
Alexander Gardens
Preliminary Information – Full Audit Pending
This buildings features were determined from publicly available data, including MLS listings. While we cross-referenced additional data sources, it still likely contains incomplete or inaccurate information, as it has not yet been personally verified.
Once a building has been fully audited, this page will be replaced with an in-depth analysis featuring verified details and photos of every key feature.
Until then, we provide a data‑driven overview that blends statistical analysis of the checkbox selections agents make in MLS with an AI‑powered read of their public remarks—yielding a clearer picture of the building than raw listings alone.
If this building is important to your search, you can help prioritize it for a full audit by requesting one below. To see what a complete report looks like, check out the example full report.
Alexander Gardens
Building Overview
Alexander Gardens in Manoa — concrete building (1957) with a pool and assigned parking. Based on MLS data.

About Alexander Gardens
Alexander Gardens is a residential building located in the Manoa neighborhood. According to available records, the building was constructed in 1957 and is built of concrete. Size and unit count are not provided in the MLS data supplied.
Based on MLS data, on-site amenities include a pool and a BBQ area. Air conditioning is provided via window units. No short-term rentals are allowed and pets are not permitted, per the MLS information provided.
Parking is available and assigned. The management company is listed as Unknown in the available records. This summary is based on MLS data; buyers should verify all details, rules, fees and availability with listing agents or management before making decisions.
Building Features & Data Confidence
All features from MLS data with AI-assisted confidence analysis. Click each category to expand and see details.
No analysis available
I looked for explicit owner-occupancy figures or descriptive language indicating a high percentage of owner-occupied units, but the remarks do not mention this. Because owner occupancy is rarely stated in MLS remarks and none was provided here, it remains unknown.
The listing remarks explicitly call Alexander Gardens a 3-story walkup, which is strong evidence there are no elevators. I did not find any mention of elevators in the remarks, and the walkup description is the clearest indicator available.
Calculated from the lowest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from the highest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from association fees observed in penthouse unit listings for this building.
No analysis available
No analysis available
All 8 current MLS listings include OTCOEX, which corresponds to common area electricity being covered by the maintenance fee. None of the public remarks mention any change or dispute this, so the evidence remains strong and consistent across the building.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Sewer is listed as included in the association fee in all 8 current MLS records. There is no remark-based evidence of a correction or change, so this appears to be a stable building-level inclusion.
Water is included in the association fee across all 8 current listings. The remarks are silent on any exception, and the repeated MLS pattern supports this as a reliable building feature.
BBQ/grilling facilities are strongly supported for Alexander Gardens. Multiple remarks mention a "barbecue area" or "BBQ area," and the historical MLS record shows BBQ in 7 of 8 listings. The evidence is consistent across several listings and agents, so this feature should be included.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Storage is supported by both the MLS history and the public remarks. At least 3 listings explicitly mention storage, including phrases like 'additional secure storage is located in the basement,' 'a storage unit,' and 'storage in the basement,' while the historical MLS data shows 5/8 listings with storage in amenities and 3/8 with storage in unit features. This appears to be a real building feature rather than a copy-paste artifact.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Pool is strongly supported across the remarks: at least 6 listings explicitly mention a swimming pool or pool area, often alongside the BBQ area and garden setting. The evidence is consistent across multiple agents and reads like a shared building amenity, not a one-off unit feature.
No analysis available
No analysis available
At least 1 of 6 current listings explicitly mentions in-unit laundry: 'this unit has a dryer in-unit & washer hookup at the ready.' Most other remarks describe community/common laundry downstairs, so in-unit laundry appears to exist for some units but is not building-wide. Evidence is limited to a single listing plus the MLS inclusion count (1/6), so confidence is moderate.
Community laundry is strongly supported by both historical MLS data and current remarks. At least 2 listings explicitly mention shared/common laundry, including phrases like "community laundry is available downstairs" and "the building has common laundry (only $0.75)." The repeated mentions across multiple remarks indicate this is a real building amenity rather than a copy-paste error.
One listing states "The building has common laundry (only $0.75)", indicating paid/coin-operated community laundry.
No analysis available
Parking is clearly available in the building, with multiple current remarks describing 'deeded parking stall,' 'assigned parking stall,' and '1 parking.' One studio explicitly says it does not come with parking, which shows parking varies by unit rather than being absent from the building. The evidence is strong across multiple listings and appears consistent rather than copy-paste error.
Assigned/reserved parking is explicitly confirmed in several remarks, including 'assigned parking stall' and 'deeded parking stall.' This is consistent across multiple listings and supports a high-confidence building-level feature for buyers seeking reserved parking. The wording is direct and repeated, not just an inferred amenity.
No analysis available
The remarks directly mention a deeded parking stall, which is strong evidence the parking is owned with the unit. Multiple listings also describe an assigned parking stall, reinforcing that parking is included and deeded.
No analysis available
I searched for parking rental, monthly parking fees, or any extra parking cost. The remarks only say the unit has a deeded or assigned stall, so no parking fee can be confirmed from the listings.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
I looked for 'parking waitlist,' 'waiting list,' or similar wording and found nothing. The listings describe assigned/deeded parking or no parking, but not a waitlist process.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Window AC appears to be a real feature in at least some units at Alexander Gardens. One of the listings explicitly mentions "the window AC," and the current MLS data has ACWIUN checked in 4 of 8 listings, suggesting this is not just a one-off typo. The evidence is enough to include the feature for buyer searches, though it appears to apply to some units rather than all units.
Concrete construction is strongly supported by the MLS history: 7 of 8 current listings mark CONCRE. None of the public remarks contradict this, and the consistency across listings suggests this is not a copy-paste anomaly.
2 of 6 current MLS listings include DOUWAL in construction_materials, but none of the public remarks mention 'double wall' or similar phrasing. Evidence is limited to MLS checkbox entries across multiple listings and lacks corroborating agent remarks, so inclusion is implied but not strongly confirmed.
Hollow tile is only weakly supported by the MLS data (3 of 8 listings) and there are no public remarks confirming it. Because the building remarks focus on units, amenities, and location—not construction—this appears unverified and likely agent-driven checkbox noise.
Masonry/stucco appears in only 3 of 8 MLS listings and is not mentioned in any public remarks. The limited, inconsistent checkbox presence suggests this is not a reliably verified building feature.
No analysis available
1 of 6 current MLS listings include SLAB in construction_materials, but none of the public remarks reference a concrete slab foundation. This is a single-checkbox indication without corroborating remarks, so the feature is possible but not well-supported.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
I searched for short-term rental indicators such as legal STR, NUC, TVU, or vacation rental language and found none. There is also no evidence that 30-day minimum or owner-occupant-only rules were stated, so STR is not supported by the remarks.
I looked for hotel pool language such as Hilton, Trump, Ritz, or a hotel rental program and found nothing. Because STR is not evidenced as allowed, this must remain false.
I searched for phrases like mandatory pool, required to participate, must rent, or cannot opt out and found none. With no hotel pool program mentioned and no STR evidence, there is no basis to mark mandatory participation true.
No analysis available
No analysis available
I looked for leasehold wording such as 'lease expires,' 'ground lease ends,' 'leasehold expiring,' or any renewal year, but nothing was stated. There is no public remark evidence to extract a lease expiry year.
I searched the public remarks for explicit VA loan approval language and found none. Since VA approval must be stated publicly to confirm it, this remains unverified and is treated as not evidenced in the listings.
The public remarks directly reference 100% replacement value hurricane insurance, which aligns with fully insured building-level coverage. This is strong evidence that the HOA provides comprehensive insurance for the building.
No analysis available
I searched the public remarks for any explicit reference to a fire/life safety evaluation, fire inspection pass, or life-safety certification and found nothing. Since this is only determined from remarks, there is no evidence to confirm the building has passed FLSE.
Flood zone determined from official FEMA Digital Flood Insurance Rate Map (DFIRM) data using building coordinates, not from agent-reported listing data.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
There is limited but real evidence that some units in Alexander Gardens have city views: 2 of 8 current listings are tagged CITY in the MLS view data. The public remarks mostly describe garden/pool views or location near downtown, and do not consistently mention city views, so this appears to be a partial building feature rather than something every unit has.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Across the provided listings, 0 explicitly mention sunset views and several describe the outlook as a pool/garden setting or simply bright and breezy. The evidence is consistent across multiple agents and appears to be copy-pasted amenity text rather than a sunset-view building feature.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Confidence levels are based on MLS checkbox data and AI analysis of listing remarks. High = strong evidence, Medium = some evidence, Low = limited or conflicting evidence. Buyers should always verify critical details independently.