Country Club Village 3
Preliminary Information – Full Audit Pending
This buildings features were determined from publicly available data, including MLS listings. While we cross-referenced additional data sources, it still likely contains incomplete or inaccurate information, as it has not yet been personally verified.
Once a building has been fully audited, this page will be replaced with an in-depth analysis featuring verified details and photos of every key feature.
Until then, we provide a data‑driven overview that blends statistical analysis of the checkbox selections agents make in MLS with an AI‑powered read of their public remarks—yielding a clearer picture of the building than raw listings alone.
If this building is important to your search, you can help prioritize it for a full audit by requesting one below. To see what a complete report looks like, check out the example full report.
Country Club Village 3
Building Overview
Country Club Village 3 in Aliamanu-Salt Lake — built 1994 with concrete construction; pets allowed and short-term rentals not permitted.
About Country Club Village 3
Country Club Village 3 is located in the Aliamanu–Salt Lake neighborhood. According to available records, the building was built in 1994 and is constructed of concrete.
Key recorded features for Country Club Village 3 include that pets are allowed and short-term rentals are not permitted. The management company is listed as unknown in the available MLS information.
Additional specifics such as unit sizes, parking arrangements, maintenance fees, and other amenities are not provided in the MLS data supplied. Based on MLS data, buyers should verify all building details, rules, and fees with the listing agent or management before making decisions.
Building Features & Data Confidence
All features from MLS data with AI-assisted confidence analysis. Click each category to expand and see details.
No analysis available
I looked for owner-occupancy indicators like a percentage, "majority owner occupied," or similar language, but there were no such references. With no explicit percentage in the public remarks, the owner-occupancy rate remains unknown.
I searched the remarks for elevator-related phrases such as "elevators," "multiple elevators," or a specific count like "4 elevators," but found none. Because this is a numeric field and there is no explicit evidence, the value remains unknown rather than guessed.
Calculated from the lowest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from the highest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from association fees observed in penthouse unit listings for this building.
No analysis available
No analysis available
All 7/7 current listings indicate common area electricity is included via OTCOEX. There are no contrary remarks, and the consistency across the listings suggests this is a building-level feature rather than a copy-paste error.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
The current MLS data does not support hot water being included in the maintenance fee: 0/7 listings have HOTWAT, and 4/7 list WTRHTR. Public remarks are silent on this point, so the stronger inference is that hot water is not a shared fee-covered building service.
No analysis available
No analysis available
All 7/7 listings consistently include sewer in the association fee items. With no conflicting public remarks, this appears to be a reliable building-level inclusion.
Water is included across all 7/7 current listings. The evidence is consistent and appears to reflect a standard building-level fee inclusion rather than agent-specific checkbox noise.
BBQ is strongly supported by the public remarks: multiple listings explicitly say "BBQ areas" or "BBQ area." This aligns with current MLS data showing BBQ in 6/7 listings, suggesting a consistent shared amenity rather than a one-off copy-paste error.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No public remarks mention a dog park, dog run, or pet area, only that the building is "pet-friendly." Given the lack of explicit mention across multiple detailed listings, the MLS dog-park checkbox looks like it may be a copy-paste or unchecked-from-amenity mismatch rather than a confirmed amenity.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Patio/deck access is strongly supported: multiple listings explicitly mention a lanai, including a "private lanai" and an "ultra spacious 372 sq ft lanai." The current MLS data also shows PATDEC/COVPAT in 6 of 7 listings, so this appears to be a consistent building feature rather than a one-off agent error.
Walking/jogging paths are strongly confirmed by the remarks, which repeatedly cite "walking paths" and "walking/jogging paths." With 7/7 MLS listings showing the code and multiple independent remarks confirming it, this is a very strong building feature.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Recreation area is clearly supported by several listings, with repeated references to a "recreation area." The MLS pattern (6/7 listings) and the repeated wording across listings indicate this is a real common building amenity.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Storage is mentioned in 1 of the provided public remarks, specifically as a "community storage room located on the same floor." MLS data also shows 3/7 listings with storage noted in unit_features, which supports that this is a real building feature rather than a one-off mistake. The evidence is moderate and somewhat inconsistent, so confidence is below very high.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Trash chute is not supported by the remarks: none of the listings mention a trash, garbage, or refuse chute. Because the feature is only present in 5/7 MLS records and lacks any narrative confirmation, it appears unreliable and is likely an MLS checkbox artifact.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
The building has a pool. All 7 current MLS records include pool-related amenities, and multiple remarks say "community pool," "relax by the pool," and list it among the complex’s amenities. The repeated references across several listings make this strong evidence and not likely a copy-paste error.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Laundry in unit is clearly present across the listings. Multiple remarks explicitly say "in-unit washer/dryer," "in-unit washer/dryer hookups," and note a "full-sized washer/dryer replaced earlier this year," which confirms the feature rather than a copied checkbox. This is consistent with the MLS inclusion data showing 7/7 listings with washer/dryer.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Most listings imply assigned parking by describing specific stall allocations rather than open parking. Across the remarks, the building is repeatedly described with "2 covered parking stalls" or similar fixed parking descriptions, which is consistent with assigned/reserved parking even though the word "assigned" is rarely used verbatim.
Covered parking is clearly established across the listings. Multiple remarks explicitly mention covered stalls, covered tandem spaces, or covered parking, and the evidence is consistent across several agents/listings rather than a single copied note.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Guest parking is strongly supported by the remarks and appears consistently across the listings. Several descriptions explicitly state there is plenty/lots/ample guest parking, which is good corroboration beyond the MLS checkbox data.
No analysis available
Tandem parking is clearly present in the building, though not every listing mentions it. The remarks repeatedly specify tandem stalls in several units, showing that tandem parking is a real building feature rather than a one-off or copy-paste error.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Security guard service is strongly supported across the current listings: 7 of 7 MLS entries include SECGUA, and several remarks explicitly say '24/7 security,' 'secure BLDG,' and 'pet-friendly and secure building/community.' The repeated wording across multiple remarks suggests this is a real building-level amenity, not just a copy-paste checkbox.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Window A/C is supported by multiple current listings, including explicit remarks saying "window A/C" and MLS inclusions showing ACWIUN in 4 of 7 listings. The repeated mention across listings suggests this is not just copy-paste noise, but an actual feature available in the building's units.
5 of 7 current listings indicate concrete construction in the MLS, while none of the public remarks directly address the building material. Because this feature is structural and the MLS checkbox is present in a majority of listings, it likely reflects the building's construction, but the evidence is mostly from MLS data rather than agent descriptions.
6 of 7 current listings identify the building as double wall construction in the MLS. No public remarks mention or contradict this, so the evidence is primarily the repeated MLS classification, which is consistent enough to include but not fully independently verified by listing text.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
I searched the remarks for insurance language such as "fully insured," "full insurance," or "walls-in coverage," and found nothing. Since there is no explicit evidence in the listings, this is treated as not confirmed.
Fire sprinklers are explicitly mentioned in 2 listings, including phrases like "fire sprinklers throughout the unit" and "in-unit sprinklers." The remarks are clear and consistent, so this is strong confirmation rather than a copy-paste checkbox issue.
I looked for explicit references to a passed fire/life safety evaluation, fire safety certification, or a passed fire inspection, but none were stated in the remarks. The mentions of sprinklers are about unit-level safety features and do not confirm the building passed an FLSE.
Flood zone determined from official FEMA Digital Flood Insurance Rate Map (DFIRM) data using building coordinates, not from agent-reported listing data.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Strong building-level evidence supports garden views. 6 of 7 current listings have GARDEN in the MLS view field, and multiple remarks independently mention a "treetop garden view" and landscaped surroundings. This appears consistent across agents rather than a one-off copy-paste.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Resident manager is supported by current MLS checkbox data in 5 of 7 listings, but none of the public remarks explicitly say "resident manager," "live-in manager," or similar. The only related text is "on-site management office," so this looks like moderate but not definitive evidence.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Confidence levels are based on MLS checkbox data and AI analysis of listing remarks. High = strong evidence, Medium = some evidence, Low = limited or conflicting evidence. Buyers should always verify critical details independently.