Coty Tower
Preliminary Information – Full Audit Pending
This buildings features were determined from publicly available data, including MLS listings. While we cross-referenced additional data sources, it still likely contains incomplete or inaccurate information, as it has not yet been personally verified.
Once a building has been fully audited, this page will be replaced with an in-depth analysis featuring verified details and photos of every key feature.
Until then, we provide a data‑driven overview that blends statistical analysis of the checkbox selections agents make in MLS with an AI‑powered read of their public remarks—yielding a clearer picture of the building than raw listings alone.
If this building is important to your search, you can help prioritize it for a full audit by requesting one below. To see what a complete report looks like, check out the example full report.
Coty Tower
Building Overview
Coty Tower in Ala Moana-Kakaako, 1968 concrete building with a resident manager; assigned parking. Pets and short-term rentals not allowed.
About Coty Tower
Coty Tower is located in the Ala Moana-Kakaako neighborhood and was built in 1968. According to available records, the building is constructed of concrete.
Key features noted in MLS data include a resident manager on site. The management company is listed as unknown in the available records.
Parking is available and assigned. Pets and short-term rentals are not allowed per MLS information. Based on MLS data analysis, prospective buyers should verify all details, including management, fees, and current building policies, with the listing agent or HOA.
Building Features & Data Confidence
All features from MLS data with AI-assisted confidence analysis. Click each category to expand and see details.
No analysis available
I searched for owner-occupancy clues such as "80% owner occupied," "majority owner occupied," or similar descriptions. The remarks do not provide any owner-occupancy percentage or qualitative indicator, so the figure remains unknown.
I found multiple references confirming the building has elevator access, but the remarks never specify how many elevators there are. I searched for explicit counts like "4 elevators," "four elevators," or "multiple elevators" and only found generic elevator-access language.
Calculated from the lowest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from the highest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from association fees observed in penthouse unit listings for this building.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Common area electricity appears to be included in HOA/maintenance fees for this building based on current MLS data (6 of 10 listings). Public remarks do not explicitly say "common area electricity included," so this is supported more by the MLS pattern than by remark-level confirmation.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Sewer is shown as included in association fees in 8 of 10 current MLS listings. There are no direct remark confirmations, but the repeated MLS checkbox across multiple listings makes this a strong likely building feature rather than a one-off entry.
Water is included in association fees in 8 of 10 current MLS listings. Public remarks do not explicitly confirm water coverage, so this rests mainly on the repeated MLS association-fee entries across multiple listings.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
I searched for public remarks mentioning surfboard or board storage facilities and found nothing. The listings focus on unit features, parking, and building security, but do not mention any storage amenity for surfboards.
No analysis available
9 of 10 current MLS listings have the TRACHU amenity checked, suggesting the building likely has a trash chute system. However, across the provided public remarks, there are zero explicit references to a 'trash chute,' 'garbage chute,' or 'refuse chute,' so the evidence appears to come from MLS checkbox data rather than agent descriptions. Buyers searching for chute access would likely want this included, but it is not directly verified in remarks.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Checked remarks for 'salt water pool', 'saltwater pool', 'salt pool', or similar. The building has no pool in the provided context and remarks do not mention a pool.
Strong evidence that Coty Tower has in-unit laundry in at least some units. Multiple current listings explicitly mention it, and the wording is consistent across different remarks rather than a one-off agent typo. This aligns with the historically high MLS inclusion rate, so the feature should be treated as present.
No analysis available
I looked for any public remark indicating paid community laundry, such as coin laundry or card-operated machines, and found nothing. Multiple listings mention washer/dryer in the unit, which suggests this is not a paid shared laundry building feature.
I searched the remarks for phrases like laundry on each floor, floor-by-floor laundry, and community laundry rooms on every floor, but found none. The only laundry references are to in-unit washer/dryer, which does not support this feature.
All 9 MLS listings list parking in the checkbox data and multiple public remarks mention parking stalls (examples: “1 assigned open parking stall”, “covered parking stall”, “one cherished open air parking spot”). Evidence is consistent across listings and agents, so building-level parking is strongly supported.
Assigned parking is strongly supported across the listings: several remarks explicitly mention assigned stalls, including "2 assigned parking stalls" and "1 assigned open parking stall." This aligns with the MLS data showing assigned parking in 9 of 10 listings, so this appears to be a real building feature rather than a copy-paste error.
Covered parking is supported by explicit remark evidence, including the phrase "covered parking stall." While most listings describe open or street-level parking, the presence of at least one covered stall means the building offers this feature to some units. The MLS data also shows 2 of 10 listings with covered/garage-type parking, reinforcing that this is a real building-level option.
I looked for deeded/owned parking language such as 'deeded parking', 'parking included in deed', or 'owned stall' and found only assigned-use language. That supports parking being assigned rather than deeded.
No analysis available
I searched for 'parking fee', 'monthly parking', 'parking rental', or similar phrasing and found nothing. Because no amount is stated, the monthly parking cost remains unknown.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
I looked for 'parking waitlist', 'waiting list', or 'join waitlist for parking' and found no references. In the absence of any such mention, there is no evidence the building uses a parking waitlist system.
No analysis available
Multiple remarks explicitly reference FOB/keycard access and secured entry, indicating an electronic card/fob access system for the building.
No analysis available
I looked for any reference to a patrol service or roving security and found none. The listings describe the building as secure with FOB entry and an on-site resident manager, but that is not the same as security patrol.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Window AC appears in the current MLS inclusions for 5 of 10 listings, suggesting the feature is present in at least some units. However, none of the public remarks explicitly say "window AC," "window unit," or similar, so the evidence is moderate rather than strong and may reflect MLS checkbox usage more than repeated agent confirmation.
All 9 current MLS listings indicate construction_materials='CONCRE'. None of the public remarks explicitly state 'concrete' or 'reinforced concrete' (no quotes in remarks). Evidence is consistent across MLS entries (multiple agents) but appears to be checkbox data without corroborating textual confirmation, so confidence is moderate.
No analysis available
3 out of 9 current MLS listings show construction_materials='HOLTIL', but none of the public remarks mention 'hollow tile' or similar phrasing. Evidence comes only from MLS checkboxes (possible agent copy/paste); therefore the feature is included with limited (implied) confidence.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Across the provided listings, none of the public remarks describe the building as brick, brick-and-mortar, or brick exterior. The sole MLS construction_materials hit (1/10) is not supported by the remarks, so evidence for brick construction is weak and likely copied in error.
No analysis available
I searched for explicit STR indicators such as 'short-term rental allowed', 'vacation rental', 'TVU', 'NUC', or a 30-day minimum and found none. The remarks do not establish that short-term rentals are allowed.
I looked for hotel pool references such as 'hotel rental pool', 'hotel program', 'managed by hotel', or brand pool language and found nothing. Since STR is not supported in the remarks, hotel-pool participation is also false.
I searched for 'mandatory hotel pool', 'required to participate', 'cannot opt out', and similar wording and found none. There is no evidence of a mandatory rental pool in these public remarks.
No analysis available
No analysis available
I searched for leasehold wording such as 'lease expires', 'ground lease', 'leasehold', or a renewal year and found none. The public remarks point to fee simple ownership, which suggests no lease expiry date is applicable.
Multiple remarks explicitly state the building is VA-approved. Evidence is direct and clear, so VA financing approval is set to true with high confidence.
I looked for insurance-related remarks suggesting the HOA provides full or walls-in coverage. The listings do not mention building insurance status, so there is no evidence supporting full insurance coverage.
No analysis available
I searched the remarks for phrases indicating a passed fire/life safety evaluation, fire safety certification, or similar compliance language. None of the listings mention any such inspection or certification, so there is no evidence to mark this true.
Flood zone determined from official FEMA Digital Flood Insurance Rate Map (DFIRM) data using building coordinates, not from agent-reported listing data.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
City views are strongly supported. One remark explicitly says 'partial ocean, city, and treetop views,' and multiple listings frame Coty Tower as urban/city-oriented with downtown Honolulu access. The historical MLS pattern is consistent, with CITY appearing in 9 of 10 current view descriptions, suggesting this is a real building-level offering rather than a copy-paste anomaly.
No analysis available
There is no remark evidence for garden views across the provided listings. The only MLS support is 1 of 10 current view descriptions, which is too weak to establish a genuine building-wide feature, so this is treated as not supported.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
I searched for language like "see fireworks from," "fireworks view," or "watch fireworks from lanai," but there were no such references. The remarks mention ocean, city, and tree-top views, but not fireworks viewing.
No analysis available
Strong evidence the building has a resident manager: 6–8 of the recent listings mention it explicitly (phrases include 'on-site resident manager', 'Resident Manager on site', and 'res mgr.'). MLS amenities historically show RESMAN checked in 8/9 listings and multiple agents' remarks consistently repeat the feature, indicating building-level service rather than a single-unit attribute.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Confidence levels are based on MLS checkbox data and AI analysis of listing remarks. High = strong evidence, Medium = some evidence, Low = limited or conflicting evidence. Buyers should always verify critical details independently.