Ahuimanu Gardens 1
Preliminary Information – Full Audit Pending
This buildings features were determined from publicly available data, including MLS listings. While we cross-referenced additional data sources, it still likely contains incomplete or inaccurate information, as it has not yet been personally verified.
Once a building has been fully audited, this page will be replaced with an in-depth analysis featuring verified details and photos of every key feature.
Until then, we provide a data‑driven overview that blends statistical analysis of the checkbox selections agents make in MLS with an AI‑powered read of their public remarks—yielding a clearer picture of the building than raw listings alone.
If this building is important to your search, you can help prioritize it for a full audit by requesting one below. To see what a complete report looks like, check out the example full report.
Ahuimanu Gardens 1
Building Overview
Ahuimanu Gardens 1 in Kahaluu — built 1972; pets allowed, short-term rentals not permitted (based on MLS data).
About Ahuimanu Gardens 1
Ahuimanu Gardens 1 is a residential building located in the Kahaluu neighborhood. According to available records, the property was built in 1972. Size and construction type are not specified in the MLS data provided.
Key policy details recorded in the MLS indicate that pets are allowed, while short-term rentals are not permitted. The management company is listed as unknown in the available MLS information. No additional amenities or building features are specified in the data provided.
Additional details such as parking, maintenance fees, unit mix, and on-site amenities are not included in the supplied MLS fields. Based on MLS data analysis; buyers should verify all property specifics, policies, and management information with the listing agent or management company before making decisions.
Building Features & Data Confidence
All features from MLS data with AI-assisted confidence analysis. Click each category to expand and see details.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
The remarks do not provide an owner-occupancy percentage or describe the community as majority or highly owner occupied. No current owner-occupancy value is available, so the percentage is unknown.
The remarks describe townhouse features, parking, grounds, and amenities but do not mention elevators, multiple elevators, or a specific elevator count. No current elevator value is provided, so the number is unknown.
Calculated from the lowest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from the highest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from association fees observed in penthouse unit listings for this building.
No analysis available
Four of 13 current listings mark CABTV as included in the association fee. No remarks confirm cable service, so the evidence is based on limited MLS checkbox data and may partly reflect copied information rather than strong independent confirmation.
Ten of 13 current listings indicate common area electricity through OTCOEX. Public remarks also describe low maintenance fees including “common area maintenance,” which is consistent with building-level common expenses, although electricity is not explicitly named.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No current listing includes HOTWAT, while six of 13 list WTRHTR, supporting the conclusion that units use individual water heaters. No public remarks claim that hot water is included, so this remains strongly false.
Although 5 of 12 MLS entries flag 'INTSER' (internet service) in association fee fields, none of the public remarks mention 'internet included' or 'wifi included.' With inconsistent MLS checkbox use and no corroborating agent remarks, there's insufficient evidence to include internet as a confirmed included fee.
No analysis available
Twelve of 13 current listings mark sewer as included in the association fee. The explicit phrase “includes water, sewer and common area maintenance” corroborates the MLS data across the building.
Twelve of 13 current listings indicate that water is included in the association fee. A public remark explicitly says the low maintenance fee “includes water, sewer and common area maintenance,” providing strong corroboration.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
None of the 13 listing remarks mention a clubhouse or community/recreation center. Although 1 of 13 listings includes the CLUHOU amenity code, this isolated checkbox is not supported by remarks from the other listings and appears likely to be an agent data-entry or copy-paste error.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Outdoor spaces are repeatedly documented across the listings, including a “private, fenced-in backyard,” “private fenced/enclosed lanai,” “private enclosed courtyard,” and “private, fenced in patio area.” The evidence spans numerous listings and is consistent with the previously high-confidence assessment, rather than appearing to be a single copied remark.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Private yards are repeatedly referenced—roughly 8–9 listings mention private or fenced yards/backyards (quotes: "private fenced yard", "fenced backyard", "private yard"). This aligns with MLS checkbox data (7/12) and indicates private yard space is commonly available in units of this building.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Storage is mentioned in 1 of 13 public remarks, specifically as a "large built in storage unit outside." Current MLS data also shows storage in 2 of 13 building amenity records and 2 of 13 unit-feature records, so the evidence is limited but consistent with storage being available for some units.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
In-unit laundry is strongly supported by current MLS data: 11 of 13 listings include WASHER/DRYER in the inclusions. Multiple remarks also reference laundry areas, including one explicit confirmation of a "Stacked washer and dryer inside the unit," so the feature appears valid for at least some units in the building.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Parking is consistently documented across the building: 13 of 13 listings have parking feature codes and none list NONE. Public remarks repeatedly mention phrases such as "two dedicated parking stalls," "two assigned parking stalls," and "two parking stalls right out front," indicating strong confirmation across multiple listings.
Assigned parking is strongly supported by both MLS data and public remarks. Multiple listings use phrases including "two dedicated parking stalls," "two assigned parking stalls," and "two side-by-side parking stalls right outside your front door," confirming this is a building-level offering rather than an isolated claim.
No analysis available
The listings consistently describe assigned or dedicated parking, but assigned parking does not establish deeded ownership. No explicit references to deeded parking, owned stalls, or parking included in the deed were found.
No analysis available
The remarks mention low maintenance or HOA fees but do not identify any separate parking fee. A monthly parking amount cannot be determined from the public remarks.
Guest parking has limited direct support: 2 of 13 current MLS records include the GUEST code, while none of the provided public remarks mention "guest parking" or "visitor parking." The feature is therefore included based on the MLS indication and prior building-level confidence, but the absence of corroborating remarks makes confidence moderate.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
The listings describe multiple parking stalls available with the units, generally directly in front of the homes. No evidence of a parking waitlist system was found.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Current MLS metadata shows 3 of 11 listings with 'CONCRE' in construction materials, but 0 of the gathered public remarks mention 'concrete', 'reinforced concrete', or 'concrete building'. Given the lack of any explicit remark across multiple agent listings and no prior verification, the indication of concrete construction appears to be weak and likely due to checkbox inconsistencies rather than true building feature.
Six of 13 listings list double-wall construction in the MLS construction-materials field. The remarks do not contain "double wall," "double-wall construction," or "two walls," so the evidence is mixed across listings and could reflect checkbox carryover.
No analysis available
Of 12 public listing remarks reviewed, none mention masonry, stucco, or 'masonry and stucco.' The MLS currently shows MASSTU checked on 4/12 listings, but the absence of any descriptive mention across multiple agents indicates the checkbox is likely inconsistent or erroneous. Given no historical confirmation and no remarks documenting the feature, we omit masonry/stucco as a building characteristic (moderate confidence).
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Five of 13 listings identify the building as wood frame through the MLS construction-materials field. None of the remarks explicitly mention "wood frame" or "wood frame construction," so the evidence is moderate and may partly reflect copied MLS data.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
The remarks focus on residential townhome features and do not mention short-term rental permissions or prohibitions. Based on the absence of STR-related language, STR allowance is not supported.
No evidence of participation in a hotel rental pool or hotel-managed rental program was found. Because STR allowance is not supported, this feature is also false.
The remarks contain no indication that owners must participate in a hotel rental pool. Since STR allowance is not supported, mandatory hotel pool participation must also be false.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Searched for leasehold terminology and specific expiration or renewal years. No relevant language was found, so the lease expiry year cannot be determined.
The remarks directly identify an option for VA loan assumption, which indicates VA financing availability. This is strong, explicit evidence from the public remarks.
The remarks mention HOA and maintenance fees but do not state that the HOA provides full, comprehensive, or walls-in building insurance. I found no explicit reference to the property being fully insured.
No analysis available
The remarks contain no statement that the building passed a fire/life safety evaluation or inspection. I searched for references to FLSE, fire safety certification, life safety compliance, and passed fire inspection, but found none.
Flood zone determined from official FEMA Digital Flood Insurance Rate Map (DFIRM) data using building coordinates, not from agent-reported listing data.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Mountain views are strongly supported across the listings: at least 11 of 13 remarks mention phrases such as "peaceful mountain views," "Koolau mountain views," "stunning views of majestic Koolau mountain range," or "majestic views ... right from your living room window." This aligns with the current MLS data showing MOUNTA in 12 of 13 listings and appears consistently reported by multiple agents rather than being a single copy-paste claim.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Confidence levels are based on MLS checkbox data and AI analysis of listing remarks. High = strong evidence, Medium = some evidence, Low = limited or conflicting evidence. Buyers should always verify critical details independently.