Beretania-Pensacola
Preliminary Information – Full Audit Pending
This buildings features were determined from publicly available data, including MLS listings. While we cross-referenced additional data sources, it still likely contains incomplete or inaccurate information, as it has not yet been personally verified.
Once a building has been fully audited, this page will be replaced with an in-depth analysis featuring verified details and photos of every key feature.
Until then, we provide a data‑driven overview that blends statistical analysis of the checkbox selections agents make in MLS with an AI‑powered read of their public remarks—yielding a clearer picture of the building than raw listings alone.
If this building is important to your search, you can help prioritize it for a full audit by requesting one below. To see what a complete report looks like, check out the example full report.
Beretania-Pensacola
Building Overview
Beretania-Pensacola in Makiki-Tantalus — built 1964; window air conditioning, no short-term rentals.
About Beretania-Pensacola
Beretania-Pensacola is a residential building located in the Makiki-Tantalus neighborhood, originally built in 1964. Specifics such as building size, number of units, and construction type are not specified in the MLS data provided.
According to available records, units in the building use window air conditioning. The MLS indicates that pets are not allowed and short-term rentals are not permitted. The management company for the building is listed as unknown in the available data.
Additional details commonly important to buyers—such as parking availability, maintenance fees, assessments, and other building amenities—are not included in the MLS information provided. Based on MLS data analysis, prospective buyers should verify all building details, rules, and fees with listing agents or building management before making decisions.
Building Features & Data Confidence
All features from MLS data with AI-assisted confidence analysis. Click each category to expand and see details.
No analysis available
Public remarks do not indicate the percentage of owner-occupied units. Because there is no explicit percentage or current value provided, the owner-occupancy percentage is unknown.
No public remarks in any listing mention elevators or their count. Because there is no explicit numeric statement and no current value provided, the number of elevators is unknown.
Calculated from the lowest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from the highest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from association fees observed in penthouse unit listings for this building.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
All 6 current MLS listings indicate sewer is included in association fees, but 0 of the 6 public remarks mention sewer (no phrases like "sewer included" or "sewer in HOA fees"). Evidence is consistent across multiple listings (possible copy/paste), so the feature is included with moderate confidence.
All 6 current MLS listings indicate water is included in association fees, while 0 of the 6 public remarks explicitly mention "water included" or similar. The uniform MLS entries support inclusion, though lack of remarks suggests moderate (not definitive) confidence.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
5 of 6 public remarks mention parking options: key quotes include "on-site after-hours parking for $125/month" and "full-time parking at First United Methodist Church, just a 5-minute walk away." One remark says the unit does not come with parking but notes ample street parking and possible rented stalls nearby. Evidence is consistent across multiple listings/agents (some repetition suggests copy-paste), indicating the building offers parking options even though MLS parking checkboxes are unchecked.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Searched for 'deeded parking', 'owned parking', or 'parking included in deed' and found none. All references describe rental/after-hours or nearby parking options, so deeded parking is not indicated.
No analysis available
The public remarks explicitly list a monthly charge: 'on-site after-hours parking for $125/month.' This is taken as the monthly parking fee for that option.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Searched for 'parking waitlist', 'waiting list', and similar phrases; found no references. Absence of mention suggests no waitlist, but confidence is low due to lack of explicit statement.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
All six current MLS listings include the ACWIUN inclusion (e.g., 6/6 listings list window AC), but none of the public remarks explicitly mention 'window AC' or 'window unit'. The consistent MLS checkbox across multiple listings suggests units have window air conditioners, though the absence of remarks could indicate agent copy/paste; evidence is therefore implied rather than explicit.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
5 of 6 current MLS listings include BRICK in construction_materials, while 0 of the public remarks mention a brick exterior. The evidence is primarily from MLS checkbox data across multiple listings (possible agent copy/paste) rather than explicit remarks, so inclusion is cautious (moderate confidence).
No analysis available
Searched remarks for STR indicators (e.g., 'short-term rental allowed', 'vacation rental', 'TVU', 'NUC') and found none. With no explicit allowance mentioned, STR is treated as not indicated (medium confidence).
Searched for 'hotel rental pool', 'hotel rental program', and hotel brand management references; none found. Because STR is not indicated, hotel pool participation is false.
Searched remarks for 'mandatory hotel pool', 'required to participate', or similar language and found none. Therefore mandatory participation is false.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Multiple remarks state 'fee-simple', so this is not a leasehold property. Lease expiry year is not applicable and therefore unknown (null).
Searched remarks for phrases like 'VA approved', 'VA financing', or 'VA loans accepted' and found no references. With no explicit mention in any listing remark, VA approval is treated as not indicated.
The listings do not state that the HOA or building provides full 'walls-in' insurance coverage. With no explicit statement and no current verified value, this is marked false with medium confidence.
No analysis available
None of the public remarks state that the building passed a fire/life safety evaluation. In the absence of any mention and no current verified value, the feature is assumed false with medium confidence (absence in remarks suggests it was not highlighted).
Flood zone determined from official FEMA Digital Flood Insurance Rate Map (DFIRM) data using building coordinates, not from agent-reported listing data.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No listing remarks mention city, downtown, or urban views; the remarks instead describe proximity to Downtown and nearby amenities (e.g., “Conveniently located near Downtown”). CURRENT MLS data lists 0/6 with CITY in view_descriptions and 1/6 as NONE. Evidence is consistent across multiple listings and agents, so the building should be recorded as not offering city views.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Confidence levels are based on MLS checkbox data and AI analysis of listing remarks. High = strong evidence, Medium = some evidence, Low = limited or conflicting evidence. Buyers should always verify critical details independently.