College Gardens 1
Preliminary Information – Full Audit Pending
This buildings features were determined from publicly available data, including MLS listings. While we cross-referenced additional data sources, it still likely contains incomplete or inaccurate information, as it has not yet been personally verified.
Once a building has been fully audited, this page will be replaced with an in-depth analysis featuring verified details and photos of every key feature.
Until then, we provide a data‑driven overview that blends statistical analysis of the checkbox selections agents make in MLS with an AI‑powered read of their public remarks—yielding a clearer picture of the building than raw listings alone.
If this building is important to your search, you can help prioritize it for a full audit by requesting one below. To see what a complete report looks like, check out the example full report.
College Gardens 1
Building Overview
College Gardens 1 in Waipahu — concrete construction, built 1984; pets and short-term rentals not allowed.
About College Gardens 1
Based on MLS data, College Gardens 1 is a residential building located in the Waipahu neighborhood. According to available records it was built in 1984 and is constructed of concrete. Size and unit mix information are not provided in the MLS data available.
Key recorded policies include no pets and no short-term rentals allowed. The MLS data does not list specific on-site amenities, common area features, or unit-level details, so prospective buyers should request complete amenity and floor plan information from the seller or listing agent.
Management company is listed as unknown in the MLS. Information about parking, maintenance fees, association rules, or other assessments was not provided in the available MLS data. Buyers should verify all building details, policies, fees, and management information independently before making decisions.
Building Features & Data Confidence
All features from MLS data with AI-assisted confidence analysis. Click each category to expand and see details.
No analysis available
No analysis available
I looked for owner-occupancy indicators such as a percentage, 'majority owner occupied,' or 'highly owner occupied.' The remarks contain no occupancy-rate language, so the owner-occupancy percentage is not stated in the listings.
I searched the public remarks for any reference to elevators, including counts like '4 elevators,' 'multiple elevators,' or any explicit elevator mention. None of the listings described an elevator-served building, so there is no evidence to determine the number of elevators from the remarks.
Calculated from the lowest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from the highest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from association fees observed in penthouse unit listings for this building.
No analysis available
No analysis available
The MLS pattern suggests common-area electric may be included, with 10 of 18 listings carrying OTCOEX. However, the public remarks across the listings do not mention common electric or building power, so the evidence is only moderate and could be template-driven.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Evidence points to hot water not being included in the maintenance fee. Across the listings, HOTWAT appears in only 2 of 20 records, while WTRHTR appears in 16 of 20, consistent with unit-supplied water heaters rather than building-provided hot water. Public remarks do not mention hot water inclusion, and the pattern looks consistent across multiple agents rather than a one-off copy-paste error.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Sewer inclusion is strongly supported by the MLS records, with 17 of 20 current listings marking SEWER in association_fee_includes. Public remarks do not dispute this, and the consistency across many listings makes this a high-confidence building feature. This looks like a stable association fee component rather than an agent-specific copy-paste anomaly.
Water inclusion is extremely likely, with 19 of 20 current MLS listings showing WATER in association_fee_includes. No public remarks suggest otherwise, and the near-unanimous MLS pattern is strong building-level evidence. This appears to be a consistent fee inclusion across the building.
BBQ/grilling facilities are repeatedly confirmed across many listings, with well over 6 remarks explicitly mentioning them. Phrases like "BBQ area," "BBQ areas," and "back yard opens directly to the park area with a BBQ grill" suggest this is a shared community amenity, not a copy-paste anomaly.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Strong evidence that the building offers patio/deck-style outdoor space. Multiple current listings explicitly mention an enclosed patio, private lanai, semi-private lanai patio area, private balcony, and fenced private yard, confirming this is a real building-level feature rather than a one-off agent checkbox. The evidence is consistent across many listings and appears to be well established rather than copy-paste error.
There is no direct evidence of a jogging or walking path in the public remarks. The text only references being walkable to nearby destinations and general walks, which is not the same as a dedicated path/fitness trail amenity, so this feature should be treated as absent unless stronger evidence appears.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Storage is supported by both MLS fields and recurring public remarks. At least 2-3 listings explicitly mention storage phrases like "exterior storage closet" and "extra storage space," while current MLS data shows storage checked in a minority of listings. The evidence suggests this is a real building/unit feature available in some units rather than an isolated agent mistake.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Strong, consistent evidence across many listings supports in-unit laundry at College Gardens. Multiple remarks from different listings/agents explicitly say 'in-unit washer and dryer,' 'washer & dryer included,' and 'full-size washer and dryer in the unit,' which matches the prior MLS pattern of 19/20 listings including washer/dryer. This appears to be a stable building feature rather than a one-off or copy-paste error.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Parking is strongly supported across the building. Multiple current remarks explicitly reference parking in many units, and the historical MLS data shows parking features on all current listings with no NONE values. This appears consistent across agents and is not just a single copy-paste mention.
Assigned parking is clearly supported for this building. Several current remarks explicitly state assigned stalls or deeded parking, and the historical MLS data already showed a strong majority of listings with ASSIGN checked. The evidence is consistent across multiple listings and agents.
No analysis available
There is direct public-remark evidence that parking is deeded/owned with the unit. Other remarks mention assigned stalls, but the explicit deeded-stall wording is the key evidence.
No analysis available
I looked for wording like parking fee, monthly parking charge, additional parking cost, or parking rental, but found no such mention. The listings talk about assigned or deeded stalls, not any separate fee.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
I searched for phrases like parking waitlist, parking waiting list, or join a waitlist for parking and found nothing. Because there is no evidence of a waitlist system in the remarks, this is set to false with low-to-medium confidence.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Security/guard service appears to be present based on multiple remarks that mention a "guard station"; one listing says amenities include "BBQ area, guard station, and an on-site playground," and another repeats that "just downstairs is a BBQ area and the guard station." With at least 2 listings explicitly referencing the guard station, this looks like a real building-level amenity rather than a one-off unit feature. The language is fairly consistent across remarks, though some descriptions appear reused across listings.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Window A/C is strongly supported across multiple listings. At least 4 remarks explicitly mention it, including phrases like "window A/C unit in living room" and "brand-new AC in the living room," and the current MLS data also has ACWIUN checked in most recent listings. The evidence is consistent across different listings and agents, so this feature should be included.
No analysis available
Double wall construction is present in 12 of 20 current MLS listings, which is strong building-level evidence. The public remarks do not explicitly mention it, but the MLS pattern suggests this is not a one-off unit detail and is likely a consistent building characteristic.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Wood frame construction appears in 10 of 20 current MLS listings, giving moderate support that this is a building-level feature. None of the public remarks explicitly say “wood frame,” so this is driven mainly by the repeated MLS construction_materials data rather than remark text.
None of the listings mention “above ground construction” or related phrasing. Because the feature appears only in a small minority of MLS records and is unsupported by the remarks, confidence is low that it should be treated as a verified building feature.
No analysis available
No analysis available
I searched for explicit STR indicators such as short-term rental allowed, STR permitted, NUC, TVU, or vacation rental language, but found none. With no evidence supporting STR eligibility in the public remarks, this is set to false at moderate-low confidence.
I looked for hotel-pool terminology like hotel rental pool, managed by hotel, or brand-specific rental programs, but found none. Since there is no evidence that STR is allowed here, hotel-pool participation is marked false.
I searched for mandatory-pool language such as required participation, cannot opt out, or must rent through a program, and found nothing. With no evidence of any hotel or rental pool system in the remarks, this is marked false.
No analysis available
No analysis available
I searched for leasehold language such as lease expires, ground lease, leasehold, renewed through, or a specific expiration year, but found nothing. No remarks provide a lease expiry date, so this remains unknown.
The public remarks repeatedly and directly mention VA financing and VA assumable loan options, which is strong evidence that VA loans are accepted for this building. I relied only on the listing language, and the evidence is consistent across multiple remarks.
I searched for insurance-related wording such as fully insured, full insurance, walls-in coverage, or comprehensive building insurance. Nothing in the remarks indicates the HOA provides full or walls-in coverage, so this cannot be confirmed from the available text.
No analysis available
I looked for fire/life safety language such as FLSE passed, fire safety certified, life safety compliant, or passed fire inspection. The remarks do not contain any of these phrases, so there is no public remark evidence that the building passed a fire/life safety evaluation.
Flood zone determined from official FEMA Digital Flood Insurance Rate Map (DFIRM) data using building coordinates, not from agent-reported listing data.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Garden/green-space views appear to be available in some College Gardens units. Across the remarks, at least 2-3 listings explicitly mention views or outlooks onto green space, park area, or a playground, which aligns with the current MLS mix of 9/20 listings showing GARDEN and 8/20 showing NONE. The evidence suggests this is a genuine unit-level feature rather than a copy-paste artifact.
No analysis available
No analysis available
There is not enough evidence to support sunrise views as a building feature. The remarks are silent on sunrise, morning sun, or eastern exposure, and the current MLS mix includes only a small number of SUNRIS flags alongside many NONE entries, suggesting this is not reliably present across the building.
There is no direct remark evidence for sunset views in the listings provided. The MLS view field is mixed and leans against the feature being broadly available, with only 1/19 listings marked SUNSET and 8/19 marked NONE. This looks more like an occasional unit-specific entry or copy/paste inconsistency than a confirmed building feature.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Resident manager is indicated in the MLS amenities on 9 of 18 listings, but the public remarks do not mention an on-site, live-in, or building manager anywhere. Because the evidence comes from checkbox data without narrative confirmation, this appears moderate rather than strong and could reflect agent copy/paste behavior.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Confidence levels are based on MLS checkbox data and AI analysis of listing remarks. High = strong evidence, Medium = some evidence, Low = limited or conflicting evidence. Buyers should always verify critical details independently.