about on-site amenities, common area features, or HOA services.
Management company, parking provisions, maintenance fees, and other homeowner association details are listed as unknown or not provided in the MLS data. Buyers should verify all building features, rules, and fee information with the listing agent or managing entity before making decisions.
Building Features & Data Confidence
All features from MLS data with AI-assisted confidence analysis. Click each category to expand and see details.
No analysis available
No analysis available
I looked for explicit owner-occupancy figures or descriptive language such as '80% owner occupied' or 'highly owner occupied,' but found nothing. Since the remarks do not provide a percentage or owner-occupancy description, the value remains unknown.
I searched the remarks for explicit elevator references such as '1 elevator,' '4 elevators,' 'multiple elevators,' or similar wording, and found none. Because there is no current value provided and no remark-based evidence, the elevator count remains unknown.
Calculated from the lowest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from the highest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from association fees observed in penthouse unit listings for this building.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Common area electricity appears to be included at Crosspointe, with 9 of 10 current MLS listings checking OTCOEX. None of the public remarks spell it out, so this is driven by consistent MLS data rather than text descriptions. The pattern looks systematic across listings, not like a one-off agent copy.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Hot water does not appear to be included in the maintenance fee. None of the current MLS listings check HOTWAT, and several instead list WTRHTR, which is a strong indicator that individual water heaters are present. Public remarks also do not mention hot water being included.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Sewer is included according to the current MLS data, with 9 of 10 listings checking SEWER. The public remarks do not directly confirm it, but the consistency across multiple listings makes this a strong building-level feature. This looks more reliable than a one-off agent note.
Water appears to be included in the maintenance fee at Crosspointe, based on 9 of 10 current MLS listings checking WATER. The remarks do not explicitly mention water, so this is primarily supported by the MLS data. The repeated inclusion suggests a building-wide amenity rather than a listing error.
BBQ/grilling facilities are referenced in many listings, with repeated phrases like 'BBQ area' and 'BBQ areas.' The evidence is consistent across multiple agents and aligns with the strong historical MLS pattern.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
The building/community is explicitly described as offering a 'clubhouse' in the remarks. This is consistent with the historical MLS data and appears to be a stable shared amenity.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Exercise/fitness amenities are mentioned in several listings, including 'fitness center,' 'exercise room,' and 'workout room.' This is consistent across multiple remarks and appears to be a real building amenity rather than a one-off MLS checkbox.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Strong building-level evidence that patio/deck-type outdoor space is available. Multiple listings mention a lanai or private courtyard, including phrases like "generous lanai," "spacious lanai," "large private lanai," and a "covered, cozy spot" with a retractable awning. This appears consistent across many remarks rather than a one-off agent copy-paste issue.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Recreation area is directly called out in the remarks, including 'Recreation Area' alongside other community amenities. The repeated mention across listings suggests a common building amenity.
A recreation/rec room is explicitly referenced in multiple listings, including 'rec room' and 'recreation center.' This appears to be a genuine shared amenity and not just copied MLS text.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
I looked for surfboard storage-related phrases such as surfboard storage, board storage, or surf storage. There are no references to surfboard storage facilities in the public remarks.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Whirlpool/jacuzzi is directly mentioned in several listings, including 'whirlpool' and 'jacuzzi.' The repeated explicit references across remarks make this a strong, reliable building feature.
The pool feature is strongly confirmed across the remarks: roughly 8 of the listing blocks explicitly mention a pool, with some adding details like 'heated swimming pool' and 'pool, jacuzzi.' This looks consistent across multiple agents rather than a one-off checkbox entry, so the building should be treated as having a shared pool amenity.
No analysis available
The listings confirm that the building has a pool, including one description of a heated swimming pool. However, I found no public remark describing it as saltwater, saline, or salt pool.
9 of 10 current MLS listings list WASHER/DRYER in the inclusions, indicating in-unit laundry is likely available in this building. The public remarks reviewed here do not explicitly say "in-unit laundry," so this appears driven more by MLS agent data than by repeated remark language.
No analysis available
I looked for coin laundry, card-operated machines, quarters, laundry fees, or other paid-laundry language. The remarks do not mention any laundry setup, so there is no evidence that community laundry is paid.
I searched the public remarks for any wording like laundry on every floor, laundry room on each floor, or floor-by-floor laundry. There is no mention of community laundry facilities at all, so this cannot be confirmed from the listings.
Parking is clearly present across the building. Every current MLS listing includes parking features, and the remarks repeatedly reference 'two parking stalls,' 'two assigned parking spaces,' and 'one covered parking stall plus guest parking.'
Assigned parking is strongly supported by both MLS data and remarks. At least several listings explicitly say 'assigned parking' or 'assigned parking stalls,' while the current MLS records show the ASSIGN checkbox in nearly all listings.
Covered parking is well supported. Multiple listings explicitly mention covered stalls or covered parking, and the MLS data shows covered/garage parking in a strong majority of current listings.
I looked for deeded, owned, or parking-included-in-the-deed wording and found none. The listings describe assigned, covered, and rented stalls instead, which does not support deeded parking.
No analysis available
I searched for an explicit monthly parking charge, parking rental amount, or additional parking cost. The remarks indicate a rented parking option, but they do not provide a fee, so the monthly cost is unknown.
Guest parking appears to be an offered building feature. The MLS data shows guest parking in a majority of listings, and at least one public remark directly confirms it with the phrase 'plus guest parking.'
Secured entry/parking-related security is strongly indicated. Several remarks mention a gated community, security guard, and 24-hour security, which aligns with the MLS secured-entry checkbox appearing in some listings.
No analysis available
No analysis available
I looked for parking waitlist language such as joining a queue or waiting list. Nothing in the remarks indicates that the building uses a parking waitlist system.
No analysis available
I looked for key card, fob, card reader, or keycard entry language. The remarks mention gated access and security staffing, but nothing about a card-based access system.
Security guard service is strongly supported for Crosspointe. At least 3 listings explicitly mention it, including phrases like 'security guard' and '24-hour security,' which align with the historical MLS data where 9/10 listings have SECGUA checked. This appears to be a consistent building-level amenity rather than an isolated agent error.
I searched for explicit patrol wording such as security patrol, roving security, or patrolled building. The listings mention security guards and 24-hour security, but not a patrol service, so this is not confirmed.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Window AC appears to be a current building feature based on MLS inclusions: 10/10 listings have ACWIUN checked. None of the public remarks explicitly say "window AC," "window unit," or "wall AC," so this is supported by MLS data rather than agent narrative. One remark mentions a split AC in a specific unit, which is a separate AC type and does not contradict the building-level MLS flag.
No analysis available
All current listings have the DOUWAL construction-materials checkbox set, which is strong evidence that Crosspointe is treated as a double-wall building in the MLS. None of the public remarks explicitly say “double wall” or similar phrasing, so this appears to be checkbox-based data rather than remark-confirmed copy. Still, the consistency across all current listings supports including it.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Five of ten current listings have the SLAB checkbox set, indicating slab construction appears in part of the building’s MLS data. No public remarks explicitly mention a concrete slab or solid concrete foundation, so the evidence is moderate rather than strong. Because buyers searching for slab construction would still want to know it is available in the building, it should be included with moderate confidence.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Six of nine current listings have the above-ground (ABOGRO) checkbox set, while 0 of 9 public remarks mention above-ground construction. The MLS checkbox presence across multiple listings implies the building may be classified as above-ground in some units, but absence of descriptive confirmation reduces confidence to a moderate level.
No analysis available
No analysis available
I searched for STR-related wording such as short-term rental allowed, legal vacation rental, NUC, TVU, or minimum-stay rules. None were found in the public remarks, so there is no evidence that STRs are allowed.
I looked for hotel pool references such as Hilton, Ritz, Trump, hotel rental program, or similar managed rental pools. No such language appears in the remarks, so this is not supported.
I searched for wording like mandatory pool, required participation, cannot opt out, or must rent. The public remarks contain none of that language, so mandatory hotel-pool participation is not supported.
No analysis available
No analysis available
I searched for lease expiration language such as a year, ground lease end date, or renewal/extension term. The remarks only mention that the property is leasehold, so the expiry year cannot be determined from the public text.
The listings explicitly advertise VA financing through an assumable VA loan option. This is strong public evidence that VA financing is supported for at least some sales in the building.
I searched for insurance-related phrases that would indicate the HOA provides full building coverage or walls-in insurance, and found none. The remarks do not mention being fully insured, so this cannot be confirmed from the available text.
No analysis available
I looked for any fire/life safety compliance language, including FLSE passed, fire safety certified, life safety compliant, or passed fire inspection, but nothing appeared in the remarks. With no explicit evidence, I cannot confirm that the building has passed a fire/life safety evaluation.
Flood zone determined from official FEMA Digital Flood Insurance Rate Map (DFIRM) data using building coordinates, not from agent-reported listing data.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Garden/courtyard-type views are supported by multiple remarks across the listings, especially "beautifully maintained grounds," "lush, tropical greenery," and "private courtyard." Evidence is moderate rather than universal because current MLS view data is mixed, with some listings showing GARDEN and others NONE. This suggests some units face landscaped/common grounds while others do not.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
One of nine MLS listings (1/9) explicitly lists 'SUNSET' in view_descriptions, while four listings list 'NONE' and none of the public remarks reference 'sunset', 'western exposure', or similar. The single MLS mention suggests some units may have sunset views, but the evidence is weak and possibly due to agent checkboxing/copy-paste, so confidence is moderate (0.72).
No analysis available
I searched for explicit fireworks-view language such as seeing Friday night fireworks from the unit, lanai, or building. The listings only discuss location and amenities, with no indication of a fireworks view.
No analysis available
Across these listings, 0 remarks explicitly mention a resident manager or similar on-site management presence. The evidence suggests the RESMAN amenity checkbox may be a data-entry artifact rather than a verified building feature, since the descriptions repeatedly list pool/clubhouse/security-style amenities but never management staff on property.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Confidence levels are based on MLS checkbox data and AI analysis of listing remarks. High = strong evidence, Medium = some evidence, Low = limited or conflicting evidence. Buyers should always verify critical details independently.