Cove Waikiki
Preliminary Information – Full Audit Pending
This buildings features were determined from publicly available data, including MLS listings. While we cross-referenced additional data sources, it still likely contains incomplete or inaccurate information, as it has not yet been personally verified.
Once a building has been fully audited, this page will be replaced with an in-depth analysis featuring verified details and photos of every key feature.
Until then, we provide a data‑driven overview that blends statistical analysis of the checkbox selections agents make in MLS with an AI‑powered read of their public remarks—yielding a clearer picture of the building than raw listings alone.
If this building is important to your search, you can help prioritize it for a full audit by requesting one below. To see what a complete report looks like, check out the example full report.
Cove Waikiki
Building Overview
Cove Waikiki in Waikiki — concrete building from 2015; pets allowed, short-term rentals not permitted.
About Cove Waikiki
Based on MLS data, Cove Waikiki is a concrete condominium building located in the Waikiki neighborhood. According to available records the building was built in 2015. The provided MLS information does not include building size, unit counts, or number of floors.
Key features reported in the MLS indicate that pets are allowed and short-term rentals are not permitted. No specific amenities were listed in the available MLS data; prospective buyers should request a full amenities list and verify HOA rules and amenities directly with the seller or managing agent.
Additional details such as parking provisions, maintenance fees, management company, and other policies are not specified in the MLS data provided (management company listed as Unknown). This summary is based on MLS data analysis; buyers should independently verify all facts, policies, and fees before making purchasing decisions.
Building Features & Data Confidence
All features from MLS data with AI-assisted confidence analysis. Click each category to expand and see details.
No analysis available
I searched for explicit owner-occupancy figures or descriptors such as '80% owner occupied' or 'majority owner occupied,' but found none. The remarks do not provide enough information to estimate owner occupancy.
I searched the public remarks for explicit elevator references such as a count ('4 elevators'), 'multiple elevators,' or similar wording, but found none. There is no evidence in these listings to confirm the number of elevators.
Calculated from the lowest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from the highest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from association fees observed in penthouse unit listings for this building.
No analysis available
No analysis available
12 of 16 current MLS listings include OTCOEX/common area electricity in association fees. No public remarks explicitly say 'common area electricity' or equivalent, so this appears to come from MLS checkbox data rather than agent descriptions. The evidence suggests the feature is likely included, but it is not directly confirmed by remarks.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No current listings (0/15) list HOTWAT in association_fee_includes and 6/15 explicitly include WTRHTR (unit water heater) in unit inclusions, reinforcing that hot water is not provided/covered by the association. Historical confidence was high and current MLS checkbox data strongly confirms hot water is not included.
No analysis available
No analysis available
All 16 current MLS listings include SEWER in association_fee_includes. Although the remarks do not spell out 'sewer included,' the consistency across every listing strongly supports that sewer is part of the building's maintenance fees. This looks like stable MLS data rather than a one-off copy-paste error.
15 of 16 current MLS listings include WATER in association_fee_includes. The remarks do not explicitly say 'water included,' but the near-uniform MLS pattern strongly supports that water is included in maintenance fees. This appears to be a consistent building-level charge rather than an isolated agent entry.
BBQ/grilling is very well supported. At least a dozen public remarks reference “BBQ area,” “outdoor BBQ area,” “grilling area,” or similar phrasing, across multiple listings and agents. This looks consistent and not like a one-off copy-paste error.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
This feature is directly confirmed by the listing remarks. The amenity is explicitly named as 'bike/surfboard storage,' which is clear evidence that surfboard storage is available.
No analysis available
Trash chute appears to be a real building amenity based on the MLS checkbox data: 13 of 16 listings mark TRACHU. However, none of the public remarks mention a “trash chute,” “garbage chute,” or similar wording, so the evidence is mostly from MLS fields rather than listing descriptions.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Strong, consistent evidence that The Cove Waikiki has a shared swimming pool. Roughly 10+ listings mention it directly, with phrases like "Residents enjoy a swimming pool," "pool and BBQ areas," "tropical pool and lounge area," and "large swimming pool and outdoor entertainment space." The consistency across many different remarks suggests this is not just copy-paste checkbox data but an actual amenity.
No analysis available
I checked for explicit salt-pool wording like 'salt water pool' or 'saltwater pool.' The building does have a pool, but the public remarks do not identify it as salt water, so this cannot be confirmed.
In-unit laundry is consistently supported across the listing remarks and matches the historical MLS pattern. Multiple listings explicitly say "in-unit washer/dryer," "full-size washer/dryer in the unit," or "stackable washer and dryer in the unit," indicating this is a standard building feature rather than a one-off claim.
No analysis available
I looked for signs of paid community laundry such as coin laundry, coin-op machines, card-operated washers, or laundry fees. The remarks only reference in-unit washer/dryer, so there is no evidence from the listings that community laundry is paid.
I searched the remarks for wording like 'laundry on each floor,' 'laundry room on every floor,' and similar floor-by-floor laundry references. The listings only mention in-unit washer/dryer, so there is no public-remarks evidence that community laundry exists on every floor.
No analysis available
Assigned parking is strongly supported. Several listings explicitly mention '2 secure, assigned parking stalls,' 'Two assigned parking stalls,' and '2 assigned parking spaces,' which is consistent with the current MLS assigned-parking pattern. The repeated phrasing across multiple remarks suggests this is a real building feature, not a one-off copy-paste error.
Covered/garage parking is clearly present in the building. Multiple remarks mention 'secured covered parking stall,' '2 covered parking stalls,' '2 Garage Parking Spaces,' and 'secured, gated garage,' aligning with the current MLS covered-parking pattern. The evidence is repeated across several listings and agents, so this appears to be a stable building feature.
I looked for explicit deeded/owned parking language such as "deeded parking," "parking included in deed," or "owned stall." The listings consistently describe assigned/secured stalls, which is not the same as deeded parking, so I mark this false based on lack of explicit deeded evidence.
No analysis available
A listing gives a clear monthly cost for an additional parking stall. This supports a parking fee of 100 per month for the rented second stall.
Guest parking is well supported across the listing set. At least several remarks explicitly say 'guest parking,' including 'Guest parking in the complex' and 'guest parking is available,' matching the current MLS guest-parking indicator. The repeated mentions across multiple listings make this a high-confidence building amenity.
Secured-entry parking is strongly evidenced. Remarks mention 'secured entry,' 'secure, gated garage,' and 'secured parking' in multiple listings, consistent with the current MLS secured-entry parking flag. This appears to be a genuine shared building feature rather than a single-agent checkbox.
No analysis available
No analysis available
I searched for "parking waitlist," "parking waiting list," and similar wording, but found nothing. The listings discuss assigned, secured, and extra rented stalls, not a waitlist system.
No analysis available
I looked for card/fob access language such as key card entry, fob access, card readers, or electronic access. The remarks only say secured entry/parking and gated garage, which indicates security but not a card-based access system.
No analysis available
I searched for explicit patrol language, including security patrol, roving security, and patrolled building wording. The remarks reference secure access and a resident manager, but nothing about an actual patrol service.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Strong evidence confirms window AC is available in the building. At least 3 separate public-remarks entries explicitly mention 'window AC units,' 'through the wall AC units,' or 'bedroom AC units,' aligning with the historical MLS inclusion of ACWIUN across all current listings. This appears to be consistent, cross-listing evidence rather than a one-off agent copy/paste.
10 of 15 current MLS records list 'CONCRE' as a construction material, suggesting the building is concrete. None of the public remarks explicitly mention 'concrete', 'concrete construction', or 'reinforced concrete', so the evidence relies on MLS checkbox data across multiple listings and may reflect agent checkbox use rather than explicit description in remarks. Moderate confidence reflects agreement across many listings but absence of explicit confirmation in remarks.
Double wall construction appears in 9 of 16 current MLS entries, but none of the public remarks explicitly say “double wall,” “double-wall,” or similar wording. The evidence is stronger than a one-off checkbox, but it still looks somewhat like agent-entered MLS data rather than verified site remarks, so confidence is moderate rather than high.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
SLAB is checked in 8 of 14 MLS records, yet none of the public remarks mention 'concrete slab', 'slab foundation', or similar foundation descriptions. The absence of any supporting language across multiple agent remarks suggests the checkbox entries are likely inconsistent and do not provide reliable evidence of slab construction.
No analysis available
There is no public-remarks evidence that The Cove Waikiki is wood frame constructed. Only 3 of 16 current MLS records have WOOFRA checked, which is too little and too unsupported by remarks to treat as a reliable building feature.
Only 3 of 14 MLS records previously included ABOGRO and the historical confidence was Low. Across the provided public remarks for the building (multiple listings/units), there are no phrases like 'above ground', 'above-ground construction', or mentions of above-ground materials. Evidence is inconsistent across agents and likely due to checkbox/copy-paste errors; available remarks do not support including this as a building-level feature.
No analysis available
No analysis available
I looked for short-term rental indicators like "STR permitted," "legal short-term rental," "TVU," "NUC," and hotel-style rental references. Nothing in the remarks indicates STR is allowed, so this is set to false from absence of evidence.
I searched for hotel rental pool language such as hotel program, managed by hotel, or branded pools like Hilton/Trump/Ritz. No such references appear, and because STR is not supported in the remarks, this must be false.
I looked for wording like "must participate," "required to rent," or "cannot opt out," but found none. There is also no evidence of any STR hotel pool, so mandatory participation is false.
No analysis available
No analysis available
I searched for leasehold language such as "lease expires," "ground lease," "leasehold," and renewal dates, but found nothing. There is no public-remarks evidence of a land lease expiry year.
The public remarks repeatedly and directly confirm VA financing approval for the building. The repeated phrasing across multiple listings makes this highly reliable.
I searched for 'fully insured,' 'full insurance,' 'walls-in coverage,' or 'comprehensive building insurance,' but the only insurance-related statement was that 'hurricane insurance is in place.' That suggests some coverage exists, but it does not confirm the building is fully insured by the HOA.
Fire sprinkler coverage is strongly supported across the listings. At least 4 remarks explicitly mention 'fire sprinklers,' 'sprinklers are already installed,' or 'fire sprinkler system,' and the historical MLS data already showed FIRSPR checked in 11/16 listings. This looks like a consistent building feature rather than copy-paste noise.
I looked for phrases like 'fire life safety evaluation passed,' 'FLSE passed,' 'life safety compliant,' or 'passed fire inspection,' but did not find any. The remarks only mention fire sprinklers, which is not the same as a passing FLSE result.
Flood zone determined from official FEMA Digital Flood Insurance Rate Map (DFIRM) data using building coordinates, not from agent-reported listing data.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Several agent remarks (roughly 6/15 listings) describe landscaped grounds or green palms — e.g., "surrounded by beautifully landscaped grounds," "landscaped gardens," and "open views that face over the lush green palms." The MLS view_descriptions show GARDEN in 1/15 listings and NONE in 4/15, but multiple independent remarks indicate garden/courtyard views are available in the building, so include view_garden as true with moderate confidence.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No strong evidence supports sunset views for this building. Across the remarks provided, agents repeatedly mention Friday fireworks, Ala Wai Boat Harbor, and general open or tree-top views, but none explicitly call out sunset, western exposure, or evening sun. The MLS data also leans negative, with no SUNSET view descriptions and many NONE entries.
No analysis available
Multiple remarks directly confirm fireworks viewing from the building/unit, not merely proximity to fireworks. Phrases like 'front-row access to Friday night fireworks' and 'breathtaking Friday Fireworks display' are strong evidence for this feature.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Resident manager is supported by the public remarks, though less strongly than fire sprinklers. One listing explicitly mentions a 'resident manager,' and the historical MLS data shows RESMAN checked in 7 of 16 listings. The evidence suggests the building has on-site management, but mentions are sparse compared with other amenities.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Confidence levels are based on MLS checkbox data and AI analysis of listing remarks. High = strong evidence, Medium = some evidence, Low = limited or conflicting evidence. Buyers should always verify critical details independently.