Ala Wai Manor
Preliminary Information – Full Audit Pending
This buildings features were determined from publicly available data, including MLS listings. While we cross-referenced additional data sources, it still likely contains incomplete or inaccurate information, as it has not yet been personally verified.
Once a building has been fully audited, this page will be replaced with an in-depth analysis featuring verified details and photos of every key feature.
Until then, we provide a data‑driven overview that blends statistical analysis of the checkbox selections agents make in MLS with an AI‑powered read of their public remarks—yielding a clearer picture of the building than raw listings alone.
If this building is important to your search, you can help prioritize it for a full audit by requesting one below. To see what a complete report looks like, check out the example full report.
Ala Wai Manor
Building Overview
Ala Wai Manor in McCully-Moiliili (1965 concrete building) with ocean views and a pool. Assigned parking; no pets or short-term rentals.
About Ala Wai Manor
Based on MLS data, Ala Wai Manor is a concrete residential building located in the McCully-Moiliili neighborhood, built in 1965. Unit count and individual floorplan sizes are not specified in the provided MLS data.
According to available records, the building offers ocean views and includes an on-site pool as an amenity. No other common-area facilities are listed in the supplied MLS information.
MLS data indicates assigned parking is available. Pets and short-term rentals are not allowed. The management company is listed as unknown in the MLS. Buyers should verify all details, including unit sizes, fees, and management, with the listing agent or management company prior to making decisions.
Building Features & Data Confidence
All features from MLS data with AI-assisted confidence analysis. Click each category to expand and see details.
No analysis available
I checked for owner-occupancy indicators such as a percentage, 'majority owner occupied,' or 'highly owner occupied,' but none were stated. Because the remarks do not provide a usable occupancy figure, this remains unknown.
I searched the remarks for explicit elevator references such as 'elevator,' '4 elevators,' or 'multiple elevators,' but found none. Without a stated number or any mention of elevator service, the elevator count remains unknown from these listings.
Calculated from the lowest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from the highest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from association fees observed in penthouse unit listings for this building.
No analysis available
Cable TV appears to be included in the association fee. Current MLS data is very strong, with 11 of 12 listings showing CABTV, and there are no remarks suggesting otherwise. This looks like a building-level amenity that has been consistently carried across listings.
Common-area electricity appears to be included, but the evidence is moderate rather than strong. About 6 of 11 current listings show OTCOEX, which suggests this may be a real HOA inclusion, though the remarks do not mention it explicitly. This could reflect agent checkbox usage, so confidence is lower than for water or sewer.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Hot water does not appear to be included in the maintenance fee. The current MLS signals are weak for HOTWAT and there are multiple indicators of unit-level water heaters, including a remark about a "tankless heater" and MLS inclusions showing WTRHTR. That combination strongly suggests the building does not supply hot water as an HOA-paid utility.
Internet is included in the maintenance fee. One remark explicitly states "Spectrum internet included," and current MLS data also shows INTSER in 6 of 12 listings. This is a direct confirmation rather than just a checkbox pattern.
No analysis available
Sewer appears to be included in the association fee. The MLS pattern is very strong, with 11 of 12 listings showing SEWER, and no remarks indicate a change. Evidence suggests a consistent building-level inclusion.
Water appears to be included in the maintenance fee. The current MLS data is strong, with 11 of 12 listings showing WATER, and the remarks do not suggest any change. This appears to be a stable building-level inclusion.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
I looked for surfboard storage references such as board storage, surf storage, or bike and surfboard storage. The public remarks do not mention any such storage facility.
No analysis available
Most recent MLS records are consistent: 10 of 12 listings show TRACHU checked, indicating the building has a trash chute system. None of the public remarks explicitly mention a trash or garbage chute, so this appears to be driven by MLS amenity data rather than marketing copy. Given the repeated checkbox pattern across multiple listings, confidence is high.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Pool is strongly confirmed for this building. At least 6 listings explicitly mention it, with phrases like 'private pool area with lounge chairs and dining tables,' 'community pool with BBQ area,' and 'large pool.' The evidence is consistent across multiple agents and aligns with the prior high-confidence MLS history.
No analysis available
I looked for explicit pool-type wording such as "salt water pool," "saltwater pool," or "saline pool." The remarks confirm a pool exists, but they do not specify that it is salt water.
Strong, consistent evidence confirms in-unit laundry for this building. The current remarks mention it in nearly every listing excerpt, with multiple agents explicitly stating "in-unit washer/dryer" or equivalent wording, which aligns with the prior high-confidence MLS data. This appears to be a genuine building feature rather than a copy-paste error.
No analysis available
I looked for paid laundry language such as coin laundry, coin-op machines, card-operated machines, or laundry fees. The remarks only refer to in-unit washer/dryer, so there is no evidence of a paid common laundry room.
I searched the public remarks for wording like "laundry on each floor," "laundry room on every floor," and similar floor-by-floor references. The listings only mention in-unit washer/dryer, not shared laundry facilities on each floor.
Parking is strongly supported across the listings. Multiple remarks explicitly mention parking for the unit, including phrases like '1 assigned parking,' 'covered parking,' and '1 parking space,' which appears consistent across different agents rather than a one-off copy-paste error. Historical MLS data also shows 11/11 listings with a parking type and no listings with NONE.
Assigned parking is strongly supported across the building. Multiple remarks explicitly mention '1 assigned parking,' 'assigned open parking #54,' and a 'full-size deeded parking space,' which is consistent with the current MLS flags (12/12). This appears to be consistent, building-level information rather than a one-off agent entry.
Covered parking is supported by both the MLS and the remarks. At least two listings explicitly say 'covered parking' or '1 assigned covered parking stall,' while the current MLS data still shows covered/garage-style parking flags in 4 of 12 listings. The evidence looks consistent enough to treat covered parking as an available building feature.
The remarks clearly state that the unit includes deeded parking, which means the parking is owned with the unit. This is direct evidence and strongly supports a true value.
No analysis available
I looked for any separate monthly parking fee, parking rental, or additional parking charge. The remarks only mention assigned, covered, deeded, and included parking stalls, but no fee amount or parking charge.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
I searched for parking waitlist or waiting list language such as 'join waitlist for parking' or 'parking waiting list,' and found none. The listings discuss parking availability, but not a formal waitlist system.
No analysis available
The public remarks clearly support card/fob-based security access. Phrases like "FOB security" and "secured entrance" are strong evidence of electronic entry control.
No analysis available
I searched for patrol-related language indicating a patrolled building or roving security. The remarks only mention secure FOB entry, secured entrance, and controlled access, which are not the same as security patrol.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No listing remarks explicitly describe window air conditioning; 0 of 11 public remarks mention a window AC, window unit, or wall AC. The only MLS indicator is ACWIUN in 3/11 listings, which is too sparse and inconsistent to override the absence of supporting remarks, so this looks like unreliable checkbox data rather than a confirmed building feature.
Evidence strongly supports concrete construction. The public remarks include one explicit description of the building as a "cement masonry building," and the current MLS data shows CONCRE in 9/12 listings. The consistency across multiple listings suggests this is not just copy-paste noise.
There is no remark-level support for double wall construction in the provided listings. Only 4 of 11 current MLS entries have DOUWAL, which is not enough to override the lack of supporting remarks and suggests inconsistent agent checkbox usage.
There is no meaningful remark-based support for hollow tile construction. With only 1 of 12 MLS listings showing HOLTIL and no corroborating public remarks, this appears to be an agent checkbox artifact rather than a verified building feature. I am correcting it to false with high confidence because the evidence is sparse and unsupported.
No analysis available
No analysis available
There is no direct remark evidence for a concrete slab foundation. Because only 1 of 12 MLS listings shows SLAB and the remarks are silent, this looks like an unverified checkbox rather than a confirmed building feature. I am setting it to false with high confidence as a correction to likely MLS noise.
No analysis available
No analysis available
This feature is moderately supported by the MLS pattern, with 8 of 12 listings marked ABOGRO. The public remarks do not explicitly use the phrase "above ground," so the support is implied rather than direct. Still, the repeated MLS pattern across listings suggests the building likely qualifies.
No analysis available
No analysis available
I looked for short-term rental language such as STR permitted, TVU, NUC, vacation rental allowed, or minimum-stay rules, and found none. There is no public evidence in these remarks that short-term rentals are allowed.
I searched for hotel rental pool, hotel-managed, branded rental program, or similar language and found nothing. Since the remarks do not show STR is allowed, this must remain false.
I looked for language indicating owners must participate in a rental pool or cannot opt out, and found none. With no evidence of STR or a hotel pool program, there is no basis to mark participation as mandatory.
No analysis available
No analysis available
I searched for leasehold language such as lease expiry year, ground lease ends, lease expires, or any renewal/extension date, but none appeared in the remarks. There is no public evidence here to identify a land lease expiration year.
The listing remarks directly identify the building as VA approved, which indicates VA financing is accepted. This is explicit and unambiguous, so confidence is very high.
I searched for insurance-related phrases like 'fully insured,' 'walls-in coverage,' or 'comprehensive building insurance,' and there were no matches. The remarks mention security and amenities, but nothing about HOA insurance coverage.
No analysis available
I looked for language indicating a passed fire/life safety evaluation, fire inspection compliance, or similar safety certification, but found nothing in the public remarks. Since there is no explicit evidence of FLSE passage, this is treated as not confirmed.
Flood zone determined from official FEMA Digital Flood Insurance Rate Map (DFIRM) data using building coordinates, not from agent-reported listing data.
No analysis available
Ocean views are strongly supported across multiple listings and agents. Public remarks repeatedly describe 'Pacific Ocean,' 'ocean,' and 'breathtaking panoramic views' from the building, matching the high current MLS frequency. This appears to be consistent building-level marketing rather than an isolated unit feature.
Mountain views are not supported by the public remarks for this building. While 2/12 MLS listings contain MOUNTA, the listing text consistently describes canal, marina, ocean, and Diamond Head views instead of true mountain views. This looks weak and inconsistent compared with the other view types.
Diamond Head views are clearly documented across the remarks and MLS data. Roughly 7-8 listings reference it directly with phrases like 'Diamond Head from this move-in ready condo,' 'marina, ocean, and iconic Diamond Head,' and 'views of the Ala Wai Canal, ocean, and Diamond Head.' This is strong multi-listing evidence rather than an isolated agent note.
City views are strongly supported and appear to be standard in the MLS records. All 11 listings include CITY in the view descriptions, and remarks such as 'stunning city skyline' and 'overlooks the Ala Wai Canal and city lights' confirm the feature in public descriptions. This looks consistent across agents rather than a questionable checkbox.
Coastline views are not supported by the public remarks. Although 2/12 MLS listings contain COASTL, the listing descriptions consistently emphasize ocean, marina, canal, and Diamond Head views rather than coastline/shoreline/coastal views. This looks like weak or incidental MLS data rather than a confirmed building feature.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Marina views are extremely well supported and appear in every MLS record provided. Public remarks repeatedly reference the 'marina' directly, often alongside the Ala Wai Canal and ocean, which suggests this is a stable building-level view characteristic. The evidence is strong across multiple listings and multiple agents.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
I searched for direct references to viewing Friday night fireworks from the unit, lanai, or building. The remarks mention canal, ocean, Diamond Head, and city views, but nothing about fireworks views.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Resident manager is strongly supported for this building. Multiple current listings explicitly mention an "on-site manager," "resident manager," or "on-site resident manager," and the historical MLS data already showed this in most listings (10/12 with RESMAN). The evidence is consistent across multiple remarks and appears to be a real building feature rather than a one-off agent checkbox.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Confidence levels are based on MLS checkbox data and AI analysis of listing remarks. High = strong evidence, Medium = some evidence, Low = limited or conflicting evidence. Buyers should always verify critical details independently.