Alii Park Place
Preliminary Information – Full Audit Pending
This buildings features were determined from publicly available data, including MLS listings. While we cross-referenced additional data sources, it still likely contains incomplete or inaccurate information, as it has not yet been personally verified.
Once a building has been fully audited, this page will be replaced with an in-depth analysis featuring verified details and photos of every key feature.
Until then, we provide a data‑driven overview that blends statistical analysis of the checkbox selections agents make in MLS with an AI‑powered read of their public remarks—yielding a clearer picture of the building than raw listings alone.
If this building is important to your search, you can help prioritize it for a full audit by requesting one below. To see what a complete report looks like, check out the example full report.
Alii Park Place
Building Overview
Alii Park Place — neighborhood unknown; built 2004. No pets and no short-term rentals (based on MLS data).
About Alii Park Place
Based on MLS data, Alii Park Place is a building completed in 2004. Neighborhood and building size or construction type are not specified in the available records.
According to available records, the property is subject to a no-pets policy and short-term rentals are not permitted. The management company is listed as unknown in the MLS data.
Additional details commonly sought by buyers—such as parking availability, homeowner association fees, unit mix, on-site amenities, and any recent assessments—are not provided in the MLS information. Buyers should verify all property specifics, rules, and fees with the listing agent or management before making decisions.
Building Features & Data Confidence
All features from MLS data with AI-assisted confidence analysis. Click each category to expand and see details.
No analysis available
The remarks mention a 30-day minimum rental period but do not provide any figures or descriptions of the percentage of owner-occupied units. Therefore, the owner-occupancy rate remains unknown.
The public remarks do not reference any elevators or lifts in the building. Without explicit mention or prior data, the number of elevators cannot be determined and is left unknown.
Calculated from the lowest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from the highest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from association fees observed in penthouse unit listings for this building.
No analysis available
No analysis available
MLS checkbox (OTCOEX) is set on both current listings, but neither listing text explicitly says 'common area electricity' or 'building power included'—they only mention 'common area maintenance' and 'groundskeeping.' Evidence from agent-entered MLS fields supports inclusion, but remarks do not confirm, so confidence is low.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Both public remarks explicitly state 'maintenance/HOA fees cover ... sewer,' providing clear corroboration even though only one listing's checkbox shows SEWER. Multiple agent remarks confirm sewer is included, so confidence is high.
Both listings' remarks explicitly state 'maintenance/HOA fees cover water,' and both MLS association_fee_includes checkboxes show WATER. Strong, consistent evidence across listings and MLS fields supports high confidence that water is included.
Included because remarks in the listing explicitly reference BBQ facilities: phrases include 'BBQ pavilion' and 'BBQ areas'. One of the MLS listings also has BBQ checked in amenities; multiple agent remarks consistently describe on-site BBQ/pavilion, providing strong evidence the building offers BBQ/grilling facilities.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Not included because none of the provided public remarks mention a clubhouse or community center. Although MLS amenity checkboxes indicate CLUHOU, agent remarks only reference 'pavilion' and 'resort-style amenities' (pool, spa, BBQ) without explicitly naming a clubhouse, so evidence for a clubhouse is weak and likely a checkbox error.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Both listings (2 of 2) reference a lanai/outdoor living area — phrases include "spacious lanai" and "lanai overlooks manicured gardens," supporting building-level patio/deck amenities. Evidence is consistent across multiple agent remarks and matches the MLS amenity checkboxes, so confidence is high.
No analysis available
No analysis available
One of two listings lists PRIYAR in amenities (1 of 2), but neither remark explicitly states "private yard," "fenced yard," or "private outdoor space." Remarks reference "manicured gardens" and communal grounds, so evidence for private yard is weak and inconsistent across agents; included because at least one listing claims it, but confidence is low.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Some MLS entries indicate storage/extra storage (one listing has STORAG/ADDLVSTORAG in amenities and another lists STORAG in unit_features), but none of the public remarks explicitly mention storage lockers or additional storage. This is moderate evidence across listings and may reflect real building lockers or copy-paste checkbox usage; confidence set to 0.75 to reflect implied (not explicitly described) presence.
The remarks describe amenities such as pool, spa, BBQ pavilion, parking, and landscaping, but do not reference any surfboard or board storage areas. I specifically looked for terms like 'surfboard storage', 'board storage', 'surf storage', and 'bike and surfboard storage' and found none, so it is likely this building does not offer dedicated surfboard storage.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Both listings (2/2) explicitly reference a pool: phrases include 'Pool, hot tub, and pavilion' and 'sparkling pool' / 'resort-style amenities including a pool, spa, BBQ pavilion.' Evidence is consistent across multiple agent remarks, supporting a high-confidence inclusion of a building pool.
MLS amenities show HEAPOO in only 1 of 2 listings, but neither listing's remarks says 'heated pool' or 'heated swimming pool' (they mention 'hot tub' and 'spa' but not a heated pool). Given the lack of explicit mentions across both agent remarks, there is insufficient evidence to confirm a heated pool at this time; the single HEAPOO checkbox may be a listing error.
The remarks describe a pool but do not specify that it is salt water. I searched for terms like 'salt water pool', 'saltwater', 'saline', and 'salt pool' and found none. In the absence of explicit evidence, the pool is assumed not to be salt water.
No analysis available
No analysis available
The listing remarks do not mention any shared laundry facilities or payment methods for laundry. Terms like 'coin-op', 'card-operated', 'laundry fee', or similar were not present. Without explicit evidence, the building is assumed not to have paid community laundry.
The remarks describe the unit’s finishes, parking, and shared amenities like pool and BBQ, but do not reference any community laundry facilities on each floor. Phrases such as 'laundry on every floor' or 'laundry room on each floor' were not found. In the absence of any mention, it is assumed this feature is not present.
No analysis available
Both listings' remarks explicitly mention assigned/dedicated parking — phrases include 'Your dedicated one-car garage' and 'additional dedicated parking stall.' This matches MLS checkbox data indicating assigned parking on at least some units, and the consistent language across listings gives high confidence.
Both listings mention a garage (e.g., 'Your dedicated one-car garage', 'single-car garage'), providing clear evidence of covered parking. The MLS parking_features also show covered/garage entries for both listings, so coverage is well-supported across agents' remarks.
Public remarks explicitly describe a dedicated one-car garage plus an additional dedicated parking stall included with the unit, indicating deeded/assigned parking for the property.
No analysis available
The public remarks explicitly note 'Your dedicated one-car garage is steps from the unit with a second parking space included' and that maintenance/HOA fees 'cover ... parking', indicating there is no separate monthly parking charge included in public remarks.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
I searched for phrases like 'parking waitlist', 'parking waiting list', or 'join waitlist for parking'. The remarks instead describe dedicated parking included with the unit and HOA-covered parking, with no reference to any waitlist.
No analysis available
The remarks describe a gated community and various amenities but do not specify any card or fob-based access system. Searched for terms like key card, fob, card reader, and electronic access without finding any references, so card access is assumed not present based on available information.
One of two current MLS listings includes the SECGUA amenity, but none of the provided public remarks explicitly mention a security guard or 24/7 security. Remarks only reference a 'gated community,' which can imply controlled access but does not confirm on-site security personnel. Evidence is limited to a single MLS checkbox entry and appears weak, so the feature is marked as present with low confidence pending further verification.
The listing notes a gated community and resort-style amenities but does not reference any security patrol or roving security service. Searched for patrol-related terms and found no evidence, so a patrol service is assumed not present from the given remarks.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
The public remarks explicitly note a 30-day minimum rental policy, which rules out legal short-term rentals. No language suggests STR/TVU/NUC or vacation-rental permissibility.
Searched for 'hotel rental pool', 'hotel rental program', or branded hotel management. There is no mention of a hotel rental pool and short-term rentals are explicitly disallowed, so hotel pool participation is not applicable.
Looked for language such as 'mandatory hotel pool' or 'required to participate'. The remarks contain no such language and explicitly require 30-day minimum rentals, so there is no mandatory hotel rental pool.
No analysis available
No analysis available
I searched for explicit leasehold language and a year (e.g., 'lease expires 2050', 'land lease to 2065', 'leasehold expiring in 2040'). The remarks make no mention of land tenure being leasehold or any lease expiry/renewal year, so the lease expiry is unknown.
I searched the remarks for terms like 'VA approved', 'VA financing', or 'VA loans'. The provided public remarks contain no reference to VA loan eligibility, so there is no evidence the building is VA-approved.
While the HOA is stated to include 'association insurance', there is no clear indication that this is full or walls-in coverage. Without specific terms indicating comprehensive or fully covered building insurance, full insurance cannot be confirmed.
No analysis available
There is no indication in the remarks that the building has passed a formal fire/life safety evaluation or similar certification. In the absence of explicit evidence, this is assumed not documented as passed in the listing data.
Flood zone determined from official FEMA Digital Flood Insurance Rate Map (DFIRM) data using building coordinates, not from agent-reported listing data.
No analysis available
No listings mention mountain or mauka views (0 of 2). Public remarks and current MLS view_descriptions contain no references to 'mountain', 'mauka', or 'Koolau', so there is strong evidence the building does not offer mountain views.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
At least one listing (1 of 2) explicitly mentions garden/courtyard views: phrases include 'lanai overlooks manicured gardens' and 'surrounded by lush tropical landscaping'. Although MLS view_descriptions currently show 0/2 with GARDEN, the explicit remarks provide strong evidence the building offers garden views for some units.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
The description highlights ocean and sunrise views but does not mention any ability to see fireworks from the property. Without explicit wording about fireworks views, this feature is assumed not present.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Confidence levels are based on MLS checkbox data and AI analysis of listing remarks. High = strong evidence, Medium = some evidence, Low = limited or conflicting evidence. Buyers should always verify critical details independently.