Citron Villa
Preliminary Information – Full Audit Pending
This buildings features were determined from publicly available data, including MLS listings. While we cross-referenced additional data sources, it still likely contains incomplete or inaccurate information, as it has not yet been personally verified.
Once a building has been fully audited, this page will be replaced with an in-depth analysis featuring verified details and photos of every key feature.
Until then, we provide a data‑driven overview that blends statistical analysis of the checkbox selections agents make in MLS with an AI‑powered read of their public remarks—yielding a clearer picture of the building than raw listings alone.
If this building is important to your search, you can help prioritize it for a full audit by requesting one below. To see what a complete report looks like, check out the example full report.
Citron Villa
Building Overview
Citron Villa, McCully-Moiliili — built 1977; pets and short-term rentals not allowed.
About Citron Villa
Citron Villa is a residential building located in the McCully‑Moiliili neighborhood, built in 1977. Specifics about the number of units, building size, and construction type are not provided in the available MLS data.
Based on MLS data, key property policies include a prohibition on pets and a prohibition on short-term rentals. The listing records do not specify on-site amenities, common area features, or building services, and the management company is listed as unknown.
Parking, maintenance fees, insurance, and other ownership costs are not detailed in the MLS information provided. Prospective buyers should verify all building specifics, policies, and fees with the listing agent or management before making decisions; the above is based solely on available MLS data.
Building Features & Data Confidence
All features from MLS data with AI-assisted confidence analysis. Click each category to expand and see details.
No analysis available
I searched the remarks for explicit percentages and phrases indicating owner-occupancy level but found none. Because there is no explicit owner-occupancy statement and no prior verified value, the percentage remains unknown and cannot be guessed.
Public remarks include the phrase "near the elevator," confirming at least one elevator exists in the building, but no explicit number (e.g., '4 elevators') is given. Per rules, cannot infer or change a numeric field without an explicit count, so the number remains unknown.
Calculated from the lowest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from the highest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from association fees observed in penthouse unit listings for this building.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No public remarks (0 of the provided listings) mention 'common area electricity' or similar. MLS checkbox OTCOEX is inconsistently checked (6 of 11 current listings), and prior confidence was Low, so evidence for common-area electricity being included is weak and likely due to agent checkbox inconsistency.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
MLS association_fee_includes lists SEWER in 10 of 11 current listings, though none of the provided public remarks explicitly say 'sewer included.' The high prevalence of the SEWER checkbox across listings suggests sewer is likely included in maintenance fees, but absence from agent remarks keeps confidence moderate.
MLS association_fee_includes lists WATER in 10 of 11 current listings, while none of the public remarks explicitly mention 'water included' or 'water in HOA fees.' The consistent MLS checkbox indicates water is likely included in the maintenance fees, but the absence of corroborating public-remark language means confidence is moderate rather than high.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
The MLS amenity checkbox lists CRWSH for 6 of 11 current listings (and ~5 of 10 previously), which is the main evidence that a building car wash may exist. No public remarks mention a car wash (0 listings include phrases like 'car wash' or 'auto wash'), suggesting the checkbox may be inconsistent or copy-pasted; confidence is moderate (implied evidence across multiple listings but no explicit remarks).
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
All current MLS listings (11 of 11) list washer/dryer in the inclusions and multiple agent remarks explicitly state in-unit laundry, with phrases like "washer/dryer in the unit" and "washer and dryer" appearing throughout. The consistency across many listings and agents (not just a single outlier) provides strong evidence that some units in the building have in-unit laundry.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Strong evidence that the building offers covered parking: at least 8 separate public remarks explicitly mention covered or secured parking (e.g., "secured, covered parking", "convenient covered parking spot", "one assigned covered parking stall", "gated parking space"). This is consistent with the MLS checkbox data showing covered parking on all current listings, indicating the feature is widely offered rather than a copy-paste error.
Several listings explicitly state the parking is deeded/assigned/covered with phrases like 'one deeded parking', 'one assigned covered parking stall', and 'deeded parking', supporting a high-confidence True for deeded parking.
No analysis available
I searched for explicit monthly parking fees or rental charges and found none. The remarks consistently describe covered/assigned/deeded parking but don't provide a dollar amount or monthly fee.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
I searched for terms like 'waitlist', 'waiting list', or 'join waitlist for parking' and found no references. In absence of any mention, this is set to false with medium confidence.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Five of 11 current MLS entries have ABOGRO checked, but none of the public remarks reference 'above ground' or similar phrasing. Given the low historical confidence and lack of corroborating remarks, the evidence is weak and likely represents inconsistent agent checkbox usage rather than clear building-level above-ground construction.
Current MLS data has 5 of 11 listings with BRICK checked and one public remark explicitly says 'Brick building with cool trade winds.' Evidence is moderate across multiple listings (checkboxes) with an explicit agent remark confirming brick construction, though many remarks do not mention exterior materials and some agent entries may be copy-paste.
No analysis available
One remark specifically states 'Please use ... DPP STR disclosure form with the offer,' which implies short-term rental rules apply to the property. While the remarks do not explicitly say 'STR permitted', the required STR disclosure strongly suggests STR activity/eligibility, so STR allowed is set to true with moderate confidence.
I searched for 'hotel rental pool', 'hotel rental program', or hotel brand management references and found none. Because there's no evidence of hotel pool participation, this is set to false with medium confidence. (Prerequisite satisfied because STR is true.)
I looked for explicit phrasing like 'mandatory hotel pool' or 'required to participate' and found none. There is also no mention of optional/opt-out language, but absent any evidence that a pool is mandatory, this is set to false with medium confidence.
No analysis available
No analysis available
I looked for explicit leasehold language and a 4-digit lease expiry year (e.g., 'lease expires 20XX'). None found. In fact, one remark states 'fee simple', indicating ownership rather than leasehold, so there is no lease expiry year to extract.
I searched the remarks for phrases like 'VA approved', 'VA financing', or 'VA loans accepted' and found none. With no evidence in the public remarks, VA approval is set to false with low-medium confidence.
Public remarks explicitly state the building is fully insured, indicating HOA walls-in/full coverage. This explicit phrasing warrants high confidence that the building is fully insured.
No analysis available
I searched the public remarks for explicit statements such as 'fire life safety evaluation passed', 'FLSE passed', 'passed fire inspection', or similar; none were found. With no current value provided, absence of mention is treated as likely not present (medium confidence).
Flood zone determined from official FEMA Digital Flood Insurance Rate Map (DFIRM) data using building coordinates, not from agent-reported listing data.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Multiple listings and remarks indicate mountain views for Citron Villa. Public remarks explicitly say 'city and mountain views' and 'Enjoy beautiful... mountain views' (appearing in several listings), and current MLS data reports 4 of 11 listings with MOUNTA, so evidence is consistent and strong across agents.
No analysis available
City views are consistently referenced across the listing remarks. Phrases such as 'lanai with city view' and 'city and mountain views' appear in multiple public remarks, and MLS data lists CITY for 5 of 11 listings, so there is strong corroborating evidence.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Confidence levels are based on MLS checkbox data and AI analysis of listing remarks. High = strong evidence, Medium = some evidence, Low = limited or conflicting evidence. Buyers should always verify critical details independently.