
Carlton Place 1
Preliminary Information – Full Audit Pending
This buildings features were determined from publicly available data, including MLS listings. While we cross-referenced additional data sources, it still likely contains incomplete or inaccurate information, as it has not yet been personally verified.
Once a building has been fully audited, this page will be replaced with an in-depth analysis featuring verified details and photos of every key feature.
Until then, we provide a data‑driven overview that blends statistical analysis of the checkbox selections agents make in MLS with an AI‑powered read of their public remarks—yielding a clearer picture of the building than raw listings alone.
If this building is important to your search, you can help prioritize it for a full audit by requesting one below. To see what a complete report looks like, check out the example full report.
Carlton Place 1
Building Overview
Carlton Place 1 in Makiki-Tantalus, built 1986; pets and short-term rentals are not allowed.

About Carlton Place 1
Carlton Place 1 is a condominium located in the Makiki-Tantalus neighborhood, originally built in 1986. Specifics about unit counts, floor plans, building size, and construction type are not provided in the available MLS data.
Key policies recorded for the building include a prohibition on pets and a prohibition on short-term rentals. The MLS listing does not identify the management company for Carlton Place 1.
Details commonly important to buyers—such as parking arrangements, maintenance/association fees, special assessments, and amenity lists—are not included in the MLS data provided. According to available records, these items should be verified with the listing agent, management company, or through official association documents before relying on them for a purchasing decision. Based on MLS data, please confirm all building details independently.
Building Features & Data Confidence
All features from MLS data with AI-assisted confidence analysis. Click each category to expand and see details.
No analysis available
I searched for an owner-occupancy percentage or descriptive terms such as "majority owner occupied" or "highly owner occupied," but none were present. Without an explicit percentage or occupancy description, the owner-occupancy rate cannot be determined from these remarks.
I looked for any reference to the number of elevators or phrases like "multiple elevators" or "4 elevators," but none were mentioned. Since there is no explicit evidence in the public remarks, the elevator count remains unknown.
Calculated from the lowest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from the highest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from association fees observed in penthouse unit listings for this building.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Assigned parking is clearly confirmed in the remarks: "two assigned parking stalls." This is strong explicit evidence from the listing text, not just an MLS checkbox, so confidence is very high.
Covered parking is not mentioned in the provided remarks. The only parking detail stated is that the unit has "two assigned parking stalls," which does not confirm that the stalls are covered.
I searched for explicit deeded parking terms like "deeded parking," "owned stall," or "parking included in deed." The listing only states that the unit includes two assigned stalls, which does not confirm deeded parking.
No analysis available
I looked for monthly parking charges, parking rent, additional parking costs, or other parking fee language. The remarks mention two assigned stalls but provide no parking fee information.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
I searched for references to a parking waitlist or waiting list. Nothing suggests a waitlist system here, and the remarks instead indicate the unit already includes assigned parking.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No current listing remarks explicitly describe the building as masonry/stucco. The only signal is mixed MLS material coding (1 of 2 listings), which looks like weak checkbox data rather than verified building information.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
There is no explicit evidence that the building has above-ground construction. The phrase 'ground-floor unit' refers to unit placement, not construction type, so the feature is not supported by the remarks or the mixed MLS checkbox data.
No analysis available
No analysis available
I looked for terms such as short-term rental allowed, STR permitted, NUC, TVU, or similar rental-use language. The remarks contain no indication that short-term rentals are allowed in this building, so this is not supported by the text.
I searched for hotel rental pool references such as Hilton pool, Ritz pool, hotel operations, or similar wording. The remarks do not mention any hotel pool program, and there is no evidence of such a feature.
I looked for wording like mandatory participation, must participate, cannot opt out, or required rental program. The remarks do not mention any rental pool arrangement, so there is no basis to mark it mandatory.
No analysis available
No analysis available
I looked for leasehold wording, ground lease end dates, renewal language, and any 4-digit lease expiry year. The remarks do not mention land tenure or a lease expiration, so the expiry year cannot be determined from the provided text.
I searched the public remarks for VA-related financing language such as "VA approved," "VA financing," and "VA loans accepted." None was found, so there is no evidence this building is VA approved.
I looked for terms like fully insured, full insurance, walls-in coverage, or comprehensive building insurance, but found nothing. The public remarks do not indicate that the HOA provides full building insurance coverage.
No analysis available
I searched for language such as fire/life safety evaluation passed, FLSE passed, fire safety certified, or passed fire inspection. The remarks do not mention any fire/life safety certification or compliance status, so there is no evidence that the building passed FLSE.
Flood zone determined from official FEMA Digital Flood Insurance Rate Map (DFIRM) data using building coordinates, not from agent-reported listing data.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Confidence levels are based on MLS checkbox data and AI analysis of listing remarks. High = strong evidence, Medium = some evidence, Low = limited or conflicting evidence. Buyers should always verify critical details independently.