968 Spencer
Preliminary Information – Full Audit Pending
This buildings features were determined from publicly available data, including MLS listings. While we cross-referenced additional data sources, it still likely contains incomplete or inaccurate information, as it has not yet been personally verified.
Once a building has been fully audited, this page will be replaced with an in-depth analysis featuring verified details and photos of every key feature.
Until then, we provide a data‑driven overview that blends statistical analysis of the checkbox selections agents make in MLS with an AI‑powered read of their public remarks—yielding a clearer picture of the building than raw listings alone.
If this building is important to your search, you can help prioritize it for a full audit by requesting one below. To see what a complete report looks like, check out the example full report.
968 Spencer
Building Overview
968 Spencer in Makiki-Tantalus (built 1971) is a concrete building; pets and short-term rentals are not allowed.
About 968 Spencer
968 Spencer is located in the Makiki-Tantalus neighborhood and was built in 1971. According to available records, the building is constructed of concrete. Specifics such as total units, typical floor plans, or square footage were not provided in the MLS data.
Based on MLS data, the building has explicit policies: pets are not allowed and short-term rentals are not permitted. The management company is listed as unknown in the available records. No additional amenity or service details were provided in the MLS information supplied.
Buyers and agents should verify all building details, rules, and any fee or parking information with the listing agent or property management, as this narrative is based solely on MLS data available for 968 Spencer.
Building Features & Data Confidence
All features from MLS data with AI-assisted confidence analysis. Click each category to expand and see details.
No analysis available
Calculated from the lowest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from the highest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from association fees observed in penthouse unit listings for this building.
No analysis available
No analysis available
The current MLS data is consistent across both listings for this building, with 2/2 showing OTCOEX in association_fee_includes. No public remarks mention common-area electricity or related building power details, so this appears to come from the MLS checkbox data rather than agent commentary.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Hot water is not supported by the current MLS data: 0/2 listings include HOTWAT, while 2/2 list WTRHTR, which is a strong sign the units have their own water heaters rather than building-supplied hot water. No remarks suggest a recent change or building-provided hot water, so this should be treated as false.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Sewer inclusion is supported by the current MLS data, with 2/2 listings showing SEWER in association_fee_includes. No public remarks contradict this, and the matching MLS entries suggest this is a building-level fee inclusion.
Water inclusion is supported by the current MLS data, with 2/2 listings showing WATER in association_fee_includes. There are no public remarks addressing this fee item, but the consistent MLS entries across listings make this a strong building-level feature.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
2 of 2 recent listings show washer/dryer in the inclusions, and the remark explicitly confirms "in-unit washer and dryer." This is strong, direct evidence from the listing copy rather than just a checkbox, so the building should be treated as offering in-unit laundry.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Parking is clearly present. One current remark explicitly says the unit includes "TWO PARKING stalls," and the MLS data shows parking features present across 2/2 listings. This is strong evidence and does not appear to be a copy-paste anomaly.
There is no explicit remark evidence that the stalls are assigned or reserved. While current MLS data checks ASSIGN in 2/2 listings, the public remarks only say "TWO PARKING stalls" and do not clarify whether they are assigned, deeded, or reserved. Because agents often copy/paste checkbox data, the assignment detail is not strong enough on remarks alone.
No analysis available
The listing confirms parking is included, but it does not specify deeded or owned parking. I searched for terms like deeded parking, owned stall, or parking included in deed and found none.
No analysis available
I looked for any reference to a parking fee, rental charge, or additional monthly cost for parking. The remarks only mention two stalls and do not provide any fee information.
Guest parking is not supported by the public remarks. Only 1/2 MLS listings check GUEST, and no listing text mentions guest or visitor parking. This looks like weak, possibly copied MLS data rather than confirmed building information.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
I searched for parking waitlist language such as join waitlist, parking waiting list, or limited parking availability. The remarks only state that the unit has two parking stalls, with no indication of a waitlist system.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Evidence for window AC is weak: 1 of 2 MLS listings includes ACWIUN, while the current remarks make no mention of any window or wall air-conditioning units. This looks more like limited/possibly copied MLS checkbox data than a clearly verified building-wide feature.
Concrete is supported by the current MLS data in both available listings (2/2 showing CONCRE). The public remarks do not describe construction directly, but there is no evidence of a different material, so this appears to be a stable building-level attribute.
Double wall construction is not mentioned in the remarks, and the MLS evidence is limited to a single checked listing out of two. That pattern suggests the checkbox is not reliably verified for this building.
Hollow tile is not supported by the public remarks, and only one of two current listings checks HOLTIL. With no corroborating language from agents or site notes, this appears weak and likely copy/paste noise rather than a confirmed building feature.
No analysis available
No analysis available
Concrete slab is not described in the public remarks, and only one of the two listings includes SLAB in construction materials. Without stronger cross-listing confirmation, this does not rise to a reliable building-level feature.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
I looked for short-term rental indicators like STR allowed, NUC, TVU, or hotel-style vacation rental language. The remarks do not mention any rental policy, so there is no evidence that short-term rentals are allowed.
I searched for references to hotel rental pools, hotel-managed programs, or branded resort pooling. Nothing in the remarks suggests the building participates in a hotel pool program.
I looked for language indicating mandatory participation in a rental pool, such as must rent, required program, or cannot opt out. The remarks contain no such information, so there is no evidence of a mandatory pool.
No analysis available
No analysis available
I looked for leasehold language such as lease expiration year, ground lease end date, or renewal/extension terms. Nothing in the remarks indicates the property is leasehold or provides a lease expiry year.
I searched the public remarks for any reference to VA loan approval or VA financing and found none. With no explicit mention, there is no evidence to mark the building as VA-approved.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Flood zone determined from official FEMA Digital Flood Insurance Rate Map (DFIRM) data using building coordinates, not from agent-reported listing data.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Strong confirmation for city views. The current listing directly states 'a lanai with city views,' and the MLS data also shows CITY in both recent listings (2/2), suggesting consistent reporting rather than a one-off agent error.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Confidence levels are based on MLS checkbox data and AI analysis of listing remarks. High = strong evidence, Medium = some evidence, Low = limited or conflicting evidence. Buyers should always verify critical details independently.