College Gardens 1
Preliminary Information – Full Audit Pending
This buildings features were determined from publicly available data, including MLS listings. While we cross-referenced additional data sources, it still likely contains incomplete or inaccurate information, as it has not yet been personally verified.
Once a building has been fully audited, this page will be replaced with an in-depth analysis featuring verified details and photos of every key feature.
Until then, we provide a data‑driven overview that blends statistical analysis of the checkbox selections agents make in MLS with an AI‑powered read of their public remarks—yielding a clearer picture of the building than raw listings alone.
If this building is important to your search, you can help prioritize it for a full audit by requesting one below. To see what a complete report looks like, check out the example full report.
College Gardens 1
Building Overview
College Gardens 1 in Waipahu — concrete construction, built 1984; pets and short-term rentals not allowed.
About College Gardens 1
Based on MLS data, College Gardens 1 is a residential building located in the Waipahu neighborhood. According to available records it was built in 1984 and is constructed of concrete. Size and unit mix information are not provided in the MLS data available.
Key recorded policies include no pets and no short-term rentals allowed. The MLS data does not list specific on-site amenities, common area features, or unit-level details, so prospective buyers should request complete amenity and floor plan information from the seller or listing agent.
Management company is listed as unknown in the MLS. Information about parking, maintenance fees, association rules, or other assessments was not provided in the available MLS data. Buyers should verify all building details, policies, fees, and management information independently before making decisions.
Building Features & Data Confidence
All features from MLS data with AI-assisted confidence analysis. Click each category to expand and see details.
No analysis available
I looked for owner-occupancy indicators such as a percentage, 'majority owner occupied,' or 'highly owner occupied' and found none. The remarks discuss unit condition, financing, and location, but do not provide any occupancy-rate information.
I searched the public remarks for any reference to elevators, elevator counts, or phrasing like 'multiple elevators' and found none. The listings focus on ground-floor access, second-floor units, parking, and amenities, but do not confirm whether the building has elevators.
Calculated from the lowest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from the highest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from association fees observed in penthouse unit listings for this building.
No analysis available
No analysis available
The MLS pattern suggests common-area electric may be included, with 10 of 18 listings carrying OTCOEX. However, the public remarks across the listings do not mention common electric or building power, so the evidence is only moderate and could be template-driven.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Evidence strongly indicates hot water is not included in the maintenance fee. Across the listings, only 2 of 19 mention HOTWAT, while 15 of 19 include WTRHTR, which is a strong sign units have their own water heaters instead of building-provided hot water. Current remarks do not describe hot water being included, only that a water heater was replaced in 2024.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Sewer inclusion is strongly supported by the MLS records. Sixteen of 19 current listings mark sewer as included, which is consistent across agents and appears to be standard building-level fee coverage. No public remarks contradict this inclusion.
Water is extremely likely included in the maintenance fee. Eighteen of 19 listings currently show WATER in association_fee_includes, making this one of the most consistent building-level fee items in the dataset. The public remarks do not suggest any change or exception.
BBQ/grilling facilities are repeatedly confirmed across many listings, with well over 6 remarks explicitly mentioning them. Phrases like "BBQ area," "BBQ areas," and "back yard opens directly to the park area with a BBQ grill" suggest this is a shared community amenity, not a copy-paste anomaly.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Strong evidence across many listings confirms this building offers patio/deck-style outdoor space. At least 10 listings mention it explicitly with phrases like 'private courtyard,' 'enclosed patio,' 'private lanai,' 'semi-private lanai patio area,' and 'private partial fenced-in back patio.' The consistency across multiple agents suggests this is a real shared building/unit feature, not a copy-paste error.
There is no direct evidence of a jogging or walking path in the public remarks. The text only references being walkable to nearby destinations and general walks, which is not the same as a dedicated path/fitness trail amenity, so this feature should be treated as absent unless stronger evidence appears.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Five of 17 current listings have a building-level storage checkbox and four list storage in unit_features. Public remarks in multiple listings mention additional storage such as “closet for extra storage” and “semi-private lanai patio area with extra storage space,” indicating the building offers storage options (some in-unit/lanai closets and some building-level storage indicated by agent checkboxes). Evidence is moderate across several agents rather than widespread, so confidence is set to 0.76.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Strong, consistent evidence that College Gardens offers in-unit laundry. Across the provided remarks, many listings explicitly mention "in-unit washer and dryer," "full-size washer and dryer," or "washer & dryer included," indicating this is a recurring building feature rather than a one-off agent mistake. The current remarks align with the prior high-confidence MLS data, so this should remain included.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
All 17 current MLS listings include parking features (no 'NONE'). Public remarks across the listings repeatedly mention parking availability (e.g., '1 assigned parking stall', '2 assigned parking stalls', '1 Parking'), indicating building-wide parking is offered. Evidence is consistent across many agent remarks and MLS checkbox data.
Assigned parking is strongly supported across many listings for College Gardens. Multiple agents explicitly mention "one assigned parking stall," "2 assigned parking stalls," and even a "deeded parking stall," which is consistent across the remarks rather than a single isolated note. The evidence is strong and repeated across many listings, suggesting this is a genuine building feature rather than copy-paste noise.
No analysis available
There is direct public-remark evidence that parking is deeded/owned with the unit. Other remarks also mention assigned stalls, but the explicit 'deeded parking stall' language is the key evidence.
No analysis available
I looked for language such as parking fee, monthly parking charge, parking rental, or additional cost for a stall. The listings mention assigned or deeded parking, but no separate parking fee was stated.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
I searched for 'parking waitlist,' 'waiting list,' and similar availability language. The remarks only describe assigned/deeded stalls and do not indicate any waitlist process.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Security/guard service appears to be present based on multiple remarks that mention a "guard station"; one listing says amenities include "BBQ area, guard station, and an on-site playground," and another repeats that "just downstairs is a BBQ area and the guard station." With at least 2 listings explicitly referencing the guard station, this looks like a real building-level amenity rather than a one-off unit feature. The language is fairly consistent across remarks, though some descriptions appear reused across listings.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Window A/C is strongly supported across multiple listings. At least 4 remarks explicitly mention it, including phrases like "window A/C unit in living room" and "brand-new AC in the living room," and the current MLS data also has ACWIUN checked in most recent listings. The evidence is consistent across different listings and agents, so this feature should be included.
No analysis available
Across the provided remarks, 0 listings explicitly mention double-wall construction or anything like “two walls.” The MLS checkbox data shows some DOUWAL entries, but the public descriptions appear to be generic copy/paste and do not corroborate the feature.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Wood frame construction appears in the MLS data for 9 of 18 listings, suggesting it is a building-level material rather than a unit-specific note. Public remarks across the listings do not mention 'wood frame' or similar phrasing, so this is supported more by MLS checkbox data than by agent descriptions. Confidence is moderate because the remarks are silent, but the repeated MLS material flag points toward a real feature.
None of the listings mention “above ground construction” or related phrasing. Because the feature appears only in a small minority of MLS records and is unsupported by the remarks, confidence is low that it should be treated as a verified building feature.
No analysis available
No analysis available
I searched for explicit STR indicators such as 'STR allowed,' 'NUC,' 'TVU,' 'vacation rental allowed,' or similar wording. Nothing in the remarks suggests short-term rentals are allowed, so this is treated as not permitted based on absence of evidence.
I looked for hotel-pool terminology like hotel rental pool, managed by hotel, or brand-specific pool programs. No such references appeared in the remarks, and with STR not evidenced as allowed, this is false.
I searched for phrases such as mandatory pool, required to participate, cannot opt out, or must rent through a program. The remarks contain none of that language, so there is no evidence of a mandatory pool.
No analysis available
No analysis available
I searched for leasehold language such as lease expires, ground lease, leasehold, renewed through, or expiring in a specific year. No specific land tenure expiry year was mentioned, so this remains unknown.
The public remarks repeatedly and directly reference VA financing and VA assumable loans, which is strong evidence that VA loans are accepted. This is not a single isolated mention; it appears across multiple listings.
I searched the remarks for insurance-related wording like fully insured, full insurance, walls-in coverage, or comprehensive building insurance and found none. The public descriptions mention financing eligibility and community features, but nothing that confirms full HOA insurance coverage.
No analysis available
I looked for fire/life safety language such as FLSE passed, fire safety certified, life safety compliant, or passed fire inspection and found nothing. Because there is no current verified value and no supporting remark evidence, this is treated as not confirmed in the listing remarks.
Flood zone determined from official FEMA Digital Flood Insurance Rate Map (DFIRM) data using building coordinates, not from agent-reported listing data.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Garden/green-space views appear to be available in some College Gardens units. Across the remarks, several listings mention 'overlooking green space and a playground,' 'garden oasis,' and units opening to park or landscaped areas, which is consistent with the MLS GARDEN flags. The evidence is moderate and seems to come from multiple listings rather than a single outlier.
No analysis available
No analysis available
There is not enough evidence to support sunrise views as a building feature. The remarks are silent on sunrise, morning sun, or eastern exposure, and the current MLS mix includes only a small number of SUNRIS flags alongside many NONE entries, suggesting this is not reliably present across the building.
There is no direct remark evidence for sunset views in the listings provided. The MLS view field is mixed and leans against the feature being broadly available, with only 1/19 listings marked SUNSET and 8/19 marked NONE. This looks more like an occasional unit-specific entry or copy/paste inconsistency than a confirmed building feature.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Resident manager is indicated in the MLS amenities on 9 of 18 listings, but the public remarks do not mention an on-site, live-in, or building manager anywhere. Because the evidence comes from checkbox data without narrative confirmation, this appears moderate rather than strong and could reflect agent copy/paste behavior.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Confidence levels are based on MLS checkbox data and AI analysis of listing remarks. High = strong evidence, Medium = some evidence, Low = limited or conflicting evidence. Buyers should always verify critical details independently.