Coronado E
Preliminary Information – Full Audit Pending
This buildings features were determined from publicly available data, including MLS listings. While we cross-referenced additional data sources, it still likely contains incomplete or inaccurate information, as it has not yet been personally verified.
Once a building has been fully audited, this page will be replaced with an in-depth analysis featuring verified details and photos of every key feature.
Until then, we provide a data‑driven overview that blends statistical analysis of the checkbox selections agents make in MLS with an AI‑powered read of their public remarks—yielding a clearer picture of the building than raw listings alone.
If this building is important to your search, you can help prioritize it for a full audit by requesting one below. To see what a complete report looks like, check out the example full report.
Coronado E
Building Overview
Coronado E in Ewa (built 1995) — concrete construction; pets and short-term rentals are not allowed.
About Coronado E
Coronado E is a residential building located in the Ewa neighborhood, built in 1995 with concrete construction. Size and unit count are not provided in the available MLS records.
According to available records, the MLS does not list specific building amenities or common-area features for Coronado E. No management company is identified in the MLS data provided.
MLS data show that pets are not allowed and short-term rentals are not allowed. Information on parking, homeowner association fees, maintenance assessments, or other building policies is not included in the MLS summary. Based on MLS data; buyers should verify all details, fees and rules with the listing agent or management prior to purchase.
Building Features & Data Confidence
All features from MLS data with AI-assisted confidence analysis. Click each category to expand and see details.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
The remarks were searched for an owner-occupancy percentage or descriptions such as majority or highly owner occupied, but none were found. The owner-occupancy percentage is therefore unknown.
The remarks were searched for elevator counts and descriptions such as multiple or four elevators, but none were found. The number of elevators is therefore unknown.
Calculated from the lowest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from the highest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from association fees observed in penthouse unit listings for this building.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Three of four listings include OTCOEX in the association-fee inclusions, which supports that common-area electricity is covered. The public remarks focus on amenities such as pools and BBQ areas and do not independently confirm common-area electric, so the evidence is moderately strong but not explicit.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
All four current listings identify SEWER as included in the association fees. No remarks explicitly discuss sewer, but the consistent checkbox data across every listing provides strong building-level evidence.
Three of four current listings include WATER in the association-fee inclusions. The public remarks do not mention water, but the majority pattern across listings supports inclusion with moderate-to-high confidence.
BBQ amenities are strongly supported across the building: 3 of 4 listings mention a BBQ area or BBQ areas, and all 4 current MLS records include BBQ. The repeated references across multiple listings indicate this is a genuine building amenity rather than an isolated checkbox error.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
One of four listings explicitly mentions a "recreation room" among the community amenities. Although the feature appears in only one remark and one MLS record, the wording indicates a shared recreational facility, supporting inclusion with moderate-to-high confidence.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
The building's pool is strongly supported across multiple listings: remarks state "Community amenities include a pool," "amenities including a BBQ area, pool," and "Amenities include a Pool and BBQ Area." Combined with pool-related MLS amenities appearing in 4/4 listings, this indicates a genuine shared building feature rather than an isolated or copy-pasted claim.
No analysis available
No analysis available
All 4 listings list WASHER/DRYER in the MLS inclusions, supporting availability of in-unit laundry. No public remarks mention washer/dryer or in-unit laundry, so the evidence is consistent across listings but may reflect copied checkbox data rather than independently verified remarks.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Three of four current listings contain the ASSIGN parking designation, and one listing mentions a unit with '1 parking.' The evidence supports assigned parking, though the feature appears to rely primarily on MLS data rather than repeated explicit remarks.
Covered parking is strongly supported across all four listings through COVERE/CO1/CO2/CO3PLUS/GARAGE MLS designations. One listing independently confirms, 'Parking is covered and very close to the Unit,' providing explicit remark-level evidence.
No analysis available
No analysis available
One of four listings explicitly mentions 'ample guest parking,' matching the GUEST MLS designation in one listing. Although not repeated across multiple remarks, the explicit statement is sufficiently clear to include the feature.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
None of the 4 public remarks explicitly mention window AC, window units, or wall AC. However, ACWIUN is checked in all 4 current listings, indicating consistent MLS reporting across multiple listings, though the lack of remark confirmation leaves some possibility of copied checkbox data.
No analysis available
Three of four listings identify DOUWAL in the construction materials, making double-wall construction more consistently reported than wood framing. However, none of the remarks mention “double wall” or “two walls,” so confidence is moderate rather than high.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
One of four listings identifies WOOFRA in the construction materials. No remarks quote or otherwise confirm wood-frame construction, so this is weak, single-listing MLS evidence rather than confirmation across multiple agents.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
The remarks do not mention full HOA insurance, comprehensive building insurance, walls-in coverage, or similar insurance details. Because there is no current value or supporting evidence, this is treated as false with medium-low confidence.
No analysis available
The remarks contain no statements about a passed fire/life safety evaluation, FLSE, fire safety certification, or passed fire inspection. Because there is no current value or supporting evidence, this is treated as false with medium-low confidence.
Flood zone determined from official FEMA Digital Flood Insurance Rate Map (DFIRM) data using building coordinates, not from agent-reported listing data.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
None of the 4 listings mention sunset views or related terms, and all 4 MLS view descriptions are NONE. The consistent absence across multiple listings strongly supports that the building should not be marked as offering sunset views.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
None of the 4 listings mention a resident manager or equivalent phrase. RESMAN appears in only 1 of 4 MLS amenity records, suggesting an unverified checkbox rather than a consistently documented building feature.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Confidence levels are based on MLS checkbox data and AI analysis of listing remarks. High = strong evidence, Medium = some evidence, Low = limited or conflicting evidence. Buyers should always verify critical details independently.