Club View Gardens 2
Preliminary Information – Full Audit Pending
This buildings features were determined from publicly available data, including MLS listings. While we cross-referenced additional data sources, it still likely contains incomplete or inaccurate information, as it has not yet been personally verified.
Once a building has been fully audited, this page will be replaced with an in-depth analysis featuring verified details and photos of every key feature.
Until then, we provide a data‑driven overview that blends statistical analysis of the checkbox selections agents make in MLS with an AI‑powered read of their public remarks—yielding a clearer picture of the building than raw listings alone.
If this building is important to your search, you can help prioritize it for a full audit by requesting one below. To see what a complete report looks like, check out the example full report.
Club View Gardens 2
Building Overview
Club View Gardens 2 in Kahaluu — wood frame building (1974) with mountain views and an on-site pool.
About Club View Gardens 2
Club View Gardens 2 is a residential building located in the Kahaluu neighborhood. According to available records, the building was constructed in 1974 and is wood frame construction. Size or unit count information is not provided in the MLS data.
Based on MLS data, the property offers mountain views and includes an on-site pool. Units feature split air conditioning. Pets and short-term rentals are not allowed per the available listings.
Parking is listed as assigned with additional guest parking. The management company is not specified in the MLS data. This summary is based on available MLS information; buyers should verify all details, restrictions, and fees with the listing agent or management prior to purchase.
Building Features & Data Confidence
All features from MLS data with AI-assisted confidence analysis. Click each category to expand and see details.
No analysis available
I searched for owner-occupancy indicators such as a percentage (for example, "80% owner occupied") or phrases like "majority owner occupied" or "highly owner occupied." None were found, so there is no evidence to estimate this value from the remarks.
I searched the public remarks for explicit elevator references such as "4 elevators," "multiple elevators," or similar wording, and found nothing. Because this is a townhouse community and the remarks consistently describe split-level or single-level units, there is no basis to infer elevator presence or count.
Calculated from the lowest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from the highest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from association fees observed in penthouse unit listings for this building.
No analysis available
No analysis available
15 of 20 current listings include OTCOEX in association_fee_includes, pointing to common-area electricity being covered by the maintenance fee. The public remarks don’t mention this directly, but they also do not conflict with the MLS pattern. Evidence is moderate-to-strong and appears MLS-driven rather than agent copy-paste in the remarks.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No reviewed listings show HOTWAT in association_fee_includes, and most instead note WTRHTR / hot water heaters. Public remarks align with this pattern, with one listing explicitly mentioning a “hot water heater,” which points away from fee-included hot water. Overall evidence is strong that hot water is not included.
No analysis available
No analysis available
All reviewed listings show SEWER included in the association fee breakdown. The public remarks are silent on sewer, but the MLS data is fully consistent across the sample. This is very strong evidence for sewer being included.
All reviewed listings include WATER in association_fee_includes, and the public remarks do not undermine that pattern. This is consistent across the entire reviewed sample, making water inclusion highly reliable.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Strong evidence the building/community has a clubhouse. Historical MLS data is already high confidence (16/20 listings with CLUHOU), and current remarks consistently confirm it across multiple listings and agents. The feature appears repeatedly as a shared community amenity, not a one-off copy-paste error.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Strong, repeated evidence across many listings confirms patio/deck amenities for this building. At least a dozen remarks mention outdoor spaces such as 'private lanai,' 'covered deck,' 'large deck,' 'patio,' 'courtyard,' and 'Trex decking,' often across different agents and listing versions. This looks like consistent building-level amenity data rather than a one-off copy-paste error.
There is moderate evidence for jogging/walking paths in the community. One listing explicitly mentions "walking paths," while another describes "sidewalks, open green spaces," suggesting walkable shared areas rather than a private unit feature. The evidence is present but less consistently stated than the clubhouse, so confidence is moderate.
No analysis available
Private yard space is repeatedly mentioned across the listings: phrases include "fenced in grassy front yard," "private yard," "fenced-in yard," "enclosed yard space," "private courtyard," and "private outdoor area." At least 8-10 remarks reference some form of private/fenced/enclosed outdoor area, which strongly supports that the building offers units with private yard access. The MLS amenity checkbox also appears in some current listings, reinforcing that this is an actual feature available in the complex.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Storage is strongly supported across many listings for this building. At least 6+ remarks mention storage in some form, with phrases like "bonus storage area," "extra storage downstairs," "storage closet on the lanai," and "outside storage shed included." The evidence looks consistent across different agents rather than a single copy-paste remark, so the building should be marked as offering storage units/locker-style storage or extra storage space.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Strong, consistent evidence that Club View Gardens II has a shared swimming pool. Many current listings explicitly mention it across multiple agents, with wording such as "community pool," "pool complex in common area," and "club house with pool," which confirms the amenity rather than a copied checkbox alone. The historical MLS data also aligns, showing pool amenities on all recent listings.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Strong building-level evidence supports in-unit laundry. Multiple current listings explicitly mention laundry inside the unit, including phrases such as "main level includes ... laundry," "inside laundry area," and "full-size laundry." Combined with the historical MLS record showing washer/dryer in 19 of 20 listings, this is highly consistent across agents and not just copy-paste noise.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Parking is clearly available for this building. Across the remarks, at least 10+ listings explicitly mention two assigned/dedicated stalls or parking right in front, which is consistent with the MLS data showing parking on all 20/20 listings. The evidence is strong and repeated across multiple agents, not just a single copied description.
There is strong evidence the building offers assigned/reserved parking: 14/18 MLS listings mark ASSIGN and numerous remarks explicitly say 'two assigned parking stalls' or similar phrasing across different listings, confirming assigned stalls are provided.
No analysis available
The remarks consistently describe assigned, dedicated, or conveniently located stalls, which indicates reserved parking access. I did not find language showing the stalls are deeded or owned with the unit, so this is not supported.
No analysis available
I looked for parking fee language such as monthly parking rent, stall rental, or added parking charges. The listings only mention assigned or dedicated stalls, with no fee information.
Guest parking appears to be available based on the MLS checkbox data in 12 of 20 listings, but the public remarks do not clearly confirm it. Because the remarks focus on assigned stalls and do not mention visitor or guest parking, this feature is supported mainly by the MLS data rather than repeated public descriptions.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
I searched for explicit references to a parking waitlist, joining a waitlist, or limited parking allocation. There was no evidence of a waitlist system in the public remarks.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Strong evidence that units in this building offer split AC. At least 4-5 current remarks explicitly mention split/mini-split systems, including detailed placement like the living room, primary bedroom, and all three bedrooms. The consistency across multiple listings and agents supports keeping this feature as true.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Double wall construction is supported by one explicit remark stating the home has 'no units behind you' and is 'without neighbors through the walls,' plus strong MLS backing with 15 of 20 current listings coded DOUWAL. The consistency across the MLS and remarks makes this a high-confidence building feature.
No analysis available
Only 3 of 17 current MLS listings include MASSTU in construction_materials, and none of the listing public remarks reference 'masonry' or 'stucco'. Given the lack of corroborating agent remarks and no historical confidence data, the evidence is weak and likely a checkbox inconsistency rather than a verified building feature.
No analysis available
There are 0 explicit mentions of a concrete slab foundation in the public remarks provided. The current MLS checkbox data shows only partial support (10 of 20 listings), but without remark confirmation there is not enough evidence to validate slab construction for the building.
No analysis available
Across the listings provided, there are 0 explicit mentions of wood frame construction. The remarks read like standard marketing copy and do not indicate a verified structural change, so there is not enough evidence to support this feature.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
I searched for STR-related terms such as short-term rental allowed, NUC, TVU, vacation rental, or minimum-night rules. None were found, so there is no public evidence that STRs are allowed.
I looked for hotel pool references like hotel rental program, managed by hotel, or branded pool participation. None appeared in the remarks, and since STR is not evidenced as allowed, this must be false.
I searched for language indicating a required rental pool or mandatory participation. There is no evidence of a rental-pool requirement, and the absence of STR support also makes this false.
No analysis available
No analysis available
I searched for leasehold language such as ground lease, lease expires, renewed through, or lease ending years. Nothing in the remarks indicates the land tenure type or any lease expiry date.
The listings directly reference a VA assumption, which is the clearest public evidence for VA loan approval. This supports the building being VA-finance eligible for at least some units.
The remarks directly state that the AOAO master summary sheet reflects the project is properly insured, which supports full building insurance / walls-in coverage. This is strong explicit evidence from the listing remarks.
No analysis available
I looked for FLSE-related language such as "passed fire life safety evaluation," "fire safety certified," or "passed fire inspection," and none appeared in the remarks. With no direct statement, this feature cannot be confirmed from the provided listing remarks.
Flood zone determined from official FEMA Digital Flood Insurance Rate Map (DFIRM) data using building coordinates, not from agent-reported listing data.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Strong, consistent evidence supports mountain views for this building. Roughly 15+ of the provided remarks explicitly mention Ko'olau, mountain, mauka, or hillside views, including phrases like "breathtaking Ko'olau Mountain views," "views of the Koolau mountains," and "sunlit green mountains." The evidence appears broad across multiple listings and not limited to a single agent's copy.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
There is strong evidence that this building offers garden-type views. Many remarks describe "lush greenery," "verdant tropical foliage," "garden setting," "green belts," and courtyard/landscaped outlooks, with several units noting private courtyards or grassy yards. The evidence is repeated across multiple listings and appears consistent rather than incidental.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Resident/on-site manager is clearly supported. In the current remarks, at least 2 listings explicitly mention an 'on-site manager' or 'site manager,' and the historical MLS data also shows RESMAN appearing in 10 of 20 listings. The consistency across multiple remarks suggests this is a real building amenity rather than a copy-paste MLS checkbox error.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Confidence levels are based on MLS checkbox data and AI analysis of listing remarks. High = strong evidence, Medium = some evidence, Low = limited or conflicting evidence. Buyers should always verify critical details independently.