Club View Gardens 3
Preliminary Information – Full Audit Pending
This buildings features were determined from publicly available data, including MLS listings. While we cross-referenced additional data sources, it still likely contains incomplete or inaccurate information, as it has not yet been personally verified.
Once a building has been fully audited, this page will be replaced with an in-depth analysis featuring verified details and photos of every key feature.
Until then, we provide a data‑driven overview that blends statistical analysis of the checkbox selections agents make in MLS with an AI‑powered read of their public remarks—yielding a clearer picture of the building than raw listings alone.
If this building is important to your search, you can help prioritize it for a full audit by requesting one below. To see what a complete report looks like, check out the example full report.
Club View Gardens 3
Building Overview
Club View Gardens 3 in Kahaluu — built 1976; pets allowed, short-term rentals not permitted.
About Club View Gardens 3
Club View Gardens 3 is located in the Kahaluu neighborhood and was built in 1976. According to available records, specific information on unit sizes and construction type is not provided in the MLS data.
Key policies recorded in the MLS indicate pets are allowed and short-term rentals are not permitted. The management company is listed as unknown in the available MLS information. No additional amenity list is provided in the MLS data.
Additional details commonly of interest to buyers—such as parking, maintenance fees, association rules, and exact unit square footage—are not specified in the MLS summary. Based on MLS data provided; buyers should verify all details with the listing agent or association before making decisions.
Building Features & Data Confidence
All features from MLS data with AI-assisted confidence analysis. Click each category to expand and see details.
No analysis available
I found one clear indication that at least a specific unit is owner-occupied, which supports owner-occupancy being present in the community. However, the remarks do not provide a building-level percentage like '80% owner occupied,' so the exact owner-occupancy rate remains unknown.
I searched the public remarks for any explicit elevator references or counts, including phrases like '4 elevators' or 'multiple elevators,' and found none. Because there is no evidence in the remarks, the elevator count remains unknown.
Calculated from the lowest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from the highest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from association fees observed in penthouse unit listings for this building.
No analysis available
No analysis available
9 of 14 current MLS listings include OTCOEX (common area electricity) in association_fee_includes, suggesting maintenance fees likely cover common area electricity. Public remarks do not mention utility inclusions and no owner/property manager verifications are present, so confidence is moderate and this may reflect agents copying MLS checklist.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No listings (0/14) show HOTWAT in association_fee_includes while 11/14 explicitly list WTRHTR (water heater) in unit inclusions, a strong indicator that hot water is provided by individual unit heaters and not included in HOA fees. Combined with absence of any remarks stating 'hot water included,' confidence is high that hot water is not included in the maintenance fee.
No analysis available
No analysis available
All 14 current MLS listings include SEWER in association_fee_includes, indicating sewer service is covered by the maintenance fee. Public remarks do not discuss utility inclusions, but the unanimous MLS checkbox across listings provides strong, consistent evidence.
All 14 current MLS listings include WATER in association_fee_includes, showing water is included in HOA/maintenance fees. Although public remarks do not mention utility details, the consistent MLS checkbox across all listings is strong evidence that water is included.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Evidence is strong that the building has a clubhouse: 10 of 14 current MLS listings have the CLUHOU checkbox checked and at least 6 independent public remarks explicitly mention a clubhouse or club house (quotes include "Club View Gardens Community Amenities include pool, club house" and "Big clubhouse with pool available to reserve for parties"). Multiple agents describe the clubhouse as a shared community amenity rather than a private, unit-specific feature, supporting inclusion of this building-level amenity.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
All 14 current MLS listings have the pool amenity checked and numerous public remarks reference it (phrases include “community pool,” “community swimming pool,” and “big clubhouse with pool available to reserve”). Evidence is strong and consistent across multiple listings and agents, indicating the building offers a shared community swimming pool.
No analysis available
No analysis available
All 14 current MLS listings list WASHER/DRYER in inclusions, and several agent remarks explicitly mention in-unit laundry (examples: "washer and dryer in the unit", "laundry room with full-size washer/dryer", "washer/dryer and master bedroom on first floor"). The consistency across all MLS inclusions plus multiple independent remarks provides strong evidence that some units in this building have in-unit laundry.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
All 14 listings show parking features in the MLS and numerous remarks explicitly mention parking (examples: "two parking stalls", "two open parking stalls"). Evidence is strong and consistent across multiple agent remarks and the MLS checkbox data, indicating the building offers parking.
A majority of MLS entries (11/14) list assigned parking and many public remarks explicitly say "assigned" or "reserved" parking (e.g., "two assigned parking spaces", "two reserved side-by-side parking spaces"). This is consistent across listings and confirms assigned parking is offered.
No analysis available
The listings consistently describe assigned or reserved parking, not deeded or owned stalls. I searched specifically for deeded, owned, or parking-included wording and found no such confirmation.
No analysis available
I looked for parking fee language, monthly charges, rental rates, or any dollar amount tied to parking, but found none. The remarks only describe the number and placement of parking stalls.
MLS data shows guest parking on 10 of 14 listings and remarks include explicit references to guest/visitor parking (example: "two guest parking just outside your door…"), along with mentions of ample street parking. The combined MLS and remarks evidence indicates guest parking is available.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
I searched for parking waitlist or waiting-list language and found nothing. The public remarks describe parking availability, but not any queue or waitlist system.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
5 of 14 current MLS listings list ACSPL in inclusions and at least three separate public remarks explicitly state split A/C (quotes: 'equipped with split A/C', 'split air conditioning units', 'stay cool... with the split al conditioning system'). This indicates some units in the building have ductless/mini-split systems, though it is not present in all listings and may reflect some owner-specific installations or inconsistent agent reporting.
No analysis available
No listing remarks mention concrete or 'reinforced concrete' across the 14 provided public remarks. CURRENT MLS metadata indicates 3/14 listings have CONCRE checked, but the agent remarks do not corroborate concrete construction and there is no prior verification — evidence is weak and appears to be checkbox data rather than substantiated in remarks.
CURRENT MLS shows 10/14 listings with DOUWAL checked, but the provided public remarks (14 listings) contain no references to 'double wall' or 'double-wall construction.' With no supporting remarks or owner/site verification, the evidence for double-wall construction is weak and likely reflects checkbox entries rather than confirmed feature.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Although CURRENT MLS shows 10/14 listings with WOOFRA selected, none of the 14 public remarks explicitly state 'wood frame' or 'wood frame construction.' The absence of supporting language in multiple agent remarks suggests the MLS checkbox entries are likely unverified; evidence for wood-frame construction is weak.
Although 3/14 CURRENT MLS entries list ABOGRO, none of the 14 public remarks use phrases like 'above ground construction' or similar. The agent remarks focus on views, lanais, courtyards, and amenities, offering no corroboration of above-ground construction; evidence is weak and unsubstantiated.
No analysis available
No analysis available
I searched for short-term rental, STR, vacation rental, NUC, TVU, and similar approval language, but there was no explicit permission. Because the remarks do not confirm STR legality, this is set to false.
I looked for hotel pool, hotel rental program, managed-by-hotel, Hilton/Trump/Ritz pool language, and found none. Since short-term rentals are not established from the remarks, hotel pool participation must be false.
I searched for mandatory participation, required rental program, cannot opt out, or similar language and found nothing. With no evidence of an STR program, mandatory pool participation is false.
No analysis available
No analysis available
I searched for phrases like lease expires, ground lease, leasehold, and any 4-digit lease end year, but found nothing. Since there is no explicit lease-expiry information in the public remarks, the value remains unknown.
The listings directly reference a VA assumable loan, which is strong evidence that VA financing is relevant for this building/unit. I looked for any VA-approved or VA financing language and found an explicit mention.
I searched the remarks for HOA or building insurance wording that would indicate full walls-in coverage, but there were no such references. Since the remarks do not mention insurance coverage, this cannot be confirmed.
No analysis available
I looked for explicit fire/life safety language such as FLSE passed, fire safety certified, or passed fire inspection, but found nothing in the remarks. With no public-remarks evidence, this feature is treated as not indicated.
Flood zone determined from official FEMA Digital Flood Insurance Rate Map (DFIRM) data using building coordinates, not from agent-reported listing data.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Multiple unit remarks repeatedly describe mountain views — phrases include "mountain views are abundant," "Koolau Mountain Range," "breathtaking views of the Ko'olau mountain range," and "majestic Koolau mountains." Current MLS checkbox data also lists MOUNTA for 7 of 14 listings, indicating the building offers mountain-view units across several agents' listings rather than an isolated mention.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
12 of 14 current MLS listings list RESMAN in amenities and several agent remarks explicitly mention an "on-site manager" or "on-site manager." Evidence is consistent across multiple listings and agents; while agent copy/paste is possible, the overwhelming checkbox majority plus explicit remarks indicate the building does have a resident/on-site manager.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Confidence levels are based on MLS checkbox data and AI analysis of listing remarks. High = strong evidence, Medium = some evidence, Low = limited or conflicting evidence. Buyers should always verify critical details independently.