Beretania-Pensacola
Preliminary Information – Full Audit Pending
This buildings features were determined from publicly available data, including MLS listings. While we cross-referenced additional data sources, it still likely contains incomplete or inaccurate information, as it has not yet been personally verified.
Once a building has been fully audited, this page will be replaced with an in-depth analysis featuring verified details and photos of every key feature.
Until then, we provide a data‑driven overview that blends statistical analysis of the checkbox selections agents make in MLS with an AI‑powered read of their public remarks—yielding a clearer picture of the building than raw listings alone.
If this building is important to your search, you can help prioritize it for a full audit by requesting one below. To see what a complete report looks like, check out the example full report.
Beretania-Pensacola
Building Overview
Beretania-Pensacola in Makiki-Tantalus — built 1964; window air conditioning, no short-term rentals.
About Beretania-Pensacola
Beretania-Pensacola is a residential building located in the Makiki-Tantalus neighborhood, originally built in 1964. Specifics such as building size, number of units, and construction type are not specified in the MLS data provided.
According to available records, units in the building use window air conditioning. The MLS indicates that pets are not allowed and short-term rentals are not permitted. The management company for the building is listed as unknown in the available data.
Additional details commonly important to buyers—such as parking availability, maintenance fees, assessments, and other building amenities—are not included in the MLS information provided. Based on MLS data analysis, prospective buyers should verify all building details, rules, and fees with listing agents or building management before making decisions.
Building Features & Data Confidence
All features from MLS data with AI-assisted confidence analysis. Click each category to expand and see details.
No analysis available
I searched the public remarks for explicit owner-occupancy statements such as '80% owner occupied', 'majority owner occupied', or 'highly owner occupied' and found none. Because there is no numeric current value and no explicit mention in the remarks, the percentage of owner-occupied units is unknown.
I searched the public remarks for explicit statements like '4 elevators', 'four elevators', or 'multiple elevators' and found no reference to the number of elevators. Because there is no current numeric value to preserve and no explicit mention in the remarks, the number of elevators is unknown.
Calculated from the lowest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from the highest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from association fees observed in penthouse unit listings for this building.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
All 7 current MLS listings indicate 'sewer' is included in association fees, but 0 of the 7 public remarks mention sewer (no phrases like 'sewer included'). Historical confidence was Medium and the evidence is primarily MLS checkbox data, so inclusion is likely but not independently confirmed in agent remarks and may be copy-paste.
All 7 current MLS listings indicate 'water' is included in association fees, but 0 of the 7 public remarks explicitly state 'water included' or similar. Given Medium historical confidence and lack of corroborating remarks, the feature is likely but only implied from MLS entries rather than confirmed in agent text.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
6 of 7 public-remark blocks explicitly mention parking options, including "on-site after-hours parking for $125/month" and "full-time parking at First United Methodist Church, just a 5-minute walk away." One remark notes the unit does not include a dedicated stall but cites ample street parking and rental stall options nearby. Evidence is consistent across multiple listings (though some text appears copy/pasted), so the building should be marked as offering parking options.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Multiple remarks explicitly say the unit does not include parking and describe on-site after-hours parking and nearby rental options, so parking is not deeded to the unit.
No analysis available
The public remarks list an on-site after-hours parking charge of $125/month; used this explicit figure as the monthly parking fee.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
I searched for terms like 'parking waitlist' and 'waiting list' and found none; the remarks only describe paid on-site after-hours parking and nearby rental options.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
All seven current MLS listings list the ACWIUN inclusion (7/7), indicating units have window AC, but none of the public remarks use phrases like "window AC", "window unit", "window air conditioner", or "wall AC." Given the uniform MLS checkbox but absence of corroborating remarks (and prior Medium confidence), the feature is included with moderate confidence because agents commonly copy/paste inclusions.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Six of seven current MLS listings include BRICK in construction_materials, while 0 of the provided public remarks mention a brick exterior. The support comes primarily from MLS checkbox data across multiple listings (possible agent copy/paste); no remarks explicitly confirm or describe a brick exterior.
No analysis available
The public remarks reference a 'short sale' but contain no indicators that short-term rentals are permitted; therefore STR is not indicated.
No evidence of participation in a hotel rental pool was found. Because short-term rentals are not indicated, hotel-pool participation cannot be true.
No listings mention any mandatory participation in a rental or hotel pool; since STR is not indicated, mandatory participation is not applicable.
No analysis available
No analysis available
The listings explicitly call the unit 'fee-simple', indicating this is not a leasehold; therefore no lease expiry year applies.
No evidence in the public remarks that the building is VA-approved. The remarks describe sales terms (short sale) but contain no VA financing language.
I searched the public remarks for terms like 'fully insured', 'full insurance', 'walls-in coverage', or 'comprehensive building insurance' and found no references. With no explicit statement that the HOA provides walls-in or full coverage, this is set to false with medium confidence.
No analysis available
I searched the public remarks for phrases such as 'fire life safety evaluation passed', 'FLSE passed', 'fire safety certified', or 'passed fire inspection' and found no references. In the absence of any explicit statement, this field is set to false with medium confidence (no evidence in remarks to confirm a pass).
Flood zone determined from official FEMA Digital Flood Insurance Rate Map (DFIRM) data using building coordinates, not from agent-reported listing data.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
None of the public remarks across the listings mention 'city', 'downtown', 'city view', or similar phrases. Although 6 of 7 current MLS view_descriptions are set to CITY, the repeated listing remarks only describe proximity to Downtown and nearby amenities (e.g., 'Conveniently located near Downtown'), which implies location rather than an actual city view—indicating the CITY checkbox was likely applied inconsistently by agents.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Confidence levels are based on MLS checkbox data and AI analysis of listing remarks. High = strong evidence, Medium = some evidence, Low = limited or conflicting evidence. Buyers should always verify critical details independently.