75 Kihapai
Preliminary Information – Full Audit Pending
This buildings features were determined from publicly available data, including MLS listings. While we cross-referenced additional data sources, it still likely contains incomplete or inaccurate information, as it has not yet been personally verified.
Once a building has been fully audited, this page will be replaced with an in-depth analysis featuring verified details and photos of every key feature.
Until then, we provide a data‑driven overview that blends statistical analysis of the checkbox selections agents make in MLS with an AI‑powered read of their public remarks—yielding a clearer picture of the building than raw listings alone.
If this building is important to your search, you can help prioritize it for a full audit by requesting one below. To see what a complete report looks like, check out the example full report.
75 Kihapai
Building Overview
75 Kihapai in Kailua — built 1957, concrete construction. Pets and short-term rentals not allowed.
About 75 Kihapai
75 Kihapai is a residential building located in the Kailua neighborhood. According to available records, the building was constructed in 1957 and is of concrete construction.
Key policy details indicated in MLS data include that pets are not allowed and short-term rentals are not permitted. The management company is listed as unknown in the available records. No specific on-site amenities are reported in the provided data.
Additional information such as parking, maintenance fees, unit sizes, and other building amenities are not specified in the MLS data provided. Buyers should verify all building details, policies, and fees with the listing agent or management. Based on MLS data; buyers should confirm accuracy independently.
Building Features & Data Confidence
All features from MLS data with AI-assisted confidence analysis. Click each category to expand and see details.
No analysis available
I searched for owner-occupancy indicators such as a percentage, 'majority owner occupied,' or similar descriptors, but none were present. Without an explicit statement, the owner-occupancy rate remains unknown.
I searched the public remarks for any elevator count or phrases like 'multiple elevators' or a specific number of elevators, but found nothing. Because there is no explicit evidence, the elevator count cannot be inferred from these listings.
Calculated from the lowest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from the highest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from association fees observed in penthouse unit listings for this building.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
None of the six listings list 'hot water' in association fee includes (0/6), and five of six listings explicitly list WTRHTR (water heater) in unit inclusions, implying units have their own hot water. Public remarks across listings never state 'hot water included' or similar, so it's very likely hot water is not included in the HOA fee.
No analysis available
No analysis available
All six MLS listings have 'SEWER' checked under association fee includes (6/6). Although public remarks do not mention sewer explicitly, the consistent MLS data across multiple listings provides strong support that sewer is included in the maintenance fees.
Every listing (6/6) has 'WATER' checked in association fee includes. While the public remarks do not reference water inclusion, the consistent MLS data across all units is strong evidence that water is included in the maintenance fees.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
At least 4 of 6 public remarks explicitly mention outdoor spaces: 'private and covered lanai', 'large private lanai', '120 sqft lanai', and 'covered front patio'. MLS checkbox data also lists PATDEC/COVPAT on 3 of 6 listings. Multiple agents independently describe lanais/covered patios, indicating the building does offer patio/deck amenities for buyers.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
At least 3 listings explicitly reference building/unit storage: quotes include 'in the yard a storage unit' and 'storage area conveniently located on the ground floor level.' MLS checkboxes also show storage in some listings (1/6 amenities, 2/6 unit_features). Evidence comes from multiple agent remarks across different listings and aligns with MLS fields, so the building offers storage units/lockers.
I searched for surfboard-specific storage terms such as surfboard storage, board storage, or surf storage and found none. A personal storage unit is mentioned, but that does not establish dedicated surfboard storage facilities.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
All 6 MLS listings include POOL in amenities and several agent remarks explicitly reference a saltwater pool (quotes: 'salt water pool', 'saltwater pool offering a peaceful spot', 'pool and BBQ area', 'refreshing saltwater pool'). Multiple listings from different remark blocks consistently describe the same shared pool, supporting a high-confidence inclusion rather than a copy/paste error.
No analysis available
This feature is directly confirmed in multiple remarks. The building pool is repeatedly described as a saltwater pool, which is strong public evidence for a saltwater system.
5 of 6 current MLS listings list washer/dryer in inclusions and at least two separate public remarks explicitly state an in-unit washer and dryer ('this home includes ... a washer and dryer', 'Your own washer and dryer provide added ease and convenience'). One listing describes a dedicated washer/dryer area on the ground floor and another mentions a covered area with a top-load washer, so evidence is consistent across multiple agents that some units offer in-unit laundry.
No analysis available
I looked for explicit evidence of paid community laundry such as coin laundry, coin-op, card-operated machines, or laundry fees and found nothing. The remarks suggest laundry is private or simply located on the ground floor, but do not indicate any paid communal laundry system.
I searched for language like "laundry on each floor," "laundry room on every floor," or floor-by-floor laundry access and found none. The public remarks instead reference private laundry in the unit and a dedicated laundry area on the ground floor, which does not establish community laundry on every floor.
All 6 MLS listings include parking in parking_features and multiple public remarks reference parking stalls (quotes: 'one designated parking', 'One assigned parking stall is included'). Evidence is consistent across agents and listings, so there is high confidence the building offers parking.
MLS checkboxes show assigned parking on 5 of 6 listings and at least four unit remarks explicitly state assigned/dedicated/one assigned stall (quotes: 'one designated parking', 'One assigned parking stall is included', '1 assigned parking stall'). This provides strong evidence the building offers assigned parking.
No analysis available
I looked for explicit deeded-parking language like "deeded parking," "owned stall," or "parking included in deed" and found none. The remarks only support assigned or dedicated parking, which is not the same as deeded parking.
No analysis available
I searched for monthly parking charges, rental parking, or any added parking cost and found nothing. The listings only mention an included assigned stall, so no separate parking fee can be confirmed.
No analysis available
Three MLS listings have SECENT checked and at least two public remarks use gated/secured language (quotes: 'property is private and gated', 'Secured in a gated community'). This is moderate support that parking has a secured entry (gated/secure access), but the coverage across listings is incomplete so confidence is moderate.
No analysis available
No analysis available
I looked for "parking waitlist," "waiting list," or similar language and found none. The public remarks indicate assigned parking is available, with no evidence of a waitlist system.
No analysis available
I searched for card/fob access language such as keycard entry, fob access, or electronic card readers and found none. The building is described as gated, but gated access alone does not prove a card-based security system.
No analysis available
I looked for direct mentions of security patrols or roving security in the public remarks and found nothing. The only security-related detail is that the community is gated, which is not evidence of patrol service.
No analysis available
No analysis available
One of the six current listings explicitly mentions 'Split AC' and MLS inclusions show ACSPL checked in 1/6 listings. The other five remarks do not mention split or ductless systems (they mention tradewinds or no AC), so the feature appears present in at least some units but is not widely documented across agents.
No analysis available
No analysis available
2 of 6 MLS listings mention double-wall construction historically, but none of the current public remarks mention 'double wall' or related terms. The lack of corroborating agent remarks suggests this is likely an inconsistent checkbox entry rather than a confirmed building feature.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Only 1 of 6 MLS listings lists above-ground construction historically, and none of the public remarks reference 'above ground' or similar construction terminology. With no corroborating remarks, the solitary MLS checkbox appears unreliable and the feature is likely not a confirmed building-level attribute.
Only 1 of 6 current MLS listings lists BRICK historically, and none of the public remarks mention brick exterior (no phrases like 'brick' or 'brick-and-mortar'). Evidence is limited and appears inconsistent across agents; likely an isolated checkbox rather than a building-wide brick construction.
No analysis available
I searched for short-term rental clues such as STR allowed, vacation rental, NUC, TVU, or minimum-stay rules and found none. With no public remarks supporting STR permission, this is best treated as not allowed based on the provided listings.
I looked for hotel pool, hotel-managed rental program, or brand-specific pool language and found none. Because there is also no evidence that short-term rentals are allowed, this feature must remain false.
I searched for language indicating a required hotel pool or mandatory rental program and found none. There is also no evidence of STR permission, so a mandatory pool program is not supported.
No analysis available
No analysis available
I searched for ground lease language such as lease expiry, lease end year, renewal year, or extended lease terms and found none. The listings instead state the property is fee simple, which means there is no leasehold expiration year to extract.
I looked for "VA approved," "VA financing," and similar phrases in the provided remarks and found none. Based on the prior public remark history, this is kept as true, but with lower confidence because the current set does not repeat it.
The listings directly state '100% Hurricane insurance,' which is strong public evidence that the building/association is fully insured. This is consistent with the current high-confidence assessment and does not need to be overridden.
No analysis available
I looked for explicit fire/life safety language such as FLSE passed, fire safety certified, life safety compliant, or passed fire inspection. The remarks do not mention any of these, so there is no evidence the building has passed a fire/life safety evaluation.
Flood zone determined from official FEMA Digital Flood Insurance Rate Map (DFIRM) data using building coordinates, not from agent-reported listing data.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Across 6 current listings, 0/6 include SUNSET in view_descriptions and 1/6 explicitly lists NONE. None of the public remarks mention 'sunset', 'evening sun', 'western exposure', or related phrases (remarks reference 'great natural light' and 'tradewinds' but not sunset). Given the lack of any mentions and MLS checkboxes unchecked, there is high confidence the building should not be listed as having sunset views.
No analysis available
I searched for phrases like "fireworks view," "watch fireworks from the lanai," or any statement about seeing fireworks from the unit. The remarks only discuss location, lanai, and beach access, so there is no evidence of fireworks views.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Confidence levels are based on MLS checkbox data and AI analysis of listing remarks. High = strong evidence, Medium = some evidence, Low = limited or conflicting evidence. Buyers should always verify critical details independently.