Country Club Plaza
Preliminary Information – Full Audit Pending
This buildings features were determined from publicly available data, including MLS listings. While we cross-referenced additional data sources, it still likely contains incomplete or inaccurate information, as it has not yet been personally verified.
Once a building has been fully audited, this page will be replaced with an in-depth analysis featuring verified details and photos of every key feature.
Until then, we provide a data‑driven overview that blends statistical analysis of the checkbox selections agents make in MLS with an AI‑powered read of their public remarks—yielding a clearer picture of the building than raw listings alone.
If this building is important to your search, you can help prioritize it for a full audit by requesting one below. To see what a complete report looks like, check out the example full report.
Country Club Plaza
Building Overview
Country Club Plaza in Aliamanu-Salt Lake — concrete building (1985) with pool and mountain views.
About Country Club Plaza
Country Club Plaza is a residential building located in the Aliamanu-Salt Lake neighborhood. The building was constructed in 1985 and is of concrete construction. According to available records, units have mountain views.
Key on-site amenities include a pool, a BBQ area, and a security guard. The property allows pets and does not permit short-term rentals, per MLS information.
Parking is available with covered, assigned stalls. Management company information is listed as unknown in the MLS. Based on MLS data, buyers should verify all details, including rules, fees, and current management, with the listing agent or property manager before making decisions.
Building Features & Data Confidence
All features from MLS data with AI-assisted confidence analysis. Click each category to expand and see details.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
I searched for numeric owner-occupancy figures and qualitative statements such as '80% owner occupied' or 'highly owner occupied,' but found none. Without any remark-based evidence, the owner-occupancy rate cannot be determined from these listings.
I searched the remarks for explicit counts like '4 elevators,' 'four elevators,' or 'multiple elevators,' but found none. The only elevator-related language was indirect and did not provide a number, so the building's elevator count remains unconfirmed from remarks alone.
Calculated from the lowest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from the highest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from association fees observed in penthouse unit listings for this building.
No analysis available
Cable TV appears to be included at the building level. Current MLS data shows 15/20 listings with CABTV, and a remark explicitly says the monthly fee includes “cable internet and basic TV,” which strongly supports the feature across listings.
Common area electricity is supported by the MLS pattern, with 14 of 20 listings marked OTCOEX. No remarks use the exact phrase, so this is primarily a checkbox-pattern signal rather than explicit agent confirmation.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Hot water does not appear to be included in the maintenance fee. The building-level MLS pattern is very strong against it, with only 2 of 20 listings showing HOTWAT and many instead listing WTRHTR, which points to unit-supplied water heating rather than building-provided hot water. Current public remarks do not provide evidence of HOA-paid hot water, so the false signal remains the best fit.
Internet appears to be included in the fees. MLS data shows 13/20 listings with INTSER, and at least one remark explicitly quotes the maintenance fee as including internet service, making this a strong building-level feature.
No analysis available
Sewer is very likely included in the maintenance fee. Current MLS data shows SEWER on 18 of 20 listings, which is a strong and consistent building-level pattern. No remarks contradict this, so the feature should be retained with very high confidence.
Water is very likely included in the maintenance fee. The MLS pattern is strong, with WATER listed on 18 of 20 listings, suggesting broad building-level agreement rather than a one-off agent entry. No public remarks conflict with this signal, so confidence remains very high.
BBQ is strongly confirmed. It is mentioned in a large share of the remarks, often in repeated amenity language like 'BBQ area,' 'BBQ grills,' and 'large covered BBQ area.' This looks like a stable shared building amenity rather than copy-paste noise.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Car wash facilities are directly supported by the remarks, which explicitly say "car wash station." The MLS count is not universal, but the wording is clear enough to confirm this as a building amenity for some residents.
The clubhouse feature is not supported by the supplied public remarks. Although current MLS data shows CLUHOU in only 5/20 listings, none of the remarks mention a clubhouse or community center, so this looks more like weak or possibly copied MLS data than a verified amenity.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
There is no public-remarks evidence for a meeting room or conference room in this listing set. Although the MLS shows partial checkbox presence, the remarks consistently focus on pool, sauna, BBQ, and tennis rather than any meeting/community room. This looks unconfirmed and possibly copied in by agents.
Patio/deck is supported by multiple current remarks, especially one describing a 'large covered BBQ area with outdoor patio.' Across the listings, the amenity is mentioned in a consistent building-amenity context rather than as a private unit feature, so it should be included. The MLS checkbox presence on 2/20 listings appears to align with the remarks rather than a copy-paste error.
A jogging or walking path is not supported by the public remarks. None of the listings describe a jogging path, walking path, or trail, and the limited MLS presence is too weak to treat as verified. This feature appears likely absent or at least not a confirmed shared amenity.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
There is solid evidence for a shared recreation area. One listing explicitly says "recreation area," and the MLS data shows the amenity in half of the listings, which is enough to treat it as a real building feature.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Sauna is well supported across the listing set. Multiple remarks explicitly mention 'sauna,' often together with other shared amenities like pool and jacuzzi, and the MLS prevalence is high. This is a consistent building amenity rather than an isolated claim.
Storage is supported by both MLS data and multiple public remarks, so this is not just a single-agent checkbox issue. At least 2 listings explicitly mention it, with phrases like "secure storage space" and "Extra storage is available on the ground floor of the building." The evidence is consistent across listings and appears to reflect a real building feature.
I searched for surfboard storage, board storage, surf storage, or bike-and-surfboard storage references. The remarks only mention secure storage space in general, not dedicated surfboard storage.
Tennis court access is unequivocally supported. The public remarks repeatedly mention 'tennis courts' and similar wording across many listings, matching the very strong MLS signal. This is a clear shared amenity for the building.
Trash chute is strongly indicated by the MLS pattern even though the public remarks do not directly mention it. With 17 of 20 listings checking the amenity, this looks like a genuine building feature rather than a copy-paste anomaly.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Whirlpool/spa amenities are well supported by the remarks through repeated references to "jacuzzi," "hot tub," and "spa." The MLS data also shows the amenity in half of the listings, making this a credible shared building feature.
The pool feature is strongly confirmed. Multiple current remarks explicitly mention a pool in different forms, including "private pool," "swimming pool," "saltwater pool," and "community pool," across many listings and agents. This looks consistent rather than copy-paste error, and there is no evidence of a change away from having a pool.
No analysis available
Multiple listings directly identify the amenity as a saltwater pool, which is explicit confirmation that the building pool is salt water. This is strong, repeated evidence and aligns with the current building context that the property has a pool.
Strong, repeated evidence across many listings supports in-unit laundry at the building level. Multiple remarks explicitly mention "in-unit washer/dryer," "washer/dryer combo," and "washer and dryer" across different units and towers, indicating this is not a one-off or copy-paste anomaly. The feature should be included for buyers searching for buildings with in-unit laundry.
No analysis available
I looked for public remarks indicating paid communal laundry such as coin-op, card-operated, or quarters-required machines. The remarks reference in-unit laundry only, so there is no evidence of paid community laundry.
I searched the remarks for wording like laundry on each floor, laundry room on every floor, or similar community-laundry descriptions. The listings only mention in-unit washer/dryer or washer/dryer combos, not shared laundry facilities by floor.
Parking is strongly confirmed across the building. Current remarks mention it in many listings with phrases like "2 assigned parking stalls," "two dedicated parking stalls," "2 parking," and "one covered parking." This appears to be consistent building-level data, not a one-off unit feature.
Assigned parking is well supported by both MLS data and remarks. Multiple listings explicitly use terms like "assigned parking stalls," "dedicated parking stalls," and "2 assigned parking stalls." The repeated wording across listings suggests this is a real building feature rather than copy-paste noise.
Covered parking is strongly confirmed for the building. Listings reference "assigned covered parking," "covered parking," and a "gated and secure garage," which aligns with the high historical MLS coverage. Evidence is consistent across multiple remarks.
I looked for explicit wording like deeded parking, owned stall, or parking included in the deed. The listings only describe assigned/dedicated stalls, so deeded parking is not supported by the public remarks.
No analysis available
I searched for any parking cost language such as parking fee, monthly charge, rental, or additional stall payment. The remarks discuss parking stalls and guest parking, but none mention a separate parking fee.
Guest parking is clearly available in the building. Several listings mention "ample guest parking," "lots of guest parking," and "guest parking stalls," which appears in multiple agent remarks rather than a single source. The MLS history also supports this feature.
Secured parking/access is supported by both MLS data and repeated listing remarks. Phrases like "secured resident parking," "gated and secure garage," and "secured entry" indicate controlled access to parking areas. This looks like a genuine building amenity rather than an unchecked MLS box.
No analysis available
No analysis available
I looked for terms like parking waitlist, waiting list, or join the list for parking. The remarks instead describe assigned and available stalls, with no indication of a waitlist system.
No analysis available
I searched for card/fob-based access language such as keycard entry, card reader, or electronic access. The remarks mention secured entry, gated/secure parking, and security, but nothing specifically indicates card-based security access.
Security guard/service is strongly supported. Multiple listings explicitly mention '24-hour security,' 'on-site security,' 'security on duty,' and 'backed by 24-hour security,' while others reference secured entry and gated/secure garage. The evidence appears consistent across many remarks and agents, not just a single copy-paste listing.
I looked for direct references to patrol service, roving security, or a patrolled building. The remarks do mention 24-hour security and security on duty, but that is not the same as a stated patrol service.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
There is explicit evidence for window AC in this building: one listing states the "primary bedroom is equipped with window A/C," and other current remarks mention AC units or AC throughout. This appears to reflect a real unit-level feature available in at least some condos at Country Club Plaza, not just agent checkbox noise.
Concrete construction is strongly supported by the MLS history, with 20 of 20 current listings marked CONCRE in construction materials. None of the public remarks suggest a different construction type, and the repeated listings across multiple agents appear consistent rather than a copy-paste error. This is high-confidence building-level evidence that the property is constructed with concrete.
Mixed evidence: 5 of 20 current MLS listings check 'DOUWAL' (double-wall) which supports inclusion, but no public remarks in the sampled listings mention 'double wall' or 'double-wall construction'. The MLS checkbox presence across some listings suggests some units/buildings may have double-wall construction, but agent copy/paste or inconsistent checking means confidence is moderate rather than high.
No analysis available
Masonry/stucco is not well supported for this building: only 5 of 20 current listings have MASSTU in construction materials, and the remarks across many agents focus on amenities and unit updates rather than exterior construction type. There is no explicit mention of masonry or stucco in the remarks, so the MLS checkbox appears inconsistent and likely copy-pasted. Confidence is high enough to treat this as not a building feature.
No analysis available
Confidence 70%: 1/7 MLS listings mark SLAB in construction_materials, and high-rise concrete buildings like this commonly use slab foundations; the absence of contrary data suggests the single positive entry is plausible rather than clearly erroneous.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Confidence 72%: 3/7 MLS listings mark ABOGRO in construction_materials, with no contrary indications in remarks; amenity and structural descriptions otherwise align across listings, suggesting omission in some MLS records rather than conflicting data.
No analysis available
No analysis available
I searched for short-term rental indicators such as STR permitted, vacation rental allowed, NUC, TVU, or similar wording, but found none. With no public evidence of STR permission, the safest reading is that STR is not confirmed and should be treated as not allowed.
I looked for hotel rental pool references like hotel-managed units, Hilton/Trump/Ritz pool, or a hotel rental program and found none. Since STR is not established from the remarks, hotel-pool participation is ruled out.
I searched for wording like mandatory rental pool, required participation, cannot opt out, or must join the program. There is no evidence of any rental-pool structure in the remarks, so this is false.
No analysis available
No analysis available
I searched for leasehold language such as lease expires, ground lease, leasehold, renewed through, or an expiration year, but found nothing. No public remarks provide a specific lease expiry date.
The remarks provide direct evidence that VA financing is supported in this building. Multiple listings reference VA loans and VA-eligible buyers, which is strong public confirmation.
The remarks repeatedly confirm full insurance coverage, which aligns with fully insured / walls-in coverage. This is strong, direct evidence across multiple listings, so the feature is marked true with very high confidence.
Strong building-level evidence for fire sprinklers. Multiple listings explicitly mention "fire sprinklers" or "Water sprinklers installed," confirming the MLS amenity and suggesting this is not just copy-paste checkbox data. Current remarks align with the historical high-confidence pattern, so this feature should be retained.
I looked for direct proof that the building passed a fire/life safety evaluation, including phrases like FLSE passed, fire safety certified, or passed fire inspection. None were found, so there is no remark-based confirmation of this feature.
Flood zone determined from official FEMA Digital Flood Insurance Rate Map (DFIRM) data using building coordinates, not from agent-reported listing data.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Mountain views are strongly supported across the listing set. Multiple listings explicitly say "mountain views" or similar phrasing, and current MLS data shows 17 of 20 listings with MOUNTA in the view description. The evidence appears consistent across several agents rather than a single copy-paste remark.
No analysis available
MLS data indicates 6 of 20 listings list CITY as a view. Public remarks explicitly mention city views in 2 listings: 'The view from this unit is a park and the city' and 'expansive views of the park, city and sunset.' Many other listings describe park, mountain or golf course views, so evidence supports that some units have city views but the feature is not universal across the building and agent copy-paste may account for the MLS checkbox variations.
No analysis available
Garden-style views are supported in a subset of listings, especially through remarks about park-facing units, green spaces, and landscaped or manicured grounds. Current MLS data shows 5 of 20 listings with GARDEN in the view field and no NONE entries, suggesting this is a real building-level option for some units. The evidence is moderate and appears spread across multiple listings rather than being a one-off copy-paste claim.
Golf course views are supported by multiple current remarks, with at least 3 listings explicitly referencing them. Phrases like 'Panoramic golf course and mountain views' and 'perfect for the golf course views' indicate this is a genuine unit/building view offering, not just MLS checkbox noise. Even though there was no prior confidence data, the repeated mentions across listings make the feature highly credible.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
I searched for explicit statements that units can see fireworks from the building, lanai, or windows. The remarks describe park, golf course, city, mountain, and sunset views, but nothing about fireworks views.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Strong evidence that Country Club Plaza has a resident/on-site manager. Across multiple listings, remarks explicitly reference "on-site resident manager," "on-site manager," "site manager," and a "management office," which is consistent with a building-level staffed management presence. The repetition across listings supports this as a real shared amenity rather than a one-off MLS error.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Confidence levels are based on MLS checkbox data and AI analysis of listing remarks. High = strong evidence, Medium = some evidence, Low = limited or conflicting evidence. Buyers should always verify critical details independently.