Anapuni Manor
Preliminary Information – Full Audit Pending
This buildings features were determined from publicly available data, including MLS listings. While we cross-referenced additional data sources, it still likely contains incomplete or inaccurate information, as it has not yet been personally verified.
Once a building has been fully audited, this page will be replaced with an in-depth analysis featuring verified details and photos of every key feature.
Until then, we provide a data‑driven overview that blends statistical analysis of the checkbox selections agents make in MLS with an AI‑powered read of their public remarks—yielding a clearer picture of the building than raw listings alone.
If this building is important to your search, you can help prioritize it for a full audit by requesting one below. To see what a complete report looks like, check out the example full report.
Anapuni Manor
Building Overview
Anapuni Manor in Makiki-Tantalus (built 1969). Pet-free building; short-term rentals not allowed, per MLS data.
About Anapuni Manor
Anapuni Manor is located in the Makiki-Tantalus neighborhood and was built in 1969. According to available records, specific details on building size and construction type are not listed in the MLS data.
Based on MLS data, Anapuni Manor does not allow pets and short-term rentals are not permitted. The management company is not identified in the available records. No additional amenity or common-area information is provided in the MLS extract.
Buyers should verify all building facts, rules, and fees with the seller, homeowner association, or management, as this summary is based solely on the MLS data provided and may be incomplete.
Building Features & Data Confidence
All features from MLS data with AI-assisted confidence analysis. Click each category to expand and see details.
No analysis available
Calculated from the lowest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from the highest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from association fees observed in penthouse unit listings for this building.
No analysis available
No analysis available
There is no explicit remark support for common area electricity in the provided listings. The only related language is the generic phrase "common area expenses," which is not specific enough to confirm OTCOEX, so this looks unverified rather than clearly supported.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
This feature is directly confirmed by the listing remarks in both records. The phrase "covering water, sewer, and common area expenses" is explicit and consistent, so sewer-included fees are strongly supported.
This is explicitly stated in the public remarks for the building, with the phrase "covering water, sewer, and common area expenses." The evidence is direct and repeated, so water-included fees are very strongly supported.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
There is limited evidence for storage: 1 of 2 current MLS records checks a storage-related amenity, while neither listing remark mentions storage lockers, extra storage, or a storage unit. Because agents sometimes copy MLS amenities without verification, this is only moderate-confidence support rather than a strong confirmation.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Both current listings indicate parking, and the remarks explicitly confirm it with phrases like “1 assigned parking stall is included” and “1 covered parking spot.” This is strong, consistent evidence across multiple listings and does not appear to be a copy-paste checkbox issue.
Assigned parking is directly supported by both the MLS checkbox data and the public remarks. One listing explicitly says “1 assigned parking stall is included,” which aligns with the current MLS data and provides strong confirmation.
No analysis available
I searched for deeded, owned, or stall-in-deed language. The remarks only confirm assigned/included parking, which is not enough to conclude the stall is deeded.
No analysis available
I looked for any explicit parking cost, monthly charge, or rental fee associated with parking. No parking fee is mentioned in the remarks, so the monthly parking cost remains unknown.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
I searched for parking waitlist language such as join a waitlist or parking waiting list. The remarks do not mention any waitlist process, so there is no evidence that one exists.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No listing remarks explicitly describe the building as concrete, reinforced concrete, or otherwise mention concrete construction. With no supporting remarks across the provided listings, this feature is not substantiated despite the MLS checkbox data.
No analysis available
No analysis available
None of the provided remarks explicitly reference masonry or stucco construction. Because the feature is not mentioned in the listings and there is no prior confidence, the current MLS checkbox data is not enough to confirm it.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
I looked for short-term rental indicators such as STR allowed, legal vacation rental, NUC, or TVU, as well as restrictions like 30-day minimums. The remarks contain none of these, so short-term rental allowance is not evidenced.
I searched for hotel pool language such as hotel rental pool, hotel program, or brand-specific pools. Nothing in the remarks suggests the building participates in a hotel rental pool.
I looked for any indication that participation in a rental pool is mandatory, required, or cannot be opted out of. The remarks do not mention any such program, so there is no evidence of a mandatory pool.
No analysis available
No analysis available
I looked for leasehold language such as lease expiry, ground lease end dates, renewal dates, or any 4-digit expiration year. The remarks do not mention land tenure or a lease expiration, so this cannot be determined from the provided text.
I searched the remarks for any reference to VA loan approval or VA financing terms and found none. Based on the public remarks alone, there is no evidence that the building is VA approved.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Flood zone determined from official FEMA Digital Flood Insurance Rate Map (DFIRM) data using building coordinates, not from agent-reported listing data.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No current listing remarks describe sunset views, and the available MLS view data does not support them. The remarks instead emphasize mountainside breeze and central location, which points away from a sunset-view feature. This looks more like a copy/paste view field issue or simply a building without sunset exposure.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Confidence levels are based on MLS checkbox data and AI analysis of listing remarks. High = strong evidence, Medium = some evidence, Low = limited or conflicting evidence. Buyers should always verify critical details independently.