Awakea
Preliminary Information – Full Audit Pending
This buildings features were determined from publicly available data, including MLS listings. While we cross-referenced additional data sources, it still likely contains incomplete or inaccurate information, as it has not yet been personally verified.
Once a building has been fully audited, this page will be replaced with an in-depth analysis featuring verified details and photos of every key feature.
Until then, we provide a data‑driven overview that blends statistical analysis of the checkbox selections agents make in MLS with an AI‑powered read of their public remarks—yielding a clearer picture of the building than raw listings alone.
If this building is important to your search, you can help prioritize it for a full audit by requesting one below. To see what a complete report looks like, check out the example full report.
Awakea
Building Overview
Awakea in Makakilo-Kapolei-Honokai Hale — concrete building (2014) with pool and sunset views.
About Awakea
Awakea is a condominium building located in the Makakilo-Kapolei-Honokai Hale neighborhood. According to available records, the building was constructed in 2014 and is of concrete construction.
Key on-site features include a pool and a fitness center, and units report split air conditioning and sunset views. These are the primary amenities and unit features noted in the MLS-derived data.
Parking is listed as available and covered. Pets and short-term rentals are not allowed. Management company information is unknown in the provided records. Based on MLS data, buyers should verify all details, rules, and any applicable fees with the listing agent or condo management.
Building Features & Data Confidence
All features from MLS data with AI-assisted confidence analysis. Click each category to expand and see details.
No analysis available
I checked the public remarks for owner-occupancy indicators such as percentages, 'owner occupied', or 'majority owner occupied' and found nothing. There is no remark-based evidence to estimate a positive owner-occupancy rate, so this remains unconfirmed.
I searched the public remarks for elevator-related language such as 'elevator', 'elevators', 'lift', and numeric counts like '4 elevators' and found nothing. Based on the remarks, there is no evidence this building has elevators.
Calculated from the lowest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from the highest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from association fees observed in penthouse unit listings for this building.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Strong building-level evidence supports this feature: 16 of 20 current MLS records include OTCOEX. Remarks are generally consistent with a well-maintained community with shared amenities, and there is no indication this is a one-off or copy-paste error. This is a high-confidence inclusion for buyers searching for maintenance that covers common area electricity.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Evidence strongly indicates maintenance fees do not include hot water. Across current MLS records, 0 of 20 include HOTWAT, while 18 of 20 include WTRHTR, a strong negative signal for building-supplied hot water. Remarks mentioning a 'solar hot water heater' further support that hot water is unit-supplied rather than included in HOA fees.
No analysis available
No analysis available
10/20 MLS entries list SEWER in association_fee_includes and no remarks say sewer is separately billed; only one remark itemizes fees and mentions common area maintenance and trash but not sewer, which is likely an omission.
10/20 MLS records include WATER in association_fee_includes and no remarks contradict this, although only one remark partially itemizes covered items.
Multiple listings reference BBQ amenities, including 'BBQ area,' 'barbecue area,' and backyard spaces described as perfect for 'BBQ/ entertaining.' The repeated wording across different remarks suggests a building/community amenity rather than a one-off private yard feature. Confidence is high enough to include this as a shared feature available to buyers.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Several listings describe the 'Mehana Activity Center' with pool, rec area, and fitness facilities, and others mention a 'clubhouse/gym' and 'recreation room,' matching a clubhouse/community center amenity.
No analysis available
Dog park access is very well supported by the remarks and prior high-confidence history. Listings repeatedly mention 'dog park,' 'Mehana Dog Park,' 'dog/tot parks,' and other dog-friendly park references across multiple agents. This looks like a consistent community amenity rather than copy-paste noise.
No analysis available
Strong building-level evidence across many listings supports an exercise room/fitness center at Mehana/Mehana Activity Center. Remarks repeatedly cite 'exercise room,' 'gym,' 'clubhouse/gym,' and 'neighborhood gym,' which appears in several agent descriptions rather than a single outlier. This is consistent with the prior high-confidence signal and likely reflects a shared amenity.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Many listings describe 'covered lanai,' 'private lanai,' 'backyard patio,' 'fence-in yard/patio,' 'enclosed courtyards,' and 'private enclosed porticos,' indicating common availability of patios/decks/lanai.
The community walking/jogging path is confirmed by many listings and aligns with the existing high-confidence data. Remarks mention 'Walk/Jog Path,' 'jogging path,' 'walking paths,' 'walking/biking/running path,' and 'strolling paths,' showing strong agreement across listings. This is clearly a shared building/community feature.
No analysis available
Private yard space is strongly supported across the listings. Multiple remarks explicitly mention 'private yard,' 'private courtyard,' 'fenced yard,' 'enclosed back yard,' 'grassy front yard,' and 'yard space for kids or pets,' indicating this is a real and recurring feature rather than a one-off agent mistake. The evidence appears consistent across many listings and agents.
No analysis available
No analysis available
There is moderate-to-strong evidence for a recreation room or recreation area in the community. Remarks cite 'rec area,' 'recreation room,' and 'Mehana recreation center,' which indicates a shared amenity used by residents. The evidence is not as frequent as for the dog park or walking path, but it is sufficient to treat it as present.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
2/20 MLS listings show storage in building amenities and 7/20 show STORAG in unit_features; one remark also notes added 'garage storage racks' and shelving, indicating extra storage areas with some units.
Public remarks describe many amenities (pool, gym, dog park, playgrounds, walking/jogging paths, businesses) but never mention surfboard storage, board storage, or combined bike and surfboard storage rooms. I searched for phrases such as 'surfboard storage', 'board storage', and 'surf storage' and found none. In the absence of any explicit reference, it is more likely the building does not offer dedicated surfboard storage.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Pool access is strongly confirmed across the building. Roughly all listings reference it, with phrases like 'community pool,' 'Mehana Activity Center swimming pool,' and 'resort-style amenities including a pool.' The evidence is consistent across multiple agents and appears to be repeated MLS data plus corroborating remarks, not a one-off mention.
No analysis available
All listings were reviewed for terms like 'salt water pool', 'saltwater pool', 'salt pool', or 'saline pool' and none were found. Remarks consistently describe a standard community/swimming pool, so the pool is assumed not to be salt water based on available information.
In-unit laundry is strongly supported across the listings. Multiple remarks explicitly mention washer/dryer inside the unit, including "additional washer/dryer," "stacked washer and dryer," "full size washer and dryer," and "second floor washer and dryer." This appears consistent across many agents and matches the MLS inclusions data, so confidence is very high.
No analysis available
Searched remarks for terms such as 'coin-op', 'coin laundry', 'card-operated', 'paid laundry', or references to using quarters or laundry cards and found none. The repeated emphasis on in-unit laundry strongly suggests there is no separate paid community laundry facility.
Remarks consistently reference private in-unit laundry and never mention shared laundry rooms on any floor or building-level laundry facilities. Searched for phrases like 'laundry on each floor', 'laundry room on every floor', and similar, and found no indications that community laundry exists on every floor.
Parking is clearly present across the building. Multiple listings mention "one-car garage," "assigned parking stalls," "driveway parking," and "additional stalls," with no listings indicating NONE. The evidence is strong and consistent across many agents, suggesting this is a stable building feature rather than a copy-paste error.
No analysis available
Covered parking is well supported by both MLS data and remarks. Many listings specifically say "one-car garage," "private garage," or "enclosed garage," which confirms covered/enclosed parking is available in the building. The pattern appears consistent across multiple listings and agents.
I looked for deeded/owned parking language such as deeded parking, owned stall, or parking included in deed and found none. The listings consistently describe assigned or open stalls, which suggests non-deeded parking, but the remarks do not explicitly confirm deeded status.
No analysis available
I searched for parking fee, monthly parking charge, and parking rental language and found no references. The remarks focus on the number and placement of stalls rather than any separate parking cost.
Guest parking is supported by both the current MLS data and the remarks. Several listings explicitly state "guest and street parking is also available" or note nearby guest stalls, and the MLS checkbox appears on most recent listings. This is strong building-level evidence that guest parking is available.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
I looked for phrases like parking waitlist, parking waiting list, or join the waitlist for parking and found none. The listings instead present parking as available/assigned, with no indication of a waitlist process.
No analysis available
No explicit references were found to key card, key fob, card reader, or electronic access systems (e.g., 'keycard entry', 'fob access'). The term 'secure entrance' could describe a simple locked or gated entry, so it is not sufficient to confirm a dedicated card/fob system. Based on the available remarks, this feature is treated as not present.
No analysis available
The listings were reviewed for terms such as 'security patrol', 'roving security', 'patrolled building', or similar phrases and none were found. In the absence of any explicit references to patrol services, this feature is assumed not to be present.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Strong building-level evidence supports split AC availability. Across the remarks, many listings explicitly mention it in multiple forms—'split A/C in all rooms,' 'split AC in every room,' 'split system air conditioning throughout,' and 'three split AC units'—showing consistent confirmation from multiple agents rather than a single copy-paste source. This aligns with the historical MLS pattern where all 20/20 listings carried ACSPL.
No analysis available
Concrete construction appears in a moderate share of current MLS records (11 of 20). The public remarks do not explicitly describe the building materials, so this is supported mainly by MLS data rather than agent commentary. Evidence is enough to include, but not strong enough to treat as fully verified across all listings.
Double-wall construction is strongly supported: 15 of 20 current MLS listings include DOUWAL, and this aligns with the prior high-confidence assessment. The public remarks do not contradict it, and the consistency across listings suggests this is a standard building feature rather than isolated copy-paste noise.
No analysis available
5/20 MLS records list MASSTU for masonry/stucco construction, with no remarks clarifying the exterior finish.
No analysis available
Concrete slab is not substantiated by the remarks and only appears in a minority of current MLS records. Because this is a new, low-coverage feature with no explicit supporting text, it is more likely an inconsistent MLS checkbox than a reliable building characteristic. Omit for now.
No analysis available
Wood frame is not supported by the public remarks, and the MLS checkbox coverage is only partial. With no explicit remarks confirming wood frame construction, this looks more like inconsistent MLS entry than a building-level fact. Omit for now.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
I searched the remarks for STR-related terms such as short-term rental allowed, STR permitted, NUC, TVU, or vacation rental language and found nothing. Based on the absence of any permissive language in these public remarks, STR allowance is not supported here.
I looked for hotel pool indicators like hotel rental pool, managed by hotel, Hilton/Trump/Ritz pool, or other branded rental programs and found none. Since STR itself is not supported by the remarks, hotel-pool participation is also not indicated.
I searched for mandatory pool language such as required to participate, must be in rental program, or cannot opt out and found no evidence. The remarks also do not indicate any hotel or rental pool structure at all, so mandatory participation is not supported.
No analysis available
No analysis available
I searched for language such as lease expires, land lease, leasehold, ground lease, and renewal dates, but found nothing. With no explicit year mentioned, the lease expiry remains unknown from these remarks.
Public remarks repeatedly reference VA-specific financing, including assumable VA loans and qualification for VA buyers. This is strong evidence the building/unit offerings are VA-finance compatible or at least VA-approved in practice.
I searched the remarks for HOA insurance language such as 'fully insured', 'walls-in coverage', and 'full insurance coverage' and found no evidence. One listing mentions fire sprinklers helping lower owners insurance, but that does not confirm the building is fully insured.
At least two separate listings explicitly state the home is 'equipped with fire sprinklers' or a 'fire sprinkler system,' and MLS amenities include FIRSPR in many records.
I looked for explicit fire/life safety approval language, including FLSE pass wording and fire inspection pass statements, but found none. The remarks do mention fire sprinklers, but that is not the same as a documented fire/life safety evaluation pass.
Flood zone determined from official FEMA Digital Flood Insurance Rate Map (DFIRM) data using building coordinates, not from agent-reported listing data.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
There is limited evidence for sunset views in this building: 1 of 20 current MLS records includes SUNSET in the view description, while 12 of 20 explicitly show NONE. None of the public remarks explicitly describe sunset, western exposure, or evening sun, so this appears to be a sparse, unit-level feature rather than a strongly advertised building-wide amenity.
No analysis available
There is no evidence in the public remarks that units in this building have views of fireworks. In the absence of any mention, this feature is assumed not present.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Confidence levels are based on MLS checkbox data and AI analysis of listing remarks. High = strong evidence, Medium = some evidence, Low = limited or conflicting evidence. Buyers should always verify critical details independently.