College Gardens 1
Preliminary Information – Full Audit Pending
This buildings features were determined from publicly available data, including MLS listings. While we cross-referenced additional data sources, it still likely contains incomplete or inaccurate information, as it has not yet been personally verified.
Once a building has been fully audited, this page will be replaced with an in-depth analysis featuring verified details and photos of every key feature.
Until then, we provide a data‑driven overview that blends statistical analysis of the checkbox selections agents make in MLS with an AI‑powered read of their public remarks—yielding a clearer picture of the building than raw listings alone.
If this building is important to your search, you can help prioritize it for a full audit by requesting one below. To see what a complete report looks like, check out the example full report.
College Gardens 1
Building Overview
College Gardens 1 in Waipahu — concrete construction, built 1984; pets and short-term rentals not allowed.
About College Gardens 1
Based on MLS data, College Gardens 1 is a residential building located in the Waipahu neighborhood. According to available records it was built in 1984 and is constructed of concrete. Size and unit mix information are not provided in the MLS data available.
Key recorded policies include no pets and no short-term rentals allowed. The MLS data does not list specific on-site amenities, common area features, or unit-level details, so prospective buyers should request complete amenity and floor plan information from the seller or listing agent.
Management company is listed as unknown in the MLS. Information about parking, maintenance fees, association rules, or other assessments was not provided in the available MLS data. Buyers should verify all building details, policies, fees, and management information independently before making decisions.
Building Features & Data Confidence
All features from MLS data with AI-assisted confidence analysis. Click each category to expand and see details.
No analysis available
I looked for owner-occupancy indicators such as a percentage, majority owner occupied, or highly owner occupied, and found none. The remarks do not provide any unit-ownership composition or occupancy mix for the building.
I searched the public remarks for elevator references such as "elevator," "elevators," or counts like "4 elevators" and found none. The listings describe unit layouts, parking, and amenities, but do not mention the building having elevators.
Calculated from the lowest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from the highest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from association fees observed in penthouse unit listings for this building.
No analysis available
No analysis available
The MLS pattern suggests common-area electric may be included, with 10 of 18 listings carrying OTCOEX. However, the public remarks across the listings do not mention common electric or building power, so the evidence is only moderate and could be template-driven.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Evidence strongly indicates hot water is not included in the maintenance fee. The MLS data shows WTRHTR in 14 of 18 listings, which strongly suggests units have their own water heater rather than building-provided hot water, and only 2 listings mention HOTWAT.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Sewer inclusion is strongly supported by the MLS records, with 15 of 18 listings checking SEWER. The consistency across listings suggests this is a real building expense rather than an isolated agent error, and nothing in the remarks contradicts it.
Water inclusion is extremely well supported by the MLS data, with 17 of 18 listings marking WATER as included in the association fee. This is consistent across nearly all listings and appears to be a stable building feature.
BBQ/grilling facilities are strongly supported across many listings, with repeated mentions from multiple agents. At least 6+ remarks explicitly reference a BBQ area, BBQ areas, or a BBQ grill, suggesting this is a real shared building/community amenity rather than a one-off copy-paste error.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Remark text from at least 10 different listings explicitly references outdoor spaces (phrases include 'enclosed patio', 'private partial fenced-in back patio', 'private lanai', 'semi-private lanai patio area', 'private balcony', and 'enclosed back yard'). MLS checkbox appears in ~8 of 17 listings and the consistent, specific language across many agents supports including patio/deck as a building feature.
There is no direct evidence of a jogging or walking path in the public remarks. The text only references being walkable to nearby destinations and general walks, which is not the same as a dedicated path/fitness trail amenity, so this feature should be treated as absent unless stronger evidence appears.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Five of 17 current listings have a building-level storage checkbox and four list storage in unit_features. Public remarks in multiple listings mention additional storage such as “closet for extra storage” and “semi-private lanai patio area with extra storage space,” indicating the building offers storage options (some in-unit/lanai closets and some building-level storage indicated by agent checkboxes). Evidence is moderate across several agents rather than widespread, so confidence is set to 0.76.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Strong evidence that College Gardens offers in-unit laundry. The remarks explicitly mention it in many listings—well over 10, and likely most current ones—with consistent language such as "full-size washer and dryer in the unit," "in-unit laundry," and "washer & dryer included." This appears to be corroborated across multiple agents rather than a one-off or copied error.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
All 17 current MLS listings include parking features (no 'NONE'). Public remarks across the listings repeatedly mention parking availability (e.g., '1 assigned parking stall', '2 assigned parking stalls', '1 Parking'), indicating building-wide parking is offered. Evidence is consistent across many agent remarks and MLS checkbox data.
Assigned parking is strongly supported across many listings, with numerous agents using explicit phrases like 'one assigned parking stall,' '2 ASSIGNED PARKING STALLS,' and 'deeded parking stall.' The evidence appears consistent across multiple remarks rather than a one-off copy-paste error, confirming this building offers assigned/reserved parking.
No analysis available
The remarks include explicit wording that parking is deeded, which is direct evidence of owned parking. While many other listings mention assigned parking, the deeded-stall reference is the strongest indicator for this feature.
No analysis available
I looked for parking cost language such as "parking fee," "monthly parking," "parking rental," or any extra charge for a stall. The remarks only mention assigned/deeded parking and do not provide a fee amount, so this remains unknown.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
I searched for terms like "parking waitlist," "waiting list," or instructions to join a list for parking, but found nothing. With no evidence of a waitlist in the public remarks, this is treated as not indicated.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Security/guard service appears to be present based on multiple remarks that mention a "guard station"; one listing says amenities include "BBQ area, guard station, and an on-site playground," and another repeats that "just downstairs is a BBQ area and the guard station." With at least 2 listings explicitly referencing the guard station, this looks like a real building-level amenity rather than a one-off unit feature. The language is fairly consistent across remarks, though some descriptions appear reused across listings.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Strong evidence that the building offers window A/C units. At least 3 listings explicitly mention them, and the current MLS checkbox is present in 11 of 18 listings, suggesting this is a real building-level feature rather than a one-off agent error. The remarks are consistent across multiple listings and agents, so this should be retained with high confidence.
No analysis available
MLS checkbox data flags 10 of 17 listings as double-wall (DOUWAL), but none of the public remarks mention 'double wall' construction or related details. Without first-hand verification or explicit remarks describing recent changes, there is insufficient corroborating evidence to include double-wall construction for the building.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Wood frame construction appears in the MLS data for 9 of 18 listings, suggesting it is a building-level material rather than a unit-specific note. Public remarks across the listings do not mention 'wood frame' or similar phrasing, so this is supported more by MLS checkbox data than by agent descriptions. Confidence is moderate because the remarks are silent, but the repeated MLS material flag points toward a real feature.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
I searched for explicit STR indicators such as "short-term rental allowed," "TVU," "NUC," or "vacation rental allowed," and found no evidence. I also did not find wording implying STR permission, so the building is treated as not shown to allow STRs from these remarks.
I looked for hotel-pool language like "hotel rental pool," "managed by hotel," or brand-specific rental programs, but there were no such references. Because the remarks do not indicate STR availability, hotel pool participation is also not supported.
I searched for phrases such as "mandatory hotel pool," "must participate," or "cannot opt out," and found none. With no STR/hotel-pool evidence in the remarks, there is no basis to mark a mandatory rental pool program as present.
No analysis available
No analysis available
I searched the remarks for leasehold language such as "lease expires [year]," "ground lease," "leasehold," and renewal/extension wording. Nothing specific about land tenure or a lease expiry year was found, so the expiry date remains unknown.
Public remarks repeatedly and explicitly reference VA financing/assumable VA loans, which is strong evidence the building supports VA-approved transactions. This is confirmed across several listings rather than a single mention.
I searched for insurance-related wording like fully insured, walls-in coverage, or comprehensive building insurance, and found no mention. The public remarks do not state that the HOA provides full insurance coverage.
No analysis available
I looked for fire/life safety language such as FLSE passed, fire safety certified, life safety compliant, or passed fire inspection, and found no such statements. The remarks discuss financing eligibility and amenities, but nothing about a fire/life safety evaluation.
Flood zone determined from official FEMA Digital Flood Insurance Rate Map (DFIRM) data using building coordinates, not from agent-reported listing data.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Garden/green-space views appear to be available in some College Gardens units. Across the remarks, several listings mention 'overlooking green space and a playground,' 'garden oasis,' and units opening to park or landscaped areas, which is consistent with the MLS GARDEN flags. The evidence is moderate and seems to come from multiple listings rather than a single outlier.
No analysis available
No analysis available
There is not enough evidence to support sunrise views as a building feature. The remarks are silent on sunrise, morning sun, or eastern exposure, and the current MLS mix includes only a small number of SUNRIS flags alongside many NONE entries, suggesting this is not reliably present across the building.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Resident manager is indicated in the MLS amenities on 9 of 18 listings, but the public remarks do not mention an on-site, live-in, or building manager anywhere. Because the evidence comes from checkbox data without narrative confirmation, this appears moderate rather than strong and could reflect agent copy/paste behavior.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Confidence levels are based on MLS checkbox data and AI analysis of listing remarks. High = strong evidence, Medium = some evidence, Low = limited or conflicting evidence. Buyers should always verify critical details independently.