
Club View Gardens 2
Preliminary Information – Full Audit Pending
This buildings features were determined from publicly available data, including MLS listings. While we cross-referenced additional data sources, it still likely contains incomplete or inaccurate information, as it has not yet been personally verified.
Once a building has been fully audited, this page will be replaced with an in-depth analysis featuring verified details and photos of every key feature.
Until then, we provide a data‑driven overview that blends statistical analysis of the checkbox selections agents make in MLS with an AI‑powered read of their public remarks—yielding a clearer picture of the building than raw listings alone.
If this building is important to your search, you can help prioritize it for a full audit by requesting one below. To see what a complete report looks like, check out the example full report.
Club View Gardens 2
Building Overview
Club View Gardens 2 in Kahaluu — wood frame building (1974) with mountain views and an on-site pool.

About Club View Gardens 2
Club View Gardens 2 is a residential building located in the Kahaluu neighborhood. According to available records, the building was constructed in 1974 and is wood frame construction. Size or unit count information is not provided in the MLS data.
Based on MLS data, the property offers mountain views and includes an on-site pool. Units feature split air conditioning. Pets and short-term rentals are not allowed per the available listings.
Parking is listed as assigned with additional guest parking. The management company is not specified in the MLS data. This summary is based on available MLS information; buyers should verify all details, restrictions, and fees with the listing agent or management prior to purchase.
Building Features & Data Confidence
All features from MLS data with AI-assisted confidence analysis. Click each category to expand and see details.
No analysis available
I searched for owner-occupancy indicators such as a percentage, "majority owner occupied," or similar language, and found none. The remarks do not state any owner-occupancy level, so this remains unknown.
I searched the public remarks for explicit elevator references such as "elevator," "multiple elevators," or a count like "4 elevators," and found none. Because there is no evidence in the listings, the number of elevators remains unknown.
Calculated from the lowest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from the highest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from association fees observed in penthouse unit listings for this building.
No analysis available
No analysis available
14 of 18 current listings list OTCOEX in association_fee_includes indicating common-area electricity is included. Remarks do not explicitly mention common-area electric, but the consistent MLS checkbox across multiple agents (likely copy/paste but still widespread) supports including this feature.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Across the listings, there are no HOTWAT fee-includes entries, while most units instead note a hot water heater ('WTRHTR' / 'new hot water heater'). The remarks consistently talk about unit-owned heaters and do not describe building-provided hot water, so this appears to be a stable building pattern rather than a copy-paste artifact.
No analysis available
No analysis available
All reviewed listings show sewer included in the HOA/maintenance fees. The remarks are silent on sewer, but the MLS checkbox is consistent across every listing, making this a very strong building-level feature.
All reviewed listings include water in the association fee breakdown. This is consistent across the entire sample and not undermined by the public remarks, so it is highly reliable as a building feature.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Strong evidence the building/community has a clubhouse. At least 5 current listings explicitly mention it, including phrases like "clubhouse for parties," "community amenities include a pool, clubhouse," "pool and a clubhouse," and "recreation clubhouse." The repeated mentions across multiple remarks support the historical MLS clubhouse indicator rather than a mistaken checkbox.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Strong, consistent evidence across listing remarks: at least 15 of the unit listings explicitly mention outdoor spaces (quotes include “large lanai,” “fully fenced back patio,” “screened-in lanai,” “covered deck,” and “large enclosed patio/lanai”). References appear in listings from multiple agents and are detailed (e.g., “two spacious lanais,” “192 sq ft lanai,” “336 sq ft enclosed patio”), so the building clearly offers patios/decks as an amenity.
Moderate evidence: at least 5 listings explicitly mention walking paths/sidewalks (quotes include “walking paths,” “sidewalks, open green spaces,” and “walking paths abound”), and 6/17 MLS checkbox entries currently mark WAJOPA. The repeated, explicit mentions across multiple remarks indicate the property offers walking/jogging paths, though wording is more often 'walking paths' than dedicated 'jogging paths.'
No analysis available
Private yard space is repeatedly mentioned across the listings: phrases include "fenced in grassy front yard," "private yard," "fenced-in yard," "enclosed yard space," "private courtyard," and "private outdoor area." At least 8-10 remarks reference some form of private/fenced/enclosed outdoor area, which strongly supports that the building offers units with private yard access. The MLS amenity checkbox also appears in some current listings, reinforcing that this is an actual feature available in the complex.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Storage is strongly supported across many listings for this building. At least 6+ remarks mention storage in some form, with phrases like "bonus storage area," "extra storage downstairs," "storage closet on the lanai," and "outside storage shed included." The evidence looks consistent across different agents rather than a single copy-paste remark, so the building should be marked as offering storage units/locker-style storage or extra storage space.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Strong evidence that Club View Gardens II has a shared swimming pool. Multiple current remarks explicitly mention pool amenities, including phrases like "community pool," "pool complex in common area," "host to community swimming pool," and "clubhouse with pool." The consistency across different listings suggests this is a real building feature, not just copied MLS checkbox data.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Strong building-level evidence supports in-unit laundry. Multiple remarks explicitly mention it, including "inside laundry area," "full-size laundry," and "kitchen, living, dining, primary bedroom, bathroom, full-size laundry." Combined with the historical MLS inclusion data showing washer/dryer in nearly every listing, this appears consistent across agents and not just copy-paste noise.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Parking is strongly supported across the listing set. Multiple public remarks explicitly mention 2 stalls/assigned parking, and one notes parking is "right in front," indicating building-level parking access rather than a one-off agent error. Combined with the MLS data showing 19/19 listings with parking features, this is very strong evidence that the building has parking.
There is strong evidence the building offers assigned/reserved parking: 14/18 MLS listings mark ASSIGN and numerous remarks explicitly say 'two assigned parking stalls' or similar phrasing across different listings, confirming assigned stalls are provided.
No analysis available
The listings consistently describe assigned or dedicated stalls, which indicates reserved parking but not deeded ownership. I looked for explicit terms like deeded, owned parking, or parking included in the deed and found none.
No analysis available
I searched for parking fee, monthly parking, parking rental, and additional parking cost language, but found nothing. The public remarks do not provide any parking cost information.
MLS data shows guest parking flagged in 11 of 18 listings, suggesting guest/visitor parking may be available. However, public remarks do not mention 'guest' or 'visitor' parking, so the evidence is less direct and likely reflects agent-entered checklist data rather than explicit agent remarks.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
I looked for parking waitlist, parking waiting list, and join the waitlist phrasing, but there were no mentions. The remarks only discuss assigned/dedicated stalls, not a waitlist system.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Strong evidence that units in this building offer split AC. At least 4-5 current remarks explicitly mention split/mini-split systems, including detailed placement like the living room, primary bedroom, and all three bedrooms. The consistency across multiple listings and agents supports keeping this feature as true.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Double wall construction is supported by 13 of 19 current listings and historically had high confidence. No remarks mention alternative construction or a correction, so this remains a strong building-level feature despite the remarks being silent on it.
No analysis available
Only 3 of 17 current MLS listings include MASSTU in construction_materials, and none of the listing public remarks reference 'masonry' or 'stucco'. Given the lack of corroborating agent remarks and no historical confidence data, the evidence is weak and likely a checkbox inconsistency rather than a verified building feature.
No analysis available
8/16 MLS listings list SLAB in construction_materials, which aligns with typical townhouse construction in this area, and there is no contradictory information in remarks.
No analysis available
Wood frame appears in the MLS on 12 of 19 current listings, with no public-remark contradiction. The remarks focus on renovations, lanais, views, and AC, suggesting this is likely checkbox data rather than copied from the remarks, but the prevalence is still enough to include the feature.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
I searched for explicit STR allowance or prohibition language, including NUC, TVU, vacation rental, and minimum-stay rules, but found none. With no evidence in the remarks, STR is treated as not indicated/false here.
There is no evidence of any hotel rental pool program in the remarks, and because STR is not supported, this cannot be true. The listings only discuss owner occupancy features and community amenities like pool and clubhouse.
I searched for mandatory participation language such as required rental pool, cannot opt out, or must be in the program, but found nothing. Since there is also no evidence of STR or a hotel pool, mandatory participation is not supported.
No analysis available
No analysis available
I searched for ground lease, leasehold, lease expires, lease to, and renewal/extension language, but found no specific expiry year. Based on the public remarks alone, the land tenure lease expiry remains unknown.
The remarks directly reference VA financing via a VA assumption, which is strong evidence the building/units are VA financeable. No conflicting language appears in the listings.
The remarks explicitly state that the AOAO master summary sheet reflects the project is properly insured. That is strong evidence the building is fully insured / walls-in covered by the HOA.
No analysis available
I searched for fire/life safety evaluation language such as FLSE passed, fire safety certified, life safety compliant, or passed fire inspection, and found no explicit references. The remarks do not provide evidence that this building has passed a fire/life safety evaluation.
Flood zone determined from official FEMA Digital Flood Insurance Rate Map (DFIRM) data using building coordinates, not from agent-reported listing data.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Strong, consistent evidence across many listings supports mountain views in this building. About 16 of 19 current listings reference mountain/Ko'olau/Koolau views, with phrases like 'sunlit green mountains,' 'breathtaking Ko'olau Mountain views,' and 'views of the Koolau mountains.' The wording appears across multiple agents, not just one copy-pasted remark, so this is high-confidence.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
There is strong evidence that this building offers garden-type views. Roughly 14 of 19 current listings reference garden, courtyard, landscaped, or lush greenery views, with phrases such as 'lush tropical gardens,' 'verdant tropical foliage,' 'garden setting,' and 'garden retreat.' The pattern is broad across multiple listings and looks like genuine building-level availability rather than a single agent’s copy-paste.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Evidence supports a resident/on-site manager: 8 of 18 current MLS listings have the RESMAN amenity checked and at least two separate public remarks explicitly state 'site manager' or 'on-site manager' (quotes: 'community amenities include ... a site manager' and 'newly installed playground & on-site manager'). Mentions appear across different listings/agents and align with the MLS amenity checks, so confidence is high.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Confidence levels are based on MLS checkbox data and AI analysis of listing remarks. High = strong evidence, Medium = some evidence, Low = limited or conflicting evidence. Buyers should always verify critical details independently.