Alia at 888 Ala Moana
Preliminary Information – Full Audit Pending
This buildings features were determined from publicly available data, including MLS listings. While we cross-referenced additional data sources, it still likely contains incomplete or inaccurate information, as it has not yet been personally verified.
Once a building has been fully audited, this page will be replaced with an in-depth analysis featuring verified details and photos of every key feature.
Until then, we provide a data‑driven overview that blends statistical analysis of the checkbox selections agents make in MLS with an AI‑powered read of their public remarks—yielding a clearer picture of the building than raw listings alone.
If this building is important to your search, you can help prioritize it for a full audit by requesting one below. To see what a complete report looks like, check out the example full report.
Alia at 888 Ala Moana
Building Overview
Alia at 888 Ala Moana in Ala Moana-Kakaako — concrete construction, built 2027; pets and short-term rentals not allowed.
About Alia at 888 Ala Moana
Alia at 888 Ala Moana is a residential building located in the Ala Moana-Kakaako neighborhood. According to available records, the building was completed in 2027 and is constructed of concrete. Size and unit count are not specified in the MLS-provided data.
Key property policies and management details reported in the MLS include that pets are not allowed and short-term rentals are not allowed. The management company is listed as unknown in the available records. No additional amenity list or interior feature details were provided in the MLS data.
Parking, maintenance fees, homeowner association rules, amenities, and other ownership costs are not specified in the MLS information provided. Buyers and agents should verify all building specifics, policies, and fees with the listing agent or management. Based on MLS data; verify independently before relying on these details.
Building Features & Data Confidence
All features from MLS data with AI-assisted confidence analysis. Click each category to expand and see details.
No analysis available
Calculated from the lowest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from the highest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from association fees observed in penthouse unit listings for this building.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
None of the 3 public remarks mention BBQ, a grill area, or barbecue facilities. The repeated MLS checkbox alone is not enough to confirm the amenity.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
None of the public remarks mention a dog park or pet area. The amenity appears to be unsupported by the listing descriptions.
No analysis available
No public remarks mention an exercise room or gym across the 3 listings. Although MLS amenities are all checked, there is no descriptive support, so this looks like unchecked copy/paste rather than confirmed building information.
No analysis available
Across all 3 remarks, there is no mention of a meeting room or similar shared room. This appears unverified despite the MLS amenity flag.
The feature is checked in 3 out of 3 current MLS listings, but none of the remarks mention a patio, deck, lanai, or covered outdoor area. Because the remarks are generic and appear copy-pasted across listings, this is weak confirmation despite the consistent MLS checkbox data.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No listing remarks reference a recreation area, rec area, or amenity deck. The MLS data alone is too weak to validate the feature.
There are no public remarks describing a recreation room or rec room in any of the listings. The amenity checkbox is not backed by the listing text.
No analysis available
No analysis available
There are no sauna references in any of the 3 remarks. The amenity checkbox is not supported by the public listing text.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No public remarks mention a trash chute in the building. The repeated MLS amenity flag is not corroborated by the listing descriptions.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
The building appears to offer a pool based on current MLS amenities: 3 of 3 listings include pool-related codes. There are no explicit remarks about the pool, so this is driven by the consistent MLS data rather than narrative confirmation.
Heated pool is supported by the MLS amenity code HEAPOO appearing in all 3 listings. Because none of the public remarks explicitly mention a heated pool and pool_features are blank, confidence is moderate rather than high.
No analysis available
All 3 current listings include washer/dryer in the MLS inclusions, which is a consistent signal that in-unit laundry is available. However, the public remarks are repeated project marketing text and do not mention laundry, so this appears based on MLS entries rather than descriptive confirmation.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No listing remarks mention assigned, reserved, deeded, or designated parking. With only 1 of 3 listings showing ASSIGN in MLS and no supporting text, the evidence is weak and may reflect copy/paste checkbox noise rather than a verified building amenity.
Covered parking appears in 3 of 3 listings via MLS parking features. The public remarks are silent, so this is supported mainly by the uniform MLS data rather than explicit agent descriptions, but the consistency across all listings makes it likely the building offers covered parking.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No public remarks explicitly mention central air, but the MLS data is consistently pointing that way: 2 of 3 listings show ACCEN/CENAC in unit features and all 3 show ACCEN in inclusions. Because this is a new project and the checkbox data is repeated across multiple listings, it looks more like a building feature than a one-off agent entry, though the narrative remarks themselves do not confirm it.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Concrete construction appears to be a building-level feature, with 3 of 3 listings showing CONCRE in the MLS materials field. The public remarks are generic and do not discuss construction, so this appears to come from the MLS data rather than agent commentary.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Steel frame construction is supported by the MLS, with 3 of 3 listings marking STEFRA. The remarks are repeated boilerplate and do not mention construction details, so this looks like a consistent building attribute rather than copied narrative text.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Above-ground construction appears in 2 of 3 MLS listings, which suggests the feature may apply but is not fully consistent across the data. The public remarks do not reference this at all, so this is a weaker signal than the concrete and steel-frame entries.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
None of the remarks mention fire sprinklers, sprinkler systems, or fire suppression. Although all 3/3 current listings have FIRSPR checked in MLS amenities, there is no independent descriptive support in the listing text, so the feature is not confidently validated from remarks alone.
No analysis available
Flood zone determined from official FEMA Digital Flood Insurance Rate Map (DFIRM) data using building coordinates, not from agent-reported listing data.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Mountain views appear to be available in the building, based on 1 of 3 current listings using mountain-related view language. The public remarks are generic project marketing and do not add confirmation, so this is a moderate-confidence feature rather than a strongly verified one.
No analysis available
City views are the most consistently indicated view type in the current MLS data, appearing in 2 of 3 listings. The remarks are generic and repetitive, so the evidence comes mainly from the MLS view descriptions rather than copy-specific marketing copy.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Sunset views are indicated in one current listing, but not broadly across the set. With no confirming language in the public remarks, this is a plausible building-level offering but only at moderate confidence.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
None of the remarks reference a resident manager or any on-site management arrangement. Even though 3/3 current listings mark RESMAN, the listing text provides no supporting evidence, so this feature remains unconfirmed from the public remarks.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Confidence levels are based on MLS checkbox data and AI analysis of listing remarks. High = strong evidence, Medium = some evidence, Low = limited or conflicting evidence. Buyers should always verify critical details independently.