College Gardens 1
Preliminary Information – Full Audit Pending
This buildings features were determined from publicly available data, including MLS listings. While we cross-referenced additional data sources, it still likely contains incomplete or inaccurate information, as it has not yet been personally verified.
Once a building has been fully audited, this page will be replaced with an in-depth analysis featuring verified details and photos of every key feature.
Until then, we provide a data‑driven overview that blends statistical analysis of the checkbox selections agents make in MLS with an AI‑powered read of their public remarks—yielding a clearer picture of the building than raw listings alone.
If this building is important to your search, you can help prioritize it for a full audit by requesting one below. To see what a complete report looks like, check out the example full report.
College Gardens 1
Building Overview
College Gardens 1 in Waipahu — concrete construction, built 1984; pets and short-term rentals not allowed.
About College Gardens 1
Based on MLS data, College Gardens 1 is a residential building located in the Waipahu neighborhood. According to available records it was built in 1984 and is constructed of concrete. Size and unit mix information are not provided in the MLS data available.
Key recorded policies include no pets and no short-term rentals allowed. The MLS data does not list specific on-site amenities, common area features, or unit-level details, so prospective buyers should request complete amenity and floor plan information from the seller or listing agent.
Management company is listed as unknown in the MLS. Information about parking, maintenance fees, association rules, or other assessments was not provided in the available MLS data. Buyers should verify all building details, policies, fees, and management information independently before making decisions.
Building Features & Data Confidence
All features from MLS data with AI-assisted confidence analysis. Click each category to expand and see details.
No analysis available
I looked for explicit owner-occupancy information (e.g., '80% owner occupied', 'majority owner occupied', 'highly owner occupied') across all remarks and found nothing. There is no prior numeric value to keep and per rules I will not guess a percentage without explicit evidence.
I searched all public remarks for explicit elevator language (e.g., 'elevator', '4 elevators', 'multiple elevators', 'four elevators') and found no references. There is no current numeric value to retain, and per rules I will not guess a number without explicit evidence in the remarks.
Calculated from the lowest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from the highest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from association fees observed in penthouse unit listings for this building.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Evidence across listings indicates hot water is not included: 13 of 17 listings list WTRHTR in unit inclusions (water heater present), and only 1 of 17 listings marks HOTWAT in association fee includes. Public remarks do not mention hot-water-included language, suggesting agents may have left the HOTWAT checkbox unchecked correctly and that building hot-water service is not covered by the maintenance fee.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Strong, consistent MLS evidence: 14 of 17 listings explicitly list SEWER as included in association fees. Public remarks do not mention sewer details, but the checkbox presence across multiple independent listings indicates sewer is included in the maintenance fees for this building.
Overwhelming MLS evidence: 16 of 17 listings list WATER as included in the association fee. Although public remarks don't explicitly state 'water included,' the near-universal association_fee_includes checkbox across listings indicates water is covered by the maintenance fee.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Remark text from at least 10 different listings explicitly references outdoor spaces (phrases include 'enclosed patio', 'private partial fenced-in back patio', 'private lanai', 'semi-private lanai patio area', 'private balcony', and 'enclosed back yard'). MLS checkbox appears in ~8 of 17 listings and the consistent, specific language across many agents supports including patio/deck as a building feature.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Five of 17 current listings have a building-level storage checkbox and four list storage in unit_features. Public remarks in multiple listings mention additional storage such as “closet for extra storage” and “semi-private lanai patio area with extra storage space,” indicating the building offers storage options (some in-unit/lanai closets and some building-level storage indicated by agent checkboxes). Evidence is moderate across several agents rather than widespread, so confidence is set to 0.76.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Strong evidence across the listing remarks that many units have in-unit laundry: 16 of 17 current MLS listings list washer/dryer in inclusions and remarks repeatedly state phrases like 'in-unit washer and dryer', 'washer & dryer included', and 'full sized washer and dryer in the unit'. Mentions appear in multiple agent listings (some likely copy/paste), but the volume and consistency provide high confidence that the building offers units with in-unit laundry.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
All 17 current MLS listings include parking features (no 'NONE'). Public remarks across the listings repeatedly mention parking availability (e.g., '1 assigned parking stall', '2 assigned parking stalls', '1 Parking'), indicating building-wide parking is offered. Evidence is consistent across many agent remarks and MLS checkbox data.
MLS checkbox data indicates assigned parking in 14 of 17 listings, and the public remarks include numerous explicit phrases such as 'one assigned parking stall', '2 ASSIGNED PARKING STALLS', and 'deeded parking stall'. Multiple agents independently describe assigned/reserved stalls for units, supporting a strong conclusion that assigned parking is offered.
No analysis available
Public remarks explicitly mention a 'deeded parking stall' for at least one listing, and many listings reference assigned parking stalls. Based on the explicit 'deeded' language in the remarks, parking_deeded is marked true.
No analysis available
Reviewed all listings for explicit parking charges or monthly rental fees. Listings repeatedly reference 'assigned', 'deeded', or 'one/two assigned parking stall(s)' and street parking, but no parking fee or monthly cost is stated in the remarks.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Searched for terms like 'parking waitlist', 'parking waiting list', or 'join waitlist for parking'. None of the listings mention a waitlist system; they consistently reference assigned/deeded stalls or street parking.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
MLS checkbox data flags 10 of 17 listings as double-wall (DOUWAL), but none of the public remarks mention 'double wall' construction or related details. Without first-hand verification or explicit remarks describing recent changes, there is insufficient corroborating evidence to include double-wall construction for the building.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
MLS checkbox data indicates 8 of 17 listings flagged wood frame (WOOFRA), but zero public remarks for these units mention 'wood frame' or similar phrasing. No owner/site verification or explicit renovation notes support wood framing, so evidence for the building having wood-frame construction is weak and likely due to agent copy/paste.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Reviewed remarks for explicit STR language or indications of short-term/vacation rental allowance. There is no evidence that STRs are permitted; therefore STRs are marked not allowed.
Searched for 'hotel rental pool', 'hotel rental program', or management by a hotel brand. No listings mention hotel pool participation; because STRs are not allowed, hotel pool participation is marked false.
Looked for 'mandatory hotel pool', 'required to participate', or 'must be in rental program'. No listing indicates mandatory participation; since STRs are not allowed, mandatory pool is false.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Searched remarks for phrases like 'lease expires', 'land lease to', 'leasehold expiring', or specific years. No leasehold or lease expiry year was mentioned in any listing, so the lease expiry year is unknown.
Public remarks repeatedly reference VA financing and VA assumable loans for units in this building. Based solely on those remarks, the building is VA loan approved/VA financing available.
I searched the public remarks for statements like 'fully insured', 'walls-in coverage', 'comprehensive building insurance', or 'full insurance' and found no such language. In the absence of any explicit mention and no current value to retain, I report false with medium confidence.
No analysis available
I reviewed the remarks for explicit FLSE/fire-life-safety language (e.g., 'FLSE passed', 'fire life safety evaluation passed', 'passed fire inspection') and found none. With no mention and no existing current value, I report false with medium confidence (absence in remarks suggests it was not stated).
Flood zone determined from official FEMA Digital Flood Insurance Rate Map (DFIRM) data using building coordinates, not from agent-reported listing data.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
MLS view_descriptions include GARDEN for 3 of 17 listings. The public remarks repeatedly mention private/enclosed patios, fenced back yards, and a "private lanai overlooking a well-maintained green space" (appearing in multiple unit descriptions), indicating some units face landscaped/common green areas. Evidence is moderate and appears across several different listing remarks rather than a single copy/paste, so the building should be listed as offering garden views for some units.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Confidence levels are based on MLS checkbox data and AI analysis of listing remarks. High = strong evidence, Medium = some evidence, Low = limited or conflicting evidence. Buyers should always verify critical details independently.