Crosspointe B-1
Preliminary Information – Full Audit Pending
This buildings features were determined from publicly available data, including MLS listings. While we cross-referenced additional data sources, it still likely contains incomplete or inaccurate information, as it has not yet been personally verified.
Once a building has been fully audited, this page will be replaced with an in-depth analysis featuring verified details and photos of every key feature.
Until then, we provide a data‑driven overview that blends statistical analysis of the checkbox selections agents make in MLS with an AI‑powered read of their public remarks—yielding a clearer picture of the building than raw listings alone.
If this building is important to your search, you can help prioritize it for a full audit by requesting one below. To see what a complete report looks like, check out the example full report.
Crosspointe B-1
Building Overview
Crosspointe B-1 in Aliamanu-Salt Lake, built 1985. Pets and short-term rentals are not allowed; management company not listed.
About Crosspointe B-1
Based on MLS data, Crosspointe B-1 is located in the Aliamanu-Salt Lake neighborhood and was built in 1985. Specific details about unit sizes, number of floors, or construction type are not provided in the available MLS records.
According to available records, the building does not allow pets and does not permit short-term rentals. The MLS entry does not list a management company or on-site amenities; no additional facilities (such as a pool, gym, or recreation areas) are identified in the data provided.
Information about parking, monthly maintenance fees, insurance, or other homeowner association rules is not included in the MLS data. Buyers should verify all building details, policies, fees, and availability of management or amenities with the listing agent or association before making decisions.
Building Features & Data Confidence
All features from MLS data with AI-assisted confidence analysis. Click each category to expand and see details.
No analysis available
Calculated from the lowest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from the highest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from association fees observed in penthouse unit listings for this building.
No analysis available
Cable TV is supported by both the remarks and the MLS checkbox data. One listing explicitly says the HOA covers "cable TV," and 4 of 5 current listings include CABTV, suggesting this is a building-wide fee inclusion and not a one-off agent error.
All 4 current MLS listings show OTCOEX (common area electricity) in association_fee_includes, indicating building/common area electric is included in the maintenance fee. Public remarks do not explicitly reference this, so the conclusion relies on consistent MLS checkbox data across multiple listings.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
There is no current evidence that hot water is included in the maintenance fee. The MLS is consistently unchecking HOTWAT, and multiple listings list WTRHTR in unit inclusions, which points away from HOA-provided hot water.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Sewer inclusion is very strong and consistent. All 5 current MLS listings show SEWER, and at least one public remark explicitly says the HOA covers "sewer," making this a high-confidence building feature.
Water inclusion is confirmed across every current MLS listing. The remarks also explicitly say the HOA covers "water," so this appears to be a stable building-level inclusion rather than copy-paste noise.
BBQ is consistently supported across the remarks and the MLS data. Multiple listings explicitly reference 'BBQ areas' or a 'BBQ area,' matching the prior high-confidence MLS signal of 5/5 listings showing BBQ. This looks like a stable shared building amenity rather than a copy-paste anomaly.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Clubhouse is directly referenced in several remarks, not just one isolated listing. With current MLS data showing 4/5 listings checked and remarks repeatedly describing a clubhouse as part of the community amenities, this is strong evidence the building offers a shared clubhouse/community space.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
At least 3 of 4 public remarks explicitly reference building fitness facilities — phrases include 'exercise room' and 'fitness center' (e.g., 'resort-style amenities including a pool, exercise room, clubhouse' and 'fitness center'). Evidence is consistent across multiple listings and agents, supporting a high-confidence inclusion of an exercise/fitness room.
No analysis available
No analysis available
3 of the 5 listings mention some form of patio/deck-like outdoor space, including "open lanai," "private courtyard," and "private court yard." This looks like a real building-level offering for some units rather than a one-off agent copy, even though the MLS amenities checkbox is only present in 2/5 listings.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Multiple listings (about 3 of 4) describe shared amenity/recreation spaces — 'resort-style amenities', 'volleyball court', 'playground', 'private courtyard', pool/hot tub — indicating the building offers recreation area(s). The evidence is consistent but phrased broadly, so the feature is included with moderate confidence.
Several listings (2–3) reference a clubhouse or similar indoor common space (phrases like 'clubhouse' appear in remarks), which is commonly synonymous with a recreation/rec room. The evidence is somewhat implied rather than always explicit, so inclusion is supported at moderate confidence.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
At least one listing explicitly advertises an owner’s attic for extra storage (“HUGE BONUS owner’s attic for extra storage!”). MLS checkbox data also shows storage present in 1 of 4 listings (amenities and unit_features). Evidence is limited to some listings and may reflect unit-level extra storage rather than shared lockers, but it is sufficient to include storage_unit as available in the building.
I looked for surfboard storage, board storage, or surf storage in the public remarks. There was no mention of any dedicated surfboard storage area.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Pool is strongly confirmed. All 5 current listings reference it in amenities, and 4 separate remarks explicitly mention a pool with phrases like 'resort-style amenities include a pool,' 'enjoy resort-style amenities: pool,' 'great amenities, including a pool,' and 'a sparkling pool.' The evidence is consistent across multiple agents and reads like a standard shared community amenity, not a copied-in error.
No analysis available
I searched the public remarks for any indication that the pool is salt water. The listings only say there is a pool or sparkling pool, with no salt-water description.
Laundry in unit is strongly supported across the building: current MLS data shows washer/dryer in the inclusions for all 5/5 listings, and at least one public remark explicitly says 'a brand new stacked washer and dryer.' This appears consistent rather than copy-paste noise, so the feature should be kept as true.
No analysis available
I looked for terms like coin laundry, quarters, card-operated laundry, or laundry fees. The remarks only mention an in-unit stacked washer and dryer, so there is no evidence of paid community laundry.
I searched the public remarks for references to laundry rooms on every floor, floor-by-floor laundry access, or similar wording. The listings mention a stacked washer and dryer in one unit, but that does not indicate shared laundry on each floor.
Parking is clearly present at the building. Across the provided remarks, 4 listings explicitly reference parking details, including "2 assigned parking stalls," "1 covered + 1 open parking stall," and "comes with two parking spaces." This is strong, consistent evidence and matches the MLS checkbox data.
Assigned parking appears to be a real building feature. Multiple remarks specify assigned or designated stalls, and one even lists stall numbers, which is strong evidence of reserved parking. The language is consistent across listings rather than a one-off copy-paste claim.
MLS indicates covered parking on some listings and at least one public remark explicitly says 'one covered stall plus one open stall', supporting that covered parking exists in the building.
I looked for explicit language such as deeded parking, owned stall, or parking included in deed. The remarks only confirm assigned parking spaces and stall counts, which is not enough to conclude the parking is deeded. So this remains false/unsupported based on the public remarks.
No analysis available
I searched for parking fee language such as monthly parking charge, parking rent, or extra cost for stalls. The remarks only mention assigned stalls and parking type, with no fee information. Because no fee is stated, the value is unknown.
Guest parking is supported by the MLS checkbox data, with all 5 current listings marked for it. However, none of the public remarks explicitly mention "guest" or "visitor" parking, so this is more likely MLS-driven than remark-confirmed. Confidence is moderate rather than high.
Two MLS records include secured-entry parking and multiple remarks describe a 'gated community' and '24-hour security'. While remarks don't explicitly say 'gated parking', the recurring gated-community language across listings supports secured entry for parking.
No analysis available
No analysis available
I looked for references to a parking waitlist, waiting list, or joining a list for parking. The remarks only describe assigned parking stalls and do not mention any waitlist system. With no evidence of a waitlist, this is treated as false/absent.
No analysis available
I looked for card/fob access terms such as keycard entry, fob access, or card reader security. The remarks only mention a gated community and a security guard, not card-based access.
Security guard service is strongly supported for this building. Current remarks mention it in 2+ listings, including explicit phrases such as 'a security guard' and '24-hour security,' which aligns with the high-confidence MLS amenity data (5/5 listings showing SECGUA).
I searched for explicit references to patrol service or roving security. The remarks mention a security guard and 24-hour security, but do not describe a patrol service.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Window AC is clearly present in the building based on both historical MLS inclusions and current public remarks. 2 of the provided remarks explicitly say "window AC units" / "window AC’s," and the feature was already high-confidence in the MLS data. The evidence is strong and consistent, not a likely copy-paste error.
No analysis available
No listing remarks mention double wall construction, despite the MLS checkbox appearing consistently across 5 of 5 listings. That consistency suggests the data may be copy-pasted, but there is not enough remark evidence in this set to independently confirm it.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
None of the provided remarks explicitly mention wood frame construction. The current MLS checkbox is present in only 3 of 5 listings, which looks more like incomplete agent-entered data than verified building information. Without explicit remark support, this feature is not validated.
The remarks describe unit locations such as ground floor, single-level townhouse, and upper-level residence, but none explicitly state above-ground construction. With only 2 of 5 listings carrying the MLS code and no direct textual support, this feature remains unverified.
No analysis available
No analysis available
I searched for explicit short-term rental language such as STR allowed, vacation rental, NUC, TVU, or legal short-term rental. Nothing in the remarks indicates STR is permitted, and there is no countervailing evidence. Based on the remarks alone, STR is not supported.
I looked for hotel pool references such as hotel rental pool, hotel program, or management by a hotel brand. None were present in the remarks. Since STR is not established either, this must remain false.
I searched for terms indicating mandatory participation in a rental pool, such as required to rent, cannot opt out, or must be in the program. The remarks contain none of that language. With no STR program evidence, mandatory pool is false.
No analysis available
No analysis available
The listing clearly identifies the property as leasehold and gives a specific lease expiration year. I used the explicit year stated in the remarks. No conflicting later extension date was mentioned.
The public remarks directly reference VA financing options, including assumable VA loans. That is strong evidence the building/unit is VA loan approved or at least accepts VA-related financing. Confidence is very high because the statements are explicit and repeated.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Flood zone determined from official FEMA Digital Flood Insurance Rate Map (DFIRM) data using building coordinates, not from agent-reported listing data.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Mountain views are confirmed in at least 1 of the 5 current listings, with the phrase 'open lanai with mountain views' directly stating it. The MLS data also includes MOUNTA in the view descriptions for one listing, while other listings show NONE, so this appears to be a unit-specific feature available in the building rather than a universal one.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No listings mention sunset or western exposure: 0 of 4 listings include 'SUNSET' in view_descriptions while 2 of 4 explicitly state 'NONE'. The combined public remarks across the listings contain no references to 'sunset', 'evening sun', 'western exposure', or similar phrases, so there's strong evidence the building does not offer a sunset view.
No analysis available
I searched for explicit statements that residents can see Friday night fireworks from the building or from a unit. The remarks mention mountain views and general location convenience, but nothing about fireworks views.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Strong evidence the building has a resident manager on-site. Current MLS data shows RESMAN in amenities across 5/5 listings, and one public remark explicitly lists a "resident manager" alongside pool, clubhouse, BBQ areas, and security. The repeated MLS checkbox plus an explicit remark make this highly reliable rather than a copy-paste artifact.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Confidence levels are based on MLS checkbox data and AI analysis of listing remarks. High = strong evidence, Medium = some evidence, Low = limited or conflicting evidence. Buyers should always verify critical details independently.