Citron Villa
Preliminary Information – Full Audit Pending
This buildings features were determined from publicly available data, including MLS listings. While we cross-referenced additional data sources, it still likely contains incomplete or inaccurate information, as it has not yet been personally verified.
Once a building has been fully audited, this page will be replaced with an in-depth analysis featuring verified details and photos of every key feature.
Until then, we provide a data‑driven overview that blends statistical analysis of the checkbox selections agents make in MLS with an AI‑powered read of their public remarks—yielding a clearer picture of the building than raw listings alone.
If this building is important to your search, you can help prioritize it for a full audit by requesting one below. To see what a complete report looks like, check out the example full report.
Citron Villa
Building Overview
Citron Villa, McCully-Moiliili — built 1977; pets and short-term rentals not allowed.
About Citron Villa
Citron Villa is a residential building located in the McCully‑Moiliili neighborhood, built in 1977. Specifics about the number of units, building size, and construction type are not provided in the available MLS data.
Based on MLS data, key property policies include a prohibition on pets and a prohibition on short-term rentals. The listing records do not specify on-site amenities, common area features, or building services, and the management company is listed as unknown.
Parking, maintenance fees, insurance, and other ownership costs are not detailed in the MLS information provided. Prospective buyers should verify all building specifics, policies, and fees with the listing agent or management before making decisions; the above is based solely on available MLS data.
Building Features & Data Confidence
All features from MLS data with AI-assisted confidence analysis. Click each category to expand and see details.
No analysis available
I searched for explicit owner-occupancy percentages and qualitative phrases indicating a mostly owner-occupied building. None were found in the remarks. Without a direct statement, the owner-occupancy rate remains unknown.
I searched the remarks for an explicit elevator count or wording like "multiple elevators" and found none. The only elevator-related mention is a unit being near the elevator, which confirms existence of at least one elevator but not the total number. Because the rules require an explicit count for numeric fields, the value remains unknown.
Calculated from the lowest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from the highest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from association fees observed in penthouse unit listings for this building.
No analysis available
No analysis available
The MLS data suggests common electric is included in some or most listings, but the public remarks do not corroborate it. No listing text explicitly mentions common-area electricity or building power, so this appears to be MLS checkbox data rather than agent-described amenity evidence.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
There is strong evidence against hot water being included in the maintenance fee. The MLS data has HOTWAT unchecked across all current listings, and the presence of WTRHTR in half of the listings is a strong indicator that hot water is unit-based rather than centrally provided.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Sewer appears to be a stable building-level feature for Citron Villa. The current MLS data shows SEWER in 12 of 13 listings, and the public remarks across multiple listings do not raise any contradiction. This looks like consistent MLS reporting rather than a one-off checkbox.
Water inclusion is strongly supported at the building level for Citron Villa. The current MLS data shows WATER in 12 of 13 listings, while the public remarks across listings do not mention any change or exception. This is consistent with a shared HOA fee inclusion rather than agent-specific copy.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Car wash is indicated in the current MLS amenities for 7 of 13 listings. There are no public remarks describing a car wash station or auto wash area, so the evidence looks more like repeated MLS checkbox data than explicit agent verification. Still, the current prevalence is enough to treat it as a building amenity, with only moderate confidence.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Multiple listings mention outdoor lanai/balcony space, including phrases like "private balcony," "open lanai," "enclosed lanai," and "relaxing on your lanai." This is consistent across several remarks and appears to be genuine building/unit availability rather than a one-off checkbox entry.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Trash chute is explicitly mentioned in the public remarks, including the phrase "trash chute on every level," which confirms a building-wide chute system. The MLS data also shows TRACHU in 6 of 13 listings, reinforcing that this is a shared building amenity rather than a one-off unit feature. Confidence is very high because the remarks directly describe the feature in multiple listings.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Strong evidence supports in-unit laundry at Citron Villa. Multiple listings explicitly mention 'washer and dryer' or 'washer/dryer in the unit,' and one recent update even notes 'new toilet and washer/dryer (2025).' With 13/13 MLS listings showing washer/dryer in inclusions, this appears to be a consistent building feature rather than an isolated unit amenity.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Parking assignment is well supported across the remarks. Multiple listings describe a 'one assigned covered parking stall' or 'one deeded parking,' which indicates reserved parking for specific units. This appears to be consistent across several agents and not just copied MLS checkbox data.
Covered parking is confirmed across many listings and multiple agents, not just a single copy-paste remark. Several current remarks explicitly mention "covered parking," "covered parking stall," and "secured, covered parking," so this feature should remain included with very high confidence.
Multiple listings explicitly describe the parking as deeded, assigned, or included with the unit. The strongest evidence is the direct phrase "one deeded parking," which clearly establishes deeded parking.
No analysis available
I searched for explicit parking charges, rental fees, or monthly parking costs and found none. The remarks consistently mention covered, secured, or deeded parking, which suggests parking is included rather than separately billed.
No analysis available
There is strong evidence that the parking area has secured entry. Multiple listings mention 'gated parking,' 'secured building,' and a 'secure call box,' suggesting controlled access to the parking area. The evidence comes from several separate remarks, so it does not look like a single copy-paste error.
No analysis available
No analysis available
I looked for references to a parking waitlist, joining a list, or delayed parking assignment and found nothing. The listings instead describe a specific covered or deeded stall, so there is no evidence of a waitlist system.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Concrete construction has moderate MLS support: 8 of 13 current listings are coded CONCRE. The public remarks do not repeatedly call this out, but there is one masonry-type reference ('Brick building') and no evidence suggesting the building changed away from concrete construction.
Double-wall construction is not supported by the remarks and appears in only 2 of 13 current MLS entries. With no explicit public mention across multiple listings, this feature is not validated for the building.
Hollow tile appears in only 2 of 12 MLS records and is not called out in the public remarks. Because there is no contradictory evidence and older Honolulu condos are sometimes hollow tile, this remains a possible building feature but with low-to-moderate confidence.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Only 2 of 12 listings mark SLAB, and the remarks do not confirm foundation details. This looks like weak MLS checkbox evidence rather than repeated agent description, so confidence is low.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Above-ground construction shows some MLS checkbox activity (6 of 13) but no matching public-remarks evidence. The remarks repeatedly focus on unit updates, views, parking, and insurance, which suggests the MLS code may be unverified or copied rather than a confirmed building characteristic.
Current MLS data has 5 of 11 listings with BRICK checked and one public remark explicitly says 'Brick building with cool trade winds.' Evidence is moderate across multiple listings (checkboxes) with an explicit agent remark confirming brick construction, though many remarks do not mention exterior materials and some agent entries may be copy-paste.
No analysis available
I searched for clear STR language such as "short-term rental allowed," "NUC," "TVU," or similar permitting language and did not find it. The presence of a STR disclosure form suggests rules exist, but it does not confirm that STRs are permitted, so the safest reading is not allowed from the remarks alone.
I looked for hotel pool language such as Hilton/Trump/Ritz pool, hotel-managed rentals, or a hotel rental program and found none. Since there is no STR approval evidence either, hotel pool participation is not supported by the remarks.
I searched for terms indicating mandatory participation, required rental enrollment, or restrictions preventing owner use and found none. There is also no evidence of any hotel pool program, so mandatory pool participation is not supported.
No analysis available
No analysis available
I looked for any ground lease or lease-expiration language such as "lease expires 20XX," "ground lease ends," or "leasehold," but the remarks instead identify the property as fee simple. Because this is not a leasehold, no expiry year applies.
I searched the remarks for explicit VA loan language such as "VA approved," "VA financing," and "VA loans accepted" and found none. With no public remarks supporting VA eligibility, this is treated as not evidenced in the listing set.
The remarks directly and repeatedly state that Citron Villa is fully insured, including the phrasing "100% insured" and "Building is fully insured." This is strong explicit evidence for walls-in/full building insurance coverage. Confidence is very high because the statements are direct and unambiguous.
No analysis available
I looked for explicit statements that the building passed fire/life safety evaluation, FLSE, or similar fire-safety compliance language. None were present in the provided remarks. Since there is no evidence either way, this cannot be confirmed from the listings.
Flood zone determined from official FEMA Digital Flood Insurance Rate Map (DFIRM) data using building coordinates, not from agent-reported listing data.
No analysis available
There is no meaningful public-remarks evidence that Citron Villa offers ocean views. Across the listings provided, the remarks repeatedly mention city and mountain views instead, while ocean views appear only as a sparse MLS checkbox signal in 1 of 13 listings.
Mountain views are well supported for Citron Villa. Multiple remarks explicitly mention 'city and mountain views' and 'beautiful city and mountain views,' and the MLS data also shows mountain view in most listings, indicating this is a real building-level offering rather than a one-off agent error.
No analysis available
City views are consistently documented across the building. The remarks repeatedly reference 'city views' and 'city and mountain views,' and the MLS checkbox data is unanimous, so this is high-confidence and clearly not just copy-paste noise.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Sunset views are not supported by the provided listings. The remarks consistently discuss city and mountain views instead, and the MLS data shows no sunset-view signals at all.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Confidence levels are based on MLS checkbox data and AI analysis of listing remarks. High = strong evidence, Medium = some evidence, Low = limited or conflicting evidence. Buyers should always verify critical details independently.