Bishop Manor
Preliminary Information – Full Audit Pending
This buildings features were determined from publicly available data, including MLS listings. While we cross-referenced additional data sources, it still likely contains incomplete or inaccurate information, as it has not yet been personally verified.
Once a building has been fully audited, this page will be replaced with an in-depth analysis featuring verified details and photos of every key feature.
Until then, we provide a data‑driven overview that blends statistical analysis of the checkbox selections agents make in MLS with an AI‑powered read of their public remarks—yielding a clearer picture of the building than raw listings alone.
If this building is important to your search, you can help prioritize it for a full audit by requesting one below. To see what a complete report looks like, check out the example full report.
Bishop Manor
Building Overview
Bishop Manor in Ala Moana-Kakaako, built 1963; pets and short-term rentals are not allowed per MLS.
About Bishop Manor
Bishop Manor is a residential building located in the Ala Moana-Kakaako neighborhood, originally built in 1963. According to available records, specific details on building size (number of units) and construction type are not provided in the MLS data.
Key policies noted in the MLS include that pets are not allowed and short-term rentals are not allowed. The MLS does not list a management company for the building. Other common amenity details (pool, fitness center, etc.) are not specified in the available MLS fields.
Additional information such as parking availability, maintenance fees, assessments, or other building rules are not included in the MLS data provided. Based on MLS data analysis, buyers and agents should verify all details, policies, and fees with the listing agent or building management before making decisions.
Building Features & Data Confidence
All features from MLS data with AI-assisted confidence analysis. Click each category to expand and see details.
No analysis available
There is no owner-occupancy percentage or descriptive statement in the remarks. Because no numeric or qualitative owner-occupancy info is provided and no prior value exists, this remains unknown.
No elevator information appears in the provided remarks. Because there is no current value and no explicit mention in remarks, we cannot infer a number of elevators and leave this as unknown.
Calculated from the lowest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from the highest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from association fees observed in penthouse unit listings for this building.
No analysis available
Only 1 of 3 listings has CABTV in association_fee_includes and no listing text states 'cable included' or similar. No corroborating remarks from multiple agents; evidence points to an MLS checkbox inconsistency rather than a bona fide building feature.
Two of three listings list 'OTCOEX' (common area electricity) in association_fee_includes, though no public remark explicitly says 'common area electricity included.' MLS checkbox consistency across multiple listings provides moderate evidence the maintenance includes common electric.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Although one listing checkbox shows HOTWAT, two listings explicitly include WTRHTR (water heater) in unit inclusions and remarks do not state 'hot water included.' The presence of unit water heaters is strong evidence that hot water is not a building-provided, fee-included service.
No analysis available
No analysis available
All three listings have 'SEWER' listed in association_fee_includes, though none of the public remarks explicitly state 'sewer included.' The uniform MLS checkbox across listings gives moderate confidence that sewer is included in the HOA/maintenance fees.
All three listings list 'WATER' in association_fee_includes. Remarks note the AOAO completed a building water pipe replacement in 2026 but do not explicitly say 'water included.' The consistent MLS entries across listings provide moderate evidence that water is included in maintenance fees.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
All three current listings check the pool amenity and the public remarks repeatedly state the building has a swimming pool (phrases: "a swimming pool" and "swimming pool"). Evidence is consistent across multiple listings/agents and supports including the building-level pool feature for buyers searching for this amenity.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
All three current listings include the COMLAU amenity and each public remark explicitly states shared/on-site laundry—phrases include 'on-site laundry facilities' and 'on site laundry facility'. Evidence is consistent across multiple listings and agents, indicating the building offers community/shared laundry facilities.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
All three listings (3/3) explicitly mention assigned parking: phrases include 'Includes 1 assigned parking stall', 'comes with 1 assigned parking space', and 'move-in ready with 1 assigned parking.' Multiple agents consistently state assigned parking, providing strong evidence that assigned stalls are offered in the building.
One of three MLS listings (1/3) indicates covered parking (COVERE/CO1/CO2/GARAGE), but none of the three public remarks mention 'covered', 'garage', or 'carport.' This suggests there may be covered stalls for some units, but the evidence is limited and could be an agent checkbox or copy/paste; confidence is moderate (implied).
Listings consistently mention an assigned/assigned parking stall for the unit, but none explicitly say the stall is deeded. 'Assigned' can mean reserved but not deeded, so deeded parking is not confirmed in the remarks.
No analysis available
There is no information in the public remarks about a separate monthly parking fee. The listings only reference an assigned space, with no fee details provided.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
The remarks describe assigned parking stalls but do not indicate any waitlist system for parking; therefore a waitlist is not supported by the public remarks.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
2 of 3 current listings list ACWIUN (window air conditioner/window unit) in the inclusions, but none of the public remarks mention 'window AC', 'window unit', or similar. Because the checkbox appears on multiple listings some units likely have window AC, but the lack of remarks and potential for copy/paste errors mean confidence is moderate rather than high.
All three current listings (3/3) have 'CONCRE' checked in construction materials, but none of the public remarks mention concrete, reinforced concrete, or related wording. Evidence is consistent across multiple agents/ listings (likely not random single-listing error) but is implied from MLS checkboxes rather than explicitly stated in remarks.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Two of three current listings (2/3) have 'MASSTU' checked, but none of the public remarks reference masonry, stucco, or 'masonry and stucco.' Partial MLS consistency suggests the building may have masonry/stucco elements, but the support is moderate and appears to be an MLS checkbox entry rather than confirmed in agent remarks.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
There is no evidence in the public remarks that short-term rentals are permitted. Absence of STR language suggests they are not allowed, but this is based on no mentions rather than an explicit prohibition.
Because the public remarks do not permit or mention STRs, there is no evidence the building participates in a hotel rental pool. This field is set false accordingly.
With no indication that short-term rentals or hotel programs exist for the building, there is no basis to consider any mandatory rental-pool participation; set to false.
No analysis available
No analysis available
There is no indication in the public remarks that the property is leasehold or that a lease expiry year exists. If leasehold status is known elsewhere, include the explicit expiry year; otherwise it remains unknown.
No listings mention VA loan approval. I searched the remarks for 'VA', 'VA approved', and similar phrases but found no evidence to mark this building as VA approved.
The remarks do not indicate that the HOA provides full (walls-in) insurance or that the building is fully insured. With no explicit statement and no prior data, this is set to false with medium confidence.
No analysis available
The remarks do not state that the building has passed a fire/life safety evaluation. In absence of any mention and with no prior data, the conservative default is false with medium confidence (absence in remarks suggests it was not reported).
Flood zone determined from official FEMA Digital Flood Insurance Rate Map (DFIRM) data using building coordinates, not from agent-reported listing data.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No listings for this building advertise sunset views: 0 of 3 current listings include SUNSET in view_descriptions and 1 of 3 explicitly lists NONE. The combined public remarks do not mention 'sunset', 'western exposure', 'evening', or similar phrases. Given the absence of any remarks plus the MLS checkbox absence, there is strong evidence the building does not offer a documented sunset view.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Confidence levels are based on MLS checkbox data and AI analysis of listing remarks. High = strong evidence, Medium = some evidence, Low = limited or conflicting evidence. Buyers should always verify critical details independently.