75 Kihapai
Preliminary Information – Full Audit Pending
This buildings features were determined from publicly available data, including MLS listings. While we cross-referenced additional data sources, it still likely contains incomplete or inaccurate information, as it has not yet been personally verified.
Once a building has been fully audited, this page will be replaced with an in-depth analysis featuring verified details and photos of every key feature.
Until then, we provide a data‑driven overview that blends statistical analysis of the checkbox selections agents make in MLS with an AI‑powered read of their public remarks—yielding a clearer picture of the building than raw listings alone.
If this building is important to your search, you can help prioritize it for a full audit by requesting one below. To see what a complete report looks like, check out the example full report.
75 Kihapai
Building Overview
75 Kihapai in Kailua — built 1957, concrete construction. Pets and short-term rentals not allowed.
About 75 Kihapai
75 Kihapai is a residential building located in the Kailua neighborhood. According to available records, the building was constructed in 1957 and is of concrete construction.
Key policy details indicated in MLS data include that pets are not allowed and short-term rentals are not permitted. The management company is listed as unknown in the available records. No specific on-site amenities are reported in the provided data.
Additional information such as parking, maintenance fees, unit sizes, and other building amenities are not specified in the MLS data provided. Buyers should verify all building details, policies, and fees with the listing agent or management. Based on MLS data; buyers should confirm accuracy independently.
Building Features & Data Confidence
All features from MLS data with AI-assisted confidence analysis. Click each category to expand and see details.
No analysis available
I searched the remarks for explicit owner-occupancy percentages or descriptive statements and found none. Owner-occupancy is a numeric field and cannot be inferred from available remarks, so it is recorded as unknown (null).
The remarks describe amenities (pool, gated community, assigned parking) but do not state any elevator count. Because elevators is a numeric field and there is no evidence in the remarks, the value is unknown (null) rather than guessed.
Calculated from the lowest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from the highest association fee observed across all non-penthouse unit listings for this building.
Calculated from association fees observed in penthouse unit listings for this building.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
None of the six listings list 'hot water' in association fee includes (0/6), and five of six listings explicitly list WTRHTR (water heater) in unit inclusions, implying units have their own hot water. Public remarks across listings never state 'hot water included' or similar, so it's very likely hot water is not included in the HOA fee.
No analysis available
No analysis available
All six MLS listings have 'SEWER' checked under association fee includes (6/6). Although public remarks do not mention sewer explicitly, the consistent MLS data across multiple listings provides strong support that sewer is included in the maintenance fees.
Every listing (6/6) has 'WATER' checked in association fee includes. While the public remarks do not reference water inclusion, the consistent MLS data across all units is strong evidence that water is included in the maintenance fees.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
At least 4 of 6 public remarks explicitly mention outdoor spaces: 'private and covered lanai', 'large private lanai', '120 sqft lanai', and 'covered front patio'. MLS checkbox data also lists PATDEC/COVPAT on 3 of 6 listings. Multiple agents independently describe lanais/covered patios, indicating the building does offer patio/deck amenities for buyers.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
At least 3 listings explicitly reference building/unit storage: quotes include 'in the yard a storage unit' and 'storage area conveniently located on the ground floor level.' MLS checkboxes also show storage in some listings (1/6 amenities, 2/6 unit_features). Evidence comes from multiple agent remarks across different listings and aligns with MLS fields, so the building offers storage units/lockers.
I searched for 'surfboard storage', 'board storage', 'surf storage', and related terms; none appear in the remarks. Storage references describe a storage unit and clothesline but not surfboard-specific storage.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
All 6 MLS listings include POOL in amenities and several agent remarks explicitly reference a saltwater pool (quotes: 'salt water pool', 'saltwater pool offering a peaceful spot', 'pool and BBQ area', 'refreshing saltwater pool'). Multiple listings from different remark blocks consistently describe the same shared pool, supporting a high-confidence inclusion rather than a copy/paste error.
No analysis available
The public remarks explicitly reference a salt water/saltwater pool in multiple places. This is clear, direct language indicating the building's pool uses salt water.
5 of 6 current MLS listings list washer/dryer in inclusions and at least two separate public remarks explicitly state an in-unit washer and dryer ('this home includes ... a washer and dryer', 'Your own washer and dryer provide added ease and convenience'). One listing describes a dedicated washer/dryer area on the ground floor and another mentions a covered area with a top-load washer, so evidence is consistent across multiple agents that some units offer in-unit laundry.
No analysis available
I looked for terms such as 'coin laundry', 'paid laundry', 'card operated', or 'quarters' and found no references. Laundry mentions are limited to in-unit or ground-floor facilities, with no indication of a paid community laundry.
I searched the remarks for phrases like 'laundry on each floor', 'laundry room on every floor', or 'floor-by-floor laundry' and found none. Remarks instead describe in-unit washers/dryers and a ground-floor laundry/washer area, so there is no evidence of laundry on every floor.
All 6 MLS listings include parking in parking_features and multiple public remarks reference parking stalls (quotes: 'one designated parking', 'One assigned parking stall is included'). Evidence is consistent across agents and listings, so there is high confidence the building offers parking.
MLS checkboxes show assigned parking on 5 of 6 listings and at least four unit remarks explicitly state assigned/dedicated/one assigned stall (quotes: 'one designated parking', 'One assigned parking stall is included', '1 assigned parking stall'). This provides strong evidence the building offers assigned parking.
No analysis available
I searched for language such as 'deeded parking', 'owned stall', or 'included in the deed' but found none. The listings reference 'assigned' or 'designated' parking, which indicates a reserved stall but does not confirm deeded ownership in the public remarks.
No analysis available
Searched for 'parking fee', 'monthly parking', 'additional cost', or 'parking rental' and found no references. The listings note one assigned stall is included but do not state any parking charges.
No analysis available
Three MLS listings have SECENT checked and at least two public remarks use gated/secured language (quotes: 'property is private and gated', 'Secured in a gated community'). This is moderate support that parking has a secured entry (gated/secure access), but the coverage across listings is incomplete so confidence is moderate.
No analysis available
No analysis available
I looked for phrases indicating a waitlist for parking (e.g., 'parking waitlist', 'waiting list') and found none. There is no evidence from the remarks that the building uses a parking waitlist system.
No analysis available
I searched for 'key card access', 'fob', 'card reader', and similar phrases and found none. While the property is described as gated, there is no evidence of card/fob access security.
No analysis available
I looked for terms like 'security patrol', 'roving security', or 'patrolled' and found no references. The remarks note a gated community but do not mention any patrol service.
No analysis available
No analysis available
One of the six current listings explicitly mentions 'Split AC' and MLS inclusions show ACSPL checked in 1/6 listings. The other five remarks do not mention split or ductless systems (they mention tradewinds or no AC), so the feature appears present in at least some units but is not widely documented across agents.
No analysis available
No analysis available
2 of 6 MLS listings mention double-wall construction historically, but none of the current public remarks mention 'double wall' or related terms. The lack of corroborating agent remarks suggests this is likely an inconsistent checkbox entry rather than a confirmed building feature.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Only 1 of 6 MLS listings lists above-ground construction historically, and none of the public remarks reference 'above ground' or similar construction terminology. With no corroborating remarks, the solitary MLS checkbox appears unreliable and the feature is likely not a confirmed building-level attribute.
Only 1 of 6 current MLS listings lists BRICK historically, and none of the public remarks mention brick exterior (no phrases like 'brick' or 'brick-and-mortar'). Evidence is limited and appears inconsistent across agents; likely an isolated checkbox rather than a building-wide brick construction.
No analysis available
Searched for 'short-term rental', 'vacation rental', 'NUC', 'TVU', '30-day minimum', or similar language and found no references. Therefore there is no evidence in the public remarks that short-term rentals are allowed.
Because the listings do not indicate short-term rental is allowed and contain no references to hotel rental programs ('hotel rental pool', 'managed by hotel', etc.), hotel-pool participation is not supported by the remarks.
With no mention of short-term rental allowance or a hotel rental pool, there is likewise no evidence that any rental-pool participation would be mandatory. The remarks contain no references to 'mandatory' or 'required' rental program participation.
No analysis available
No analysis available
The remarks explicitly call the property 'fee simple', which means it is not a leasehold. Because the building is fee simple, a lease expiry year is not applicable.
Searched the remarks for phrases like 'VA approved', 'VA financing', or 'VA loans accepted' and found no references. Therefore there is no evidence the building is VA-approved from these listings.
The public remarks do not discuss HOA or building insurance coverage. Because there is no explicit statement that the building is fully insured by the HOA, this boolean is set to false with medium confidence.
No analysis available
I searched the remarks for explicit statements that the building passed a fire/life safety evaluation (e.g., 'FLSE passed', 'passed fire inspection') and found none. In the absence of any mention and with no prior data, this boolean is set to false with medium confidence (absence = likely not indicated).
Flood zone determined from official FEMA Digital Flood Insurance Rate Map (DFIRM) data using building coordinates, not from agent-reported listing data.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Across 6 current listings, 0/6 include SUNSET in view_descriptions and 1/6 explicitly lists NONE. None of the public remarks mention 'sunset', 'evening sun', 'western exposure', or related phrases (remarks reference 'great natural light' and 'tradewinds' but not sunset). Given the lack of any mentions and MLS checkboxes unchecked, there is high confidence the building should not be listed as having sunset views.
No analysis available
I searched for phrases like 'watch fireworks from', 'fireworks view', or 'see fireworks from unit' and found none. There is no evidence the building offers fireworks views from units.
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
No analysis available
Confidence levels are based on MLS checkbox data and AI analysis of listing remarks. High = strong evidence, Medium = some evidence, Low = limited or conflicting evidence. Buyers should always verify critical details independently.