Alexander Arms
Preliminary Information – Full Audit Pending
This buildings features were determined from publicly available data, including MLS listings. While we cross-referenced additional data sources, it still likely contains incomplete or inaccurate information, as it has not yet been personally verified.
Once a building has been fully audited, this page will be replaced with an in-depth analysis featuring verified details and photos of every key feature.
Until then, we provide a data‑driven overview that blends statistical analysis of the checkbox selections agents make in MLS with an AI‑powered read of their public remarks—yielding a clearer picture of the building than raw listings alone.
If this building is important to your search, you can help prioritize it for a full audit by requesting one below. To see what a complete report looks like, check out the example full report.
Alexander Arms
Building Overview
Alexander Arms in McCully-Moiliili; concrete building from 1970 with a pool, assigned parking, and no short-term rentals allowed.
About Alexander Arms
Alexander Arms is located in the McCully-Moiliili neighborhood and was built in 1970. According to available records, the building is constructed of concrete.
Based on MLS data, the building offers a swimming pool as an on-site amenity. No additional amenities are listed in the provided MLS information.
Parking is available and assigned. Pets and short-term rentals are not allowed. The management company is listed as unknown in the MLS data. This summary is based on MLS data; buyers should verify all building details, policies, fees, and availability with official sources or the managing agent.
Building Features & Data Confidence
All features from MLS data with AI-assisted confidence analysis. Click each category to expand and see details.
No analysis available
I searched for phrases like '80% owner occupied,' 'majority owner occupied,' or 'highly owner occupied.' The remarks discuss pride of ownership and management, but that is not the same as an owner-occupancy rate. Since no percentage or direct occupancy statement appears, this remains unknown.
I looked for explicit counts such as '4 elevators,' 'two elevators,' or 'multiple elevators.' The remarks confirm the building has an elevator, but they do not state how many. Because no count is given, the number remains unknown.
Calculated from the lowest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from the highest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from association fees observed in penthouse unit listings for this building.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Common area electricity appears to be included based on current MLS data: 9 of 10 listings have OTCOEX checked. None of the public remarks explicitly discuss common-area power, so this is driven by the repeated MLS association_fee_includes data rather than agent comments.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
All 9 listings show WTRHTR in inclusions and none have HOTWAT checked. Public remarks repeatedly state 'water heater in the unit' and 'tankless water heater', so hot water is provided by unit heaters and is not included in the maintenance fee.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Sewer inclusion is supported by current MLS data, with 9 of 10 listings checking SEWER. The public remarks do not mention sewer directly, suggesting the feature is being carried by the MLS fee-includes field rather than listing remarks.
Water inclusion appears to be part of the building’s maintenance fees based on current MLS data, where 9 of 10 listings have WATER checked. The public remarks are silent on this point, so this conclusion is based on the consistent MLS association_fee_includes field.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Car wash is strongly supported for this building. One listing explicitly says 'Amenities include an on-site pool and car wash area,' and the current MLS data shows the CRWSH amenity checked in 7 of 10 listings. The repeated mention alongside other common building amenities suggests this is a legitimate shared facility.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Strong evidence supports patio/deck amenities at Alexander Arms. At least 5 listings mention a lanai or related outdoor space, including 'covered lanai,' 'enclosed lanai,' and 'partial enclosure of the lanai,' which indicates this is a recurring building/unit feature rather than a one-off remark. The consistency across multiple listings suggests this is not just copy-paste noise.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Although 6 of 9 MLS listings have the TRACHU checkbox checked, none of the public remarks for this building mention a 'trash chute', 'garbage chute' or similar. Given the lack of explicit remarks and no prior confirmation, the evidence for a building-wide trash chute is weak and likely the result of inconsistent checkbox usage by agents.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
The building has strong, repeated evidence of a shared pool amenity. Current remarks mention it in multiple listings, including "on-site pool" and "SWIMMING POOL," which aligns with the historical MLS amenity data showing pool checked across the building's listings. This does not appear to be a copy-paste error because the amenity is also described in agent remarks, not just the checkbox.
No analysis available
No analysis available
All 9 current listing remarks explicitly mention in-unit laundry (phrases include "Washer/Dryer/water heater are in the unit", "full-sized washer/dryer", "in-unit washer and dryer", and "washer conveniently tucked away in-unit"). This consistent, repeated language across multiple listings and agents matches prior high-confidence data, giving strong evidence that some units in the building have in-unit laundry.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Parking is strongly supported across the current remarks and MLS data. At least 5 listings explicitly mention a stall/spot, including phrases like "one assigned parking stall" and "1 prime parking spot," while the MLS parking_features field is consistently populated. This looks like stable building-level parking rather than a one-off copy/paste error.
Assigned parking is well evidenced in both the MLS data and public remarks. Multiple agents independently describe the space as assigned or prime, and the current MLS parking_features field shows ASSIGN across all listings. This is strong building-level confirmation, not just isolated wording.
No analysis available
The listings consistently describe assigned parking, which suggests a reserved stall, but they do not say the parking is deeded or included in the unit title. Since deeded ownership is not explicitly stated, I cannot mark it true.
No analysis available
I searched for language about parking charges, monthly parking rent, or added parking costs, and found nothing. The remarks only indicate assigned parking, so any fee is not publicly disclosed here.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
I looked for wording such as "parking waitlist" or "join waitlist for parking" and found no evidence. The listings do not suggest a waitlist system is in place.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
At least two listings explicitly mention split/ split-system AC (quotes: "split A/C keeps the home comfortable year-round" and "Split system AC units in living area & both bedrooms") and another notes portable ACs installed. CURRENT MLS inclusion ACSPL=2/9 aligns with these remarks, so there is moderate-to-strong evidence that some units have ductless/ split AC systems.
No analysis available
Strong evidence that Alexander Arms is a concrete building: 10 of 10 current MLS listings list CONCRE. None of the public remarks explicitly mention concrete, but the MLS checkbox pattern is fully consistent across listings and suggests this is not a copy-paste anomaly.
Two of eight MLS listings indicate 'double wall' (DOUWAL) construction, but the public remarks are silent on wall construction. The MLS checkbox evidence is present but limited, yielding moderate confidence.
There is moderate evidence for hollow tile construction: 4 of 10 current MLS listings include HOLTIL. No public remarks explicitly reference hollow tile, so this looks like MLS checkbox evidence rather than remark-confirmed confirmation, but it is still enough to indicate the feature may exist in the building.
No analysis available
No analysis available
One of eight MLS listings lists 'slab' (SLAB) foundation, but the public remarks do not mention a concrete slab and no owner/site verifications exist. The single MLS checkbox suggests possible slab construction for at least some unit(s) but is weak evidence, so confidence is moderate-low.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Above-ground construction appears in 3 of 10 current MLS listings via ABOGRO. Because none of the public remarks mention it, the evidence is limited to MLS metadata and should be treated as moderate/low-confidence building-level support.
No analysis available
No analysis available
I searched for STR-related terms like short-term rental, vacation rental, NUC, and TVU, but the remarks are silent on rental policy. With no evidence that short-term rentals are allowed, this is treated as not confirmed.
I looked for references to hotel rental pools, branded hotel management, or pool programs and found none. Since STR allowance is not evidenced either, this cannot be true.
I searched for wording like "mandatory hotel pool," "must participate," or "cannot opt out," and found nothing. There is no public evidence that unit owners are required to join any rental program.
No analysis available
No analysis available
I looked for leasehold language such as "lease expires," "ground lease ends," or any renewal/extension year, but the remarks do not mention land tenure at all. Because no specific expiry year is provided, the value remains unknown.
I searched the remarks for phrases like "VA approved," "VA financing," and "VA loans accepted" and found none. With no public evidence indicating VA loan eligibility, this is treated as not confirmed and likely not advertised.
I looked for walls-in or full-building insurance language such as 'fully insured,' 'full insurance,' or 'comprehensive building insurance.' The remarks repeatedly and explicitly state the building is 100% hurricane insured, which strongly supports full HOA insurance coverage. This is high-confidence evidence.
No analysis available
I searched for language like 'FLSE passed,' 'fire life safety evaluation passed,' 'fire safety certified,' or similar approval wording. The remarks only mention a paid-off elevator and fire alarm special assessment, which is not the same as a documented pass. With no direct evidence of passing, this is treated as not established.
Flood zone determined from official FEMA Digital Flood Insurance Rate Map (DFIRM) data using building coordinates, not from agent-reported listing data.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Mountain views appear to be an available building feature, not just a one-off. One remark explicitly says "City, mountain, Diamond Head views from living area," and the current MLS data shows MOUNTA in 8 of 10 listings. The repeated MLS pattern plus explicit wording supports high confidence.
Diamond Head views are present in the building: 1/8 MLS view_descriptions list DIAHEA and a public remark specifically notes 'Diamond Head views' ('City, mountain, Diamond Head views from living area'). The evidence is limited to a single MLS code and one agent remark but is explicit enough to indicate some units have Diamond Head views.
City views are well supported across the building. The current MLS data shows CITY in 8 of 10 listings, and at least one public remark explicitly says "City, mountain, Diamond Head views." This looks like consistent building-level marketing rather than a copy-paste anomaly.
No coastline views found: 0/8 MLS view_descriptions include COASTL and none of the public remarks mention coastal/shoreline views. There is no supporting agent language or MLS code indicating coastline views, so it is very likely the building does not offer coastline views.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Confidence levels are based on MLS checkbox data and AI analysis of listing remarks. High = strong evidence, Medium = some evidence, Low = limited or conflicting evidence. Buyers should always verify critical details independently.