Belvedere
Preliminary Information – Full Audit Pending
This buildings features were determined from publicly available data, including MLS listings. While we cross-referenced additional data sources, it still likely contains incomplete or inaccurate information, as it has not yet been personally verified.
Once a building has been fully audited, this page will be replaced with an in-depth analysis featuring verified details and photos of every key feature.
Until then, we provide a data‑driven overview that blends statistical analysis of the checkbox selections agents make in MLS with an AI‑powered read of their public remarks—yielding a clearer picture of the building than raw listings alone.
If this building is important to your search, you can help prioritize it for a full audit by requesting one below. To see what a complete report looks like, check out the example full report.
Belvedere
Building Overview
Belvedere in Downtown-Chinatown (built 1964) with on-site pool and available parking; pets and short-term rentals are not allowed.
About Belvedere
According to available MLS records, Belvedere is a condominium building located in the Downtown-Chinatown neighborhood and was built in 1964. Size (unit count/square footage) and construction type are not specified in the MLS information provided.
The building's listed amenity is an on-site pool. No additional amenities are identified in the available MLS data. The management company is not specified in the MLS records.
Parking is noted as available. Building policies listed in MLS data indicate pets are not allowed and short-term rentals are not allowed. Buyers should verify all details, including unit size, construction type, management, fees, and policies, with the listing agent or property management, as this summary is based on MLS data only.
Building Features & Data Confidence
All features from MLS data with AI-assisted confidence analysis. Click each category to expand and see details.
No analysis available
MLS floor fields and unit-number floors both reach 3 with 4/4 agreement, matching the county and state records. No penthouse listings are present, but the available listings consistently support three floors.
The county’s reconciled residential count and the state registration both report 22 units for this single-building record. The county dwell_sum of 23 is set aside because reconciled_units strips nonresidential components.
Owner occupancy from AOUO registration(s) 1536. Refreshed by Real_Estate_Scraper/reb_registry/propagate_owner_occupancy.py, which this lock does not block.
Calculated from the lowest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from the highest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from association fees observed in penthouse unit listings for this building.
No analysis available
No analysis available
0 of 4 listings mention common-area electricity in their public remarks. However, 4 of 4 current MLS records include OTCOEX, providing consistent building-level evidence, though the lack of remark confirmation suggests the checkbox may be copied across listings.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
0 of 4 listings mention sewer being included in the fees. Current MLS data shows SEWER on 2 of 4 listings, which is moderate but not universal evidence and could reflect inconsistent data entry.
0 of 4 listings explicitly mention water being included. Nevertheless, 4 of 4 current MLS records list WATER in the association fee inclusions, showing strong consistency across listings, although the uniform checkbox data may be copied rather than remark-verified.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
None of the 2 listings mention a meeting room or any equivalent term. The feature appears in only 1/2 MLS amenity records without descriptive support, so it is likely copy-paste or checkbox error rather than a confirmed building amenity.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
The building’s pool is strongly supported by MLS amenity data in all 4 of 4 current listings. Two current remarks explicitly reference the amenity, including “Swimming pool” and “Take a refreshing dip in the pool,” while the historical assessment was already high confidence.
No analysis available
No analysis available
At least 3 of the 4 current listings explicitly mention in-unit laundry, using phrases such as "WASHER and DRYER IN THE UNIT," "in-unit washing machine," and "in-unit washer and dryer." This strongly corroborates the MLS data across multiple listings and confirms that the building offers units with in-unit laundry.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Parking is supported by MLS data across all 3 listings, with 3/3 containing parking-related feature codes and none marked NONE. One listing explicitly mentions an "assigned parking stall," providing direct confirmation that the building offers parking.
Assigned parking is confirmed across the building evidence: current MLS data marks ASSIGN in all 4 of 4 listings, and one current remark explicitly states, "The condo comes with an assigned parking stall." Another listing mentions a covered parking stall, reinforcing that parking is provided, and the consistent MLS coding across listings makes this strong evidence rather than an isolated copy-paste claim.
Covered parking is supported by the MLS parking_features data in 2 of 2 listings, but neither provided remark uses explicit covered-parking terminology. The feature is therefore included with moderate confidence based primarily on consistent current MLS coding rather than narrative confirmation.
Parking is explicitly referenced, but assigned or covered parking does not establish deeded ownership. No language such as deeded parking, owned stall, or parking included in the deed was found.
No analysis available
The listings confirm that parking is available or assigned, but provide no information about whether it costs extra. The parking fee is therefore unknown.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Although assigned parking is referenced, the remarks do not describe a parking waitlist system. Under the no-evidence rule, this feature is treated as false with low confidence.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Window AC is explicitly mentioned in 2 of 4 current listings, including "a window A/C unit to keep the space cool" and "Window AC unit in bedroom." The feature is also selected in 3 of 4 MLS records and aligns with the previously high-confidence determination, providing strong building-level evidence.
All 4 current listings identify CONCRE in the construction materials, providing strong and consistent building-level evidence. Although none of the remarks explicitly say “concrete construction” or “reinforced concrete,” the agreement across multiple listings supports retaining this feature.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
The remarks do not explicitly permit or prohibit short-term rentals. Under the no-evidence rule, STR permission is treated as false with low confidence.
The listings provide no evidence of participation in a hotel rental pool. Because short-term rental permission is not established, this feature must be false.
The remarks do not indicate that owners must participate in a hotel rental program. Because STR permission and hotel-pool participation are not established, mandatory participation is false.
No analysis available
No analysis available
The remarks do not identify the building as leasehold and provide no specific lease-expiration or renewal year. The lease-expiry year is therefore unknown.
The remarks were searched for VA approval and VA financing language, but none was found. Under the no-evidence rule, VA loan approval is treated as false with low confidence.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Flood zone determined from official FEMA Digital Flood Insurance Rate Map (DFIRM) data using building coordinates, not from agent-reported listing data.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No listings mention sunset views or related phrases such as western exposure or evening sun. All four current listings identify the view as NONE, while references to ocean views describe nearby Ala Moana Beach Park rather than views from the building.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Confidence levels are based on MLS checkbox data and AI analysis of listing remarks. High = strong evidence, Medium = some evidence, Low = limited or conflicting evidence. Buyers should always verify critical details independently.