Contessa
Preliminary Information – Full Audit Pending
This buildings features were determined from publicly available data, including MLS listings. While we cross-referenced additional data sources, it still likely contains incomplete or inaccurate information, as it has not yet been personally verified.
Once a building has been fully audited, this page will be replaced with an in-depth analysis featuring verified details and photos of every key feature.
Until then, we provide a data‑driven overview that blends statistical analysis of the checkbox selections agents make in MLS with an AI‑powered read of their public remarks—yielding a clearer picture of the building than raw listings alone.
If this building is important to your search, you can help prioritize it for a full audit by requesting one below. To see what a complete report looks like, check out the example full report.
Contessa
Building Overview
Contessa in McCully-Moiliili (built 1971) — concrete construction with mountain and Diamond Head views; pool and on-site resident manager.
About Contessa
Contessa is a residential building located in the McCully-Moiliili neighborhood. According to available records, the building was constructed in 1971 and is of concrete construction. MLS data lists mountain and Diamond Head views for the property.
Based on MLS data, on-site amenities include a pool, a resident manager, and a security guard. The building does not allow pets and short-term rentals are not permitted according to the provided information.
Parking is available with assigned stalls and guest parking. Management company information is listed as unknown in the MLS data. Buyers should verify all details, fees, and policies with the listing agent or management, as this summary is based solely on available MLS records.
Building Features & Data Confidence
All features from MLS data with AI-assisted confidence analysis. Click each category to expand and see details.
No analysis available
I searched for explicit occupancy percentages and phrases indicating a high owner-occupancy rate, but nothing was found. The remarks mostly describe unit features, parking, security, and amenities, plus one investor-oriented listing, which does not establish owner occupancy. Because no percentage is stated, the exact owner-occupancy level is unknown from these remarks.
I found multiple references to elevators, so the building clearly has elevator access. I searched for explicit counts such as "4 elevators," "two elevators," or similar wording, but none of the remarks give a number. Because the count is not stated, the exact number remains unknown.
Calculated from the lowest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from the highest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from association fees observed in penthouse unit listings for this building.
No analysis available
Cable inclusion is well supported by the MLS data and directly confirmed in current remarks. One listing explicitly states the maintenance fee includes "internet & cable," which aligns with the building-level pattern rather than a one-off copy/paste.
Common-area expense inclusion appears to be a building-wide HOA feature based on MLS data: 12 of 15 current listings show OTCOEX in association_fee_includes. The remarks neither confirm nor contradict it, so this is supported mainly by the repeated MLS checkbox pattern across many listings.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Internet is consistently listed as included in maintenance fees across the building. Current remarks explicitly say 'Maintenance includes internet with Hawaiian Telcom' and 'Maintenance fee includes: water/sewer, internet & cable,' matching the historical MLS association_fee_includes data. The evidence appears strong across multiple listings and agents rather than a one-off copy-paste error.
No analysis available
Sewer inclusion is strongly confirmed. The MLS data is nearly unanimous, and the latest remarks explicitly list "water/sewer" in the maintenance fee, reinforcing that this is a genuine building feature.
Water inclusion is strongly confirmed across the building. The MLS pattern is nearly unanimous, and one current listing explicitly states the maintenance fee includes "water/sewer," which matches the historical data and suggests consistent HOA coverage.
No listings' public remarks mention BBQ, barbecue, grill, or grilling area. Current MLS shows 2/14 listings checked for BBQ, but there is no corroborating language in any remarks and no prior historical confidence—this suggests the checkbox may be erroneous or over-reported; therefore BBQ is omitted for now.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Car wash is explicitly mentioned in one listing's remarks ('car wash area') and appears in MLS checkbox data for 5/14 listings. Evidence is moderate (some agent consistency and MLS checks), so the building likely offers a car wash area but the documentation is not extensive across remarks.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
I am treating recreation_area as absent for now because none of the remarks explicitly describe a recreation area, recreation deck, or amenity deck. The MLS checkbox appears inconsistently (6/15 listings), which looks more like possible agent copy-paste than confirmed building-level evidence.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Sauna is supported by several current listing remarks across multiple agents, not just MLS checkbox data. The feature is mentioned repeatedly in the building descriptions, with current remarks referencing "sauna on property," "pool and sauna," and "amenities include... a sauna," so confidence is very high.
Storage is strongly supported across multiple listings and appears to be a building feature, not a one-off unit perk. At least 4+ remarks explicitly mention storage as a locker, storage unit, dedicated storage area, or shared storage area, which aligns with the historical MLS storage checkboxes and suggests consistent copy/paste plus real availability.
I searched the public remarks for surfboard storage, board storage, surf storage, or bike-and-surfboard storage. The listings only mention general storage lockers or storage areas, which is not enough to confirm surfboard storage.
No analysis available
Trash chute is well supported: historical confidence was high, and the current remarks directly mention 'trash chute' as an amenity. This is consistent with the MLS data trend (12/15 listings checking TRACHU) and appears reliable across listings.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Historical data strongly supported whirlpool from prior remarks, but in these current listings there are 0 mentions of whirlpool, hot tub, jacuzzi, spa, or hydrotherapy. Because the building’s current remarks repeatedly describe other amenities (pool, sauna, security) without any whirlpool reference, this may reflect copy-paste omission in newer MLS remarks rather than a real change.
Pool is strongly confirmed for this building. Multiple remarks explicitly mention a "pool," including "beautiful pool area," "saltwater pool," and "pool, keiki pool"; several also pair it with sauna/whirlpool. The repeated references across many listings look consistent rather than copy-paste error.
No analysis available
At least one public remark explicitly identifies the pool as a saltwater pool. That is direct evidence supporting the salt-water pool feature.
Strong evidence that this building offers in-unit laundry. Multiple current listings explicitly say 'Washer/Dryer in the unit,' 'in-unit washer/dryer,' or 'washer and dryer inside the unit,' and the historical MLS data is already high confidence (13/15 listings include washer/dryer). This appears consistent across multiple agents rather than a one-off copy-paste error.
No analysis available
I looked for public remarks indicating paid community laundry, such as coin laundry, card-operated machines, quarters, or laundry fees. The remarks only reference in-unit washer/dryer, so there is no evidence of paid shared laundry facilities.
I searched the public remarks for phrases like "laundry on each floor," "laundry room on every floor," or similar floor-by-floor laundry references and found none. The listings only mention in-unit washer/dryer, which does not support community laundry on every floor.
Parking is clearly present across the building. Multiple remarks mention "1 open parking Stall," "two side by side open parking stalls," "2 assigned parking stalls," "2 deeded parking stalls," and "2 Covered parking stalls side by side." This appears consistent across many listings, not just a single agent's copy-paste.
Assigned/reserved parking is strongly supported. Remarks include "2 assigned parking stalls," "2 deeded parking spaces," and a unit with "assigned covered parking," indicating the building offers assigned parking as a common feature for some units. The evidence is repeated across multiple listings and agents.
No analysis available
The listings clearly state that the unit has deeded parking, including repeated references to two deeded stalls/spaces. This is consistent across multiple remarks and supports a very high-confidence true value.
No analysis available
I looked for parking fee, monthly parking charge, parking rental amount, and added parking cost, but no recurring dollar amount was provided. Several remarks confirm multiple stalls and guest parking, but the only rental reference does not state a fee.
Guest parking is well documented for the building. One remark states there are "twelve available visitor parking stalls," while others mention "a lot of guest stalls" and "ample guest parking stalls are available." This is strong, repeated evidence that guest parking is available at the building.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
I searched for parking waitlist, waiting list, and join-the-waitlist language and found nothing. The listings mention open stalls, deeded stalls, guest parking, and one rented stall, but not a waitlist system.
No analysis available
The remarks describe key access for elevator and building entry, along with secured entry systems. This supports a card/fob/key-access security system for the building.
Current data shows 8 of 14 listings checked SECGUA and numerous agent remarks repeatedly reference building security: phrases include "secure entry," "secured building," "manager on site," "24-hour surveillance system," and "key access for both the elevator and building entry." Evidence is consistent across multiple listings and agents (not a single isolated mention), so we assign high confidence that the building provides on-site security measures.
I looked for explicit references to security patrol, roving security, or patrolled building service. The listings mention surveillance cameras, secure entry, security, and a secured building, but nothing indicating an actual patrol service.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Concrete construction is strongly supported by the MLS data, with 14 of 15 listings checking CONCRE. The public remarks consistently describe The Contessa as a high-rise building, which fits a concrete tower structure, and there is no contradictory evidence in the remarks.
Double wall construction is not supported by the public remarks: across the merged listings, there are zero mentions of 'double wall,' 'double-wall,' or similar language. Given the low historical confidence and the fact that only 5 of 15 current MLS entries check DOUWAL, the evidence points to an MLS inconsistency rather than a real building feature.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
I searched for short-term rental allowed, STR, vacation rental, NUC/TVU, and minimum-stay language, but found no evidence that short-term rentals are allowed. Because the remarks only describe the building as residential and do not mention STR permissions, the safest reading is that STR is not confirmed and should be treated as not allowed from the public remarks.
I looked for hotel rental pool, branded hotel program, or managed rental pool references such as Hilton, Trump, or Ritz and found none. Since there is no evidence that STR is allowed, hotel-pool participation is also false by rule.
I searched for mandatory pool language such as required participation, cannot opt out, or must rent through a program, and found nothing. Because the remarks do not support STR at all, mandatory hotel-pool participation must be false.
No analysis available
No analysis available
I searched the remarks for ground lease, leasehold, lease expiry, lease to/through, and renewal language, but found no 4-digit lease expiration year. The listings discuss parking, pool, security, and renovations, but nothing about land tenure or lease expiration.
The public remarks repeatedly advertise VA financing/assumable VA loans, which is strong evidence that VA financing is available for this building. I found explicit VA references in more than one listing, so this is high confidence.
The public remarks directly state that the condo is fully insured, which matches the definition of walls-in/full building insurance. This is explicit and strong evidence, so confidence is very high.
No analysis available
I searched for direct references like FLSE passed, fire/life safety evaluation passed, fire safety certified, or passed fire inspection, and found none. The remarks mention sprinklers, insurance, and no litigation, but those are not the same as a verified fire/life safety pass. With no direct confirmation, this should be treated as not established from the remarks.
Flood zone determined from official FEMA Digital Flood Insurance Rate Map (DFIRM) data using building coordinates, not from agent-reported listing data.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Mountain views are strongly supported across the listing set. Multiple remarks explicitly cite 'stunning mountain views,' 'ocean and mountain,' 'Koolau Mountains,' and 'mauka side' / 'peace and serenity of the mountains,' consistent with the high-confidence MLS history. This appears to be a stable building-level feature rather than isolated copy-paste.
Confidence 99%: At least four listings reference Diamond Head views (e.g., 'Diamond Head views', 'panoramic views from Diamond Head', 'views of Diamond Head, Waikiki, ocean and mountain').
City views are clearly present in the building and repeatedly confirmed in current remarks. Several listings reference 'stunning mountain, city, and Diamond Head views,' 'breeze and city views,' 'city skyline,' and 'Honolulu City Lights,' making this a strong building-level feature. The evidence is broad across multiple listings and agents, not a one-off mention.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Confidence 90%: None of the six detailed listings mention sunrise views despite extensively describing view corridors (Diamond Head, Waikiki, city skyline, ocean, and mountain), and MLS view_descriptions never include SUNRIS.
Sunset views are supported, though less consistently than mountain and city views. A current remark explicitly mentions 'Waikiki fireworks' and 'Friday night fireworks,' and another references the 'cool side' / evening-oriented exposure, which aligns with sunset-facing use. This looks like a real building feature available in some units, but the evidence is more selective than the other view types.
No analysis available
The remarks directly state that units have views of Waikiki fireworks from the wrap-around lanai. This is strong public evidence that fireworks can be viewed from the building/units.
No analysis available
Strong evidence across multiple listings confirms the building has a resident/on-site manager. Several remarks explicitly say "manager on site M-F," "on-site management," and "on-site resident manager," suggesting this is a real shared building feature rather than a copy-paste checkbox error. The feature appears consistently across listings, so it should be retained with very high confidence.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Confidence levels are based on MLS checkbox data and AI analysis of listing remarks. High = strong evidence, Medium = some evidence, Low = limited or conflicting evidence. Buyers should always verify critical details independently.